ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04522778Updated Jul 5, 2024Results posted

Innovative Central Line Securement Device in the Pediatric Population

An interventional study of Wearable Central Line Securement Device (Vest) and Traditional Securement Dressing in Central Line Complication, Central Line Infection and Central Line-Associated Infection, sponsored by Ryan St. Pierre-Hetz. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-05.

Sponsored by Ryan St. Pierre-Hetz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Unable to meet enrollment targets
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study involves evaluating pediatric patients with central lines to determine differences in line complications and quality of life in those with a novel central line securement device (wrap) as compared to those who use a traditional securement device (dressing).

Read the detailed description

Children with central lines experience line breaks, line dislodgment's and line infections as a result of traditional securement techniques (dressings). These issues lead to the patients' increased health care utilization and possibly to restriction of movement and delayed development as the children are restricted in their home environment. The purpose of this study is to determine if a wearable central line securement device, can decrease the number of line breaks, line dislodgment and line infections as compared to traditional securement techniques. Events per month would be calculated for each arm before and after intervention and analyzed for treatment effect. The hypothesis is that the use of this wearable central line securement device can reduce line breaks, line dislodgment and line infections as compared to the traditional adhesive dressing. A secondary outcome for evaluation will be quality of life. This will be analyzed with a standardized quality of life survey and treatment effect will be reported as an ordinal odds ratio. Children are naturally active, however their activity is restricted by the parents given the delicate nature of their line. This study looks to see if quality of life can be improved a more secure wearable attachment device, as compared to traditional securement techniques.

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Line Complication
  • Central Line Infection
  • Central Line-Associated Infection
  • Central Line Sepsis
  • Short Gut Syndrome
  • Quality of Life
  • Pediatric Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Short Bowel Syndrome

151 studies on the registry are indexed under Short Bowel Syndrome; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is above the median of 20 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Short Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Short Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ryan St. Pierre-Hetz as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a central line ages 0-18 years old who have never worn a wearable central line securement device (vest) will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those children who currently wear a central line securement device (vest)
  • Children with central lines who are 19 years or older
  • Those females with central lines and Tanner 2 breast or greater breast development as a wearable central line securement device (vest) will not fit properly to secure the central line and may increase the risk of the central line complications.
  • If the patient does develop breast during the time of the study then the patient will no longer wear the wrap and will go back to securing their device in the traditional way. The investgators will still collect data on that patient and they will be evaluated in the device arm consistent with the intention to treat principle.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Device

    Those in the device arm will be given two wearable central line securement devices and the investigators will encourage continuous wear throughout the duration of the study.

    Device: Wearable Central Line Securement Device (Vest) · Other: Traditional Securement Dressing

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Securement Dressing

    Those is the non-device arm will continue to wear a traditional central line securement dressing as is the standard of care.

    Other: Traditional Securement Dressing

Interventions

  • DeviceWearable Central Line Securement Device (Vest)

    The wearable central line securement device is a vest that has attachments for the central line to safely be secured to the body whether it is being used for infusion or unhooked. It also has a front flap, which protects the line from snagging on external objects.

  • OtherTraditional Securement Dressing

    All subjects will use sterile dressings throughout the trial as this is the standard of care for central line securement. Subjects randomized to the dressing arm will continue to use standard of care sterile dressing as the only form of central line securement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome - Line Breaks

    Number of line breaks defined as any mechanical trauma to the line that required repair but not replacement of the line.

    Time frame: For a maximum of 1 year from enrollment

  2. Primary Outcome - Line Replacement

    Number of line replacements in which a line was removed from the patient and a new line was placed.

    Time frame: For a maximum of 1 year from enrollment

  3. Primary Outcome - Line Infections

    Number of line infections defined as a positive blood culture drawn from a central line.

    Time frame: For a maximum of 1 year from enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability as a Family to Participate in Daily Activities?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  2. How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to be Active?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses for an individual was 5 over a 12 month period.

  3. How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to Participate in Typical Activities With Peers or Siblings?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  4. How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability to Keep Your Child's Central Line Safe?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better and 6 being non applicable. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  5. Have You Been Worried About the Safety of Your Child's Central Line?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  6. Has Your Child Been Able to Take a Long Walk or Play?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  7. Has Your Child Been Able to Take a Short Walk Outside of the House?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  8. Are You Worried About Your Child's Current Health?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  9. Has Your Child Needed to Stay in Bed or a Chair During the Day?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  10. Has Your Child Needed Help With Eating, Dressing, Washing or Using the Toilet?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  11. Is Your Child Able to Socialize?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  12. Is Your Child Able to do Sports/Exercise?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  13. Is Your Child Able to Attend School/Pre-school?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  14. Does Having a Central Line Affect His/Her Participation in School?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  15. Does Having a Central Line Affect His or Her Learning at School?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  16. Is Your Child Able to Take Part in Hobbies or Leisure Activities?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  17. Is Your Child Able to Feel Independent?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  18. Has the Vest or Dressing Been Easy to Use?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  19. Has the Vest or Dressing Been Comfortable to Wear?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  20. Has the Vest or Dressing Kept You Child's Central Line Safe?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  21. Has the Vest or Dressing Prevented Your Child From Tampering With or Touching the Central Line?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  22. Has the Vest or Dressing Enabled Your Child to be More Active?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  23. Has the Presence of a Central Line Affected Their Body Image?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  24. How Would You Rate Your Child's Quality of Life on a Scale of 1 to 10?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-10 with 1 being very bad, 10 being very good. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  25. How Would You Rate Your Child's Ability to Cope With Day to Day Activities?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from -5 to 5 with -5 being very bad, 5 being very well. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  26. How Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Vest or Dressing?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from -5 to 5 with -5 being very bad, 5 being very well. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

  27. How Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Their Underlying Illness?

    Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from -5 to 5 with -5 being very bad, 5 being very well. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

    Time frame: Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.

07

Results

Posted Jul 5, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include small sample size, loss of follow up and poor compliance.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Started1211
Completed1110
Not completed11
Withdrew: Patient did not want to wear the device10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrimary Outcome - Line Breaks

Number of line breaks defined as any mechanical trauma to the line that required repair but not replacement of the line.

Time frame:
For a maximum of 1 year from enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · Line breaks/month
Primary Outcome - Line Breaks
Line breaks/monthDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Primary Outcome - Line Breaks.05 ± .09.05 ± .07
Statistical analysis
  • Device · t-test, 1 sided · p = .029
PrimaryPrimary Outcome - Line Replacement

Number of line replacements in which a line was removed from the patient and a new line was placed.

Time frame:
For a maximum of 1 year from enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · Events per month
Primary Outcome - Line Replacement
Events per monthDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Primary Outcome - Line Replacement.076 ± .15.05 ± .16
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · t-test, 1 sided · p = .35
PrimaryPrimary Outcome - Line Infections

Number of line infections defined as a positive blood culture drawn from a central line.

Time frame:
For a maximum of 1 year from enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · Infections/Month
Primary Outcome - Line Infections
Infections/MonthDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Primary Outcome - Line Infections.086 ± .12.075 ± .12
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · t-test, 1 sided · p = .334
SecondaryHow Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability as a Family to Participate in Daily Activities?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability as a Family to Participate in Daily Activities?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability as a Family to Participate in Daily Activities?3.82 ± .9822.875 ± .712
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .005 · Odds ratio (or): 38.26 · 95% CI 2.926154 to 500.4402
SecondaryHow Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to be Active?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses for an individual was 5 over a 12 month period.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to be Active?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to be Active?3.45 ± 1.063.78 ± 1.02
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .003 · Odds ratio (or): 30.975 · 95% CI 3.22 to 297.17
SecondaryHow Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to Participate in Typical Activities With Peers or Siblings?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to Participate in Typical Activities With Peers or Siblings?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Child's Ability to Participate in Typical Activities With Peers or Siblings?3.86 ± 1.102.74 ± 0.73
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .004 · Odds ratio (or): 27.36 · 95% CI 2.82 to 265.45
SecondaryHow Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability to Keep Your Child's Central Line Safe?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better and 6 being non applicable. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability to Keep Your Child's Central Line Safe?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Has the Vest or Dressing Affected Your Ability to Keep Your Child's Central Line Safe?4.03 ± 1.123.23 ± 0.80
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .011 · Odds ratio (or): 10.93 · 95% CI 1.71 to 69.82
SecondaryHave You Been Worried About the Safety of Your Child's Central Line?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Have You Been Worried About the Safety of Your Child's Central Line?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Have You Been Worried About the Safety of Your Child's Central Line?2.42 ± 1.22.84 ± 1.02
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .099 · Odds ratio (or): .298 · 95% CI .0706 to 1.258
SecondaryHas Your Child Been Able to Take a Long Walk or Play?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has Your Child Been Able to Take a Long Walk or Play?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has Your Child Been Able to Take a Long Walk or Play?3.37 ± .823.41 ± .87
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .312 · Odds ratio (or): 1.201 · 95% CI .549 to 6.562
SecondaryHas Your Child Been Able to Take a Short Walk Outside of the House?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has Your Child Been Able to Take a Short Walk Outside of the House?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has Your Child Been Able to Take a Short Walk Outside of the House?3.68 ± .793.52 ± .89
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .753 · Odds ratio (or): 1.519 · 95% CI .112 to 20.623
SecondaryAre You Worried About Your Child's Current Health?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Are You Worried About Your Child's Current Health?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Are You Worried About Your Child's Current Health?2.61 ± 0.992.74 ± 1.15
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .156 · Odds ratio (or): .321 · 95% CI .067 to 1.541
SecondaryHas Your Child Needed to Stay in Bed or a Chair During the Day?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has Your Child Needed to Stay in Bed or a Chair During the Day?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has Your Child Needed to Stay in Bed or a Chair During the Day?1.19 ± .511.4 ± .76
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .318 · Odds ratio (or): .458 · 95% CI .099 to 2.122
SecondaryHas Your Child Needed Help With Eating, Dressing, Washing or Using the Toilet?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has Your Child Needed Help With Eating, Dressing, Washing or Using the Toilet?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has Your Child Needed Help With Eating, Dressing, Washing or Using the Toilet?1.19 ± .511.4 ± .76
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .684 · Odds ratio (or): .449 · 95% CI .009 to 21.003
SecondaryIs Your Child Able to Socialize?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Is Your Child Able to Socialize?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Is Your Child Able to Socialize?3.33 ± .833.35 ± 1.02
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .460 · Odds ratio (or): 2.335 · 95% CI .246 to 22.194
SecondaryIs Your Child Able to do Sports/Exercise?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Is Your Child Able to do Sports/Exercise?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Is Your Child Able to do Sports/Exercise?2.68 ± 1.012.85 ± 1.23
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .439 · Odds ratio (or): 2.299 · 95% CI .279 to 18.927
SecondaryIs Your Child Able to Attend School/Pre-school?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Is Your Child Able to Attend School/Pre-school?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Is Your Child Able to Attend School/Pre-school?2.96 ± 1.262.73 ± 1.33
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .714 · Odds ratio (or): 1.634 · 95% CI .119 to 22.514
SecondaryDoes Having a Central Line Affect His/Her Participation in School?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Does Having a Central Line Affect His/Her Participation in School?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Does Having a Central Line Affect His/Her Participation in School?2.11 ± 1.182.33 ± 1.28
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .412 · Odds ratio (or): .379 · 95% CI .037 to 3.842
SecondaryDoes Having a Central Line Affect His or Her Learning at School?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Does Having a Central Line Affect His or Her Learning at School?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Does Having a Central Line Affect His or Her Learning at School?1.5 ± 0.811.67 ± 1.03
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .558 · Odds ratio (or): .579 · 95% CI .094 to 3.582
SecondaryIs Your Child Able to Take Part in Hobbies or Leisure Activities?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Is Your Child Able to Take Part in Hobbies or Leisure Activities?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Is Your Child Able to Take Part in Hobbies or Leisure Activities?2.82 ± .943.28 ± .89
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .673 · Odds ratio (or): .688 · 95% CI .121 to 3.90
SecondaryIs Your Child Able to Feel Independent?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Is Your Child Able to Feel Independent?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Is Your Child Able to Feel Independent?3.13 ± 1.093.27 ± 1.03
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .544 · Odds ratio (or): .674 · 95% CI .189 to 2.406
SecondaryHas the Vest or Dressing Been Easy to Use?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has the Vest or Dressing Been Easy to Use?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has the Vest or Dressing Been Easy to Use?3.54 ± .723.2 ± .89
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .464 · Odds ratio (or): 1.88 · 95% CI .345 to 10.278
SecondaryHas the Vest or Dressing Been Comfortable to Wear?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has the Vest or Dressing Been Comfortable to Wear?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has the Vest or Dressing Been Comfortable to Wear?3 ± 1.072.15 ± 1.16
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .090 · Odds ratio (or): 5.595 · 95% CI .766 to 40.854
SecondaryHas the Vest or Dressing Kept You Child's Central Line Safe?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has the Vest or Dressing Kept You Child's Central Line Safe?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has the Vest or Dressing Kept You Child's Central Line Safe?3.26 ± .983.45 ± .74
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .991 · Odds ratio (or): .987 · 95% CI .107 to 9.114
SecondaryHas the Vest or Dressing Prevented Your Child From Tampering With or Touching the Central Line?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has the Vest or Dressing Prevented Your Child From Tampering With or Touching the Central Line?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has the Vest or Dressing Prevented Your Child From Tampering With or Touching the Central Line?3.16 ± 1.152.7 ± 1.15
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .223 · Odds ratio (or): 4.239 · 95% CI .415 to 43.326
SecondaryHas the Vest or Dressing Enabled Your Child to be More Active?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has the Vest or Dressing Enabled Your Child to be More Active?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has the Vest or Dressing Enabled Your Child to be More Active?2.84 ± 1.172.67 ± 1.24
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .488 · Odds ratio (or): 2.199 · 95% CI .238 to 20.348
SecondaryHas the Presence of a Central Line Affected Their Body Image?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-5 with 1 being much worse, 5 being much better. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Has the Presence of a Central Line Affected Their Body Image?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
Has the Presence of a Central Line Affected Their Body Image?1.72 ± 1.092.71 ± 1.33
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .018 · Odds ratio (or): .177 · 95% CI .0424 to .743
SecondaryHow Would You Rate Your Child's Quality of Life on a Scale of 1 to 10?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from 1-10 with 1 being very bad, 10 being very good. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Would You Rate Your Child's Quality of Life on a Scale of 1 to 10?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Would You Rate Your Child's Quality of Life on a Scale of 1 to 10?9.16 ± 1.048.28 ± 1.78
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .269 · Odds ratio (or): 3.688 · 95% CI .364 to 37.379
SecondaryHow Would You Rate Your Child's Ability to Cope With Day to Day Activities?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from -5 to 5 with -5 being very bad, 5 being very well. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Would You Rate Your Child's Ability to Cope With Day to Day Activities?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Would You Rate Your Child's Ability to Cope With Day to Day Activities?4.23 ± 1.413.5 ± 1.87
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .108 · Odds ratio (or): 4.251 · 95% CI .728 to 24.84
SecondaryHow Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Vest or Dressing?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from -5 to 5 with -5 being very bad, 5 being very well. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Vest or Dressing?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Vest or Dressing?3.17 ± 2.341.5 ± 2.38
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .113 · Odds ratio (or): 3.658 · 95% CI .737 to 18.157
SecondaryHow Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Their Underlying Illness?

Survey modified from Baxter Scale of Quality of Life. These surveys were completed by family members or patients. Responses were recorded as a likert scale from -5 to 5 with -5 being very bad, 5 being very well. Quality of life data was recorded using ordinal scales. Therefore, we compared responses to individual questions between the dressing group and vest group using ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for clustering of responses within a participant. We present the mean and standard deviation for all responses as well as the ordinal odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for a unit change in response level for each question.

Time frame:
Responses were recorded every Thursday follow up appointment, save for holidays between January 2021 and September 2022. The maximum number of responses of a participant was 5 over a maximum of 12 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
How Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Their Underlying Illness?
score on a scaleDeviceTraditional Securement Dressing
How Has Your Child's Quality-of-life Been Affected by Their Underlying Illness?2.2 ± 2.86.59 ± 2.72
Statistical analysis
  • Device vs Traditional Securement Dressing · Chi-squared · p = .049 · Odds ratio (or): 2.495 · 95% CI 1.004 to 6.202

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year from enrollment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Device0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Traditional Securement Dressing0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DeviceTraditional Securement DressingTotal
Mean4.99 ± 4.135.46 ± 5.165.21 ± 4.53
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DeviceTraditional Securement DressingTotal
Female6410
Male6713
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)DeviceTraditional Securement DressingTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)DeviceTraditional Securement DressingTotal
United States121123
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hwang FR, Stavropoulos SW, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Mondschein JI, Patel AA, Solomon JA, Itkin M, Soulen MC, Chittams JL, Trerotola SO. Tunneled infusion catheter breakage: frequency and repair kit outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Feb;19(2 Pt 1):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.08.030. PubMed 18341949 ↗
  • Lundgren IS, Zhou C, Malone FR, McAfee NG, Gantt S, Zerr DM. Central venous catheter repair is associated with an increased risk of bacteremia and central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Apr;31(4):337-40. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31823eeec5. PubMed 22146741 ↗
  • Cesaro S, Corro R, Pelosin A, Gamba P, Zadra N, Fusaro F, Pillon M, Cusinato R, Zampieri C, Magagna L, Cavaliere M, Tridello G, Zanon G, Zanesco L. A prospective survey on incidence and outcome of Broviac/Hickman catheter-related complications in pediatric patients affected by hematological and oncological diseases. Ann Hematol. 2004 Mar;83(3):183-8. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0796-9. Epub 2003 Nov 13. PubMed 15064868 ↗
  • Ullman AJ, Marsh N, Mihala G, Cooke M, Rickard CM. Complications of Central Venous Access Devices: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1331-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1507. Epub 2015 Oct 12. PubMed 26459655 ↗
  • Peng C, Monagle P, Newall F. Clinical outcomes of management of CVAD occlusions. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Sep;96(9):885-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.194969. Epub 2011 Mar 11. PubMed 21398316 ↗
  • Rey C, Alvarez F, De La Rua V, Medina A, Concha A, Diaz JJ, Menendez S, Los Arcos M, Mayordomo-Colunga J. Mechanical complications during central venous cannulations in pediatric patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Aug;35(8):1438-43. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1534-0. Epub 2009 Jun 16. PubMed 19529913 ↗
  • Winkler MF, DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Guenter P, Resnick HE, Robinson L, Lyman B, Ireton-Jones C, Banchik LH, Steiger E. Characteristics of a Cohort of Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients at the Time of Enrollment in the Sustain Registry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Nov;40(8):1140-1149. doi: 10.1177/0148607115586575. Epub 2015 May 13. PubMed 25972431 ↗
  • Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Oct 23;1:60. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-60. PubMed 14613562 ↗
  • Gimeno-Santos E, Raste Y, Demeyer H, Louvaris Z, de Jong C, Rabinovich RA, Hopkinson NS, Polkey MI, Vogiatzis I, Tabberer M, Dobbels F, Ivanoff N, de Boer WI, van der Molen T, Kulich K, Serra I, Basagana X, Troosters T, Puhan MA, Karlsson N, Garcia-Aymerich J; PROactive consortium. The PROactive instruments to measure physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46(4):988-1000. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00183014. Epub 2015 May 28. PubMed 26022965 ↗
  • St Pierre-Hetz RE, Ackerman KS, Cercone AM, Yaworski JA, Callaway CW, Rudolph JA, Manole MD. A novel central line securement vest reduces line trauma and improves quality of life in patients with intestinal failure. JPGN Rep. 2026 Apr 20;7(3):416-421. doi: 10.1002/jpr3.70165. eCollection 2026 Aug. PubMed 42499744 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 1, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04522778
Lead sponsor
Ryan St. Pierre-Hetz
Responsible party
Ryan St. Pierre-Hetz (Pediatric Emergency Medicine Attending, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2020
Start date
Nov 5, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2022
Completion
May 1, 2023
Results posted
Jul 5, 2024
Last update
Jul 5, 2024

Study contacts

Angelica Mazzarini, MD
principal investigator · UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion