An interventional study of Prostate Biopsy and MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy in Prostate Disease, Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen and Family History of Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Ardeshir Rastinehad. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-02.
Sponsored by Ardeshir Rastinehad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This research study is designed to determine if targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy is better than the standard of care ultrasound guided biopsy alone in diagnosing subjects with clinically significant prostate cancer with MRI visible lesions. This study will consist of comparing the standard of care (ultrasound guided prostate biopsy) with the protocol biopsy which consists of an ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and a MRI/US fusion tracked prostate biopsy.
The efficacy of targeting lesions for ultrasound-guided biopsy, surgery,or ablation may be limited by the visibility of a target during the procedure. The successful outcome of the intervention depends upon accurate device placement.
Historically, prostate cancer was diagnosed by finger guided trans-rectal prostate biopsies. However, with the advent of PSA screening and improvements in ultrasonography, ultrasound guided prostate biopsy has become the standard of care to screen and diagnose men with prostate cancer. A standard 12-14 core prostate biopsy is now common practice, detecting cancer in 27% to 44% of patients in patients with an elevated serum PSA.
Initially, prostate MR imaging was not considered for routine clinical practice. However, the addition of an endorectal-coil probe and a 3 Tesla magnet has improved its diagnostic utility. Currently, most mpMRI are done without the use of an endo-rectal coil at 3Tesla. The MRI is able to evaluate the entire prostate (transrectal ultrasound images are overlaid on a previously obtained prostate MRI, combined with an electromagnetic tracking system) prior to biopsy and allows the physician to target specific areas of the prostate that are suspicious for cancer. This contrasts with the typical US guided approach which samples regions of the prostate in a standard fashion.
This study will consist of comparison of the standard of care prostate biopsy with the protocol biopsy which consists of a US guided prostate biopsy and a MR/US fusion tracked prostate biopsy. The researchers are interested in learning which procedure is more useful in obtaining a diagnosis of prostate cancer which will in turn provide a better diagnosis rate. Each patient will act as their own control.
7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,586 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.
Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →This is the only study on the registry with Ardeshir Rastinehad as lead sponsor.
Compared within Prostatic Neoplasms, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Prostatic Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Biopsy and archival tissue
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Each participant will receive standard of care ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and a MR/TRUS Fusion Guided prostate biopsy.
Other: Prostate Biopsy · Other: MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy · Device: MR/TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
Standard of care
Also known as: Transperineal (TP) Prostate Biopsy, UroNav Fusion Biopsy, Targeted prostate biopsy, Ultrasound guided Prostate Biopsy
Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided fusion prostate biopsy (Arm 1) or a Transperineal Ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy (Arm 2). All patients will under go a standard ultrasound guided biopsy at the time of their targeted (fusion) biopsy.
Also known as: Fusion Biopsy
TRUS images are overlaid on a previously obtained prostate MRI, combined with an electromagnetic tracking system. The urologist then performs directed prostate biopsies at MR-identified targets in addition to the standard prostate biopsies.
Incidence of Prostate Cancer
Incidence of diagnosing subjects with prostate cancer with MR visible lesions
Time frame: 1 Month
Incidence of adverse events
the incidence of adverse events occurring after a targeted and ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Time frame: 1 Month
Pirads score
The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score classifies MRI lesions on a scale from 1 to 5, which reflects their level of suspicion from least to most. Higher score indicates more suspicion.
Time frame: 1 Month
Gleason score
The Gleason Score ranges from 1-5 and describes how much the cancer from a biopsy looks like healthy tissue (lower score) or abnormal tissue (higher score). Sum of the gleason grade of the most predominant tumor pattern and a second gleason grade of the second most predominant pattern. Full score from 2 to 10, with higher score indicating more clinically significance.
Time frame: 1 Month
Started Aug 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2025, 61 months after the start.
Of 1,098 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 86. This study's planned 61 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,155 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 84.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.