ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04453592Updated Mar 3, 2025Results posted

Adductor Longus Tenotomy & the BKFO Test

An observational study in Adductor Tendinitis, sponsored by Aspetar. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by Aspetar · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The bent knee fall out test (BKFO) is a common test for hip adductor flexibility. It is unknown whether the BKFO actually tests the the adductors or potentially hip range of motion instead.

In this study, the BKFO test is performed in the operating theater before and after an adductor longus tenotomy.

Read the detailed description

Adductor-related groin pain is the most common type of groin pain in athletes, and pain at the proximal adductor longus insertion is a key finding in the diagnosis of longstanding groin pain. "Tightness" or "shortening" of the adductor longus is considered both a cause and effect of pain, that can lead to increased tension at the proximal insertion, thus playing a role in the persistence of longstanding adductor-related pain. For patients who do not respond sufficiently to non-surgical procedures, an adductor longus tenotomy is a surgical option that is considered to reduce tension at the proximal adductor longus insertion assisting in reduction of pain and return to sport.

The bent knee fall out test (BKFO) is one of the most commonly used tests to test adductor flexibility. This test involves a combined hip movement with hip flexion, abduction, and external rotation, and a high result is generally considered to be related to adductor muscle "tightness", specifically that of the adductor longus. It is uncertain whether the BKFO test is actually measuring adductor muscle flexibility or hip joint range of motion, as the test results may also be affected by a femoral head cam morphology. A slightly different test, called the Patrick FABER's test, involves a similar movement and is mainly used as a hip joint pain provocation test.

By cutting the adductor longus tendon, thereby removing the effect of potential adductor longus "tightness", it will be possible to show if and how much the flexibility of this muscle affects the BKFO test results. This will assist in future considerations of what this test is actually testing.

The aim of this study is to investigate the immediate effect of an adductor longus tenotomy on the results of the bent knee fall out test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adductor Tendinitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tendinopathy

397 studies on the registry are indexed under Tendinopathy; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 61 across 50 observational studies indexed under Tendinopathy.

Browse Tendinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Aspetar is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Athletes with groin pain are consecutively recruited from two clinics of a visceral surgeon specialized in groin pain in athletes. The clinics are located in Bordeaux and Paris, France, and patient population includes athletes from all over France.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults (>18 years old)
  • athletes (recreational or elite)
  • clinical diagnosis of adductor-related groin pain
  • patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral adductor longus tenotomy by one general surgeon.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No specific exclusion criteria were present other than refusal to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention assigned as part of this study.

    The intervention included in this study is part of routine medical care, and not assigned as a result of study participation. This study includes only the addition of a measurement; the bent knee fall out test. Therefore, we believe this study design is observational, and in line with the provided observation study design definition: "Observational: studies in human beings in which biomedical and/or health outcomes are assessed in predefined groups of individuals. Participants in the study may receive diagnostic, therapeutic, or other interventions, but the investigator does not assign specific interventions to the study participants. This includes when participants receive interventions as part of routine medical care, and a researcher studies the effect of the intervention." See uploaded study protocol for further details.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Bent Knee Fall Out Test

    The patient lies supine on the surgical table with app. 90° knee flexion, 45° hip flexion, and the feet together and the hips in external rotation (also known as the frog-leg position. Standardization of position is achieved by flexing one leg first, so the medial malleolus is placed next to the medial knee joint line of the contra-lateral leg. The knee is then moved laterally, externally rotating the hip with the plantar surface placed towards the contra-lateral leg. The contra-lateral leg is then flexed, and the plantar surfaces of the feet are aligned. The distance between the most distal point on the head of the fibula and the surface of the surgical table is measured using a rigid tape measure and distance is recorded in cm to the nearest 0.5 cm

    Time frame: Baseline pre-surgery and immediately after the surgery.

07

Results

Posted Mar 3, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTenotomy
Started60
Completed60
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in the Bent Knee Fall Out Test

The patient lies supine on the surgical table with app. 90° knee flexion, 45° hip flexion, and the feet together and the hips in external rotation (also known as the frog-leg position. Standardization of position is achieved by flexing one leg first, so the medial malleolus is placed next to the medial knee joint line of the contra-lateral leg. The knee is then moved laterally, externally rotating the hip with the plantar surface placed towards the contra-lateral leg. The contra-lateral leg is then flexed, and the plantar surfaces of the feet are aligned. The distance between the most distal point on the head of the fibula and the surface of the surgical table is measured using a rigid tape measure and distance is recorded in cm to the nearest 0.5 cm

Time frame:
Baseline pre-surgery and immediately after the surgery.
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Change in the Bent Knee Fall Out Test
cmTenotomy
Change in the Bent Knee Fall Out Test3.9 ± 2

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tenotomy0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Demographic Data of All Athletes
Median27 (23 to 34.5)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Demographic Data of All Athletes
Female0
Male60
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Demographic Data of All Athletes
Height
Height(cm)Demographic Data of All Athletes
Mean180.4 ± 7.8
Weight
Weight(Kg)Demographic Data of All Athletes
Median78 (71.5 to 85)
BMI
BMI(kg/m2)Demographic Data of All Athletes
Median23.8 (22.2 to 26.2)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinique du sport Bordeaux - Mérignac
    Merignac, 33700, France
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — There are currently no IPD plans. IPD data be obtained upon reasonable request

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2019 to primary completion in May 2020, 6 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2025, 4 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 19 observational studies under Tendinopathy, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 36. This study's 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 22, 2020
First posted
Jul 1, 2020
StartActual
Nov 22, 2019
Primary completionActual
May 22, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 18, 2021
Results first posted
Mar 3, 2025
Last update
Mar 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04453592
Lead sponsor
Aspetar
Collaborators
Clinique du sport
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2020
Start date
Nov 22, 2019
Primary completion
May 22, 2020
Completion
Jan 18, 2021
Results posted
Mar 3, 2025
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion