CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04469270REGAiN-1AUpdated Oct 9, 2025Results posted

Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Engensis and Placebo in Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, sponsored by Helixmith Co., Ltd.. Completed at 16 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-09.

Sponsored by Helixmith Co., Ltd. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
162
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular administration of Engensis on pain in participants with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the feet and lower legs, as compared to Placebo, as a second Phase 3, well controlled study, sufficient in supporting the efficacy and safety of Engensis.

Read the detailed description

Overall Design VMDN-003-2 is an adaptive Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Engensis (containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient VM202) in Participants with painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Following completion of the informed consent process, Screening activities (during 45 days [from Day -52 to Day -7] prior to Day 0) will determine which Participants meet all-but-one eligibility criteria, which are assessed by an adjudication procedure, followed by completion of a 7-day eDiary prior to Day 0. Eligible participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion and in a 1:1 ratio on Day 0 to either Engensis or Placebo. During Screening, medical history and familial cancer history, demographics, vital signs, height, body mass index, waist size, physical examination, retinal fundoscopy (by an ophthalmologist), 12-lead electrocardiogram, ultrasound of the right and left gastrocnemius muscles (to guide Study Injections), laboratory assessments, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hemoglobin A1c levels, viral screening, a record of all concomitant medications and procedures, urine drug analysis, and urine pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential will be conducted.

In addition, the following procedures will be conducted during Screening: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Accurate Pain Reporting and Placebo Response Reduction, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, and cancer screening tests.

During 7 days before Day 0 and randomization, Participants must complete the full Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy on an eDiary for determining the Average Daily Pain Scores for at least 5 out of the 7 days. Adverse event assessments will start upon completion of the consent process at the start of Screening.

At any time prior to dosing on Day 0, Bedside Sensory Testing should be administered.

Following randomization, and prior to the first intramuscular injections of Engensis or Placebo on Day 0, the partial Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, , and quality of life instruments will be completed. Blood will be collected for testing of selected cytokines, anti-Hepatic growth factor antibodies, and laboratory assessments.

All Participants will receive sixteen (16) 0.5-mL intramuscular injections of Engensis or Placebo in each calf gastrocnemius muscle at each of two Visits during two Treatment Cycles: Treatment Cycle 1 on Day 0 and Day 14, and Treatment Cycle 2 on Day 90 and Day 104. At 2 hours (± 1 hour) after completion of intramuscular injections of Engensis or Placebo on Days 0 and 14 and Days 90 and 104, vital signs and blood draw for cytokine levels will be performed. Treatment-emergent adverse event assessment, including injection site reactions, will start as of randomization (Day 0) and continue throughout the study.

Follow-up Study Visits will be conducted on Days 28, 60, 150, and 180 or early termination. Vital signs will be recorded at all Study Visits. At the Day 180 Visit (end of study), the following assessments will be conducted: the full Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (performed for 7 days prior to the Day 180 Visit), Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Bedside Sensory Testing, Patient Global Impression of Change and the quality of life assessments (36-item Short Form Health Survey and European Quality of Life Health Utilities Index, urine drug analysis, retinal fundoscopy, physical examination, concomitant medications and procedures, and anti-Hepatic Growth Factors antibodies. Blood will be drawn for determination of serum chemistry, lipid profile, pregnancy status, hematology, and Hemoglobin A1c levels. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Engensis compared to Placebo as measured by changes in the means of the Average Daily Pain Scores of the full Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, selected blood cytokines, Bedside sensory testing, and assessments of injection site reactions, physical examination, laboratory assessments, vital signs, treatment emergent Adverse events, and serious adverse events.

Study and Treatment Duration:

Screening will occur up to 52 days prior to Baseline (Day 0) and Participants will be followed from Day 0, the day of first Study Injections, to Day 180/Early termination.

Visit Frequency: Consented Participants will be seen and evaluated for enrollment during Screening (up to 52 days prior to Baseline, Day 0). There are 8 visits to the Clinical Site during the study from Day 0 to Day 180 for Study Injections and follow-up.

Intervention Groups and Duration:

Two treatment groups of Participants (Engensis or Placebo) will be in the study for 180 days.

Number of Participants (N = 152 to approximately 250):

The target sample size is a minimum of 152 Participants and the maximum sample size is 250 Participants based on the proposed adaptive design analysis. The final sample size of Participants to be enrolled and evaluated will be determined by the independent Data Monitoring Committee. An interim analysis will be conducted after approximately 50% of Participants in the target sample (i.e., 76 Participants) have completed the primary efficacy endpoint at Day 180 or have withdrawn prematurely. The Data monitoring committee will make a recommendation based on an unblinded (comparative) power analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Browse trials for

03

In context

Diabetic Neuropathies

617 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Neuropathies; 91 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 162 is above the median of 73 across 510 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Neuropathies.

Browse Diabetic Neuropathies studies →

Lead sponsor

Helixmith Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female participants age ≥ 18 years at time of completion of the informed consent process
  2. Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and on current Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2020 optimal guideline-directed medical therapy in participants (including vaccine recommendations if possible), and without unstable diabetes or significant medical problems, such as progressive end-organ disease, within 3 months of or during Screening, in the judgment of the Investigator
  3. Glycosylated HbA1c of ≤ 10.0% using the first assessment collected during Screening
  4. Documented diagnosis of bilateral painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in both lower extremities at least 6 months prior to Screening
  5. An Average Daily Pain Score ≥ 4 (standard deviation ≥ 0.3 and ≤ 1.5) that was completed during the 7 days prior to randomization (Day 0)
  6. The physical examination component of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score of ≥ 2.5
  7. If on medication for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (other than gabapentin or pregabalin), must have been on a stable dose defined as \< 50% change in total dose over 3 months prior to completion of informed consent
  8. Male participants and their female partners had to agree to use double-barrier contraception during the study or provide proof of postmenopausal state (minimum 1 year) or surgical sterility
  9. Male participants were not to donate sperm during the study
  10. Female participants had to be nonpregnant, nonlactating, and either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, or surgically sterile for at least 3 months, or agreed to use double-barrier contraception from 28 days prior to randomization and/or their last confirmed menstrual period prior to study randomization (whichever is longer) until the end of the study
  11. Capable and willing to comply with the requirements and restrictions of the protocol and informed consent form
  12. Able to complete all screening activities within 52 days of signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Other sources of pain that prevented accurate assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain (e.g., thoracic and/or lumbar root proximal neuropathy, mononeuritis multiplex)
  2. Peripheral neuropathy caused by a condition other than diabetes: e.g., anatomic (sciatic nerve compression), systemic (monoclonal gammopathy), metabolic (thyroid disease), and toxic (alcohol use) neuropathies
  3. Had taken gabapentin or pregabalin during 30 days before completion of informed consent process or was going to take at any time during the study
  4. Progressive or degenerative neurological disorder, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, multiple sclerosis, or other neurological disorders determined by the Investigator to preclude participation
  5. Symptomatic peripheral artery disease or peripheral artery disease requiring revascularization and/or that may interfere with the conduct of the study
  6. Vasculitis, such as from Buerger's or other diseases
  7. Systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg on tolerable doses of standard antihypertensive medications at Screening determined by the Investigator to preclude participation
  8. Hyperlipidemia or dyslipidemia not being treated with an optimal treatment regimen that follows the Standards of Care for hyperlipidemic/dyslipidemic patients with DM
  9. Class 3 or 4 heart failure
  10. Symptomatic bradycardia or untreated high degree atrioventricular block
  11. Stroke or cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction within 3 months before Screening
  12. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula based on Cystatin C levels
  13. Progressive renal dysfunction, defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate to chronic kidney disease Stage 1, 2, or 3 in the past 6 months before Screening
  14. Ophthalmologic conditions pertinent to signs or symptoms of proliferative diabetic retinopathy or other ocular conditions that precluded standard ophthalmologic examination
  15. Myopathy (e.g., Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy, polymyositis)
  16. Any prior or planned lower extremity amputation (excluding toe amputations) due to diabetic complications or prior lower leg injury (e.g., scarring, muscle atrophy) in the calf area (gastrocnemius) that would significantly reduce the surface area of the skin or amount of intact skeletal muscle required for the 16 treatment injections of Engensis
  17. Active infection requiring antimicrobial agent(s) (chronic infection or severe active infection that may compromise the Participant's well-being or participation in the study, in the Investigator's judgment)
  18. Chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disease (e.g., Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis)
  19. Immunosuppression due to underlying disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus) or to currently receiving immunosuppressive drugs, (e.g., chemotherapy, corticosteroids) or to radiation therapy
  20. Participants requiring chronic oral or injectable steroids and unwilling to refrain from taking these drugs for the duration of the study
  21. Participants with a family medical history of 2 or more first-degree relatives (parent, sibling, child) diagnosed to have the same type of cancer - breast cancer, cervical cancer, colon cancer, endometrial cancer, lung cancer, or prostate cancer; or with a family medical history of Lynch Syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) in any first-degree relative; or who show positive results during cancer screening
  22. Positive human immunodeficiency virus or human T-cell lymphotropic virus I/II test at Screening
  23. Participants with cancer who have not been cancer-free for ≥5 years with the following exceptions (not excluded): Participants with in-situ basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma
  24. Participants with a prior history of stem cell transplant for cancer no matter how long they have been cancer-free
  25. Active acute or chronic hepatitis B
  26. Active hepatitis C
  27. Clinically significant laboratory values or current medical conditions during Screening that, in the judgment of the Investigator, should be exclusionary
  28. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score of ≥ 15 on either subscale
  29. History of drug abuse (the habitual taking of addictive or illegal drugs) in the past 3 months and positive for Drugs of Abuse, with the exception of cannabis, during Screening
  30. Participants unwilling to discontinue their use of the following during Screening at least 7 days before starting eDiary entries and not use any of the following during the study:

    • skeletal muscle relaxants
    • opioids
    • transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (tens)
    • acupuncture
    • benzodiazepines (other than stable bedtime dose)
    • injectable or oral steroids
  31. Participants not on a stable dose and not willing to remain on a stable dose during study for the following drugs:

    • antidepressants
    • antiepileptics
    • duloxetine
  32. Participants using the following medications and unwilling to discontinue topical use on the lower legs and feet and throughout the study:

    • capsaicin
    • anesthetic creams (except during Study Injections)
    • anesthetic patches
    • isosorbide dinitrate spray
  33. Use of an investigational drug or treatment in past 30 days or previous participation in a clinical study with Engensis
  34. Body mass index ≥ 42 kg/m2
  35. Recent treatment for COVID-19 with ongoing sequelae
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
162 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Engensis

    16 (ea) 0.25mg (0.5 mL) injections in each of the right and left gastrocnemius muscles on Days 0, 14, 90, and 104.

    Biological: Engensis

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    16 0.5 mL injections in each of the right and left gastrocnemius muscles on Days 0, 14, 90, and 104.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalEngensis

    Intramuscular injections

  • OtherPlacebo

    Intramuscular injections

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

    • The Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Change in Baseline to Day 180. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Average Daily Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population). Overall Engensis n=79.

    Time frame: 180 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo

    • The Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Worst Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population).

    Time frame: 180 days

  2. Efficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

    • The Average Daily Pain Score from the Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of Responders with ≥50% Reduction from Baseline in the Average Daily Pain Score on Day 180 (Intent-To-Treat Population).

    Time frame: 180 days

  3. Safety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to Placebo

    To evaluate the safety of intramuscular administration of Engensis in Participants with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the feet and lower legs as compared to Placebo. • Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse event; Incidence of injection site reactions; Incidence of clinically significant laboratory values.

    Time frame: 180 days

  4. To Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to Engensis

    Change from baseline in the TNF-alpha, IL-1b, IFNy, IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12p70 cytokine profile post-dose at the Day 104 visit.

    Time frame: 104 days

  5. To Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth Factor

    • Presence of anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies following Engensis administration compared to Placebo \- Anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies will be collected on Day 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180, and the presence will be summarized according to each time point.

    Time frame: Days 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180

07

Results

Posted Jan 20, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEngensisPlacebo
Started8181
Completed6575
Not completed166
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up43
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject73
Withdrew: Not dosed - 2 subjects misrandomized, included in itt, but not safety population.20
Withdrew: Missing10

Outcome measures

PrimaryEfficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

• The Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Change in Baseline to Day 180. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Average Daily Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population). Overall Engensis n=79.

Time frame:
180 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Efficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
score on a scaleEngensisPlacebo
Efficacy of Engensis Compared to Placebo Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Lower Legs Comparing Average Daily Pain Score From Day 0 Visit to Day 180 Visit on Brief Pain Inventory for Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy-2.03 ± 2.020-2.69 ± 2.115
SecondaryEfficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo

• The Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of the Actual Value of the Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Worst Pain Score (Intent-To-Treat Population).

Time frame:
180 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Efficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo
score on a scaleEngensisPlacebo
Efficacy of Engensis on Worst Pain in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Comparing Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Worst Pain Score From Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy to Day 180 Compared to Placebo-2.10 ± 2.374-3.06 ± 2.588
SecondaryEfficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

• The Average Daily Pain Score from the Brief Pain Inventory for Participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 with a higher score representing a worse outcome of more pain. Summary of Responders with ≥50% Reduction from Baseline in the Average Daily Pain Score on Day 180 (Intent-To-Treat Population).

Time frame:
180 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Efficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
ParticipantsEngensisPlacebo
Efficacy of Engensis Reducing Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs by Determining a ≥ 50% Reduction in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Day 180 Using the Brief Pain Inventory With Participants Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy2433
SecondarySafety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to Placebo

To evaluate the safety of intramuscular administration of Engensis in Participants with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the feet and lower legs as compared to Placebo. • Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse event; Incidence of injection site reactions; Incidence of clinically significant laboratory values.

Time frame:
180 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety of Engensis in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Feet and Legs Comparing Incidence of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events, Incidence of Injection Site Reactions, and Incidence of Clinically Significant Laboratory Values to Placebo
ParticipantsEngensisPlacebo
Any Treatment Emergent AE4544
Treatment Emergent AE by Severity - Mild1824
Treatment Emergent AE by Severity - Moderate2017
Treatment Emergent AE by Severity - Severe73
Injection Site Reactions109
Clinically Significant Lab Values - Any Abnormal Analyte Value of Interest2930
SecondaryTo Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to Engensis

Change from baseline in the TNF-alpha, IL-1b, IFNy, IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12p70 cytokine profile post-dose at the Day 104 visit.

Time frame:
104 days
Reported as:
Mean · ng/L
To Evaluate the Possibility of Cellular Responses to Engensis
ng/LEngensisPlacebo
TNF-alpha - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.334 ± 4.59710.518 ± 1.8213
IL-1beta - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.245 ± 2.0345-0.001 ± 0.0125
IF-gamma - Change from Baseline Day 104-3.371 ± 27.81901.087 ± 5.4897
IL-6 - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.262 ± 1.66920.012 ± 0.6282
IL-4 - Change from Baseline Day 104-0.002 ± 0.01570.0 ± 0.0
IL-10 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.147 ± 1.22920.029 ± 0.1439
IL-12 - Change from Baseline Day 1040.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
SecondaryTo Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth Factor

• Presence of anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies following Engensis administration compared to Placebo \- Anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies will be collected on Day 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180, and the presence will be summarized according to each time point.

Time frame:
Days 0, 60, 90, 150 and 180
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
To Evaluate the Possibility of Humoral Responses to Engensis - Anti-Hepatic Growth Factor
ParticipantsEngensisPlacebo
Day 0 - Anti-HGF Present00
Day 60 - Anti-HGF Present00
Day 90 - AntiHGF Present10
Day 150 - AntiHGF Present01
Day 180 - AntiHGF Present00

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline (Day 0) to Day 180. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Engensis1/79 (1.3%)7/79 (8.9%)38/79 (48.1%)
Placebo0/81 (0%)4/81 (4.9%)41/81 (50.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventEngensisPlacebo
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/790/81
Cardiac failure acuteCardiac disorders1/790/81
Pericardial effusionCardiac disorders1/790/81
TachycardiaCardiac disorders1/790/81
EnteritisGastrointestinal disorders1/791/81
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/790/81
Cyclic vomiting syndromeGastrointestinal disorders1/790/81
Pneumothorax spontaneousRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/790/81
Sudden cardiac deathGeneral disorders1/790/81
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/790/81
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 155
Most frequent other events
EventEngensisPlacebo
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/795/81
COVID-19Infections and infestations4/794/81
InfluenzaInfections and infestations4/790/81
Injection site painGeneral disorders4/791/81
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/794/81
Diabetic retinopathyEye disorders0/794/81
Nasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/794/81
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders3/790/81
HypoaesthesiaNervous system disorders3/790/81
Tooth InfectionInfections and infestations0/793/81

Baseline characteristics

ITT Population

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)EngensisPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years475198
>=65 years343064
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)EngensisPlaceboTotal
Mean62.7 ± 9.4661.0 ± 10.2561.8 ± 9.87
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EngensisPlaceboTotal
Female232548
Male5856114
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)EngensisPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino121123
Not Hispanic or Latino6970139
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)EngensisPlaceboTotal
United States8181162
BMI (kg/m^2)
BMI (kg/m^2)(kg/m^2)EngensisPlaceboTotal
Mean32.533 ± 5.218231.440 ± 4.704931.987 ± 4.9830
08

Study locations

16 sites
  • Arizona Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85053, United States
  • Clinical Trials - Little Rock
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • California Medical Clinic for Headache
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Clinical Trials Research - Sacramento
    Sacramento, California 95821, United States
  • Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Gateway Clinical Trials, LLC
    O'Fallon, Illinois 62269, United States
  • Foot & Ankle Center of Illinois
    Springfield, Illinois 62704, United States
  • Clinical Research Professionals
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63005, United States
  • Richmond Behavioral Associates
    Staten Island, New York 10314, United States
  • Health Concepts
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Futuro Clinical Trials, LLC
    McAllen, Texas 78501, United States
  • ClinPoint Trials LLC
    Waxahachie, Texas 75165, United States
  • Manassas Clinical Research Center
    Manassas, Virginia 20110, United States
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School
    Norfolk, Virginia 23510, United States
  • Dominion Medical Associates
    Richmond, Virginia 23219, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 28, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 13, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04469270
Lead sponsor
Helixmith Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 14, 2020
Start date
Nov 20, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 24, 2023
Completion
Jul 31, 2024
Results posted
Jan 20, 2025
Last update
Oct 9, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion