CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04581759EnTRIPSUpdated May 10, 2022

Endovascular Treatment and RIPC in Acute Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of RIPC device (IPC-906X) and foundational treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Endovascular Treatment, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-10.

Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endovascular treatment(ET)is an effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke(AIS) with great vessel obstruction. However, acute complications such as high postoperative perfusion injury, hemorrhagic transformation and restenosis resulted in functional independence in only about 50% of patients 90 days after interventional surgery. Therefore, it is very important to protect the neurologic function after emergency endovascular treatment. The investigators' previous studies have shown that combined with intravenous thrombolytic therapy and remote postconditioning(RIPC)can significantly improve the neurological impairment and short-term and long-term prognosis in patients with acute stroke. In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, the investigators assumed patients with acute ischemic stroke who had successfully revascularization after ET might benefit from RIPC as well. Patients in the RIPC group had five cycles of 5-min cuff inflation followed by 3-min deflation to the bilateral upper arm after ET. The primary endpoint measure was the proportion of patients with a favorable recovery of nerve function deficient assessed by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS≤2) 90 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included the following: (1) Symptom endpoints: Neurological intelligence and function scores, postoperative hemorrhagic transformation rate, etc. (2) Blood index test: postoperative inflammatory factors, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and other indicators. (3) Imaging endpoints: MRI-FLAIR , TCD, etc.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Endovascular Treatment
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University is the lead sponsor of 306 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. acute ischemic stroke(AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery system and vertebral basilar artery system) within 24 hours after onset, endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombotomy, intra-arterial thrombolysis, balloon dilatation or stent angioplastyand) successful opening were performed, and the definition of successful opening was defined by Modified Thrombolysis standard [Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral infarction, mTICI]≥ 2B,The standards of endovascular interventional treatment are in line with the indications and contraindications formulated in the Chinese Guidelines for the Early Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2018;
  2. Modified Rankin scale score (mRS) ≤1 before onset:
  3. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS)≥6 on admission;
  4. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥6 on admission;
  5. Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. CT or MRI scan showed significant midline deviation and the mass effect;
  2. Glasgow(GCS) score ≤8 on admission;
  3. failure to accomplish 3-months and 6-months follow up;
  4. Severe cardiac, liver, or kidney disease, malignancy, severe coagulation dysfunction, severe anemia and systemic organ dysfunction;
  5. Pregnant or nursing women, or patients with moderate to severe mental disorders or dementia;
  6. Severe soft tissue injuries, fractures, thrombosis and other known peripheral vascular lesions of the upper limbs,active visceral hemorrhage, acute stage of fundus hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm or cerebral arteriovenous malformation, and other unsuitable for bilateral upper arm compression.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RIPC

    Patients in the RIPC group not only receive foundational treatment but also have five cycles of 5-min cuff inflation followed by 3-min deflation to the bilateral upper arm using a RIPC device (IPC-906X; Beijing Renqiao Institute of Neuroscience, Beijing, China) after endovascular treatment while in-hospital.

    Device: RIPC device (IPC-906X) · Drug: foundational treatment

  • Sham comparator
    foundational treatment group (FT)

    Patients in the FT group only receive foundational treatment, including free radical elimination in the acute stage, blood pressure and blood glucose stabilization, and antiplatelet (aspirin or/and clopidogrel,100-300mg/d) and lipid-lowering (atorvastatin 20-60mg/d,rosuvastatin 10-20mg/d) drugs, during the study period without remote ischemic postconditioning after endovascular treatment.

    Drug: foundational treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceRIPC device (IPC-906X)

    Patients in the RIPC group will have five cycles of 5-min cuff inflation followed by 3-min deflation to the bilateral upper arm twice a day after Mechanical Thrombectomy.

  • Drugfoundational treatment

    foundational treatment, including free radical elimination in the acute stage, blood pressure and blood glucose stabilization, and antiplatelet (aspirin or/and clopidogrel ) and lipid-lowering (statins) drugs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Rankin scale (mRS)

    The percentage of patients with a favorable outcome from baseline at 90 days and 180 days postoperatively, defined as a score of 0 or 2 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS)(Notes:mRS score from 0-6, higher scores mean worse outcome)

    Time frame: 7days, 90 days and 180 days after the surgery and at discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change of NIHSS score

    The percentage of functional recovery from baseline at 90 days and 180 days postoperatively, as measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, short for NIHSS(Notes:NIHSS score from 0-42. higher scores mean worse outcome)

    Time frame: 7days, 90 days and 180 days after the surgery and at discharge

  2. The change of Barthel Index

    The change of functional recovery from baseline at 90 days and 180 days postoperatively, as measured by the Barthel Index (Notes:Barthel Index score from 0-100. higher scores mean better outcome)

    Time frame: 7days, 90 days and 180 days after the surgery and at discharge

  3. The change of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score

    The change of cognitive recovery from baseline at 90 days and 180 days postoperatively, as measured by the MoCA (Notes:MoCA score from 0-30. higher scores mean better outcome)

    Time frame: 7days, 90 days and 180 days after the surgery and at discharge

  4. The change of MMSE score

    The change of cognitive recovery from baseline at 90 days and 180 days postoperatively, as measured by the MMSE(Notes:MMSE score from 0-30. higher scores mean better outcome)

    Time frame: 7days, 90 days and 180 days after the surgery and at discharge

  5. The change of inflammatory indicators

    Peripheral venous blood was drawn before Endovascular Treatment(ET) and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively to determine the effect of repeated RIPC on anti-inflammatory (hIL-1β、hIL-2R、hIL-6、hIL8、hIL-10、S100-β、TNF-α) (Notes: unit ng/ml)

    Time frame: before ET, 24 hours and 7 days after the surgery

  6. The change of angiogenic factors

    Peripheral venous blood was drawn before ET and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively to determine the effect of repeated RIPC on vascular (VEGF、bFGF、EPO、HIF-1α、BDNF) and other pathways (S100B、NSE)(Notes: unit ng/ml)

    Time frame: before ET, 24 hours and 7 days after the surgery

  7. The change of hemoglobin and Blood viscosity

    Peripheral venous blood was drawn before ET and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively to determine the effect of repeated RIPC on Hb and Blood viscosity(Notes: unit g/L , mPa.s)

    Time frame: up to 7 days after the surgery

  8. Postoperative hemorrhagic transformation

    The proportion of patients with postoperative hemorrhagic transformation, based on CT scan and symptom

    Time frame: 72 hours after ET and hospitalization

  9. The change of MRI FLAIR Fazekas score

    Cerebral white matter demyelination measured by MRI FLAIR Fazekas score,(Notes:Fazekas score from 0-6. higher scores mean worse outcome)

    Time frame: the changs from within 7 days to 90 days after the surgery

  10. The change of blood flow velocity

    Vascular blood flow velocity measured by transcranial doppler (TCD) examination

    Time frame: the changs from 24 hours after ET to 7 days after the surgery

  11. Vascular resistance

    Vascular resistance measured by TCD examination

    Time frame: the changs from 24 hours after ET to 7 days after the surgery

  12. mortality rate

    90-days and 180-days mortality rate

    Time frame: up to 90 days and 180 days

  13. recurrence rate of cerebrovascular disease

    90-days and 180-days recurrence rate of cerebrovascular disease

    Time frame: up to 90 days and 180 days

  14. blood pressure

    The effect of RIPC on blood pressure

    Time frame: up to 7days

  15. heart rate

    The effect of RIPC on heart rate

    Time frame: up to 7days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04581759
Lead sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Collaborators
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xijing Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital, Xi'an No.3 Hospital, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2020
Start date
Apr 12, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
May 10, 2022

Study contacts

Guogang Luo, MD
Contact
lguogang@163.com
0086-13991974085
Meng Wei, MD
Contact
67183723@qq.com
0086-15991748135

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion