ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04577716PET-EVARUpdated Jul 3, 2025

Predicting Endoleaks Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using 18F-Sodium Fluoride

An observational study in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Endoleak and Stent-Graft Endoleak, sponsored by University of Edinburgh. Completed at 4 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-03.

Sponsored by University of Edinburgh · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
102
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to describe Sodium Fluoride uptake (using Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography - PET-CT) following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) and to determine whether Sodium Fluoride PET-CT can predict the development of endoleaks.

Read the detailed description

Abdominal aortic aneurysms are a leading cause of death in the United Kingdom. Surveillance programmes and pre-emptive surgical repair are lifesaving. Traditional open surgical repair is associated with major perioperative morbidity and mortality and there has been a move towards minimally invasive Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR), which reduces these early risks. However, the cost effectiveness and long-term clinical effectiveness of EVAR is undermined by concerns of durability due to the development of endoleaks and late aneurysm rupture secondary to progression of native aortic aneurysm disease and stent graft failure. It has previously been demonstrated that 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography can predict progression of aneurysm disease and is associated with greater rates of abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion and the future risk of rupture or surgical repair.

The investigators here wish to examine whether 18F-Sodium Fluoride on Positron Emission Tomography uptake (i) is increased in patients with endoleaks or related complications, (ii) can prospectively predict the likelihood of developing endoleaks in patients undergoing EVAR, and (ii) is a feasible approach to select patients for EVAR with a reduced future risk of stent graft failure and re-intervention. The investigators believe that there is a compelling scientific rationale for this approach with major translational potential to better select subgroups of patients for EVAR and ultimately improve their outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
  • Endoleak
  • Stent-Graft Endoleak

Keywords

  • EVAR
  • Endoleak
  • 18F-Sodium Fluoride
  • PET
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal

467 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; 99 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is below the median of 165 across 217 observational studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Edinburgh is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of individuals with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The first part of the study (Study 1 - Case Control Study) will recruit patients with existing EVAR in to two groups: patients that have an endoleak or related complication (endoleak group, n = 22) and those that have remained complication-free (no endoleak group, n = 22). We will also prospectively recruit patients who are yet to receive EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (pre-EVAR group, n = 100) for the (Study 2 - Cohort Study).

There will be four patient identification centres from which patients will be recruited: NHS Lothian, NHS Lanarkshire, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, and NHS Tayside.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of AAA as defined by the European Society of Vascular Surgery guidelines on the management of aorto-iliac artery aneurysms, and having undergone endovascular repair within the recommended Instructions For Use (IFU) by the manufacturer. ['Endoleak' and 'No Endoleak groups only]
  • Complication will be defined as any type of endoleak or stent graft migration ['Endoleak' group only].
  • A diagnosis of AAA requiring endovascular repair OR a diagnosis of juxtarenal AAA requiring fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair as defined by the European Society of Vascular surgery guidelines on the management of aorto-iliac artery aneurysms and planned EVAR or fenestrated EVAR surgery. ['pre-EVAR' group only]
  • Minimum age: 50 years. No maximum age.
  • Retain capacity for

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The inability of patients to undergo PET/CT scanning
  • Chronic kidney disease ( ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)
  • Major or untreated cancer
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy or to iodinated contrast
  • Inability or unwillingness to give
  • Life-expectancy of less than two years
  • Known history of connective tissue disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Endoleak Group

    Participants with a previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) who have developed an endoleak

    Diagnostic Test: 18F Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography · Diagnostic Test: CT Aortic Angiogram

  • No Endoleak Group

    Participants with a previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) who have not developed an endoleak

    Diagnostic Test: 18F Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography · Diagnostic Test: CT Aortic Angiogram

  • Pre-EVAR Group

    Participants who have an abdominal aortic aneurysm and who are undergoing an Endovascular Aneurysm Repair as standard of care

    Diagnostic Test: 18F Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography · Diagnostic Test: 12-month CT Aortic Angiogram · Other: 24-month review

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test18F Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography

    PET scan using the 18F-Sodium Fluoride radiotracer followed by an attenuation correction CT scan

  • Diagnostic testCT Aortic Angiogram

    CT scan to assess aortic morphology and contextualise PET scan

  • Diagnostic test12-month CT Aortic Angiogram

    CT scan to assess aortic morphology and the stent graft

  • Other24-month review

    This will consist of a telephone consultation with the study participant and review of electronic clinical records

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Microcalcification activity in stented and aneurysmal aorta

    Will be measured as 18F Sodium Fluoride binding in the aorta. Uptake will be quantified in Standardised Uptake Values and as a tissue to background ratios.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pattern of microcalcification activity in the stented aorta

    Microcalcification activity

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Intensity of microcalcification activity in the stented aorta

    Microcalcification activity

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Endoleaks

    Computed tomography and ultrasound endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Stent graft migration

    Computed tomography and ultrasound endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Aneurysm sac diameter

    Computed tomography and ultrasound endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Neck diameter and neck angulation

    Computed tomography and ultrasound endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Geometry: tortuosity, curvature, torsion

    Computed tomography and ultrasound endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Aneurysm-related mortality

    Clinical endpoints

    Time frame: 24 months

  9. Re-intervention

    Clinical endpoints

    Time frame: 24 months

  10. All-cause mortality

    Clinical endpoints

    Time frame: 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Co-localisation of 18F-Sodium Fluoride with histological changes in aortic tissue

    Uptake of 18F-Sodium Fluoride will be identified on PET-CT scans that are acquired as part of the study visit. This will be compared with histological changes in aortic specimens obtained if participant undergoes an open aortic procedure during the study period.

    Time frame: 12-36 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Ninewells Hospital
    Dundee, DD2 1SG, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital Hairmyres
    East Kilbride, G75 8RG, United Kingdom
  • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
    Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Debono S, Nash J, Fletcher AJ, Syed M, van Beek EJR, Williams MC, Falah O, Tambyraja A, Dweck MR, Newby DE, Forsythe RO. Aortic sodium [18F]fluoride uptake following endovascular aneurysm repair. Heart. 2023 Oct 26;109(22):1677-1682. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322514. PubMed 37164479 ↗
  • Debono S, Nash J, Tambyraja AL, Newby DE, Forsythe RO. Endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Heart. 2021 Nov;107(22):1783-1789. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318288. Epub 2021 Mar 4. PubMed 33674354 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There are no plans for individual participant data sharing.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04577716
Collaborators
NHS Lothian, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, NHS Lanarkshire, NHS Tayside
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2020
Start date
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025
Completion
Mar 31, 2025
Last update
Jul 3, 2025

Study contacts

Samuel Debono
principal investigator · University of Edinburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion