CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04493333Updated Nov 27, 2024Results posted

Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors on Aromatase Inhibitors

A Phase 2 interventional study of Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone and Vaginal Polycarbophil Moisturizer in Vaginal Atrophy, Postmenopausal Symptoms and Breast Cancer Female, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-27.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
Low recruitment/enrollment
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and effectiveness of Intrarosa®, also known as Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and prasterone. By doing this study, the investigators hope to learn if Intrarosa® can improve vaginal discomfort. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups. One group will use Intrarosa® once a day. The other group will use Replens™ two times a week.

Read the detailed description

This will be a two-armed, randomized Phase II trial. All study subjects will be asked to fill out a simple 5-question sexual functioning survey. If any concern about sexual functioning is noted, the subject will also be asked to fill out a more extensive Sexual functioning tool, to help determine which domain of sexual functioning is the most bothersome.

Subjects who complete the initial screening will be randomly assigned to the Intrarosa® or Replens™ arm by a 1:1 ratio. Subjects randomized to the Intrarosa® arm will use 6.5 mg daily for 12 weeks (±1 week). Subjects randomized to the Replens™ arm will use a vaginal applicator two times per week for 12 weeks.

At baseline and at 12 weeks, subjects will undergo a physical exam including clinical breast and gynecological exam. During gynecologic exams, the vaginal Potential of Hydrogen (pH) will be determined and a swab of vaginal epithelium sent for determination of the Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI) and Maturation Value (MV). These will be used as objective physiologic markers to determine the improvement in vaginal atrophy. The cytologist's reading specimens will be blinded.

Additionally, all study subjects will be asked to fill out questionnaires at baseline and again in 12 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaginal Atrophy
  • Postmenopausal Symptoms
  • Breast Cancer Female
  • Long-term Survivors

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postmenopausal
  • Breast Cancer Survivor
  • Vaginal
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 391 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Postmenopausal patients with a history of breast cancer who have completed primary treatment with curative intent, who have been on an aromatase inhibitors (AI) for at least 6 months
  • Stage I-III, hormone receptor positive breast cancer regardless of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status
  • Postmenopause defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea, or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels > 40 mIU/mL (milli-international units per milliliter), or 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy. FSH level will be documented on all subjects.
  • Patients reporting any symptoms of vaginal dryness or dyspareunia as assessed by the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) or the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
  • No evidence of active malignant breast or gynecologic disease
  • Absence of undiagnosed, persistent or recurring genital bleeding that has not been evaluated to determine the cause [6]
  • No planned changes in AI during the study period
  • Mammogram (if appropriate, as determined by the treating physician and will be documented) within 12 months of study entry
  • Patients with documented normal Pap within 12 months of study entry

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of any estrogen or progesterone depot-preparation drug or progestin implant in the last 6 months before study entry
  • Use of any androgen or anabolic steroids in the last 6 months before study entry
  • Use of any oral or transdermal hormonal products (estrogen, progestin, or DHEA) within the last 8 weeks prior to study entry; however, a subject can elect to wait for an 8-week washout period before study entry.
  • Use of any vaginal or intrauterine hormonal products in the last 8 weeks; however, a subject can elect to wait for an 8-week washout before study entry.
  • Use of any natural over the counter estrogenic products in the last 6 months; however, a subject can elect to wait for a 6-month washout before study entry.
  • Concomitant vulvar and vaginal surgical or laser treatments
  • Vaginal infection or confounding vulvar or active vaginal disease process
  • Prior radiation to the pelvis or history of gynecologic cancer
  • Inability to tolerate a vaginal/speculum exam
  • Undiagnosed, persistent or recurring genital bleeding or other indication of active pelvic disease process that has not been evaluated [6]
  • Clinically significant uncontrolled depression or severe psychiatric symptoms
  • If subject has an established routine of inert vaginal lubricant use for routine or occasional relief of vulvar or vaginal symptoms prior to the study period, it may be continued during the study period along with the study drug.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vaginal DHEA

    Vaginal insert with 6.5 mg vaginal DHEA self-administered once daily at bedtime for 12 weeks

    Drug: Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone

  • Active comparator
    Vaginal Polycarbophil Moisturizer

    Prefilled vaginal applicator with 2.5 g of polycarbophil vaginal moisturizing gel, self-administered two times per week at night for 12 weeks

    Combination Product: Vaginal Polycarbophil Moisturizer

Interventions

  • DrugVaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone

    This is a vaginally administered suppository steroid indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe dyspareunia, a frequent symptom of vulvovaginal atrophy due to menopause or genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

    Also known as: Intrarosa®, Vaginal DHEA, Prasterone

  • Combination productVaginal Polycarbophil Moisturizer

    This is an FDA cleared, over-the-counter personal lubricant for vaginal application, intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. It is non-sterile, water-based, non-irritating, non-greasy, non-staining vaginal gel delivered as a long-lasting moisturizer for vaginal dryness.

    Also known as: Replens™

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI) Response From Baseline to Week 12

    The change in the subject's calculated VMI from baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks (±1 week). VMI = 1.0 x %S + 0.5 x %I + 0.0 x %P cells, which is the same as VMI = %S + (0.5 x %I) when simplified. It has a potential range of 0-100. A VMI of 65-100 suggests a normal premenopausal environment, 50-64 indicates a moderate estrogenic effect, and \< 50 indicates atrophy.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks (±1 week)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Vaginal pH From Baseline to Week 12

    Vaginal pH was used as an objective physiologic marker to determine the improvement in vaginal atrophy. pH is a measure of acidity and alkalinity and can range from 0 to 14, with 7 being neutral. Lower pH scores are acidic and higher pH scores are basic or alkaline. A normal healthy vaginal pH is 4.5. As the vaginal epithelium becomes thinner and more atrophic, the mucosa has less glycogen content and less lactobacilli to convert the glycogen into lactic acid, which results in an increase in the vaginal pH.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (±1 week)

  2. Difference in Dyspareunia Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 12

    The Dyspareunia Score on the BSSC-W asks if there is a problem with pain during sex. A difference score of 0 indicated no change in whether it was a problem. The min and max are both 0 which makes the range also 0. Only 2 participants had week 12 scores. These scores were both 1. (So the min and max were 1 with the range being 0.) Of the baseline scores, these 2 participants both had scores of 1 again. (So the min and max for these 2 participants were both 1 with a range of 0.) If we include these 2 participants with the other 6 who have baseline dyspareunia scores on the BSSC-W, then 7 participants has a score of 1 and 1 participant had a score of 0. This would make the min, max, and range 0, 1, and 1 respectively. As for which value represents a better or worse outcome, 1 indicates presence of dyspareunia while 0 indicates absence of dyspareunia, so 1 is a worse outcome than 0. Subscales are not combined here to produce a total score.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (±1 week)

  3. Difference in Vaginal Dryness Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 12

    The min and the max are both 0 which make the range also 0. These were obtained from subtracting each participant's score at baseline from their score at week 12. Only 2 participants had week 12 scores. These scores were both 1. Of the baseline scores, these 2 participants both had scores of 1 again. If 2 participants with the other 6 have baseline dyspareunia scores on the BSSC-W, then 7 participants have a score of 1 and 1 participant had a score of 0. This would make the min, max, and range 0, 1, and 1 respectively. As for which value represents a better or worse outcome, 1 indicates presence of vaginal dryness (problem with decreased vaginal lubrication) while 0 indicates absence of vaginal dryness (or an absence of this problem of decreased vaginal lubrication), so 1 is a worse outcome than 0. Subscales are not combined here to produce a total score.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (±1 week)

  4. Difference in Dyspareunia Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 12

    The Dyspareunia Subscale Score on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index ranges from 0-5 with higher scores indicating better sexual function, so less dyspareunia.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (±1 week)

  5. Difference in Vaginal Dryness Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 12

    The Vaginal Dryness (or Lubrication) Subscale Score on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index ranges from 0-5 with higher scores indicating better sexual function, so more lubrication.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (±1 week)

  6. Difference in Quality of Life on the Quality of Life - Cancer Survivor Version (QOL-CSV) From Baseline to Week 12

    The Quality of Life - Cancer Survivor Version ranges from 0-10 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. T here are only 2 difference scores for each of the 4 subscales. The min, max, and ranges of these Well-Being Subscales: Physical -1.00, -0.62, and 0.38. Psychological -0.72, 0.94, and 1.67. Social 0.75, 1.25, and 0.50. Spiritual -1.57, 3.29, and 4.86. For Psychological the min, max, and range are 2.61, 6.83, and 4.22. For Social the min, max, and range are 2.63, 7.38, and 4.75. For Spiritual the min, max, and range are 4.43, 8.43, and 4.00. A negative difference score indicates a worsening of quality of life while a positive score indicates that qualify of life got better. Subscales were not combined here to produce a total score. For the baseline and week 12 scores on the QOL-CSV, higher scores mean higher quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (±1 week)

07

Results

Posted Sep 23, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Early termination due to low enrollment and lack of subject participation/noncompliance.

Participant flow

Potential subjects will be identified in the UAMS CI and UAMS Women's Health clinics and from the CARTI Cancer Center, during routine clinic appointments by the provider or research staff. Potential research subjects may also contact the UAMS Cancer Institute's Clinical Trials Office regarding participation based on the information found within the IRB-approved DHEA flyer that is to be distributed amongst UAMS and the CARTI medical clinics.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Started53
Completed20
Not completed33
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Ineligible01
Withdrew: Noncompliance21

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifference in Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI) Response From Baseline to Week 12

The change in the subject's calculated VMI from baseline to the end of treatment at 12 weeks (±1 week). VMI = 1.0 x %S + 0.5 x %I + 0.0 x %P cells, which is the same as VMI = %S + (0.5 x %I) when simplified. It has a potential range of 0-100. A VMI of 65-100 suggests a normal premenopausal environment, 50-64 indicates a moderate estrogenic effect, and \< 50 indicates atrophy.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI) Response From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Difference in Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI) Response From Baseline to Week 12-7.5 ± 24.75—
SecondaryDifference in Vaginal pH From Baseline to Week 12

Vaginal pH was used as an objective physiologic marker to determine the improvement in vaginal atrophy. pH is a measure of acidity and alkalinity and can range from 0 to 14, with 7 being neutral. Lower pH scores are acidic and higher pH scores are basic or alkaline. A normal healthy vaginal pH is 4.5. As the vaginal epithelium becomes thinner and more atrophic, the mucosa has less glycogen content and less lactobacilli to convert the glycogen into lactic acid, which results in an increase in the vaginal pH.

Time frame:
12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Vaginal pH From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Difference in Vaginal pH From Baseline to Week 12-1.00 ± 2.83—
SecondaryDifference in Dyspareunia Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 12

The Dyspareunia Score on the BSSC-W asks if there is a problem with pain during sex. A difference score of 0 indicated no change in whether it was a problem. The min and max are both 0 which makes the range also 0. Only 2 participants had week 12 scores. These scores were both 1. (So the min and max were 1 with the range being 0.) Of the baseline scores, these 2 participants both had scores of 1 again. (So the min and max for these 2 participants were both 1 with a range of 0.) If we include these 2 participants with the other 6 who have baseline dyspareunia scores on the BSSC-W, then 7 participants has a score of 1 and 1 participant had a score of 0. This would make the min, max, and range 0, 1, and 1 respectively. As for which value represents a better or worse outcome, 1 indicates presence of dyspareunia while 0 indicates absence of dyspareunia, so 1 is a worse outcome than 0. Subscales are not combined here to produce a total score.

Time frame:
12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Dyspareunia Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Difference in Dyspareunia Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 120.00 ± 0.00—
SecondaryDifference in Vaginal Dryness Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 12

The min and the max are both 0 which make the range also 0. These were obtained from subtracting each participant's score at baseline from their score at week 12. Only 2 participants had week 12 scores. These scores were both 1. Of the baseline scores, these 2 participants both had scores of 1 again. If 2 participants with the other 6 have baseline dyspareunia scores on the BSSC-W, then 7 participants have a score of 1 and 1 participant had a score of 0. This would make the min, max, and range 0, 1, and 1 respectively. As for which value represents a better or worse outcome, 1 indicates presence of vaginal dryness (problem with decreased vaginal lubrication) while 0 indicates absence of vaginal dryness (or an absence of this problem of decreased vaginal lubrication), so 1 is a worse outcome than 0. Subscales are not combined here to produce a total score.

Time frame:
12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Vaginal Dryness Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Difference in Vaginal Dryness Scores on the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (BSSC-W) From Baseline to Week 120.00 ± 0.00—
SecondaryDifference in Dyspareunia Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 12

The Dyspareunia Subscale Score on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index ranges from 0-5 with higher scores indicating better sexual function, so less dyspareunia.

Time frame:
12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Dyspareunia Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Difference in Dyspareunia Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 122.20 ± 3.11—
SecondaryDifference in Vaginal Dryness Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 12

The Vaginal Dryness (or Lubrication) Subscale Score on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index ranges from 0-5 with higher scores indicating better sexual function, so more lubrication.

Time frame:
12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Vaginal Dryness Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Difference in Vaginal Dryness Subscale Scores on the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index (FSFI) From Baseline to Week 121.80 ± 2.55—
SecondaryDifference in Quality of Life on the Quality of Life - Cancer Survivor Version (QOL-CSV) From Baseline to Week 12

The Quality of Life - Cancer Survivor Version ranges from 0-10 with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. T here are only 2 difference scores for each of the 4 subscales. The min, max, and ranges of these Well-Being Subscales: Physical -1.00, -0.62, and 0.38. Psychological -0.72, 0.94, and 1.67. Social 0.75, 1.25, and 0.50. Spiritual -1.57, 3.29, and 4.86. For Psychological the min, max, and range are 2.61, 6.83, and 4.22. For Social the min, max, and range are 2.63, 7.38, and 4.75. For Spiritual the min, max, and range are 4.43, 8.43, and 4.00. A negative difference score indicates a worsening of quality of life while a positive score indicates that qualify of life got better. Subscales were not combined here to produce a total score. For the baseline and week 12 scores on the QOL-CSV, higher scores mean higher quality of life.

Time frame:
12 weeks (±1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Difference in Quality of Life on the Quality of Life - Cancer Survivor Version (QOL-CSV) From Baseline to Week 12
Units on a scaleIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
QOL-CSV Physical Well-Being Subscale-0.81 ± 0.27—
QOL-CSV Psychological Well-Being Subscale0.11 ± 1.18—
QOL-CSV Social Well-Being Subscale1.00 ± 0.35—
QOL-CSV Spiritual Well-Being Subscale0.86 ± 3.43—

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks (+/- 1 week). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)4/5 (80%)
Replens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventIntrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase Inhibitor
Vaginal dischargeReproductive system and breast disorders3/50/3
FatigueGeneral disorders2/50/3
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/50/3
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders2/50/3
Vaginal painReproductive system and breast disorders2/50/3
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/51/3
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/51/3
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations0/51/3
BloatingGastrointestinal disorders1/50/3
Burning with vaginal Intrarosa applicationGeneral disorders1/50/3

Baseline characteristics

Postmenopausal females between 18 and 70 with a history of breast cancer.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorTotal
Mean57.8 ± 3.9654.00 ± 15.3956.38 ± 8.98
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorTotal
Female538
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American000
White426
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Intrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorTotal
United States538
Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI)
Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI)(Units on a scale)Intrarosa & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorReplens & Standard of Care Aromatase InhibitorTotal
Mean50.83 ± 16.6536.67 ± 23.2343.75 ± 19.67
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 7, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04493333
Lead sponsor
University of Arkansas
Collaborators
AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2020
Start date
Jun 7, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2023
Completion
Jul 18, 2023
Results posted
Sep 23, 2024
Last update
Nov 27, 2024

Study contacts

Gloria Richard-Davis, MD
principal investigator · University of Arkansas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion