CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04530305MARAJAUpdated Sep 14, 2023

Microbiota Analysis to Predict Outcomes of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With JAK-inhibitor

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-14.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2021; still recruiting 5 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Personalized medicine in which each patient would receive the ideal personalized treatment and regimen, holds great promise to improve patient's care. However, previous studies failed to establish validated predictors of response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors is a new class of DMARDs with great efficacy that might be even superior to anti-TNF drugs. As there are chemicals, their production cost is much cheaper than biological therapies and they will probably be central in patient's care in the coming years. Three are currently available: upadacitinib (UPA) tofacitinib and baricitinib. Our study will focus on UPA. Clinical outcomes mainly depend on i) factors influencing drug metabolism \& concentrations and ii) adequacy between drug target and the inflammation pathways involved in the patient's disease. Humans carry in their gut trillions of germs, which are now known to be key players in health and disease. Those germs possess many enzymes and strongly modulate human enzymes expression. Gut-microbiota can, indeed, directly metabolize oral drugs and control the expression of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), the main enzyme metabolizing TOFA. We showed, in a preliminary mouse experiment, that modifying gut-microbiota composition changes JAKi effects on signaling pathways. We thus believe that models including gut-microbiota composition together with markers of immune activation will predict clinical outcomes in RA patients treated with UPA.

Main and secondary objectives: To build predictive models for clinical outcomes (efficacy and safety) of RA patients treated with UPA based on microbiota analysis and markers f immune activation.

Methodolgy:

This multicentric longitudinal prospective study will include 60 patients with RA and inadequate response to methotrexate. The clinical outcomes studied will be EULAR non-response at 3 months as defined by the European league against rheumatism EULAR (primary outcome), achievement of low-disease activity at 6 months or incident adverse events (secondary outcomes). Gut microbiota will be assessed at baseline and M3 from thawed fecal samples. DNA will be purified using QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen) and qualify using Qubit and TapeStation 4200 (Agilent). Library will be prepared by amplification of V1-V2 and V3-V4 regions from the bacterial 16S rRNA genes and will be qualified by q-PCR and amplicons will be sequenced by MiSeq (Illumina). Initial bioinformatic analysis and taxonomies will be carried out using the QIIME2 software. Immune activation will be assessed through JAK-STAT pathway activation by JAK STAT signaling pathway RT² profiler PCR Array (Qiagen) which profiles expression of 84 genes related to Jak and Stat-mediated signaling. UPA concentrations will be assessed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at baseline and 3 months. Statistical classifiers (Neural network algorithm, Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Random forests, Shrinkage Methods, or Nearest Neighbors) incorporating microbiome, JAK STAT signaling pathway gene expression and clinical data, will be used to determine profiles associated with UPA clinical response and safety. Patients who will prematurely stop UPA (before 3 months) for adverse events or loss of follow-up will be considered as non-responders.

Read the detailed description

Gut microbiota is becoming an important predictor of response and tolerance with anti-cancer drugs. However, its potential of prediction in other fields has poorly been explored.

Drug metabolism and concentrations of tofacitinib depend on body mass index, liver function and cytochrome P450 activity (especially CYP3A4). Humans carry in their gut trillions of germs, which are now known to be key players in health and disease. Those germs can strongly impact drug metabolism and concentrations based on 3 mechanisms. First, gut bacteria possess a huge pool of enzymes which catalyzes drug metabolism reactions. Second, gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism which play critical role in drug metabolism. Third, gut microbiota modulates the expression of cytochrome P450, especially CYP3A4, the main enzyme catabolizing Tofacitinib (TOFA).

In addition to drug metabolism, gut microbiota is a key driver of immune activation. Clinical response to CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 strongly depends on gut microbiota in different cancers. The experiments performed to decipher the mechanisms involved suggested that microbiota composition affects immune responses, which will facilitate or not anti-tumoral efficacy of checkpoints inhibitors.

RA is a heterogeneous disease with predominant inflammation pathways varying dependent on patients. Some RA seem to be more dependent on IL-6 whereas others rely more on TNF-alpha, B or T cells. Gut microbiota was shown to affect all those different targets. Assessing baseline levels of JAK STAT signaling pathway gene expression will help us to link immune activation, gut microbiota and clinical response to UPA.

We hypothesize that gut-microbiota composition impacts JAKi metabolism, immune activation, and thus clinical response and has a great potential to predict clinical outcomes in patients with RA treated with UPA.

Study objectives :

  1. Main objective

    To construct a model based on gut-microbiota composition, immune activation markers (JAK-STAT signalling pathway) and clinical data to predict UPA non-response at 3 months in RA patients with inadequate response to methotrexate.

  2. Secondary objectives

    • To construct a model based on gut-microbiota composition, immune activation markers (JAK-STAT signalling pathway) and clinical data to predict low-disease activity at 6 months of UPA in RA patients with inadequate response to methotrexate.
    • To compare responders and non-responders and patients with or without adverse effects on UPA in terms of:

      • baseline gut-microbiota
      • UPA concentrations at 3 months
      • baseline JAK-STAT signalling pathway gene expression profile
      • baseline clinical data
    • To correlate changes in disease activity score based on 28 joint evaluation (DAS28, see annex for calculation) between month-3 and baseline with:

      • changes in gut microbiota
      • UPA concentrations
      • changes in JAK-STAT signaling
02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,244 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with RA fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European league against rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria with inadequate response to MTX for who a treatment with UPA will be prescribed in standard care to control disease activity

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with RA fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European league against rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria
  • Patients with inadequate response to MTX
  • Patients receiving MTX as adjuvant therapy or will receive UPA as monotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindication to upadacitinib
  • Patients previously treated with biological DMARDs or JAK inhibitors
  • Patients treated with ≥ 10 mg/day of glucocorticoids
  • Use of IV glucocorticoids in the previous month
  • Previous use of biological DMARDs (TNF inhibitors, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab) or JAK inhibitors
  • Absence of informed consent
  • Pregnancy planned for the duration of the study, Women pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Major protected by law or patient under guardianship
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • DrugUpadacitinib <15 MG [Rinvoq]

    Patients with RA for who the introduction of upadacitinib has been decided will be proposed the study. If they accept, they will be followed for 6 months with 3 visits (baseline, 3 and 6 months) which is the usual standard care. In addition to routine markers, stool and blood will be collected at baseline and 3 months specifically for the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EULAR response

    Response will be defined following European league against rheumatism EULAR definition that is a decrease \>0.6 points of Disease-Activity-Score 28-joints (DAS28-CRP) and a DAS28-CRP≤5.1 at 3 months . Patients who will prematurely stop UPA (before 3 months) for adverse events, RA flair or loss of follow-up will be considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. EULAR good response

    EULAR good-response at 3 and 6 months: DAS28-CRP≤3.2 and deltaDAS28 (M0-M3)\>1.2

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months

  2. Achievement of low-disease activity:

    DAS28-CRP at 6 months \<3.2 and/or DAS28-ESR at 6 months \<3.2

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Adverse events

    Incidence, relatedness, and severity of treatment-emergent SUSARs, SAEs, ARs and AEs will be evaluated continuously. Patients with adverse events occurring between study visits will be asked to contact the study center for AE reporting.

    Time frame: during the 6 month follow-up

  4. Baseline gut-microbiota

    microbiota will be described in terms of alpha and beta diversity, phylum, genus, OTU.

    Time frame: baseline, 3 and 6 months

  5. UPA concentrations

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months

  6. Baseline JAK-STAT signalling pathway gene expression profile

    gene expression profile will include the level of expression of 84 genes

    Time frame: baseline

  7. Baseline clinical data

    DAS28-CRP, body-mass index, age and gender

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
    • Claire DAIEN · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04530305
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 28, 2020
Start date
Jan 7, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2023

Study contacts

Claire I DAIEN, Prof
Contact
c-daien@chu-montpellier.fr
467338710 ext. +33
Alban POUVREAU
Contact
a-boissin@chu-montpellier.fr
4 67 33 24 82 ext. +33
Claire DAIEN, Prof
principal investigator · Montpellier Hospital and University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion