CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04529057Updated Aug 27, 2020

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Airway by Acoustic Rhinometry

An interventional study of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment in Posterior Crossbite, Upper Airway, sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University. Completed. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-27.

Sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2016, registered Aug 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is an orthodontic treatment based on the principle of opening the midpalatal suture with the effect of orthopedic forces. The aim of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effects of tooth-borne, tooth-tissue borne, and bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders on nasal airway by using AR. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference for the effect on nasal airway between the appliances.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: The aim of this 3-arm parallel trial was to compare the effects of tooth-borne (Hyrax), tooth tissue-borne (KBME) and bone-borne (MIDME) rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances on nasal airway with acoustic rhinometry (AR).

Methods: Fourty-six 12- to 14-years-old patients with narrow maxilla were randomly allocated into 3 study groups according to the type of RME appliance: tooth-borne, tooth tissue-borne and bone-borne. Participants were recruited from the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Turkey. During the RME treatment, the same protocol was applied to all patients and the expansion screws were activated twice a day (0.4 mm/day). Computer-generated randomization was used with group allocation concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. The outcome assessor was blinded; however, it was not feasible to blind either operator or patients. The primary outcome of this study was the correction of posterior crossbite. Secondary outcomes included AR assessment of nasal airway dimensions as nasal volume, the minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) 1 and 2. AR measurements were obtained before treatment (T0), after active expansion (T1), and at 3 months-follow-up (T2). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni test was used for inter-group comparison and two-way ANOVA was used for intra-group evalaution.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posterior Crossbite, Upper Airway

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rapid maxillary expansion, posterior crossbite, acoustic rhinometry
03

In context

Malocclusion

457 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is above the median of 36 across 371 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Izmir Katip Celebi University is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. no previous tonsillar, nasal or adenoid surgery and orthodontic treatment,
  2. Bilateral crossbite and need for RME,
  3. maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth fully erupted,
  4. willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. the presence of adenotonsillectomy due to tonsillar hypertrophy or adenoidal hypertrophy
  2. having nasal/nasopharyngeal /oropharyngeal pathologies, craniofacial syndromes, systemic disease, poor oral hygiene,
  3. history of previous orthodontic treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tooth-borne (Hyrax) expander

    Procedure: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment

  • Experimental
    Tooth tissue-borne (KBME) expander

    Procedure: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment

  • Experimental
    Bone-borne (MIDME) expander

    Procedure: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment

Interventions

  • ProcedureRapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment

    The patients were treated with KBME, Hyrax and MIDME maxillary expansion appliances, respectively. All expansion appliances containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. In the MIDME group, two mini-screws with a diameter of 1.6 mm and a length of 10 mm are located on the right and left sides between the roots of the 2nd premolar and 1st molar teeth with 60-70° angle. KBME and Hyrax expansion appliances were cemented with glass ionomer cement and MIDME was cemented with using the light-cured composite. Same protocol was applied to all patients during RME treatment. Expansion screws in all groups were activated by two turns a day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correction of posterior crossbite

    The palatal cusps of the maxillary posterior teeth approximated the lingual cusps of the mandibular posterior teeth.

    Time frame: After active expansion (up to 3 weeks) (T1).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Increasing nasal cavity area-1

    Increasing Minimum cross-sectional area1 (MCA1)

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), after active expansion (up to 3 weeks) (T1) and after 3 months retention period (T2)

  2. Increasing nasal cavity area-2

    Minimum cross-sectional area2 (MCA2)

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), after active expansion (up to 3 weeks) (T1) and after 3 months retention period (T2)

  3. Increasing nasal cavity volume

    Volume (Vol)

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), after active expansion (up to 3 weeks) (T1) and after 3 months retention period (T2)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gokce G, Gode S, Ozturk A, Kirazli T, Veli I. Evaluation of the effects of different rapid maxillary expansion appliances on airway by acoustic rhinometry: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;155:111074. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111074. Epub 2022 Feb 15. PubMed 35189449 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04529057
Lead sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Responsible party
Gökçenur Gökçe (Assistant professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 13, 2017
Completion
May 17, 2017
Last update
Aug 27, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion