ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04508192Updated Feb 11, 2025

Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Vs an Adductor Squeeze Exercise

An interventional study of Exercise in Groin Injury, sponsored by Aspetar. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to male participants aged 16 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-11.

Sponsored by Aspetar · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The study aims to compare the effects of two different adduction exercises on adduction strength. Young male football players will be individually randomized to perform one of these exercises in addition to their normal training. The two exercise protocols are of 8 weeks duration and are matched in terms of total load.

Read the detailed description

Methods Participants Male football players 16 years or older, who are participating in full team training in Greece, will be included in the study. The study will be conducted pre-season. During that time each player will have at least 4 training sessions and 1 match per week.

Exclusion criteria were

  • any systematic resistance training of the hip adductors (> 1/week) in the preceding 1 month before study initiation.
  • groin pain resulting in loss of one or more football matches/training sessions in the preceding 1 month prior to study initiation.
  • any longstanding injury (≥ 6 weeks) in the lower extremities or in the hip/groin in the preceding 6 months prior to study initiation.
  • pain of more than 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) when performing the adduction strength tests or exercises were also excluded.
  • For analysis, players will be excluded if there was an adherence of less than 75% of the exercise sessions.

Ethics Ethical approval was obtained from University of West Attica ethics committee and all players will give their informed consent prior to inclusion in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Randomisation Randomisation will be performed after baseline strength testing. Participants will be individually randomized to perform either the CA or the SQ exercise protocol. The randomisation sequence will be obtained using an online software (e.g. randomizer.org), and sealed, opaque envelopes containing group allocation will be prepared by an independent person not otherwise involved in the study, and who will be unaware of the baseline strength test results. All participants will be instructed not to perform any additional adductor exercise other than their allocated exercise and to keep their regular training as usual.

Blinding The person performing the strength tests will be blinded to group allocation, and participants will be instructed not to reveal any information about their group allocation. In addition, the physiotherapist supervising the intervention procedures will not be allowed to know the results of the strength measurements of each player.

Training intervention Both groups will perform an 8-week training protocol with either the CA or the SQ exercise performed before or after the normal football training sessions.

Copenhagen Adduction exercise The CA is a high-intensity partner exercise where the player is lying on their side using the elbow of the lower forearm to support their body and the other arm placed along their body. The upper arm is supported by the partner who places their one hand under the knee and the other under the ankle, holding the leg approximately in the height of their hip. The player performs a 3-second concentric movement lifting their body until it reaches a straight line. At the same time, the other leg is adducted so that it touches the other leg. A 3-second eccentric adduction then follows with the body lowered halfway to the ground and the foot of the lower leg touching the ground without supporting the body. To ensure a correct performance the therapist instructs the players that there should not be any side flexion of the trunk or hip during the exercise. Each player performs one set on each side and then the players change roles. Each couple will be comprised of players of similar height and weight to ensure optimal conditions.

Adductor Squeeze exercise The SQ exercise is an isometric hip adduction exercise with the player holding a ball between their knees. The player lies supine with the ball placed between the knees with the knees and hips flexed and the feet flat on the surface with the first toe is pointed straight forward. Then the player is asked to press against the ball as hard as they can. The contraction is held for 10 seconds.

Load progression The CA will be performed with increasing number of repetitions during the intervention period as the only load progression variable. The number of sets will be kept at 2 sets per side throughout the study. Additionally, the total time under tension (TUT) of the CA protocol is adjusted to that of the SQ exercise. The SQ exercise has previously been suggested to be performed in two positions with 5 repetitions of 10 seconds each. This study will use only one exercise position for comparison, the SQ exercise will be performed for 10 repetitions.

Outcome measures The primary outcome measure of the study will be maximal eccentric adduction strength (EHAD). Secondary outcome measures will be maximal unilateral isometric adduction strength (IHAD), and DOMS. The distance between anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the point of the handheld dynamometer placement will be measured to calculate torque (Nm/kg). Both the side-lying eccentric adduction and unilateral supine isometric strength measurements will be conducted on the dominant as well as non-dominant limb. Testing will be conducted in the club's training facility. The tester will use a handheld dynamometer following standardized procedures which have been shown to have a good intra-tester reliability: eccentric adduction strength ICC 0.91 (0.70-0.98), SEM: 6.3% and isometric adduction strength ICC 0.78 (0.30-0.95), SEM: 7.3%

Compliance Compliance and perceived loading will be recorded after every training session with the respective intervention exercise, while hip adductor DOMS will be recorded in respect of the previous training session. Perceived loading will be defined via the Borg CR10 scale and DOMS via a numerical ranking scale (NRS 0-10). All players will be instructed to avoid any type of training 24h before baseline and follow-up testing. Moreover, the follow-up testing will be conducted 3 days after the intervention to avoid DOMS potentially influencing the measures.

Statistical analyses Baseline and follow-up values as well as anthropometric data will be presented as mean SD, unless otherwise stated. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to assess the interactions between groups (CA vs SQ) and time (baseline vs follow-up) on the dependent variables (EHAD, IHAD and DOMS). Additionally, the simple main effect of time will be analyzed using a dependent t-test. Cohen's d will be used for effect size (ES) calculation and will be set as small (0.2), moderate (0.5) and large (0.8) . Statistical significance level will be set at p 0.05. The data analysis will be performed using SPSS Statistics (v 26, IBM Corporation).

Sample size A sample size calculation was performed prior to study initiation using G*power software (v. 3.1, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany). Based on previous studies the expected mean normalized eccentric adduction strength was set at 3.0 Nm/kg with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.6 Nm/kg. The minimal relevant difference in EHAD strength between groups was chosen to be 20%, and correlation was arbitrarily set at 0.5. With 80% power and a type-1 error risk of 5%, and a correlation a total sample size of 42 participants was adequate to detect a large moderate effect size. To account for dropouts during the intervention a minimum of 60 participants are included.

02

Conditions studied

  • Groin Injury
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Aspetar is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male football players 16 years or older, who were participating in full team training in Greece.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any systematic resistance training of the hip adductors (> 1/week) in the preceding 1 month before study initiation.
  • groin pain resulting in loss of one or more football matches/training sessions in the preceding 1 month prior to study initiation.
  • any longstanding injury (≥ 6 weeks) in the lower extremities or in the hip/groin in the preceding 6 months prior to study initiation.
  • pain of more than 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) when performing the adduction strength tests or exercises were also excluded.
  • For analysis, players will be excluded if there was an adherence of less than 75% of the exercise sessions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Copenhagen Adduction

    The CA is a high-intensity partner exercise where the player is lying on their side using the elbow of the lower forearm to support their body and the other arm placed along their body. The upper arm is supported by the partner who places their one hand under the knee and the other under the ankle, holding the leg approximately in the height of their hip. The player performs a 3-second concentric movement lifting their body until it reaches a straight line. At the same time, the other leg is adducted so that it touches the other leg. A 3-second eccentric adduction then follows with the body lowered halfway to the ground and the foot of the lower leg touching the ground without supporting the body.

    Other: Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Adductor Squeeze

    The SQ exercise is an isometric hip adduction exercise with the player holding a ball between their knees. The player lies supine with the ball placed between the knees with the knees and hips flexed and the feet flat on the surface with the first toe is pointed straight forward.the player is asked to press against the ball as hard as they can The contraction is held for 10 seconds

    Other: Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherExercise

    Both interventions are simple strength exercises without technical equipment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Eccentric hip adductor strength

    The athlete lies on the side of the tested leg with their hip and knee in a straight position. The hip and knee of the other leg are placed in 90deg of flexion with the knee placed on a box to maintain position of the pelvis. The athlete holds on to the side of the bed with one hand for stabilization. The examiner lifts the tested leg off the bed into full adduction and applies a downward force to the limb holding the HHD 5cm above the medial, while the athlete is asked to resist that force performing hip adduction "as hard as possible" Then the tester breaks the athlete's resistance applying a downward force. The procedure is performed three times with a 30-second rest between each of them and the highest value is recorded.

    Time frame: Change from baseline eccentric adductor strength at 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unilateral isometric adduction strength

    The player is placed supine and stabilized themselves by holding onto the sides of the examination bed. A belt placed around the pelvis provides further stabilisation. The non-tested leg is placed with knee and hip flexed and the foot flat against the bed. The medial malleolus is in line with the contralateral knee joint line and the toes rest at the end of the bed. The examiner places the HHD 5cm above the medial malleolus and the elbow against the wall for stabilization. Τhe player performs a 5-second MVIC with the instruction to push "as hard as possible". The procedure is repeated two more times with a 30-second rest between each of them and the highest value is recorded.

    Time frame: Change from baseline isometric adductor strength at 8 weeks

  2. Delayed onset muscle soreness

    Numerical ranking scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is minimum and indicates no muscle soreness, and 10 is maximum and indicates worst imaginable muscle soreness

    Time frame: Difference in mean muscle soreness at 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Elite football clubs
    Athens, Greece
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04508192
Lead sponsor
Aspetar
Responsible party
Andreas Serner (Clinical Research Scientist, Aspetar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2020
Start date
Aug 3, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2022
Completion
Oct 24, 2024
Last update
Feb 11, 2025

Study contacts

Vasileios Korakakis, PhD
study director · Aspetar Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion