CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04484805Updated Oct 22, 2024Results posted

Socket Cooling Effectiveness Take Home Study

An interventional study of ICE Condition and Sham Condition in Amputation, Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower and Amputation Stump, sponsored by Liberating Technologies, Inc.. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-22.

Sponsored by Liberating Technologies, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The comfort and fit of the residual limb within a prosthetic socket are of primary concern for many amputees. The residual limb is typically covered by non-breathable and non- thermally conductive materials that can create a warm and ultimately moist environment.

To address this, Liberating Technologies, Inc. (LTI) and Vivonics, Inc. have developed a thermo-electric cooling (TEC)-based module called the Intrasocket Cooling Element (ICE), that can be embedded into the prosthesis in order to cool the residual limb. A technology that can provide thermal control while retaining adequate suspension, weight and other prosthetic characteristics would benefit many prosthesis wearers.

Read the detailed description

The comfort and fit of the residual limb within a prosthetic socket are of primary concern for many amputees. The residual limb is typically covered by non-breathable and non- thermally conductive materials that can create a warm and ultimately moist environment. Studies found increases in socket temperature after the prosthesis was donned (0.8 degrees C) and after 30 minutes of walking (2.5 degrees C). Temperatures were found to remain elevated long after activity cessation and even a rest period of double the duration of the preceding activity period is insufficient to return the limb to its initial temperature. A study suggested that a modest temperature increase of only 2 degrees C may be responsible for reports of thermal discomfort by amputees. Therefore, a small amount of activity can cause the socket temperature to elevate and remain at an uncomfortable level for an extended period of time, which can lead to decreased wear times. In summary, an uncomfortable socket/residual limb interface decreases prosthesis use among amputees who want to remain active in their lives.

To address this, Liberating Technologies, Inc. (LTI) and Vivonics, Inc. have developed a thermo-electric cooling (TEC)-based module called the Intrasocket Cooling Element (ICE), that can be embedded into the prosthesis in order to cool the residual limb. A technology that can provide thermal control while retaining adequate suspension, weight and other prosthetic characteristics would benefit many prosthesis wearers.

This study will focus on investigating the efficacy of this novel socket cooling technology.

The rationale for this study is to determine how well the new technology can cool the residual limb not only in a controlled laboratory environment, but also in a home environment where the device would ultimately be utilized.

The primary objective of this study is to measure the effects of cooling the residual limb on quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes. Cooling the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket would result in less sweating and greater comfort while wearing the prosthesis, and ultimately greater function and better quality of life as measured by standard functional and QoL outcome measures.

A two group, prospective, double-blinded, block randomized, crossover study design will be implemented. Research participants will be consented and have baseline activity and socket temperature data collected from their usual prosthesis during normal use (4 weeks). The ICE system will be integrated into a custom, experimental socket for each subject. Two versions of the cooling module will be created: (1) a fully-functional, active ICE cooling module (the so called "ON", or experimental, condition), and (2) a placebo ICE module with the TEC unit replaced with an insulating material layer between the fan and the heat spreader such that even when the system is turned on, minimal heat transfer occurs (the control, or "OFF" condition). An ICE module with a heat spreader will be embedded into the socket and the fan will continue to run whether or not active cooling is engaged for both test conditions; however, no heat will be able to be transferred through the insulating layer in the OFF condition. The TEC inside the ICE unit will not be visible once assembled and the modules will be assembled independently; therefore, both the subject and the tester will be blinded to the condition being tested for both the in-lab and at-home testing. A serial number will be used to identify the assembled units and the master key stored separately.

The participants will be divided into two groups and the order of the experimental conditions will be randomized. Each condition will be tested for 4 weeks. In-lab testing and functional measures will be assessed between testing periods as additional assessments of efficacy of the device. Testing will consist of 4 test site visits, as well as 1-2 visits to create and align the experimental socket. The entire study will continue for 3 months.

Lower limb prosthesis users will be recruited for the study and consented with an approved protocol. Research participants will represent a convenience sample and will reflect the local population of both above-knee (AK) and below-knee (BK) amputees of various K-levels using a variety of suspension types who could benefit from temperature control within the socket.

A maximum of 20 subjects will be recruited for this study. This is increased from the target 16 subjects to account for any drop-outs, etc.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower
  • Amputation Stump
  • Limb; Absence, Congenital, Lower
  • Prosthesis User
  • Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cooling
  • amputee
  • lower limb absence
  • prosthesis
  • prosthetic leg
  • transtibial
  • below knee amputation
  • lower limb difference
  • lower limb loss
  • socket
  • prosthetist
  • sweat
  • active
  • walking
  • prosthetic liner
  • prosthetic sock
  • perspiration
  • moisture
  • heat
  • thermal
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Must have a lower limb absence
  • Willing and able to complete outlined tasks
  • Must complete and pass our Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test
  • Must understand English in order to be properly consented and provide feedback to the study personnel

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The risks to pregnant women and fetuses are unknown and therefore pregnant women should not participate in the study
  • No symptoms consistent with peripheral neuropathy or other sensory diagnosis that could prevent them from feeling the temperature of their limb
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ICE Unit

    The subject wears the experimental socket with an ICE Unit, which includes a TEC and will be actively cooling the leg whenever the device is powered on. An ambient temperature sensor and step counter is attached to the socket. The subject is only informed that each condition is a "different level of cooling" to reduce bias. This condition should last approximately one month.

    Device: ICE Condition

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Unit

    The subject wears the experimental socket with a Sham Unit, which excludes a TEC and will not be actively cooling the leg when the device is powered on. An ambient temperature sensor and step counter is attached to the socket. The subject is only informed that each condition is a "different level of cooling" to reduce bias. This condition should last approximately one month.

    Device: Sham Condition

Interventions

  • DeviceICE Condition

    Experimental socket integrated with a heat spreader. An ICE Unit (includes TEC) is attached to the socket.

    Also known as: Cooling Unit, ICE Unit

  • DeviceSham Condition

    Experimental socket integrated with a heat spreader. A Sham Unit (excludes TEC) is attached to the socket.

    Also known as: Sham Unit

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual Limb Temperature

    This will be tested only during in-lab visits. An intervention of the experimental socket with the ICE cooling unit should yield at least a 2 degree Celsius decrease in temperature compared with no intervention. This will be tested in-lab with 6 thermocouples taped to the residual limb while the subject is sitting and walking on a treadmill. The reported result is the temperature difference of the residual limb from the baseline temperature (before activity) to the end of the sitting period (after activity). The ICE or Sham unit is turned on 5 minutes before the 15 minute walking period. After the 15 minute walking period, the participant sits with the unit ON for 45 minutes. The baseline temperature reading is taken directly before the unit is turned on, and the end temperature reading is taken after the 45 minutes of sitting.

    Time frame: 4 hours

06

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneICE Unit First, Then Sham UnitSham Unit First, Then ICE Unit
Started66
Completed46
Not completed20
Withdrew: Lti h01 piloted the device and was too familiar with the study design to be unblinded/analyzed10
Withdrew: Lti h02 had socket fit issues causing discomfort which caused us to withdraw them from the study.10

Outcome measures

PrimaryResidual Limb Temperature

This will be tested only during in-lab visits. An intervention of the experimental socket with the ICE cooling unit should yield at least a 2 degree Celsius decrease in temperature compared with no intervention. This will be tested in-lab with 6 thermocouples taped to the residual limb while the subject is sitting and walking on a treadmill. The reported result is the temperature difference of the residual limb from the baseline temperature (before activity) to the end of the sitting period (after activity). The ICE or Sham unit is turned on 5 minutes before the 15 minute walking period. After the 15 minute walking period, the participant sits with the unit ON for 45 minutes. The baseline temperature reading is taken directly before the unit is turned on, and the end temperature reading is taken after the 45 minutes of sitting.

Time frame:
4 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Avg Temp Diff from Baseline (Degrees C)
Residual Limb Temperature
Avg Temp Diff from Baseline (Degrees C)ICE UnitSham Unit
Residual Limb Temperature-2.3 ± 0.91.9 ± 2.0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored/collected during the experimental conditions. With each condition lasting about 1 month, each participant was monitored for adverse events for about 2 months. Adverse events were monitored/assessed at least every 2 weeks by phone call, with study staff checking in more frequently if participants reached out with questions. Participants were told to reach out to study staff immediately if adverse events did occur.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ICE Unit0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Sham Unit0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ICE Unit, Then Sham UnitSham Unit, Then ICE UnitTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years459
>=65 years213
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ICE Unit, Then Sham UnitSham Unit, Then ICE UnitTotal
Female101
Male5611
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ICE Unit, Then Sham UnitSham Unit, Then ICE UnitTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White6612
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ICE Unit, Then Sham UnitSham Unit, Then ICE UnitTotal
United States6612
07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Liberating Technologies, Inc.
    Holliston, Massachusetts 01746, United States
  • Minneapolis VA
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 12, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04484805
Lead sponsor
Liberating Technologies, Inc.
Collaborators
Vivonics, Inc.
Responsible party
Todd Farrell (Director of Research, Liberating Technologies, Inc.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2020
Start date
Aug 1, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 3, 2020
Completion
Nov 3, 2020
Results posted
Oct 22, 2024
Last update
Oct 22, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion