ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04544345Updated Feb 16, 2023

Impact of Atrio-ventricular Optimization With His Bundle Pacing on Treatment of Atrio-ventricular Dromotropathy

An interventional study of His bundle pacing, AV optimized and Backup VVI pacing in Atrioventricular Block and Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony, sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Completed at 1 site in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-16.

Sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Sep 2022, 4 years 1 month ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2019, registered Aug 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine the clinical and hemodynamic benefit of atrio-ventricular (AV) resynchronization with His bundle pacing in patients with symptomatic first degree AV block.

Read the detailed description

The term AV dyssynchrony was introduced by Salden F. and coauthors in 2018. It stands for the adverse effects of AV dyssynchrony due to PR interval prolongation. According to the ESC and ACC guidelines, severe first degree AV block is an IIa indication for permanent pacemaker implantation, yet data on these patients' clinical outcomes are scarce. To independently determine the impact of AV resynchronization, His bundle pacing will be used to avoid intraventricular desynchronization.

Symptomatic patients with severe first-degree AV block and echocardiographically proven AV dyssynchrony will be included in the study.

All patients will receive a dual-chamber pacemaker with an atrial lead positioned in the right atrium and ventricular lead placed on the bundle of His. In a single-blind cross-over design, patients will be randomized to AV sequential His bundle pacing with echo-guided AV optimization or back-up VVI pacing mode. Each study period will last for three months. At the end of both periods, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, complete echocardiographic study, and clinical evaluation will be performed.

Peak oxygen uptake and echocardiography-based hemodynamic parameters in both periods will be compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony

Keywords

  • AV block
  • His bundle pacing
  • AV dyssynchrony
  • AV optimization
  • AV dromotropathy
  • First degree AV block
  • Peak oxygen uptake
03

In context

Atrioventricular Block

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrioventricular Block; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 120 across 80 interventional studies indexed under Atrioventricular Block.

Browse Atrioventricular Block studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 294 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • First OR second degree Mobitz type 1 atrioventricular block with a PR interval > 250 ms
  • left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%
  • echocardiographic criteria of atrioventricular dyssynchrony (diastolic filling time/RR interval ratio \< 0,4 OR fusion of E and A waves OR diastolic mitral regurgitation)
  • symptoms on exertion (dyspnea, palpitations)
  • insufficient shortening of PR interval during exercise (PR interval > 200 ms at heart rate of 100 beats per minute)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%
  • third degree atrioventricular block
  • atrial fibrillation
  • sinus node disease
  • left bundle branch block
  • right bundle branch block
  • ventricular arrhythmia that indicates implantation of cardioverter defibrillator
  • consumption of drugs that influence atrioventricular conduction
  • active bacterial infection
  • inability to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise test
  • anaemia (haemoglobin concentration \< 100 g/L)
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    His bundle pacing, AV optimized

    Pacemaker programmed to DDD mode with ventricular lead placed on the bundle of His and echocardiographically optimized AV delay.

    Device: His bundle pacing, AV optimized

  • Sham comparator
    Backup VVI pacing

    Pacemaker programmed to ventricular only pacing with low base rate (40/min) to allow intrinsic rhythm.

    Device: Backup VVI pacing

Interventions

  • DeviceHis bundle pacing, AV optimized

    A Select Secure 3830 (Medtronic, MN, USA) pacing lead will be placed on the bundle of His. In case of unsuccessful His capture, left bundle branch area pacing is going to be targeted. Pacemaker will be programmed to a low base rate and a high tracking rate to allow for intrinsic sinus rhythm. AV delay will be optimized with echocardiography to the shortest AV delay without truncation of the A wave on transmitral pulse wave doppler.

  • DeviceBackup VVI pacing

    Pacemaker will be programmed to VVI (ventricular only) mode with low base rate as to allow for intrinsic sinus rhythm without AV optimization.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in exercise capacity

    Measured by peak oxygen consumption on cardiopulmonary exercise test

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  2. Changes in left ventricular stroke volume

    Measured by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  3. Changes in quality of life using the 5 level EQ-5D questionnaire

    EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status consisting of 2 pages - the EQ-5D descriptive system (descriptive system with five levels) and the EQ visual analog scale ranging from 0 (worst state) to 100 (best state).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in left ventricular volume

    End diastolic volume measured echocardiographicaly with biplane Simpson method

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  2. Changes in left atrial volume

    Left atrial volume indexed by body surface area measured by echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  3. Changes in the measure of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony

    Measured by mid-ventricular radial speckle-tracking strain with an anteroseptal to posterior wall delay (AS-P delay)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Changes in QRS complex width

    Measured by electrocardiogram

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  5. Changes in pacing thresholds

    Measured during device check

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  6. Changes in sensing of R wave

    Measured during device check

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  7. Changes in lead impedance

    Measured during device check

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  8. Fluoroscopy time

    Time of fluoroscopy use during device implantation

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Adverse events

    Any of the following adverse events: pocket hematoma, pneumothorax, hemothorax, cardiac tamponade, lead dislocation, lead perforation, cardiac implantable device infection

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UMC Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Salden FCWM, Kutyifa V, Stockburger M, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K. Atrioventricular dromotropathy: evidence for a distinctive entity in heart failure with prolonged PR interval? Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1067-1077. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux207. PubMed 29186415 ↗
  • Aro AL, Anttonen O, Kerola T, Junttila MJ, Tikkanen JT, Rissanen HA, Reunanen A, Huikuri HV. Prognostic significance of prolonged PR interval in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(2):123-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht176. Epub 2013 May 14. PubMed 23677846 ↗
  • Iliev II, Yamachika S, Muta K, Hayano M, Ishimatsu T, Nakao K, Komiya N, Hirata T, Ueyama C, Yano K. Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00652.x. PubMed 10666756 ↗
  • European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, Cleland J, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Elliott PM, Gorenek B, Israel CW, Leclercq C, Linde C, Mont L, Padeletti L, Sutton R, Vardas PE. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1070-118. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut206. Epub 2013 Jun 24. No abstract available. PubMed 23801827 ↗
  • Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, Kutalek SP, Sharma A; Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3115-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3115. PubMed 12495391 ↗
  • Kiehl EL, Makki T, Kumar R, Gumber D, Kwon DH, Rickard JW, Kanj M, Wazni OM, Saliba WI, Varma N, Wilkoff BL, Cantillon DJ. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Dec;13(12):2272-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.027. PubMed 27855853 ↗
  • Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Naperkowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22. PubMed 25446158 ↗
  • Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10. PubMed 29535066 ↗
  • Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Foster E, Greenberg H, Higgins SL, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Wilber D, Zareba W; MADIT-CRT Trial Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1329-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906431. Epub 2009 Sep 1. PubMed 19723701 ↗
  • Kutyifa V, Stockburger M, Daubert JP, Holmqvist F, Olshansky B, Schuger C, Klein H, Goldenberg I, Brenyo A, McNitt S, Merkely B, Zareba W, Moss AJ. PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):645-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299. Epub 2014 Jun 24. PubMed 24963007 ↗
  • Joshi NP, Stopper MM, Li J, Beshai JF, Pavri BB. Impact of baseline PR interval on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in patients with narrow QRS complexes: an analysis of the ReThinQ Trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;43(2):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-9999-y. Epub 2015 Apr 29. PubMed 25921348 ↗
  • Zhang J, Guo J, Hou X, Wang Y, Qian Z, Li K, Ge P, Zou J. Comparison of the effects of selective and non-selective His bundle pacing on cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony. Europace. 2018 Jun 1;20(6):1010-1017. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux120. PubMed 28575215 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04544345
Responsible party
Anja Zupan Mežnar (Principal Investigator, University Medical Centre Ljubljana) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2020
Start date
Dec 23, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 13, 2022
Completion
Jan 4, 2023
Last update
Feb 16, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion