CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04577391Updated Mar 9, 2021

Comparing the Effectiveness of mCIMT and Bimanual Training

An interventional study of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Bimanual Training in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Muş Alparslan University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 14 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-09.

Sponsored by Muş Alparslan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Sep 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to compare the effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) and Bimanual Training (BIT) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Children \&Youth (ICF-CY) conceptual framework. Our assumptions were that (1) mCIMT is more effective on outcomes representing all subdomains of ICF and (2) the possible improvements in the body structure and function, activity, and participation subdomains of ICF are intimately related to each other.

Read the detailed description

Thirty-two children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (mean age 10.43 years [SD 2.9 years]; 15 females, 17 males) whose functional profiles associated with Manual Ability Classification System, Gross Motor Function Classification System, and Communication Function Classification System changed between level I-III were randomly distributed to one of the mCIMT or BIT groups with equivalent dosing frequency and intensity (10 weeks/3 days per week/2.5 hours per day). Outcome measures categorized according to the domains of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Children \&Youth (ICF-CY) framework were used to document body functions, activity, and participation outcomes. Assessments were carried out before (T1) and after treatment (T2), and at 16 weeks post-intervention (T3) by a physical therapist blinded to group allocation. Before the study entry, informed consent was obtained from the parents. General and specific contents related to each intervention were delivered as individual sessions at the school (one session per week) or group sessions with two participants at rehabilitation centers (two sessions per week).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • upper limb
  • hand
  • bimanual training
  • constraint-induced movement therapy
  • ICF-CY
  • hemiplegic cerebral palsy
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,853 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 435 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is close to the median of 33 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Muş Alparslan University is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy
  • Must be able to attend primary or secondary school

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Family-dependent problems interfering with participation in study sessions
  • The presence of behavioral problems interfering with the assessment periods or intervention sessions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

    Children's less affected hand was restricted through a mitt with a material sewn shut on the palmar face to promote the use of involved side as maximum as possible. Besides, if the participant attempted to use his/her less affected hand as an assistive, a bandage was also used to strap less affected upper limb to the trunk. Specific activities were selected according to deficit of interest, participant preference (on the condition of having potential effects on hand skills) and parent/guardian, or their teacher's request (e.g., drawing, painting, and eating). In case of activities requiring both hand use, such as stabilizing paper during the painting or holding the bricks of lego on the ground, the treating physiotherapist undertook the role of the child's dominant hand.

    Other: Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Bimanual training

    BIT was administrated without any restrictive material on the non-involved upper limb, but instead, children were engaged in age-appropriate gross and fine motor bimanual activities. All targeted deficits of interest were addressed within the context of the selected activity.

    Other: Bimanual Training

Interventions

  • OtherModified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

    Children's less affected hand was restricted through a mitt with a material sewn shut on the palmar face to promote the involved side's use, and unimanual gross and fine motor activities were practiced with the more affected hand. Besides, if the participant attempted to use his/her less affected hand as an assistive, a bandage was also used to strap less affected upper limb to the trunk. Specific activities were selected according to the deficit of interest, participant preference (on the condition of having potential effects on hand skills) and parent/guardian, or their teacher's request (e.g., drawing, painting, and eating).

  • OtherBimanual Training

    BIT was administrated without any restrictive material on the non-involved upper limb, but instead, children were engaged in age-appropriate gross and fine motor bimanual activities. All targeted deficits of interest were addressed within the context of the selected activity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in unimanual capacity on Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) at 16 weeks

    The Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is a criterion-referenced measurement tool, developed to evaluate upper extremity quality of movement in children with cerebral palsy.The Upper Extremity Skills Test has been validated for children with cerebral palsy aged 18 months to 12 years. Intra-rater reliability of the QUEST has been indicated to strong (ICC=0.96) in children with cerebral palsy aged eight and over.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 16

  2. Change from baseline in manual ability on ABILHAND-Kids at 16 weeks

    ABILHAND-Kids is developed for children with cerebral palsy and measures a child's ability to manage 21 daily activities that require the use of the upper limbs. It measures the children's typical performance in daily life. ABILHAND-Kids is useful in reporting the functional performance of children with one affected side in the perspective of manual ability and has excellent test-retest reliability for Turkish children with cerebral palsy (ICC=0. 0.98)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 16

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mus Alparslan University
    Mus, Muş 49100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fedrizzi E, Rosa-Rizzotto M, Turconi AC, Pagliano E, Fazzi E, Pozza LV, Facchin P; GIPCI Study Group. Unimanual and bimanual intensive training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and persistence in time of hand function improvement: 6-month follow-up results of a multisite clinical trial. J Child Neurol. 2013 Feb;28(2):161-75. doi: 10.1177/0883073812443004. Epub 2012 May 10. PubMed 22580904 ↗
  • Gelkop N, Burshtein DG, Lahav A, Brezner A, Al-Oraibi S, Ferre CL, Gordon AM. Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy in an educational setting. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015 Feb;35(1):24-39. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.925027. Epub 2014 Jul 1. PubMed 24983295 ↗
  • Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd RN. Best responders after intensive upper-limb training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):578-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.003. PubMed 21440702 ↗
  • Thompson AM, Chow S, Vey C, Lloyd M. Constraint-induced movement therapy in children aged 5 to 9 years with cerebral palsy: a day camp model. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2015 Spring;27(1):72-80. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000111. PubMed 25521268 ↗
  • Bingol H, Gunel MK. Comparing the effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy mainstreamed in regular school: A randomized controlled study. Arch Pediatr. 2022 Feb;29(2):105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.11.017. Epub 2022 Jan 14. PubMed 35039189 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04577391
Lead sponsor
Muş Alparslan University
Responsible party
Hasan Bingöl (Academician (Lecturer, Muş Alparslan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 6, 2020
Start date
Oct 15, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2020
Completion
Apr 15, 2020
Last update
Mar 9, 2021

Study contacts

Hasan Bingöl, MSc
principal investigator · Mus Alparslan University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion