ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04414761Updated Aug 30, 2023

Live Birth Rate Between PPOS and GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Anticipated High Ovarian Response

A Phase 3 interventional study of Progesterone and GnRH Antagonist in IVF, GnRH Antagonist and PPOS, sponsored by ShangHai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 43 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-30.

Sponsored by ShangHai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
784
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 43 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Progestin can inhibit the pituitary LH surge during ovarian stimulation and various studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH surge in IVF. More and more centers in China are using PPOS because this regimen appears simpler and cheaper.A randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF in terms of the live birth rate is urgently needed.

Trial objectives: To compare the live birth rate between the PPOS protocol and the antagonist protocol used for ovarian stimulation during IVF

Eligible women will be randomised into one of the two groups:

Antagonist group : Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix or Ganirelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger.

PPOS group: Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or duphaston 10mg bd daily from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

There will be no fresh transfer. Only one blastocyst will be allowed to replaced in the first FET and a maximum of two blastocysts will be replaced in the subsequent FET cycles.

The primary outcome is the live birth rate of the first frozen-thawed transfer cycle.

02

Conditions studied

  • IVF
  • GnRH Antagonist
  • PPOS
03

In context

Lead sponsor

ShangHai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 43 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age of women \<43 years at the time of ovarian stimulation for IVF
  • The first IVF cycle
  • Antral follicle count (AFC) >15 on day 2-5 of the period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a functional ovarian cyst with E2>100 pg/mL
  • Recipient of oocyte donation
  • Undergoing preimplantation genetic testing
  • Presence of hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyp which is not surgically treated
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
784 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Antagonist group

    Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix or Ganirelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger.

    Drug: GnRH Antagonist

  • Experimental
    PPOS group

    Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or duphaston 10mg bd daily from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

    Drug: Progesterone

Interventions

  • oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or duphaston 10mg bd daily from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger

    Also known as: medroxyprogesterone, duphaston

  • GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix or Ganirelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger

    Also known as: Cetrorelix, Ganirelix

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. live birth rate

    live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer cycle

    Time frame: deliveries ≥22 weeks gestation with heartbeat and breath

Secondary outcomes

  1. positive serum hCG

    serum β-hCG ≥10 mIU/mL of the first FET

    Time frame: 2 weeks after FET

  2. clinical pregnancy

    presence of intrauterine gestational sac by trans-vaginal ultrasound at 6 gestational weeks of the first FET

    Time frame: 6 weeks' gestation

  3. biochemical pregnancy

    positive serum hCG not followed by clinical pregnancy of the first FET

    Time frame: 6 weeks' gestation

  4. implantation rate

    the number of gestational sacs per blastocyst transferred of the first FET

    Time frame: 6 weeks' gestation

  5. ongoing pregnancy

    a viable pregnancy beyond 12 weeks' gestation of the first FET

    Time frame: 12 weeks' gestation

  6. cumulative live birth

    cumulative live birth within 6 months of randomization

    Time frame: 2 years' after FET

  7. number of oocytes retrieved

    number of oocytes retrieved

    Time frame: 1 day after oocyte retrieval

  8. number and grading of blastocysts

    number and grading of blastocysts suitable for biopsy and freezing

    Time frame: 1 week after oocyte retrieval

  9. multiple pregnancy

    more than one intrauterine sacs on scanning

    Time frame: multiple pregnancy beyond gestation 12 weeks

  10. ectopic pregnancy

    pregnancy outside the uterine cavity

    Time frame: ectopic pregnancy during 12 weeks gestation

  11. birthweight of newborns

    the birth weight of newborns

    Time frame: 1 year after FET

  12. serum baseline FSH

    baseline FSH of period day 2-3

    Time frame: day 2-3 of period

  13. estradiol level on the trigger day

    Time frame: 2 days before oocyte retrieval

  14. progesterone level on the trigger day

    Time frame: 2 days before oocyte retrieval

  15. estradiol and progesterone levels in the follicular fluid

    estradiol and progesterone levels in the follicular fluid

    Time frame: 1 year after FET

  16. miscarriage

    clinically recognised pregnancy loss before 22 weeks of pregnancy.

    Time frame: 22 weeks of pregnancy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • ShangHai JIAI Genetics&IVF Institute
    Shanghai, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034. PubMed 30927417 ↗
  • Yu S, Long H, Chang HY, Liu Y, Gao H, Zhu J, Quan X, Lyu Q, Kuang Y, Ai A. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367. PubMed 29300975 ↗
  • Massin N. New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):211-220. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw047. PubMed 28062551 ↗
  • Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5. PubMed 25956370 ↗
  • Dong J, Wang Y, Chai WR, Hong QQ, Wang NL, Sun LH, Long H, Wang L, Tian H, Lyu QF, Lu XF, Chen QJ, Kuang YP. The pregnancy outcome of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using 4 versus 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1048-1055. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14622. PubMed 28276192 ↗
  • Alexandru P, Cekic SG, Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Ata B. Progestins versus GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Feb 5. PubMed 32327297 ↗
  • Chen ZQ, Ai A, Zhang Y, Li H, Wang JY, Wang L, Ng EHY. A randomized controlled trial to compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response. Fertil Steril. 2024 Jun;121(6):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.027. Epub 2024 Jan 23. PubMed 38272383 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) and study protocol will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will be available when beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Access criteria: To achieve aims in the approved proposal, researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will be shared with. Proposals should be sent to lihe198900@163.com.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04414761
Lead sponsor
ShangHai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2020
Start date
Jun 4, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2022
Completion
Oct 10, 2022
Last update
Aug 30, 2023

Study contacts

XIAOXI SUN, PHD
study director · Shanghai JiAi Genetics & IVF Institute

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Progesterone

Start the discussion