CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04589689IITTUpdated May 15, 2025Results posted

Insul-In This Together Program for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents

An interventional study of Insul-In This Together in Type 1 Diabetes, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
366
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The "Insul-In This Together" intervention is designed for teens with Type 1 Diabetes and their parents. This study seeks to evaluate an evidence-based family intervention for teens with type 1 diabetes and their parents to offset the psychosocial and diabetes self-management risks. This information will provide a more in-depth understanding of family-based program efficacy for teens with adolescents and provide more judicious and streamlined intervention options to be offered in diabetes clinics in the future.

Read the detailed description

This study will collect survey and biomedical data to assess this program in a randomized controlled trial with 165 families (including an adolescent and parent/caregiver) will be enrolled, complete surveys, provide biomedical data via continuous glucose monitors and receive a 6-week psychosocial intervention. The results of this study will inform future intervention redesign to provide more judicious interventions to be disseminated across diabetes care.This study will evaluate the relative efficacy of each of the individual intervention components and also identify the mechanisms of actions (mediators) that are most impacted by these types of interventions as well as most linked to long-term outcomes for adolescents.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 366 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Teen subject has a type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis according to ADA criteria for at least 6 months
  2. Teen subject is age 12-19 years at time of screening (no age limit for parent participants)
  3. Participation of at least one cohabitating parent/caregiver.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject lacks access to a smartphone or Wi-Fi via computer
  2. Subject has restricted or no English proficiency
  3. Subject has a pervasive developmental, cognitive, or psychiatric limitations that compromise participation in study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
366 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    The intervention group will participated in the The Insul-In This Together intervention, which consists of 6 weekly 30-minute online family sessions to discuss topics related to diabetes distress and parent-teen communication. Sessions include structured education, discussions, and skill-building activities related to parental involvement, parental monitoring, and parent-adolescent conflict. The intervention will be conducted by the PI or clinically trained research staff via Zoom. Online surveys, and glucose monitoring data will be captured at baseline and 3,6 and 12-month follow-ups. Brief surveys will also be conducted at 2-, 4-, and 6-week follow-ups (after every 2 sessions for the intervention group and later the control group). Participants will be asked to provide A1C test results that will be collected via chart review or from participants sharing their test results at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up.

    Behavioral: Insul-In This Together

  • Experimental
    Waitlisted Control Group

    The waitlisted control group will receive the same intervention as the intervention group, but at the 6-month follow-up mark. The intervention will be conducted by the PI or clinically trained research staff via Zoom. Online surveys, and glucose monitoring data will be captured at baseline and 3,6 and 12-month follow-ups. Brief surveys will also be conducted at 2-, 4-, and 6-week from baseline. Participants will be asked to provide A1C test results that will be collected via chart review or from participants sharing their test results at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up.

    Behavioral: Insul-In This Together

Interventions

  • BehavioralInsul-In This Together

    Session 1: Introduction to Parental Monitoring Session 2: Advanced Parental Monitoring Session 3: Introduction to Parental Involvement Session 4: Advanced Parental Involvement Session 5: Introduction to Parent-Teen Conflict Management Session 6: Advanced Parent-Teen Conflict Management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Glucose Levels Percent Time in Target Range Based on Glucose Monitoring

    Adolescent glucose levels percent time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) based on glucose monitoring to measure glycemic control. The clinical recommendation is a percent time-in-range of 70% or more.

    Time frame: Average percent time in range based on two weeks of glucose monitoring data at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up (plus or minus 2 weeks around target data collection date)

  2. Adolescent Quality of Life

    Self-report via Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) surveys for adolescents to measure the adolescent's quality of life. Possible score range is 0-100 and the higher scores indicated better quality of life. Adolescent quality of life was measured for adolescents only (not parents).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adolescent Depression

    Surveys of self-report via Children's Depression Inventory - short version (CDI:S80), a 10 scale item, will be used to assess adolescent depression. Possible total score range is 0-20 with higher scores indicated more severe depressive symptoms. Item response options included 0 = Not at all, 1 = Somewhat, and 2 = A lot. Total score was the sum of all item scores.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.

  2. Parent Depression

    Surveys of self-report via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) - 8 item scale to assess depression among parents. Response options for each item included 0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, and 3 = nearly every day. Items were summed into a total score. The possible total score range is 0-24 and higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.

  3. Adolescent Diabetes Distress

    Measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) survey of diabetes distress, which includes 14 items that were summed to create a total score with a possible total score range of 14-84. Item response options range from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problem). Higher scores indicate more diabetes distress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up

  4. Parent Diabetes Distress

    Measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) survey of diabetes distress, which includes 15 items that were summed into a total score with a possible total score range of 15-90. Higher scores indicate more diabetes distress. Response options ranged from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problem).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.

  5. Parenting Stress

    Surveys of self-report on parenting stress via The Parenting Stress Scale. Includes 18 items that were summed into a total score with a possible total score range from 18-90. Higher scores indicate more parenting stress. Item responses included 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = not sure, 4 = disagree, and 5 = strongly disagree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up

  6. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

    Medical record data on glycated hemoglobin in blood reported as National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) percentage. The clinical recommendation for pediatrics is below 7.5%.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow-up

07

Results

Posted May 15, 2025

Participant flow

Enrollment was of adolescent/parent dyads, both had to sign informed consent for either of them to enroll, and they received the study intervention together.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention Group - AdolescentsIntervention Group - ParentsWaitlisted Control Group - AdolescentsWaitlisted Control Group - Parents
Started79797878
Completed68686161
Not completed11111717

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlucose Levels Percent Time in Target Range Based on Glucose Monitoring

Adolescent glucose levels percent time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) based on glucose monitoring to measure glycemic control. The clinical recommendation is a percent time-in-range of 70% or more.

Time frame:
Average percent time in range based on two weeks of glucose monitoring data at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up (plus or minus 2 weeks around target data collection date)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time-in-range
Glucose Levels Percent Time in Target Range Based on Glucose Monitoring
percentage of time-in-rangeIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline61.185 ± 18.4264.542 ± 17.74
3 months62.223 ± 18.5764.571 ± 18.21
6 months61.680 ± 18.9165.908 ± 17.82
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.777 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.247 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
PrimaryAdolescent Quality of Life

Self-report via Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) surveys for adolescents to measure the adolescent's quality of life. Possible score range is 0-100 and the higher scores indicated better quality of life. Adolescent quality of life was measured for adolescents only (not parents).

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Adolescent Quality of Life
score on a scaleIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline67.902 ± 13.9264.633 ± 15.38
3-month67.965 ± 14.4763.675 ± 16.39
6-month69.523 ± 14.6365.511 ± 16.16
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.160 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.275 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
SecondaryAdolescent Depression

Surveys of self-report via Children's Depression Inventory - short version (CDI:S80), a 10 scale item, will be used to assess adolescent depression. Possible total score range is 0-20 with higher scores indicated more severe depressive symptoms. Item response options included 0 = Not at all, 1 = Somewhat, and 2 = A lot. Total score was the sum of all item scores.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Adolescent Depression
score on a scaleIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline2.278 ± 3.562.718 ± 3.63
3-month follow-up2.411 ± 4.273.130 ± 3.91
6-month follow-up2.419 ± 4.012.963 ± 3.96
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.509 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.610 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
SecondaryParent Depression

Surveys of self-report via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) - 8 item scale to assess depression among parents. Response options for each item included 0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, and 3 = nearly every day. Items were summed into a total score. The possible total score range is 0-24 and higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parent Depression
score on a scaleIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline4.772 ± 4.825.167 ± 5.25
3-month follow-up4.099 ± 4.024.346 ± 4.81
6-month follow-up4.088 ± 4.564.409 ± 4.43
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.807 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.826 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
SecondaryAdolescent Diabetes Distress

Measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) survey of diabetes distress, which includes 14 items that were summed to create a total score with a possible total score range of 14-84. Item response options range from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problem). Higher scores indicate more diabetes distress.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Adolescent Diabetes Distress
score on a scaleIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline28.608 ± 12.6832.064 ± 14.98
3-month follow-up27.847 ± 13.0732.219 ± 16.39
6-month follow-up27.883 ± 11.9730.265 ± 16.16
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.076 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.747 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
SecondaryParent Diabetes Distress

Measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) survey of diabetes distress, which includes 15 items that were summed into a total score with a possible total score range of 15-90. Higher scores indicate more diabetes distress. Response options ranged from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problem).

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parent Diabetes Distress
score on a scaleIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline43.177 ± 17.3244.859 ± 17.81
3-month follow-up36.405 ± 14.2738.817 ± 16.22
6-month follow-up36.393 ± 14.3940.542 ± 18.09
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.154 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.107 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
SecondaryParenting Stress

Surveys of self-report on parenting stress via The Parenting Stress Scale. Includes 18 items that were summed into a total score with a possible total score range from 18-90. Higher scores indicate more parenting stress. Item responses included 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = not sure, 4 = disagree, and 5 = strongly disagree.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parenting Stress
score on a scaleIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline73.633 ± 9.7371.256 ± 10.88
3-month follow-up74.706 ± 9.1671.777 ± 12.25
6-month follow-up74.376 ± 9.7371.865 ± 10.93
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.445 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.543 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)
SecondaryHemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

Medical record data on glycated hemoglobin in blood reported as National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) percentage. The clinical recommendation for pediatrics is below 7.5%.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6-month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycated hemoglobin
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
percentage of glycated hemoglobinIntervention GroupWaitlisted Control Group
Baseline7.166 ± 1.207.19 ± 1.42
6-month follow-up7.260 ± 1.387.069 ± 1.29
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Waitlisted Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.157 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is \<.05.)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Group - Adolescents0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)
Intervention Group - Parents0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)0/79 (0%)
Waitlisted Control Group: Control - Adolescents0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)
Waitlisted Control Group: Control - Parents0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)
Waitlisted Control Group: Intervention - Adolescents0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)
Waitlisted Control Group: Intervention - Parents0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intervention Group - AdolescentsIntervention Group - ParentsWaitlisted Control Group - AdolescentsWaitlisted Control Group - ParentsTotal
<=18 years730720145
Between 18 and 65 years679678169
>=65 years00000
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Intervention Group - AdolescentsIntervention Group - ParentsWaitlisted Control Group - AdolescentsWaitlisted Control Group - ParentsTotal
Male45734995
Female32724068212
Non-binary10113
Undisclosed10304
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Intervention Group - AdolescentsIntervention Group - ParentsWaitlisted Control Group - AdolescentsWaitlisted Control Group - ParentsTotal
Non-Hispanic white61666165253
Hispanic white531312
Black21328
Asian/Pacific Islander242715
Native American01001
More than once race717015
Undisclosed234110
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Intervention Group - AdolescentsIntervention Group - ParentsWaitlisted Control Group - AdolescentsWaitlisted Control Group - ParentsTotal
United States79797878314
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 11, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 11, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04589689
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Korey Hood (Professor, Medicine, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2020
Start date
Dec 18, 2020
Primary completion
May 6, 2024
Completion
May 6, 2024
Results posted
May 15, 2025
Last update
May 15, 2025

Study contacts

Korey K Hood, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion