An interventional study of Proton radiotherapy and Photon radiotherapy in Anal Cancer Squamous Cell, sponsored by Umeå University. Recruiting at 4 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-03.
Sponsored by Umeå University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Dosimetric studies suggest that radiotherapy with protons has a potential to reduce side effects compared to treatment with photons for patients with anal carcinoma (AC). There are so far no studies comparing these treatment techniques in a randomised setting. The aim of this study is to compare side effects following photon therapy versus proton therapy within the framework of a randomised controlled trial.
Anal carcinoma is a disease in which modern therapy is reasonably successful in achieving tumour control/cure. Both acute and late side effects are substantial. Proton radiotherapy is hypothesised to have the potential to decrease the incidence/severity of some acute side effects from certain organs at risk e.g. bone marrow and intraperitoneal bowel. By sparing the dose to these organs it is also possible that late effects might be less evident. Sparing of the bone marrow may lead to fewer septic events and dose reductions of chemotherapy which may, as a consequence, improve tumour control. The primary aim of this study is to find ways to decrease acute side effects primarily to alleviate some discomfort from the patient during and after a usually painful treatment experience. It has also been concluded by others that reduction of acute side effects is a relevant aim and end point for the evaluation of new treatment techniques and both patient reported and physician reported data are assessed
1,772 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; 412 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 44 across 1,414 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Squamous Cell.
Browse Carcinoma, Squamous Cell studies →Umeå University is the lead sponsor of 263 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Conventional photon radiation is delivered by volumetric arc therapy/intensity modulated radiotherapy/helical tomotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. The total dose to the primary tumour target and node metastases \>2 cm is 57.5 Gy in 27 fractions, one fraction/day, five fractions/week during 5.5 weeks. Node metastases up to 2 cm will receive 50.5 Gy in 27 fractions. Elective lymph nodes will receive a total dose of 41.6 Gy.
Radiation: Photon radiotherapy
Proton radiation is delivered by spot scanning. Proton plans will be produced by single field optimisation/single field uniform dose or multifield optimisation/intensity modulated proton therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. The total dose to the primary tumour target and node metastases \>2 cm is 57.5 Gy(RBE) in 27 fractions, one fraction/day, five fractions/week during 5.5 weeks. Node metastases up to 2 cm will receive 50.5 Gy(RBE) in 27 fractions. Elective lymph nodes will receive a total dose of 41.6 Gy(RBE).
Radiation: Proton radiotherapy
Proton radiotherapy
Also known as: Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT)
Conventional photon radiotherapy
Also known as: Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy
Acute grade >2 hematological side effects
Acute hematological side effects will be assessed by weekly full blood cell counts during radiotherapy and the first three weeks after treatment completion. Side Grade \>2 acute GI and haematological side-effects during therapy and up to three weeks after the end of treatment. Thereafter, every six weeks for up to three months after treatment. Results will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system. Haematological adverse events will also be assessed by registering febrile episodes during an after treatment as well as the frequency of chemotherapy dose reduction or delayed chemotherapy.
Time frame: Treatment start until three months after treatment
Acute grade >2 gastrointestinal side effects
Acute side-effects from the gastrointestinal tract are assess the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system by using. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer, (QLQ-ANL27). During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).
Time frame: Treatment start until three months after treatment
Acute side effects from skin
Acute side-effects from skin are assessed by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27. During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).
Time frame: Treatment start until three months after treatment
Acute side effects from the genitourinary tract
Acute side-effects from the genitourinary tract are assessed by scoring of genitourinary symptoms, pain by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27. During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).
Time frame: Treatment start until three months after treatment
Pain due to acute radiation reaction
Pain is assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported pain is assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27. During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).
Time frame: Treatment start until three months after treatment
Late side effects from the gastro-intestinal system
Late side effects 1, 2 and 5 years after completion of treatment. Side effects from the gastrointestinal system, are assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the EORTCs disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.
Time frame: From three months after treatment up to five years after treatment
Late side effects
Late side effects 1, 2 and 5 years after completion of treatment. Side effects from the genitourinary system are assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the EORTCs disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.
Time frame: From three months after treatment up to five years after treatment
Late side effects from skin
Late side effects 1, 2 and 5 years after completion of treatment. Side effects from the skin are assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the EORTCs disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.
Time frame: From three months after treatment up to five years after treatment
Assessment of Quality of life (QoL)
Patient reported quality of life during and after treatment assessed by • HRQoL will be investigated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire, the QLQ-C30, supplemented by the disease specific module (anal-cancer) QLQ-ANL27. • EuroQol (EQ-5D) is a generic QoL instrument designed for self-administration. The result could be expressed as a weight with values between zero and one (0-1). Together with information about survival the QoL weight can be expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
Time frame: From randomisation up to 5 years
Primary tumour response
Frequency of complete tumour regression after primary treatment
Time frame: 3-6 months after treatment
Locoregional failure
Time from randomisation until first recurrence, local and/or regional
Time frame: Up to five years after randomisation
Disease free survival
Time from randomisation until first recurrence, local/regional/systemic or death
Time frame: Up to five years after randomisation
Overall survival
Time from randomisation until death
Time frame: Up to five years after randomisation
Cost-utility analysis
Costs and QoL as well as clinical outcome measured as survival time will be considered. The results of the health-economic part of the study will be expressed as cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) saved of one intervention in comparison with the other. All relevant costs should be identified, quantified, and valued. Also indirect costs related to loss of production when patients cannot work due to the disease. All types of resources associated with the two treatment arms during the follow-up should be considered. E.g. costs for treatment of side-effects, costs for surgery when performed, and travelling costs for patients. Costing will be performed at the end of the study. For evaluation and analysis of the study results, a relatively simple health-economic model will be developed. This model will be used for evaluation of the two treatment arms from inclusion into the study until 5 years of follow up or death.
Time frame: From randomisation until 5 years or death
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No — Data may be made available upon request from other researchers to the study group
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Umeå University