CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04495660HearCogUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Restauration of the Auditory and Cognitive Functions in Cochlear Implanted Deaf Children in fNIRS

An interventional study of Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Passive perceptual stimulation in Deafness, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 10 Months to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-31.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
10 Months to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the cortical developement of perceptual skills and executive functions over time, in children with cochlear implants aged 10-24 months and 3-7 years compared with normally hearing subjects (NHS). To do this, the investigator will use functional Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) during 4 tasks that engage the childs perceptual and cognitive skills over a period of 18 months. The performance scores obtained by each participants as well as the cortical activity will be analysed and decrypted.

Read the detailed description

When confronted with a severe to profound congenital bilateral hearing loss, cochlear implantation is considered to be the preferential treatment method as it restaures auditory function and enables language acquisition for communication purposes. When cochlear implantation is done before 2 and a half years old, better results are obtained in terms of language, communication and social developement, as well as reading skills. However when a cochlear implantation occurs between 2 and 5 years of age, speech and language skills do develop but communication and reading skills are altered. Therefore, when a cochlear implant is placed before the age of 2 and a half we find ourselves within the maximal cerebral plasticity window for speech, language and communication developement.

This study is divided into two cohorts, the first aged 10-24 months and the second 3-7 years. All children will be seen for 5 sessions, spread out at regular intervals, over a period of 18 months and will participate in two perceptual tasks and two cognitive tasks. The children will also have a speech and language assessment at T-0 and T+12. The cochlear implanted patients will continue to be seen by the ENT service and the sessions will be organised to coincide with their natural follow up. As it is a non-interventional study, no follow-up would be needed. After the study patients will continue to receive the same quality of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deafness

Keywords

  • Functional Neuroimaging
  • Profound and Severe Hearing Loss
  • Cochlear implant
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Months to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria:

Cohort 1 :

  • 10-24 months old children will be included.
  • All participants have to be affiliated to the social health security system and parental consent is obligatory.
  • All congenitally deaf patients will have a severe to profound hearing loss and about to be fitted with a cochlear implant.
  • Normally hearing counterparts shall have normal hearing as evidenced by acoustical otoemissions (AOE) in both ears.

Cohort 2 :

  • 3-7 years old children will be included.
  • All participants have to be affiliated to the social health security system and parental consent is obligatory.
  • All congenitally deaf patients will have a cochlear implant, and they will have been implanted before 2 years of age.
  • Normally hearing counterparts shall have normal hearing as evidenced by acoustical otoemissions (AOE) in both ears.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include psycho-neurological diseases, other sensorineural or motor deficiency, familial bilingualism, medications affecting vigilance and child whose both parents benefit from a legal protection measure
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Severe/profoundly deaf children 10-24 months old

    The cohort 1 includes patients aged 10-24 months old about to be implanted

    Device: Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) · Behavioral: Passive perceptual stimulation · Behavioral: Task A not B · Behavioral: VSWMT task · Behavioral: The sensory room

  • Experimental
    Severe/profoundly deaf children 3-7 years old

    The cohort 2 includes 3-7 years old cochlear implanted patients (implanted before 24 months of age)

    Device: Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) · Behavioral: Passive perceptual stimulation · Behavioral: VSWMT task · Behavioral: Perceptual Go-No-Go · Behavioral: Verbal memory task

  • Other
    Normally hearing children 10-24 months old

    The cohort 1 includes patients aged 10-24 months matched in age and sex with normally hearing children

    Device: Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) · Behavioral: Passive perceptual stimulation · Behavioral: Task A not B · Behavioral: VSWMT task · Behavioral: The sensory room

  • Other
    Normally hearing children 3-7 years old

    The cohort 2 includes 3-7 years old matched in sex and age with cochlear implanted patients

    Device: Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) · Behavioral: Passive perceptual stimulation · Behavioral: VSWMT task · Behavioral: Perceptual Go-No-Go · Behavioral: Verbal memory task

Interventions

  • DeviceNear InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS)

    Functional neuroimaging examination by fNIRS at each follow-up visit for all children of both cohorts: this non-invasive imaging technique involves the installation of a cap carrying electrodes to collect brain activity on the surface of the scalp , during stimulation. It is very insensitive to movement and therefore represents a method particularly suitable for its use in children. In addition, this technique is compatible with the cochlear implant. It will be used during 6 tasks adapted to each cohort

  • BehavioralPassive perceptual stimulation

    Passive perceptual stimulation: For this passive task the child is on his parents' lap in front of a screen. He will see images, hear everyday noises and watch small videos. Duration 8-10 minutes.

  • BehavioralTask A not B

    Task A not B: the child will play with an adult who will hide an object under a cloth several times. The child will have to find the hidden object. Duration 10 minutes maximum

  • BehavioralVSWMT task

    VSWMT task: the child will be on the parents' lap in front of a screen and will watch a monkey hiding bananas in the trees several times. Duration of 10 minutes maximum.

  • BehavioralPerceptual Go-No-Go

    Perceptual Go-No-Go: This perceptual task consists in the discrimination of images (faces) and sounds (words) through 3 conditions (auditory, visual and visuo-auditory) presented independently of each other and lasts 15 to 20 minutes in total. It is presented by means of a computer

  • BehavioralVerbal memory task

    Verbal memory task :the child will be presented with 5 lists of 5 words which he will have to restore after a predefined delay of a few seconds. Its duration does not exceed 10 minutes.

  • BehavioralThe sensory room

    The sensory room: the child will sit in the middle of a carpet and play with the adult. He will hear everyday noises and see light effects. Duration 8-10 minutes

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of Oxyhemoglobin (O2Hb) measure

    Oxyhemoglobin (O2Hb) rates measured on the auditory cortex during an auditory stimulus.

    Time frame: 60 months

  2. Evolution of Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb) measure

    Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb) rates measured on the auditory cortex during an auditory stimulus.

    Time frame: 60 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Activation of the cortical area for children with normal hearing and children benefiting from CI

    Describe the evolution of the perceptual capacities of children benefiting from CI, compared to the typical development in children with normal hearing

    Time frame: 60 months

  2. Look the executive function when performing tasks describe in Arms and intervention chapter, between children with normal hearing and children benefiting from CI

    Describe the evolution of the executive functions of children benefiting from CI, compared to the typical development in normal hearing children

    Time frame: 60 months

  3. Correlation of link between the evolution of perceptual hearing skills and the development of post-implantation language skills.

    Evolution of language.

    Time frame: 60 months

  4. Make activation cards of the cortical reorganization between these two groups

    Describe the cortical reorganization of the auditory area post implantation. performances obtained during perceptual anc cognitive tasks

    Time frame: 60 months

  5. Make activation cards of the cortical reorganization between these two groups

    Describe the cortical reorganization of the visual area post implantation. performances obtained during perceptual anc cognitive tasks

    Time frame: 60 months

  6. Comparison

    Correlation of link between cortical activation in post-implantation fNIRS and: * perceptual and executive functions over time in deep deaf children after CI; * language skills over time in deep deaf children after CI.

    Time frame: 60 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04495660
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2020
Start date
May 29, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 3, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 3, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 31, 2026

Study contacts

Yohan GALLOIS, MD
Contact
gallois.y@chu-toulouse.fr
5 61 77 85 97 ext. +33
Yohan GALLOIS, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion