CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04578574Updated Mar 19, 2024Results posted

Effects of Bodily Illusion and tDCS on SCI-related Neuropathic Pain

An interventional study of Bodily Illusions (BI) Procedure and Transcranial direct electrical stimulation (tDCS) in Neuropathic Pain, sponsored by University of Miami. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-19.

Sponsored by University of Miami · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a combination of two procedures: (1) Bodily Illusion (BI) and (2) Transcranial direct electrical stimulation (tDCS) on neuropathic pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathic Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neuralgia

1,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 52 across 973 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Miami is the lead sponsor of 820 studies on the registry; 161 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 93 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants will be men or women, 18-70 years of age, with an incomplete cervical traumatic SCI.
  2. Participants must have experienced neuropathic pain for a minimum of six months. They must have neuropathic pain in the moderate to severe category, which will be defined as a score of at least 4 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); (range of 0 to 10).
  3. Participants must be willing and able to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major psychiatric disease/disorder (self-reported)
  2. A significant neurological trauma besides SCI
  3. A recent (one-year) history of alcohol or drug abuse (selfreported)
  4. Any other medical conditions in which transcranial DCS is relatively contraindicated, such as pregnancy, epilepsy and/or seizures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BI-TDCS Stimulation Group

    Participants in this group will receive the BI and TDCS interventions for 10 sessions over two weeks.

    Other: Bodily Illusions (BI) Procedure · Device: Transcranial direct electrical stimulation (tDCS)

  • Sham comparator
    BI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation Group

    Participants in this group will receive the BI and TDCS (Sham) interventions for 10 sessions over two weeks.

    Other: Bodily Illusions (BI) Procedure · Other: Sham Transcranial Direct Electrical Stimulation (tDCS)

Interventions

  • OtherBodily Illusions (BI) Procedure

    Each sessions will consists of two types of illusions that are 15 min each, the rubber hand illusion (RHI) and the walking illusion (WI) that involve both arms and legs.

  • DeviceTranscranial direct electrical stimulation (tDCS)

    Each sessions will consists of electrical current delivered from a battery-driven, constant current stimulator using saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes. One electrode will be placed on your scalp on the right side and the other electrode over the left eye on your forehead. A weak current will be applied for 30 min at the same time as the BI.

  • OtherSham Transcranial Direct Electrical Stimulation (tDCS)

    Each session of the Sham tDCS will be applied for 30 min at the same time as the BI.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Neuropathic Pain Severity

    Assessed by the use of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). The NPSI has a total score ranging from 0 to 100 with the higher score indicating greater pain.

    Time frame: baseline, up to two weeks

  2. Change in Performance of Body Part Processing

    Assessed by a customized computer task, where individual reaction times will be measured in response to mental rotation of body parts. Results will be reported in milliseconds.

    Time frame: baseline, up to two weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Sensory Thresholds

    Assessed by the Quantitative Sensory Testing. Pain thresholds are evaluated using Medoc machine (Medoc Ltd,Ramat Yishai, Israel and FDA approved. It assesses participants' ability to feel change in temperature (0°C to 50°C). The temperatures in this range may be felt as cool, cold, warm, and hot. A probe is placed on the skin and it feels either cool, cold, warm or hot. Participants' thresholds are recorded for cool or warm sensation, and for cold or hot painful thresholds.

    Time frame: baseline, up to two weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 19, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBI Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation Group
Started62
Completed62
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Neuropathic Pain Severity

Assessed by the use of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). The NPSI has a total score ranging from 0 to 100 with the higher score indicating greater pain.

Time frame:
baseline, up to two weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Neuropathic Pain Severity
score on a scaleBI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation Group
Change in Neuropathic Pain Severity-7.3 ± 3.98.5 ± 6.3
PrimaryChange in Performance of Body Part Processing

Assessed by a customized computer task, where individual reaction times will be measured in response to mental rotation of body parts. Results will be reported in milliseconds.

Time frame:
baseline, up to two weeks
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds (reaction times)
Change in Performance of Body Part Processing
milliseconds (reaction times)BI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation Group
change scores in mental rotation of body parts-18.2 ± 67.530.9 ± 25
change scores in mental rotation of control stimuli-4.5 ± 924.4 ± 54
SecondaryChange in Sensory Thresholds

Assessed by the Quantitative Sensory Testing. Pain thresholds are evaluated using Medoc machine (Medoc Ltd,Ramat Yishai, Israel and FDA approved. It assesses participants' ability to feel change in temperature (0°C to 50°C). The temperatures in this range may be felt as cool, cold, warm, and hot. A probe is placed on the skin and it feels either cool, cold, warm or hot. Participants' thresholds are recorded for cool or warm sensation, and for cold or hot painful thresholds.

Time frame:
baseline, up to two weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Celsius
Change in Sensory Thresholds
CelsiusBI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation Group
delta pain threshold and perception threshold of painful site expressed as change score (hot-warm)2.2 ± 6.5-1.3 ± 4
delta pain thresh. and perception threshold of painful site expressed as change score (cold-cool)-1.37 ± 5.43.9 ± 1

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year (during data collection). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BI-TDCS Stimulation Group0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
BI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation Group0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation GroupTotal
Mean50 ± 1640 ± 748 ± 14.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation GroupTotal
Female202
Male426
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)BI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino303
White303
Black American022
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)BI-TDCS Stimulation GroupBI-TDCS (Sham) Stimulation GroupTotal
United States527
South America101
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 21, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04578574
Lead sponsor
University of Miami
Collaborators
Florida
Responsible party
Eva Widerstrom-Noga (Research Professor, University of Miami) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2020
Start date
Jan 13, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 10, 2023
Completion
Mar 10, 2023
Results posted
Mar 19, 2024
Last update
Mar 19, 2024

Study contacts

Eva Widerstrom-Noga, Phd
principal investigator · University of Miami

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion