CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04446273Updated Feb 25, 2026

Proximal Priority Versus Distal Priority Robotic Priming Effects in Patients With Chronic Stroke

An interventional study of Bi-Manu-Track in Stroke, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Recruiting at 4 sites in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-25.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2020; still recruiting 6 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-blind randomized comparative efficacy study involving 54-72 participants with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomized into proximal priority robotic group or distal priority robotic group and receive 18 intervention sessions (90 min/d, 3 d/wk for 6 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale, Medical Research Council Scale, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, and Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered at baseline, after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Method will be used to examine the comparative efficacy and predictors of outcome, respectively, after intervention.

Read the detailed description

Background. The sequence of establishing proximal stability or function before facilitation of the distal body part has long been recognized in stroke rehabilitation practice but lacks scientific evidence. This study plans to examine the effects of proximal priority robotic priming and impairment-oriented training (PRI) and distal priority robotic priming and impairment-oriented training (DRI).

Methods. This is a single-blind randomized comparative efficacy study involving 54-72 participants with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomized into PRI or DRI groups and receive 18 intervention sessions (90 min/d, 3 d/wk for 6 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale, Medical Research Council Scale, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, and Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered at baseline, after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Method will be used to examine the comparative efficacy and predictors of outcome, respectively, after PRI and DRI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Upper extremity rehabilitation
  • Proximal priority
  • Distal priority
  • Robotic therapy
  • Bilateral motor priming
  • Impairment-oriented training
  • Task-oriented training
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • The inclusion criteria are age between 20 and 75 years old, more than 3 months after the onset of a first unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, moderate to severe UE motor impairment (i.e., total UE score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment [FMA] score between 18 and 56), no severe spasticity in any joints of the affected arm (modified Ashworth Scale score \<3 in any of the affected shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers), able to follow instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination total score >24), no UE fractures in the past 3 months, and not simultaneously participating in other medication or rehabilitation studies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria are other neurologic, neuromuscular, or orthopedic disease, such as epilepsy, or severe health or physical conditions that might impede participation in this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PRI group

    The PRI and DRI groups will receive an equal amount of treatment time, comprising 1.5 hours per day, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. The PRI protocol provides robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist).

    Device: Bi-Manu-Track

  • Active comparator
    DRI group

    The PRI and DRI groups will receive an equal amount of treatment time, comprising 1.5 hours per day, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. The DRI protocol provides robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).

    Device: Bi-Manu-Track

Interventions

  • DeviceBi-Manu-Track

    The PRI and DRI protocol provide robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist). The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).In every session of robotic training, the patient will practice bilateral passive range of motion exercise, in which affected upper extremity is assisted by the unaffected side, and bilateral active range of motion exercise. Robotic training will be followed by impairment-oriented training.

    Also known as: impairment-oriented training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment is used to assess motor impairment of body function, including ranges of motion of the upper extremity (UE) joints, and grasping, coordination, and speed of UE. movement.

    Time frame: Fugl-Meyer Assessment will be administered to participants at baseline.

  2. Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment is used to assess motor impairment of body function, including ranges of motion of the UE joints, and grasping, coordination, and speed of UE movement.

    Time frame: Fugl-Meyer Assessment will be administered to participants at immediately after intervention.

  3. Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment is used to assess motor impairment of body function, including ranges of motion of the UE joints, and grasping, coordination, and speed of UE. movement.

    Time frame: Fugl-Meyer Assessment will be administered to participants at three months after intervention.

  4. Medical Research Council Scale

    Medical Research Council Scale is used to assess muscle power of the affected upper extremity joints.

    Time frame: Medical Research Council Scale will be administered to participants at baseline.

  5. Medical Research Council Scale

    Medical Research Council Scale is used to assess muscle power of the affected upper extremity joints.

    Time frame: Medical Research Council Scale will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.

  6. Medical Research Council Scale

    Medical Research Council Scale is used to assess muscle power of the affected upper extremity joints.

    Time frame: Medical Research Council Scale will be administered to participants three months after intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The ABILHAND Questionnaire

    The ABILHAND Questionnaire is an inventory of 23 manual activities on which the patient provides his or her self-perceived performing difficulty on a 3-level scale (impossible, difficult, easy).

    Time frame: The ABILHAND Questionnaire will be administered to participants at baseline.

  2. The ABILHAND Questionnaire

    The ABILHAND Questionnaire is an inventory of 23 manual activities on which the patient provides his or her self-perceived performing difficulty on a 3-level scale (impossible, difficult, easy).

    Time frame: The ABILHAND Questionnaire will be administered to participants immediately after intervention..

  3. The ABILHAND Questionnaire

    The ABILHAND Questionnaire is an inventory of 23 manual activities on which the patient provides his or her self-perceived performing difficulty on a 3-level scale (impossible, difficult, easy).

    Time frame: The ABILHAND Questionnaire will be administered to participants three months after intervention..

  4. The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0

    The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 is a 59-item questionnaire that measures perceived disability and health-related quality of life after stroke in eight domains: strength, hand function, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory/thinking, and participation/role function.

    Time frame: The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 will be administered to participants at baseline.

  5. The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0

    The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 is a 59-item questionnaire that measures perceived disability and health-related quality of life after stroke in eight domains: strength, hand function, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory/thinking, and participation/role function.

    Time frame: The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.

  6. The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0

    The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 is a 59-item questionnaire that measures perceived disability and health-related quality of life after stroke in eight domains: strength, hand function, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory/thinking, and participation/role function.

    Time frame: The Stoke Impact Scale 3.0 will be administered to participants three months after intervention.

  7. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 13-item questionnaire to evaluate self-efficacy in functioning after stroke.

    Time frame: The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire will be administered to participants at baseline.

  8. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 13-item questionnaire to evaluate self-efficacy in functioning after stroke.

    Time frame: The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.

  9. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 13-item questionnaire to evaluate self-efficacy in functioning after stroke.

    Time frame: The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire will be administered to participants three months after intervention.

  10. The Wolf Motor Function Test

    The Wolf Motor Function Test is used to assess functional motor ability of the upper extremity with 15 functional tasks.

    Time frame: The Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered to participants at baseline.

  11. The Wolf Motor Function Test

    The Wolf Motor Function Test is used to assess functional motor ability of the upper extremity with 15 functional tasks.

    Time frame: The Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.

  12. The Wolf Motor Function Test

    The Wolf Motor Function Test is used to assess functional motor ability of the upper extremity with 15 functional tasks.

    Time frame: The Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered to participants three months after intervention.

  13. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a cognitive screening assessment that is used to measure several cognitive domains, which include working memory, delayed recall, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration, language, and orientation to time and place. The total score ranges from 0 to 30. One extra point is added to adjust the total score for participants who received less than 12 years of education.

    Time frame: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment will be administered to participants at baseline.

  14. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a cognitive screening assessment that is used to measure several cognitive domains, which include working memory, delayed recall, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration, language, and orientation to time and place. The total score ranges from 0 to 30. One extra point is added to adjust the total score for participants who received less than 12 years of education.

    Time frame: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.

  15. The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory

    The CAHAI evaluates the functional ability of the affected arm and hand to perform tasks after stroke. The 13 items contained in the CAHAI represent bimanual meaningful everyday activities and are made up a variety of the upper-extremity characteristics, including strength, dexterity, coordination, and grasp. The 7-point activity scale is used in the CAHAI, where 1 indicates "performing less than 25% of the effort to complete the task" and 7 indicates "the participants' affected upper extremity is able to complete the task competently independently." The reliability and validity of the CAHAI have been ascertained in stroke.

    Time frame: The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory will be administered to participants at baseline.

  16. The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory

    The CAHAI evaluates the functional ability of the affected arm and hand to perform tasks after stroke. The 13 items contained in the CAHAI represent bimanual meaningful everyday activities and are made up a variety of the upper-extremity characteristics, including strength, dexterity, coordination, and grasp. The 7-point activity scale is used in the CAHAI, where 1 indicates "performing less than 25% of the effort to complete the task" and 7 indicates "the participants' affected upper extremity is able to complete the task competently independently." The reliability and validity of the CAHAI have been ascertained in stroke.

    Time frame: The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory will be administered to participants immediately after intervention.

  17. The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory

    The CAHAI evaluates the functional ability of the affected arm and hand to perform tasks after stroke. The 13 items contained in the CAHAI represent bimanual meaningful everyday activities and are made up a variety of the upper-extremity characteristics, including strength, dexterity, coordination, and grasp. The 7-point activity scale is used in the CAHAI, where 1 indicates "performing less than 25% of the effort to complete the task" and 7 indicates "the participants' affected upper extremity is able to complete the task competently independently." The reliability and validity of the CAHAI have been ascertained in stroke.

    Time frame: The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory will be administered to participants three months after intervention.

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Taipei 100, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital
    New Taipei City, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Fongyuan Hospital
    Taichung, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital
    Taipei, 116, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wu SY, Li YC, Chen YW, Chen CL, Pan HC, Lin KC, Lau HY. Construct validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Dec;46(25):6195-6203. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2324122. Epub 2024 Mar 3. PubMed 38433459 ↗
  • Lee YC, Li YC, Lin KC, Chen CL, Wu YH, Kuo C, Yeh YP, Liu TX. Effects of proximal priority and distal priority robotic priming techniques with impairment-oriented training of upper limb functions in patients with chronic stroke: study protocol for a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05561-6. PubMed 34496938 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04446273
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Collaborators
National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 24, 2020
Start date
Jul 3, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 25, 2026

Study contacts

Kehchung Lin, ScD
Contact
kehchunglin@ntu.edu.tw
+886233668180
Keh-chung Lin, ScD
principal investigator · National Taiwan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion