An observational study in Description of an Effective Surgical Strategy to Treat Cancer Related Lymphedema, a High Incidence Pathology, sponsored by University of Siena. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Italy. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-24.
Sponsored by University of Siena · Observational
Cancer-related lymphedema represents one of the major complications of cancer treatment, especially for breast and gynecologic cancers. Moreover, it has high impact on cancer survivors and healthcare systems. Lymphedema management still remains challenging. The better understanding of lymphedema physiopathology as well as the development of sophisticated surgical and diagnostic techniques have led to effective strategies to address lymphedema patients but, despite the considerable interest in international literature, no consensus exist.
The authors present a retrospective analysis of 24 consecutive patients affected by cancer-related lymphedema treated by the combination of LVA and liposuction in the same surgical session. Patients data regarding limb volume, lymphangitis rate and quality of life index were assessed before surgery and 1 year after surgery.
One year after surgery an average volume reduction of 37,9% was registered. Lymphangitis rate significantly decreased after surgery to 0.95 per year. Quality of life score improved.
CONCLUSIONS The combination of LVA and liposuction represents an effective strategy in treating patients with cancer-related lymphedema, ensuring a significant decrease in volume and reduction of lymphangitis rate as well as stable results in time. In addition, it appears to be minimally invasive and well tolerated by patients, since it can be performed under local anesthesia with low risk of complications.
560 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 135 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 106 across 144 observational studies indexed under Lymphedema.
Browse Lymphedema studies →University of Siena is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
24 patients with secondary lymphedema
previous lymphadenectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
free from cancer related pathology
Tumescent technique in lymph-sparing fashion was adopted. Areas were infiltrated with a mix of a standard tumescent solution consisting for each liter of in 1000 ml of saline solution, 50 ml lidocaine 1%, 1 ml epinephrine 1:1000, 10 ml bicarbonate 8,4%. Infiltration volume was approximately from 0,5 to 1 liter for the upper extremities and 1-2 liters for lowers. Three to 4 mm 3 holes blunt cannulas were employed. Aspiration technique was as parallel as possible along the lymphatic network pattern and from superficial to deep layers. Lymphatic vessels identified at ICG lymphography were spared. Volume of the aspirate was aimed to approximate 80 percent of the volume difference between the affected and non affected side. The number and type of anastomosis were recorded as well as amount of removed lipoaspirate versus the excess limb volume.
Volume reduction of the limb
mesurement of volume reduction
Time frame: one year after surgery
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Siena