CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04552535Updated Jan 11, 2022Results posted

A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

An observational study in Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-11.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to characterize the profile and outcomes for patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (SqCC) who progress on 1L pembrolizumab in combination with platinum based chemotherapy and receive afatinib as second line (2L) therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
03

In context

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

1,772 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; 412 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 100 across 268 observational studies indexed under Carcinoma, Squamous Cell.

Browse Carcinoma, Squamous Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with metastatic Squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung treated with pembrolizumab in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy as first line (1L) treatment followed by either afatinib as second line (2L) treatment or chemotherapy as 2L treatment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of squamous or mixed histology non-small cell lung cancer
  • Treated with pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as initial therapy for advanced or metastatic disease (stage IIIB or IV)

    • First cycle of pembrolizumab received after 06/01/2018
    • Permanently discontinued 1L pembrolizumab treatment
  • Initiated second-line treatment at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection, with either :

    • Afatinib
    • Any chemotherapy
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-Received pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as part of an interventional clinical trial

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Second line (2L) afatinib

    Second line (2L) afatinib treated following discontinuation of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (first line (1L))

    Drug: Second line (2L) afatinib

  • Second line (2L) chemotherapy

    Second line (2L) chemotherapy treated following discontinuation of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (first line (1L))

    Drug: Second line chemotherapy

Interventions

  • DrugSecond line (2L) afatinib

    Afatinib

  • DrugSecond line chemotherapy

    Chemotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment

    Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients

  2. Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status

    Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment. Patients treated with afatinib were analysed for their histology status and categorized into a squamous cell - or mixed histology treatment group.

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients

  3. Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status

    Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients

  4. Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment

    Chart abstractors (i.e. the patients treating physician) were asked to abstract information regarding severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs of specific interest (including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, higher indeterminate pulmonary events, death, or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity) during first line (1L) treatment and second line (2L) for both patients treated with afatinib in 2L and those treated with chemotherapy in 2L. Providers/abstractors were asked only if these specific immune related events occurred.

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 8, 2021

Participant flow

This retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site cohort study utilized existing data from the electronic medical records of patients with advanced or metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung treated with first-line pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy, followed by second-line afatinib or chemotherapy.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSecond-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
Started99101
Completed99101
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

Time frame:
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients
Reported as:
Median · months
Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment
monthsSecond-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment7.3 (5.2 to 8.1)4.2 (3.9 to 4.9)
PrimaryTime on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment. Patients treated with afatinib were analysed for their histology status and categorized into a squamous cell - or mixed histology treatment group.

Time frame:
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients
Reported as:
Median · months
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status
monthsSecond-line Afatinib Treatment Group With Squamous Cell HistologySecond-line Afatinib Treatment Group With Mixed Histology
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status5.8 (4.4 to 8.0)8.1 (5.5 to 9.9)
PrimaryTime on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

Time frame:
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients
Reported as:
Median · months
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status
monthsSecond-line Afatinib Treatment Group With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive StatusSecond-line Afatinib Treatment Group With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Negative Status
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status7.4 (5.6 to 8.6)5.9 (4.4 to NA)
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment

Chart abstractors (i.e. the patients treating physician) were asked to abstract information regarding severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs of specific interest (including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, higher indeterminate pulmonary events, death, or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity) during first line (1L) treatment and second line (2L) for both patients treated with afatinib in 2L and those treated with chemotherapy in 2L. Providers/abstractors were asked only if these specific immune related events occurred.

Time frame:
From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment
ParticipantsSecond-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment60

Adverse events

Collected over From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group2/99 (2%)—37/99 (37.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSecond-line Afatinib Treatment Group
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders26/99
Skin rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/99
FatigueGeneral disorders5/99
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/99
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders5/99

Baseline characteristics

All patients (pts) aged ≥18 years, initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy. All pts had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Maximum follow-up for any pts was approx 15 months. Pts were excluded if they had received pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based CT as part of an interventional clinical trial.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
Median67 (60 to 71)66 (61 to 70)67 (61 to 72)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
Female433477
Male5667123
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian617
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American302353
White5973132
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported448
Tumor histology
Tumor histology(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
Squamous cell only6498162
Mixed histology35338
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
EGFR mutation positive39544
EGFR mutation negative283361
Not tested / unknown326395
Smoking history
Smoking history(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
Never smoked12012
Current smoker161935
Former smoker7182153
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at initiation of second line (2L) treatment
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at initiation of second line (2L) treatment(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
ECOG 0/1455095
ECOG ≥ 25451105
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis(Participants)Second-line Afatinib Treatment GroupSecond-line Chemotherapy Treatment GroupTotal
Tumor stage I to IIIA13821
Tumor stage IIIB7310
Tumor stage IV7990169

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions
    Dublin, Ohio 43017, United States
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 20, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04552535
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2020
Start date
May 8, 2020
Primary completion
May 18, 2020
Completion
May 18, 2020
Results posted
Jul 8, 2021
Last update
Jan 11, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion