CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04543929Updated Oct 10, 2024

Effects of Innovative Aerobic Exercise Training in Cystic Fibrosis

An interventional study of exercise in Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-10.

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2020, registered Sep 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different exercise interventions in a patient-centered, home-based exercise program for improving cardiorespiratory-fitness in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). We hypothesize cystic fibrosis patients participating in a high intensity interval training (HIIT) group will experience greater improvements in cardiorespiratory-fitness than those in a moderate continuous training (MCT) group. Further, we plan to investigate the efficacy of the comparators on patient-centered outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized control trial that compares MCT to HIIT using a patient-centered and home-based delivery model with CF Care Centers in the United States. Participants will be randomly allocated to either an MCT or HIIT arm. Both the MCT and HIIT interventions are accepted forms of prescribed exercise in clinical practice. The interventions will be delivered with a telehealth platform using internet (HIPAA-Compliant video), phone, and email/text support. All study sites will receive initial and on-going training and program facilitation to assure consistency of delivering the intervention. All participants across both arms visit their respective CF clinics on a regular basis for routine CF care. Thus, our research team will be able to coordinate all testing/assessment visits, including long-term (18-month timepoint), with participants throughout the study. The primary and secondary outcomes include important patient-centered outcomes as selected by our study's CF Patient and Stakeholder Advisory Board.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 36 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 484 studies on the registry; 113 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis
  • Prescribed and taking for 28 days ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor (Trikafta)
  • 18 years and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 17 years of age or less
  • not eligible for ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor (Trikafta)
  • inability to exercise
  • pregnancy
  • status post lung transplantation
  • already participating in more than 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    exercise

    exercise prescription + standard of care

    Behavioral: exercise

  • No intervention
    no exercise

    no exercise prescription + standard of care

Interventions

  • Behavioralexercise

    partially supervised and home-based exercise activity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Aerobic Exercise Capacity - V02max

    anaerobic threshold (V02max) measured via Sub-maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pulmonary function testing

    Standardized testing to measure forced expiratory volume 1 sec (FEV1)

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Quality of Life measured by Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire - Revised (CFQ-R)

    cystic fibrosis questionnaire (CFQ-R) score. Standardized scores ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicated better health related quality of life

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04543929
Lead sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Responsible party
Dave Burnett (Ph.D., Chair Dept. of Respiratory Care and Diagnostic Science, University of Kansas Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2020
Start date
Feb 11, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 23, 2020
Completion
Jun 23, 2020
Last update
Oct 10, 2024

Study contacts

Dave Burnett, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Kansas Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion