ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04481776Updated Jul 24, 2020

Breakfast Omission and Energy Balance in Girls

An interventional study of Breakfast consumption and Breakfast omission in Adolescent Obesity, Insulin Resistance and Adolescent Behavior, sponsored by University of Bedfordshire. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 11 Years to 14 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-24.

Sponsored by University of Bedfordshire · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2018, registered Jul 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
11 Years to 14 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

There is a distinct lack of experimental evidence on whether breakfast consumption and omission affect energy balance-related variables. This research is of particular relevance to adolescent girls due to concerns of low rates of breakfast consumption and physical activity in this population. This study aims to compare the effect of seven consecutive days of breakfast omission with standardised breakfast consumption on free-living physical activity energy expenditure, energy intake and perceived appetite and energy levels in adolescent girls.

Read the detailed description

Observational reports showing infrequent breakfast consumption to be associated with increased adiposity and cardiometabolic disease risk in children and adolescents have fuelled concerns over the low prevalence of habitual breakfast consumption among adolescents. Yet, only experimental study designs can determine the causal effects of breakfast consumption on health-related variables and such research has typically targeted adults. Adolescent girls may respond differently to manipulations in breakfast consumption than adults because they have distinct hormonal, metabolic and behavioural profiles. Further, a link between breakfast and physical activity in adolescent girls has particular public health relevance because the adolescent decline in both breakfast consumption frequency and physical activity is more pronounced in girls than in boys. Thus, the primary aim of the current study is to use a randomised, cross-over design to compare the effect of seven consecutive days of breakfast omission with standardised breakfast consumption on free-living PAEE in adolescent girls. The secondary aims are to examine the effects on energy intake, perceived appetite and energy levels.

Using a randomized crossover design, girls aged 11-14 years will complete two, 7-day conditions. A standardized breakfast will consumed every day before 09:00 in the daily breakfast consumption condition. No energy-providing nutrients will consumed (i.e., only water) before 10:30 in the breakfast omission condition. Combined heart rate-accelerometry will be used to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and digital photography complemented with written food diaries will be used to assess energy intake during each condition; these data will be separated into three time segments: wake to 10:30, 10:30 to 15:30 and 15:30 to bed. Visual analogue scales will be used to assess perceptions of hunger, fullness, tiredness and energy levels on waking and at 09:00 and 10:30. Statistical analyses will be completed using condition by time of day linear mixed models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adolescent Obesity
  • Insulin Resistance
  • Adolescent Behavior

Keywords

  • Breakfast
  • Physical activity
  • Nutrition
  • Appetite
  • Sedentary
03

In context

Pediatric Obesity

1,129 studies on the registry are indexed under Pediatric Obesity; 187 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 100 across 870 interventional studies indexed under Pediatric Obesity.

Browse Pediatric Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bedfordshire is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parental
  • Child assent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Health related issues identified from a health screen questionnaire that could be adversely affected by participation or could affect the study outcomes (e.g., allergies to the breakfast meals, fitted with a pacemaker)
  • Unable to walk or wear a combined heart rate-accelerometer on the chest.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Breakfast consumption

    Participants will be asked to consume a standardised breakfast at home before 09:00 for seven consecutive days. The energy content of the breakfast will be 25% of individual measured resting metabolic rate. Prior to the experimental conditions, the participants will select one wholegrain, high-fibre ready-to-eat cereals (with the option of adding raisins) and fruit juice from a limited selection. Thus, breakfast composition will be controlled within participants, but not between participants to account for individual preferences. To ensure that the correct amount of each breakfast item is consumed, food items will be provided to the participants in pre-packaged containers and the participants will be provided with a marked beaker to measure their milk and juice each morning. The only exception is that parents will be asked to provide the 1.8% milk.

    Other: Breakfast consumption

  • Experimental
    Breakfast omission

    Participants were asked to abstain from all energy-providing nutrients before 10:30 for seven consecutive days.

    Other: Breakfast omission

Interventions

  • OtherBreakfast consumption

    Standardised breakfast consumption across seven days

  • OtherBreakfast omission

    No breakfast consumed across seven days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical activity energy expenditure (kJ/day)

    Free-living physical activity energy expenditure from sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous activities (kJ/day) assessed using combined heart rate-accelerometry across seven consecutive days.

    Time frame: Seven days

  2. Time spent in physical activity (minutes/day)

    Time spent sedentary and in light, moderate and vigorous physical activity (minutes/day) assessed using combined heart rate-accelerometry across seven consecutive days.

    Time frame: Seven days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Energy intake (kJ/day)

    Energy intake (kJ/day) assessed using combined digital photography and food diaries across four days.

    Time frame: Four days

  2. Carbohydrate intake (g/day)

    Carbohydrate intake (g/day) assessed using combined digital photography and food diaries across four days.

    Time frame: Four days

  3. Fat intake (g/day)

    Fat intake (g/day) assessed using combined digital photography and food diaries across four days.

    Time frame: Four days

  4. Protein intake (g/day)

    Protein intake (g/day) assessed using combined digital photography and food diaries across four days.

    Time frame: Four days

  5. Fibre intake (g/day)

    Fibre intake (g/day) assessed using combined digital photography and food diaries across four days.

    Time frame: Four days

  6. Perceived hunger (mm)

    Perceived hunger (mm) assessed using 0-100 mm visual analogue scales on waking, at 09:00 and at 10:30 on four days. Higher values equate to higher hunger.

    Time frame: Four days

  7. Perceived fullness (mm)

    Perceived fullness (mm) assessed using 0-100 mm visual analogue scales on waking, at 09:00 and at 10:30 on four days. Higher values equate to higher fullness.

    Time frame: Four days

  8. Perceived tiredness levels (mm)

    Perceived tiredness levels (mm) assessed using 0-100 mm visual analogue scales on waking, at 09:00 and at 10:30 on four days. Higher values equate to higher tiredness.

    Time frame: Four days

  9. Perceived energy levels (mm)

    Perceived energy levels (mm) assessed using 0-100 mm visual analogue scales on waking, at 09:00 and at 10:30 on four days. Higher values equate to higher energy levels.

    Time frame: Four days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Bedfordshire
    Bedford, Bedfordshire MK41 9EA, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04481776
Lead sponsor
University of Bedfordshire
Responsible party
Dr Julia Fruer (Senior Lecturer in Health, Nutrition and Exercise, University of Bedfordshire) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2020
Start date
Jan 15, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2019
Completion
Mar 15, 2019
Last update
Jul 24, 2020

Study contacts

Julia K Fruer, PhD
principal investigator · University of Bedfordshire

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion