CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04568434BALANCEUpdated Mar 6, 2025Results posted

A Study of Olezarsen (Formerly Known as AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx) Administered to Patients With Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (FCS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Olezarsen and Placebo in Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome, sponsored by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 47 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-06.

Sponsored by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of olezarsen as compared to placebo on the percent change in fasting triglycerides (TG) from baseline.

Read the detailed description

This was a multi-center, double-blind, Phase 3 study in up to 60 patients with FCS. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive Olezarsen or matching placebo in a 53-week treatment period. The length of participation in the study was approximately 74 weeks, which included an up to 8-week screening period, a 53-week treatment period, and a 13-week post-treatment evaluation period. Following the treatment period, eligible patients had the option to enroll in the Open-label Extension (OLE) Study ISIS 678354-CS13 (NCT05130450).

02

Conditions studied

  • Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome

Keywords

  • FCS
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of genetically confirmed Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (type 1 Hyperlipoproteinemia)
  • Fasting TG ≥ 880 mg/dL (10 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) at Screening
  • History of pancreatitis. Patients without a documented history of pancreatitis are also eligible but their enrollment will be capped at 35%
  • Stable doses of statins, omega-3 fatty acids, fibrates, or other lipid-lowering medications are allowed

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome within 6 months of Screening
  • Major surgery within 3 months of Screening
  • Have any other conditions, which, in the opinion of the Investigator would make the participant unsuitable for inclusion, or could interfere with participating in or completing the study
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received olezarsen-matching placebo, once every 4 weeks by subcutaneous (SC) injection, during Weeks 1 to 49 of the 53-week treatment period.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Olezarsen 50 mg

    Participants received olezarsen, 50 milligrams (mg), once every 4 weeks by SC injection, during Weeks 1 to 49 of the 53-week treatment period.

    Drug: Olezarsen

  • Experimental
    Olezarsen 80 mg

    Participants received olezarsen 80 mg, once every 4 weeks by SC injection, during Weeks 1 to 49 of the 53-week treatment period.

    Drug: Olezarsen

Interventions

  • DrugOlezarsen

    Olezarsen was administered by SC injection.

    Also known as: ISIS 678354, AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx

  • DrugPlacebo

    Olezarsen-matching placebo was administered by SC injection.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 6

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) at Months 6 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12

  3. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 40% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 6

    Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Month 6

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B-48 (apoB-48) at Months 6 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Months 6 and 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12

  6. Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53) in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis

    All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the Acute Pancreatitis Adjudication Committee (PAC) Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the treatment period.

    Time frame: During the treatment period Week 1 through Week 53

  7. Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53)

    All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the treatment period.

    Time frame: During the treatment period Week 1 through Week 53

  8. Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Per 100 Participant-Years Rate During Week 13 Through Week 53 in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis

    All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the specified duration.

    Time frame: Week 13 through Week 53

  9. Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Week 13 to Week 53

    All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the specified duration.

    Time frame: Week 13 through Week 53

  10. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 70% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 6

    Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Month 6

  11. Percentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 880 mg/dL at Month 6

    Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Month 6

  12. Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Treatment Period in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment

    All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the treatment period.

    Time frame: During the treatment period Week 1 through Week 53

  13. Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years From Week 13 to Week 53 in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment

    All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the specified duration.

    Time frame: Week 13 to Week 53

  14. Percentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 500 mg/dL at Month 6

    Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Month 6

06

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at investigative sites in the United States, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom from 18 November 2020 to 17 October 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Started232122
Completed221919
Not completed123
Withdrew: Voluntary withdrawal011
Withdrew: Adverse events (ae) or serious adverse events (sae)012
Withdrew: Investigator judgement100

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 6
Time frame:
Baseline, Month 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 6
percent changePlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 611.52 (-5.321 to 28.356)-10.85 (-27.797 to 6.095)-31.99 (-49.031 to -14.940)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0009 (ANCOVA model included effects of treatment (olezarsen 80 mg, olezarsen 50 mg, or placebo): dependent variable, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline TG: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -43.5 · 95% CI -69.085 to -17.921
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0775 (Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model included effects of treatment (olezarsen 80 mg, olezarsen 50 mg, or placebo): dependent variable, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline TG: covariate.) · Least squares (ls) mean difference: -22.37 · 95% CI -47.200 to 2.463
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 12
Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 12
percent changePlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 1220.89 (1.016 to 40.764)-22.92 (-42.505 to -3.336)-38.50 (-58.187 to -18.815)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0044 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting TG at Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline TG: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -43.81 · 95% CI -73.928 to -13.692
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0002 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting TG at Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline TG: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -59.39 · 95% CI -90.663 to -28.119
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) at Months 6 and 12
Time frame:
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) at Months 6 and 12
percent changePlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Month 67.57 (-5.229 to 20.359)-57.91 (-71.193 to -44.631)-66.13 (-79.437 to -52.823)
Month 1217.08 (2.149 to 32.009)-59.98 (-75.163 to -44.795)-64.20 (-79.408 to -48.984)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoC-III at Month 6: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline apoC-III: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -65.48 · 95% CI -82.634 to -48.320
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoC-III at Month 6: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline apoC-III: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -73.69 · 95% CI -94.553 to -52.837
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoC-III at Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline apoC-III: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -77.06 · 95% CI -98.938 to -55.177
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoC-III at Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol specified 2 randomization stratification factors: fixed effects, log-transformed baseline apoC-III: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -81.28 · 95% CI -104.656 to -57.894
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 40% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 6

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 40% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 6
percentage of participantsPlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 40% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 64.333.340.9
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B-48 (apoB-48) at Months 6 and 12
Time frame:
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B-48 (apoB-48) at Months 6 and 12
percent changePlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Month 624.50 (-9.972 to 58.973)-8.78 (-42.976 to 25.406)-59.46 (-93.164 to -25.765)
Month 12-3.52 (-53.159 to 46.124)-36.41 (-77.689 to 4.860)-79.15 (-118.442 to -39.861)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.1860 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoB-48 to Month 6: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline apoB-48: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -33.29 · 95% CI -82.612 to 16.041
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0019 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoB-48 to Month 6: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline apoB-48: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -83.97 · 95% CI -136.949 to -30.982
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.4219 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoB-48 to Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline apoB-48: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -32.9 · 95% CI -113.254 to 47.459
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0560 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting apoB-48 to Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline apoB-48: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -75.63 · 95% CI -153.195 to 1.927
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Months 6 and 12
Time frame:
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Months 6 and 12
percent changePlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Month 65.33 (-5.345 to 16.014)-12.35 (-23.541 to -1.163)-18.86 (-29.952 to -7.774)
Month 1212.01 (-2.480 to 26.494)-17.84 (-32.128 to -3.545)-27.69 (-41.722 to -13.664)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0401 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting non-HDL-C to Month 6: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline non-HDL-C: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -17.69 · 95% CI -34.571 to -0.801
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0036 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting non-HDL-C to Month 6: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline non-HDL-C: covariate) · Ls mean difference: -24.2 · 95% CI -40.484 to -7.911
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0134 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting non-HDL-C to Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline non-HDL-C: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -29.84 · 95% CI -53.490 to -6.198
  • Placebo vs Olezarsen 80 mg · ANCOVA · p = =0.0009 (ANCOVA model included percent change from baseline in fasting non-HDL-C to Month 12: dependent variable, treatment group, protocol prespecified randomization stratification factors: fixed effects \& log-transformed baseline non-HDL-C: covariate.) · Ls mean difference: -39.7 · 95% CI -63.108 to -16.292
SecondaryAdjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53) in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis

All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the Acute Pancreatitis Adjudication Committee (PAC) Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the treatment period.

Time frame:
During the treatment period Week 1 through Week 53
Reported as:
Mean · events per 100 participant-years
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53) in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis
events per 100 participant-yearsPlaceboPooled Olezarsen
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53) in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis66.22 (30.490 to 143.817)6.73 (1.612 to 28.087)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Pooled Olezarsen · Negative Binomial Regression Model · p = =0.0052 (Regression model: treatment group \& previous treatment (volanesorsen):factors adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior enrollment:covariate. Logarithm of time in year that each participant was observed from Week 1 to 53:offset variable.) · Mean rate ratio: 0.1 · 95% CI 0.020 to 0.506
SecondaryAdjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53)

All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the treatment period.

Time frame:
During the treatment period Week 1 through Week 53
Reported as:
Mean · events per 100 participant-years
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53)
events per 100 participant-yearsPlaceboPooled Olezarsen
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During the Treatment Period (Week 1 Through Week 53)36.31 (14.700 to 89.685)4.37 (0.942 to 20.298)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Pooled Olezarsen · Negative Binomial Regression Model · p = =0.0144 (Regression model: treatment group \& previous treatment (volanesorsen):factors adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior enrollment:covariate. Logarithm of time in year that each participant was observed from Week 1 to 53:offset variable.) · Mean rate ratio: 0.12 · 95% CI 0.022 to 0.656
SecondaryAdjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Per 100 Participant-Years Rate During Week 13 Through Week 53 in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis

All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the specified duration.

Time frame:
Week 13 through Week 53
Reported as:
Mean · events per 100 participant-years
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Per 100 Participant-Years Rate During Week 13 Through Week 53 in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis
events per 100 participant-yearsPlaceboPooled Olezarsen
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Per 100 Participant-Years Rate During Week 13 Through Week 53 in Participants With Prior History of Pancreatitis57.89 (24.469 to 136.972)8.17 (1.952 to 34.177)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Pooled Olezarsen · Negative Binomial Regression Model · p = =0.0174 (Regression model: treatment group \& previous treatment (volanesorsen):factors adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior enrollment:covariate. Logarithm of time in year that each participant was observed from Week 13 to 53:offset variable) · Mean rate ratio: 0.14 · 95% CI 0.028 to 0.709
SecondaryAdjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Week 13 to Week 53

All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the specified duration.

Time frame:
Week 13 through Week 53
Reported as:
Mean · events per 100 participant-years
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Week 13 to Week 53
events per 100 participant-yearsPlaceboPooled Olezarsen
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Week 13 to Week 5333.43 (13.250 to 84.321)5.42 (1.229 to 23.897)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Pooled Olezarsen · Negative Binomial Regression Model · p = =0.0314 (Regression model: treatment group \& previous treatment (volanesorsen):factors adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior enrollment:covariate. Logarithm of time in year that each participant was observed from Week 13 to 53:offset variable) · Mean rate ratio: 0.16 · 95% CI 0.031 to 0.850
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 70% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 6

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 70% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 6
percentage of participantsPlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 70% Reduction in Fasting TG at Month 604.89.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 880 mg/dL at Month 6

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 880 mg/dL at Month 6
percentage of participantsPlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Percentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 880 mg/dL at Month 6010.014.3
SecondaryAdjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Treatment Period in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment

All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the treatment period.

Time frame:
During the treatment period Week 1 through Week 53
Reported as:
Mean · events per 100 participant-years
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Treatment Period in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment
events per 100 participant-yearsPlaceboPooled Olezarsen
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years During Treatment Period in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment118.59 (61.226 to 229.698)16.59 (4.051 to 67.948)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Pooled Olezarsen · Negative Binomial Regression Model · p = =0.0137 (Regression model: treatment group \& previous treatment (volanesorsen):factors adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior enrollment:covariate. Logarithm of time in year that each participant was observed from Week 1 to 53:offset variable) · Mean rate ratio: 0.14 · 95% CI 0.029 to 0.669
SecondaryAdjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years From Week 13 to Week 53 in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment

All AEs and SAEs that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the PAC Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The adjudicated event rate represents the average number of events per 100 participant-years during the specified duration.

Time frame:
Week 13 to Week 53
Reported as:
Mean · events per 100 participant-years
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years From Week 13 to Week 53 in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment
events per 100 participant-yearsPlaceboPooled Olezarsen
Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Mean Event Rate Per 100 Participant-Years From Week 13 to Week 53 in Participants With ≥ 2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment106.91 (50.204 to 227.682)21.36 (5.233 to 87.219)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Pooled Olezarsen · Negative Binomial Regression Model · p = =0.0480 (Regression model:treatment group \& previous treatment (volanesorsen):factors adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior enrollment:covariate. Logarithm of time in year that each participant was observed from Week 13 to 53:offset variable) · Mean rate ratio: 0.2 · 95% CI 0.040 to 0.986
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 500 mg/dL at Month 6

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 500 mg/dL at Month 6
percentage of participantsPlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Percentage of Participants With Fasting TG ≤ 500 mg/dL at Month 60013.6

Adverse events

Collected over From the first dose of study drug up to end of the follow-up (up to Week 66). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/23 (0%)9/23 (39.1%)19/23 (82.6%)
Olezarsen 50 mg1/21 (4.8%)4/21 (19%)17/21 (81%)
Olezarsen 80 mg0/22 (0%)3/22 (13.6%)18/22 (81.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders4/231/211/22
Pancreatitis acuteGastrointestinal disorders3/230/210/22
Pancreatitis necrotisingGastrointestinal disorders2/230/210/22
Sudden deathGeneral disorders0/231/210/22
Gastroenteritis bacterialInfections and infestations0/231/210/22
Intentional overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/231/210/22
Intestinal perforationGastrointestinal disorders0/230/211/22
Hepatic cirrhosisHepatobiliary disorders0/230/211/22
Gastric varicesGastrointestinal disorders1/230/210/22
Gastric varices haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/230/210/22
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mg
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders8/233/214/22
COVID-19Infections and infestations8/236/213/22
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders6/231/212/22
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/234/211/22
FatigueGeneral disorders4/231/211/22
InfluenzaInfections and infestations2/233/211/22
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/233/211/22
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/233/211/22
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/233/210/22
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations1/231/213/22

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants that were randomly assigned to treatment and received at least 1 dose of olezarsen or placebo.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mgTotal
Mean44.0 ± 14.6743.2 ± 12.1147.7 ± 13.3045 ± 13.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mgTotal
Female12151138
Male1161128
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino3317
Not Hispanic or Latino20182159
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0336
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0101
Black or African American0000
White22171756
More than one race1023
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Fasting Triglycerides (TG)
Fasting Triglycerides (TG)(milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL))PlaceboOlezarsen 50 mgOlezarsen 80 mgTotal
Mean2595.7 ± 1255.722683.8 ± 1235.062613.1 ± 1498.962629.5 ± 1315.45
07

Study locations

47 sites
  • Diabetes/Lipid Management & Research Center
    Huntington Beach, California 92648, United States
  • University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) - Medical Center
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Excel Medical Clinical Trials, LLC
    Boca Raton, Florida 33434, United States
  • NorthShore University Health System
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation - Lutheran General Hospital
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60068, United States
  • Ascension St. Vincent Cardiovascular Research Institute
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46290, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC)
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • University of Michigan- Endocrinology & Metabolism
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, United States
  • New York University (NYU) Langone Medical Center
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27401, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • York Clinical Research LLC
    Norfolk, Virginia 23510, United States
  • West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Ecogene-21
    Chicoutimi, Quebec G7H 7K9, Canada
  • Nathalie Saint-Pierre
    Montréal, Quebec H2W 1R7, Canada
  • Clinique des Maladies Lipidiques de Quebec Inc.
    Québec, Quebec G1V 4W2, Canada
  • Institute de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal
    Montréal, H2W 1R7, Canada
  • Hôpital Louis Pradel - HCL
    Bron, 69677, France
  • CHU Dijon - Bocage
    Dijon, 21000, France
  • Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Marseille
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
    Milano, 20162, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone
    Palermo, 90127, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I
    Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Academic Medical Center - Department of Vascular Medicine
    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
    Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
  • The Lipid Clinic (Oslo University Hospital)
    Oslo, 0372, Norway
  • Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental. E.P.E, - Hospital Santa Cruz
    Carnaxide, 2790-134, Portugal
  • Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimaraes
    Creixomil, 4835-044, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, EPE - Hospital Egas Moniz
    Lisboa, 1349-019, Portugal
  • Metabolicke centrum MUDr Katariny Raslovej s. r. o.
    Bratislava, 83301, Slovakia
  • Hospital Abente y Lago
    A Coruña, 15001, Spain
  • Hospital Clinic Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Fundacio Pere Virgili
    Tarragona, 43204, Spain
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Göteborg, 413 45, Sweden
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Solna, 171 76, Sweden
  • The Royal Free Hospital
    London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
  • St. Thomas' Hospital
    London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT)
    Manchester, MI39WL, United Kingdom
  • Sandwell General Hospital
    West Bromwich, B71 4HJ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stroes ESG, Alexander VJ, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Hegele RA, Arca M, Ballantyne CM, Soran H, Prohaska TA, Xia S, Ginsberg HN, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S; Balance Investigators. Olezarsen, Acute Pancreatitis, and Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2024 May 16;390(19):1781-1792. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400201. Epub 2024 Apr 7. PubMed 38587247 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 2, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Ionis may share anonymized individual participant data, aggregated clinical data, and other types of data that support the results in this study. Data requests from qualified researchers will be considered once all three of the following criteria are met: (1) 12 months from marketing approval of the study drug in both the United States and European Union; (2) 18 months from conclusion of the study; and (3) 6 months from publication of study article. Access would be via a secure environment and is contingent upon approval of a research proposal and entry into an appropriate data use agreement. Requests to access data can be submitted via the website https://vivli.org/ourmember/ionis/.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04568434
Lead sponsor
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2020
Start date
Nov 18, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2023
Completion
Oct 17, 2023
Results posted
Mar 6, 2025
Last update
Mar 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion