CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04495868Updated Apr 18, 2023Results posted

Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Versus Lidocaine for Intradermal Anesthesia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bacteriostatic Normal Saline and 1% Lidocaine in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Emory University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-18.

Sponsored by Emory University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if creation of a skin wheel with bacteriostatic normal saline, which includes 0.9% benzyl alcohol, is less painful and provides a similar level of anesthesia compared to 1% lidocaine. Participants will receive both types of anesthesia, in random order.

Read the detailed description

Most chronic pain procedures or injections utilize medications (e.g. local anesthetics) to numb the skin in an effort to reduce procedure-related pain; however, they can also be a significant cause of pain leading the patient to abort the procedure. Studies have looked at alternative medications and techniques that lessen the pain but still provide similar levels of anesthesia ("numbing"). One such alternative medication is normal saline that includes benzyl alcohol. Studies researching this specific medication have usually examined procedural pain related to drawing blood or placing an intravenous (IV) catheter but not for chronic pain related procedures.

This is a single site randomized double-blinded clinical trial that will compare the standard of care (1% lidocaine) with bacteriostatic normal saline (saline with benzyl alcohol) administered as a skin wheal during a diagnostic procedure in patients with chronic low back pain. The order of administration of the medication will be randomized and the medication will be blinded to both the subject and the investigator performing the procedure. Skin wheals will be created with each medication, and the subject's level of pain will be assessed after each one to measure how painful the creation of the skin wheal was. Then, a spinal needle for the diagnostic procedure will be placed through the skin wheal and the subject's level of pain will be assessed after each one to measure the level of anesthesia (or numbing) that each one provides. The objectives of this study are to determine if administration of bacteriostatic normal saline causes less discomfort than 1% lidocaine and provides a similar level of anesthesia/numbing for the procedure.

The study will take place at the Grady Pain clinic and participants will be identified from patients that are scheduled to undergo a specific low back procedure - diagnostic lumbar medial branch block. This research study will help identify potential alternatives to the standard of care for numbing of skin during chronic pain procedures that may reduce procedure-related pain and discomfort thus making the procedure more tolerable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Local anesthetic
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,386 studies on the registry; 236 are open to participants now.

Of its 229 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 174 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for an initial lumbar medial branch block

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Inability to provide informed consent in English
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bacteriostatic Normal Saline then 1% Lidocaine

    Participants undergoing a lumbar medial branch block who are randomized to receive an intradermal administration of bacteriostatic normal saline followed by an intradermal administration of 1% lidocaine.

    Drug: Bacteriostatic Normal Saline · Drug: 1% Lidocaine

  • Active comparator
    1% Lidocaine then Bacteriostatic Normal Saline

    Participants undergoing a lumbar medial branch block who are randomized to receive an intradermal administration of 1% lidocaine followed by an intradermal administration of bacteriostatic normal saline.

    Drug: Bacteriostatic Normal Saline · Drug: 1% Lidocaine

Interventions

  • DrugBacteriostatic Normal Saline

    A skin wheal will be made with bacteriostatic normal saline (BNS). BNS contains 0.9% benzyl alcohol and benzyl alcohol is an opium alkaloid that is sometimes added to physiologic normal saline for its bacteriostatic properties. The skin wheal will be created by injecting the medication intra-dermally with a 26 gauge needle.

  • Drug1% Lidocaine

    A skin wheal will be made with 1% lidocaine. The skin wheal will be created by injecting the medication intra-dermally with a 26 gauge needle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Needle Placement Pain Score

    Participants rated their pain level from the insertion of the needle for the lumbar medial branch block using the skin wheal created with each anesthetic. Pain is rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Skin Wheal Pain Score

    Participants rated their pain level from the creation of the skin wheal using each anesthetic on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Results

Posted Apr 18, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBacteriostatic Normal Saline Then 1% Lidocaine1% Lidocaine Then Bacteriostatic Normal Saline
Started1921
Completed1921
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNeedle Placement Pain Score

Participants rated their pain level from the insertion of the needle for the lumbar medial branch block using the skin wheal created with each anesthetic. Pain is rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Needle Placement Pain Score
units on a scaleBacteriostatic Normal Saline1% Lidocaine
Needle Placement Pain Score0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 0)
SecondarySkin Wheal Pain Score

Participants rated their pain level from the creation of the skin wheal using each anesthetic on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Skin Wheal Pain Score
units on a scaleBacteriostatic Normal Saline1% Lidocaine
Skin Wheal Pain Score5 (2 to 7)6 (4 to 9)

Adverse events

Collected over Information on adverse events was collected during the lumbar medial branch block procedure (Day 1 of study).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)
1% Lidocaine0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Then 1% Lidocaine1% Lidocaine Then Bacteriostatic Normal SalineTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years142034
>=65 years516
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Then 1% Lidocaine1% Lidocaine Then Bacteriostatic Normal SalineTotal
Female131932
Male628
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Then 1% Lidocaine1% Lidocaine Then Bacteriostatic Normal SalineTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Then 1% Lidocaine1% Lidocaine Then Bacteriostatic Normal SalineTotal
United States192140
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Score of Back Pain
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Score of Back Pain(units on a scale)Bacteriostatic Normal Saline Then 1% Lidocaine1% Lidocaine Then Bacteriostatic Normal SalineTotal
Median8 (7 to 8)8 (6 to 8)8 (6 to 8)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Grady Pain Clinic
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 6, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data collected during the trial will be available for sharing, after deidentification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04495868
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Responsible party
Brian Bobzien (Assistant Professor, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2020
Start date
Jan 8, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 6, 2022
Completion
Apr 6, 2022
Results posted
Apr 18, 2023
Last update
Apr 18, 2023

Study contacts

Brian Bobzien, MD
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion