CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04415593Updated Dec 8, 2025

High and Low Dose Oral Peanut Immunotherapy - Comparison of Efficacy and Safety

An interventional study of High dose of peanuts and Low dose of peanuts in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by Medical University of Warsaw. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-08.

Sponsored by Medical University of Warsaw · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this trial the investigators aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral immunotherapy with peanut protein in high and low dose (300mg versus 150mg) in children with peanuts allergy.

Read the detailed description

Peanut allergy is a significant clinical problem. Food immunotherapy provides the latest approach to managing food allergy. Oral immunotherapy is considered as the most effective and safe, according to current research. What is more, this type of therapy is easily available and can be continued at patient's home. Obtaining and maintenance of tolerance to the allergic food is the main goal of this procedure.

The study will include children with peanut allergy, confirmed during open oral food challenge (OOFC) with peanut protein. First OOFC will be performed before immunotherapy, second one at the end of procedure. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. During the maintenance phase, the first group will receive low dose of peanut protein, which amounts 150mg, the second will get high dose, which is 300 mg of peanut protein. Oral immunotherapy with low and high dose of peanut protein in children randomly assigned to two groups (1:1).

In the following phase, every two weeks the dose of ground roasted peanut will be increased and applied to a child during hospitalization (1-day procedure). Precondition to increase of dose is good tolerance of previous portion of peanut. The maximum time frame for this phase is 14 months.

After achieving tolerance, immunotherapy will be continued for 2 months in maintenance phase, with dose 150mg or 300 mg peanut protein, depending on a study group.

The dosage increasing phase will last maximally 14 months. If patients achieves the maintenance dose earlier, this period may be shorter. Maintenance dose is determined by random patients' assignment to one from study's group and amounts 150mg or 300 mg of peanut protein, respectively.

The duration of the maintenance phase is 8 weeks (+/-2 weeks). After 2 months (8 weeks +/-2 weeks) of maintenance dose the final OOFC and evaluation of tolerance of peanut protein will be performed. Confirmation of the total desensitization of peanut is the tolerance of a single dose of 4500 mg peanut protein.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • peanuts
  • food allergy
  • immunotherapy
  • children
03

In context

Peanut Hypersensitivity

152 studies on the registry are indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 50 across 117 interventional studies indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Peanut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw is the lead sponsor of 316 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • medical history of peanut allergy,
  • IgE-mediated peanut allergy confirmed as positive skin prick tests with peanut allergens (diameter of the wheal greater than 3mm) and/or specific IgE level greater than 0.35 kilo units of Allergen per liter (kUA/l) (UniCAP method),
  • reaction to less than 100 mg of peanut protein during OOFC,
  • signed Informed Consent by parent/legal guardian and patient aged >16 years old,
  • patient's/caregivers' cooperation with researcher.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no confirmed peanut allergy,
  • negative oral food challenge with less than 100mg of peanut protein,
  • severe asthma,
  • uncontrolled mild/moderate asthma: forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1)\<80% (under 5. percentile), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC)\<75% (under 5. percentile), hospitalization due to asthma exacerbation within last 12 months,
  • current oral/sublingual/subcutaneous immunotherapy with other allergen,
  • eosinophilic gastroenteritis,
  • a history of severe recurrent anaphylaxis episodes,
  • chronic diseases requiring continuous treatment, including heart disease, epilepsy, metabolic diseases, diabetes,
  • medication:

    • oral, daily steroid therapy longer than 1 month within last 12 months,
    • at least two courses of oral steroid therapy (at least 7 days) within last 12 months,
    • oral steroid therapy longer than 7 days within last 3 months,
    • biological treatment,
    • the need to constantly take antihistamines,
    • therapy with β-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel inhibitors,
  • pregnancy,
  • no consent to participate in the study,
  • lack of patient cooperation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    high dose of peanut

    20 patients

    Dietary Supplement: High dose of peanuts

  • Active comparator
    low dose of peanuts

    20 patients

    Dietary Supplement: Low dose of peanuts

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementHigh dose of peanuts

    Patients will receive a high dose of ground peanuts (300 mg) mixed with apple mousse (supposing child tolerates apple). For the transparency of the study all patients will receive the same commercially prepared apple product

  • Dietary supplementLow dose of peanuts

    Patients will receive a low dose of ground peanuts (150 mg) mixed with apple mousse (supposing child tolerates apple). For the transparency of the study all patients will receive the same commercially prepared apple product

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tolerance of peanuts

    Proportion of participants who tolerate the single dose of 300 mg or more (maximum 4500mg) peanut protein

    Time frame: Up to 16 months after starting oral immunotherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse event

    quantity and severity of adverse effect, assessed and compared between groups, divided into mild, moderate and severe category

    Time frame: Up to 16 months after starting oral immunotherapy

  2. Laboratory data

    difference in peanut serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) level and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) level, compared between groups at the end of treatment

    Time frame: Up to 16 months after starting oral immunotherapy

  3. Skin prick test (SPT)

    change in skin prick test reactivity to peanut protein from baseline to end of treatment, compared between groups

    Time frame: Up to 16 months after starting oral immunotherapy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Pediatric Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw
    Warsaw, 02-091, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pajno GB, Fernandez-Rivas M, Arasi S, Roberts G, Akdis CA, Alvaro-Lozano M, Beyer K, Bindslev-Jensen C, Burks W, Ebisawa M, Eigenmann P, Knol E, Nadeau KC, Poulsen LK, van Ree R, Santos AF, du Toit G, Dhami S, Nurmatov U, Boloh Y, Makela M, O'Mahony L, Papadopoulos N, Sackesen C, Agache I, Angier E, Halken S, Jutel M, Lau S, Pfaar O, Ryan D, Sturm G, Varga EM, van Wijk RG, Sheikh A, Muraro A; EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy Guidelines Group. EAACI Guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):799-815. doi: 10.1111/all.13319. Epub 2017 Dec 5. PubMed 29205393 ↗
  • Stiefel G, Anagnostou K, Boyle RJ, Brathwaite N, Ewan P, Fox AT, Huber P, Luyt D, Till SJ, Venter C, Clark AT. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of peanut and tree nut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Jun;47(6):719-739. doi: 10.1111/cea.12957. PubMed 28836701 ↗
  • PALISADE Group of Clinical Investigators; Vickery BP, Vereda A, Casale TB, Beyer K, du Toit G, Hourihane JO, Jones SM, Shreffler WG, Marcantonio A, Zawadzki R, Sher L, Carr WW, Fineman S, Greos L, Rachid R, Ibanez MD, Tilles S, Assa'ad AH, Nilsson C, Rupp N, Welch MJ, Sussman G, Chinthrajah S, Blumchen K, Sher E, Spergel JM, Leickly FE, Zielen S, Wang J, Sanders GM, Wood RA, Cheema A, Bindslev-Jensen C, Leonard S, Kachru R, Johnston DT, Hampel FC Jr, Kim EH, Anagnostou A, Pongracic JA, Ben-Shoshan M, Sharma HP, Stillerman A, Windom HH, Yang WH, Muraro A, Zubeldia JM, Sharma V, Dorsey MJ, Chong HJ, Ohayon J, Bird JA, Carr TF, Siri D, Fernandez-Rivas M, Jeong DK, Fleischer DM, Lieberman JA, Dubois AEJ, Tsoumani M, Ciaccio CE, Portnoy JM, Mansfield LE, Fritz SB, Lanser BJ, Matz J, Oude Elberink HNG, Varshney P, Dilly SG, Adelman DC, Burks AW. AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18. PubMed 30449234 ↗
  • Bird JA, Spergel JM, Jones SM, Rachid R, Assa'ad AH, Wang J, Leonard SA, Laubach SS, Kim EH, Vickery BP, Davis BP, Heimall J, Cianferoni A, MacGinnitie AJ, Crestani E, Burks AW; ARC001 Study Group. Efficacy and Safety of AR101 in Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results of ARC001, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):476-485.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PubMed 29092786 ↗
  • Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Sicherer S, Teuber SS, Burks AW, Dubois AE, Beyer K, Eigenmann PA, Spergel JM, Werfel T, Chinchilli VM. Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Dec;130(6):1260-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.017. No abstract available. PubMed 23195525 ↗
  • Bollinger ME, Dahlquist LM, Mudd K, Sonntag C, Dillinger L, McKenna K. The impact of food allergy on the daily activities of children and their families. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Mar;96(3):415-21. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60908-8. PubMed 16597075 ↗
  • Cox LS, Sanchez-Borges M, Lockey RF. World Allergy Organization Systemic Allergic Reaction Grading System: Is a Modification Needed? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jan-Feb;5(1):58-62.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.009. PubMed 28065342 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04415593
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completion
May 30, 2024
Completion
Jul 30, 2024
Last update
Dec 8, 2025

Study contacts

Klementyna Łyżwa, MD
principal investigator · Department of Pediatric Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion