ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04432012Updated Sep 11, 2026

A Study to Compare Different Ways of Steroid Administration After Total Knee Implantation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 4 mg/ml intravenous and Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 4 mg/ml intra-articular in Total Knee Replacement, sponsored by Christian Candrian. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Christian Candrian · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2020; still recruiting 6 years 4 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
159
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We are going to evaluate the difference between perioperative intravenous steroid supplementation, perioperative periarticular steroid supplementation, and standard anaesthesia protocols. We'll evaluate the outcome of patients with knee osteoarthritis who are undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty to understand which of the three treatments give more benefits to the patient.

Read the detailed description

A total of 159 patients will be needed (53 patients per arm, 3 arms in total). Dexamethasone (brand name: Mephameson) is the steroid drug that we perioperative administer in two different ways: intra-venous (IV) dexamethasone (9mg) in arm-A, intra-articular (IA) dexamethasone (9mg) in arm-B. No steroid supplementation will be provided in the control group (arm-C).

The primary objective of the study is to compare the effect on post-operative pain of I.V. and I.A. perioperative dexamethasone supplementation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

The secondary objectives of the studies will be the comparison between I.V. and I.A. peri-operative dexamethasone supplementation in terms of post-operative pain and function, opioids and analgesic drugs consumption, knee range of motion, systemic inflammatory response, time to mobilisation, length of stay, and patient satisfaction.

Moreover, both I.V. and I.A. steroid supplementation protocols will be compared to routine analgesia protocol (no steroid supplementation group) in order to document their advantages over the absence of steroid supplementation.

The safety of I.V. and I.A. peri-operative dexamethasone will be evaluated and compared recording all the steroid supplementation related complications. In particular, the risk of hyperglycaemia-related complications and post-operative infections will be documented. The safety of both I.V. and I.A. steroid supplementation protocols will be verified comparing them to the no-treatment group in terms of incidence of complications.

Overall study duration will be 12 years: 2 years to enroll all the patients and 10 years to complete the last follow-up. Primary data analysis is planned after the completion of the 1-year follow-up visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Total Knee Replacement

Keywords

  • Knee
  • surgery
  • replacement
  • arthroplasty
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Christian Candrian is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA at the Ospedale Regionale di Lugano.
  • Patients with a >18.5 and \<35.
  • Patients able to provide and follow all the study procedures as indicated by the protocol.
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to .
  • Revision TKA.
  • Active steroid therapy.
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Presence of other concomitant disease states ().
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant.
  • Participation in another study with drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study.
  • Previous enrolment into the current study.
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
159 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    arm-A Intra-venous dexamethasone

    9 mg of Intra-venous dexamethasone

    Drug: Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 4 mg/ml intravenous

  • Experimental
    arm-B intra-articular dexamethasone

    9 mg of intra-articular dexamethasone

    Drug: Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 4 mg/ml intra-articular

  • No intervention
    arm-C routine

    No steroid supplementation or other drugs will be added to the routinely performed anaesthesia protocol in the control group

Interventions

  • DrugDexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 4 mg/ml intravenous

    Drug page: Dexamethasone phosphate

    Perioperative intravenous injection of 3 ml of solution (9mg of dexamethasone)

    Also known as: Mephameson

  • DrugDexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 4 mg/ml intra-articular

    Drug page: Dexamethasone phosphate

    Perioperative intra-articular injection of 3 ml of solution (9mg of dexamethasone)

    Also known as: Mephameson

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean daily pain at rest during the first 3 days on a 0-10 numeric rating scale

    Mean daily pain at rest during the first 3 days reported on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) by the patients. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 reflecting the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 3 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-operative knee pain during the first 6 weeks after surgery on a 0-10 numeric rating scale

    Pain reported on 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) during the first 6 weeks and documented with a mobile application (developed at our Institution) that will ask the patients to report pain twice a day (once in the morning, once in the evening). Comparison will be performed in terms of mean daily pain during the first 6 weeks and mean daily pain during every single week. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 reflecting the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery

  2. Post-operative knee pain during the first 10 years after surgery

    reported on 0-10 NRS at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months using a questionnaire. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 reflecting the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. Post-operative function during the first 6 weeks after surgery

    reported on 0-10 NRS 8see above) during the first 6 weeks, documented with a mobile application developed by our institution that will ask the patients to report pain twice a day (once in the morning, once in the evening). Comparison will be performed in terms of mean daily pain during the first 6 weeks and mean daily pain during every single week. Furthermore, pain trajectories will be created. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating the worst possible function and 10 reflecting the best possible function.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Post-operative knee function during the first 10 years after surgery

    reported on 0-10 NRS at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months using a questionnaire. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating the worst possible function and 10 reflecting the best possible function.

    Time frame: 10 years

  5. Post-operative knee outcome on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)

    Questionnaire at 2 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. The WOMAC questionnaire is composed of 3 sub-scores that evaluate pain (5 questions, 0-20 points), stiffness (2 questions, 0-8 points), and function (17 questions, 0-68 points) and is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate knee osteoarthritis. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Time frame: 10 years

  6. Knee conditions on Knee society score (KSS)

    Questionnaire at 2 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. The original KSS has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions.

    Time frame: 10 years

  7. Quality of pain on PainDETECT questionnaire

    Questionnaire at 2 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. PainDETECT consists of seven questions that address the quality of pain symptoms; it is completed by the patient and no physical examination is required. A score ≤12 indicates that pain is unlikely to have a neuropathic component (\< 15%), while a score of ≥19 suggests that pain is likely to have a neuropathic component (\> 90%). An intermediate score (≥13, ≤18) indicates a possible neuropathic component .

    Time frame: 10 years

  8. Patient satisfaction: numeric rating scale (NRS)

    Patient satisfaction reported on 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) at 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months using a questionnaire. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating that patient is not satisfied at all and 10 reflecting that patient is totally satisfied.

    Time frame: 10 years

  9. Post-operative nausea incidence

    incidence (on a 0-10 NRS) of nausea will be evaluated in the first post-operative days. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating no nausea and 10 reflecting the maximum intensity of nausea.

    Time frame: During Hospitalization, approximately 3 days

  10. Post-operative nausea intensity

    intensity (on a 0-10 NRS) of nausea will be evaluated in the first post-operative days. The 0-10 NRS consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating no nausea and 10 reflecting the maximum intensity of nausea.

    Time frame: During Hospitalization, approximately 3 days

  11. Post-operative opioids and analgesic drugs consumption

    Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) score will be used to evaluate analgesic drug consumption. Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) scor is calculated for each medication by taking a consensus-based detriment weight for a given pharmacologic class and multiplying it by a score for dosage. The calculated values for each medication are then summed for a total MQS score. The score can provide a useful point measure of medication usage for any pain medication regimen.

    Time frame: During Hospitalization, approximately 3 days

  12. Post-operative C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Hematic C-Reactive Protein in mg/L will be evaluated as index of post-operative inflammatory response.

    Time frame: every days 3 days from surgery

  13. Post-operative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

    Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) will be evaluated as index of post-operative inflammatory response.

    Time frame: every days 3 days from surgery

  14. Time from surgery to first mobilization

    Time frame: During Hospitalization, approximately 1 days

  15. Time needed for climbing stairs the first time

    Time frame: approximately 1 week

  16. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: approximately 1 week

Other outcomes

  1. Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events

    The safety of I.V. and I.A. dexamethasone supplementation will be evaluated in terms of: rate of serious adverse events related to steroid supplementation, rate of prosthetic joint infections, rate of wound infections, rate of wound healing problems. Furthermore, glycaemia will be evaluated daily during the first three days after surgery. To delineate a complete safety profile of dexamethasone supplementation, all treatment related adverse events will be reported.

    Time frame: 10 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ospedale Regionale di Lugano Civico e Italiano
    Lugano, 6900, Switzerland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — not foreseen

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 81 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 10, 2020
First posted
Jun 16, 2020
StartActual
Jul 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2033
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04432012
Lead sponsor
Christian Candrian
Responsible party
Christian Candrian (Principal Investigator, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Christian Candrian, MD, Prof
Contact
christian.candrian@eoc.ch
+41 (0) 91 811 61 23
Marco Delcogliano, MD
Contact
marco.delcogliano@eoc.ch
+41 (0)91 811 66 56
Christian Candrian, MD, Prof.
principal investigator · EOC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexamethasone phosphate

Start the discussion