CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04400396TargetFortUpdated Jun 9, 2020

Effect of Target Fortified Human Milk on the Growth Quality of Very Preterm Infants (TargetFort)

An observational study in Growth, Body Composition and Prematurity, sponsored by Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central. Status unknown at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 1 Day and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-09.

Sponsored by Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2020), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
80
Ages
1 Day and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is reported that the standard method for fortification of human milk (HM) overestimates the energy and protein densities of HM (Macedo MHNP 2018), thus originating infant undernutrition (Macedo AJP 2018). The target fortification, based on analysis of HM composition, is considered the gold-standard method (Rochow 2015, McLeod 2016). This observational mixed cohort study aims to assess if very preterm infants fed HM with target fortification have greater growth during hospital stay and better body composition at term post-menstrual age (PMA), than those fed HM with standard fortification.

Read the detailed description

Study design: observational mixed cohort study, comparing growth and body composition in a contemporary cohort of very preterm infants fed HM with target fortification, the currently adopted clinical practice, with a historical cohort of very preterm infants fed HM with standard fortification (Macedo AJP 2018).

Study periods: historical cohort from 1 February 2014 to 28 February 2015; contemporary cohort: start February 2020, estimated recruitment period of 16 months; Settings: Neonatal Care Unit (NICU) and Human Milk Bank at Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa and Nutrition Laboratory at Hospital Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central.

Product to be analyzed: HM, including mother's own milk (MOM) and donor's milk (DHM). Donor HM is pasteurized using the Holder method (Peila 2016) which is adopted by the Human Milk Bank of Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa (Macedo MHNP 2018).

Demographic variables: Gestational age, sex, singleton or twin, birth weight, small-, appropriate- or large-for-gestational age (\<3rd percentile, ≥3rd percentile and ≤97th percentile, >97th percentile, respectively) (Fenton 2013), severity index (SNAPPE II) (Richardson 2001), use of prenatal corticosteroids, diagnosis of late sepsis (Modi 2009), necrotizing enterocolitis (grade ≥ 3) (Bell 1971), intraperiventricular hemorrhage (grade ≥ 3) (Papile 1978), multicystic periventricular leukomalacia (de Vries 1992), and chronic lung disease (Becker 1984).

Method of collection and analysis of HM: as described in a previous study (Macedo MHNP 2018), in order to minimize daily variability of breast milk composition, mothers are asked to save milk collected through 24 hours in the same container. The HM composition (MOM and DHM) are analyzed using the Miris human milk analyzer (Miris AB, Uppsala, Sweden), following the method described in a previous study (Macedo MHNP 2018). The composition is expressed in densities: Kcal/dL of energy and g/dl of fat, raw and true protein, carbohydrates and ashes.

Energy and macronutrient composition of the multi-component HM fortifier and modular protein and fat supplements. For this purpose, an Excel program to calculate modular protein and fat supplements to be added to fortified HM was developed and registered (Nona R, Cardoso M, Portuguese Directorate of Intellectual Property Services, IGAC-DSPI, nº 480/2020, 26 February 2020).

Daily intakes of energy (Kcal/kg), protein (g/kg) and protein:energy ratio (P:E), based on administered volume of milk (ml/kg).

Anthropometric and body composition measurements in infants: According to the previously described method (Macedo AJP 2018), during the hospital stay, the same observer (MMC) measures daily the body weight (allowing the calculation of weight gain velocity), and weekly the length and the head circumference. Within the first week after discharge, body composition will be assessed using displacement plethysmography, to evaluate fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM), percentage of FM (%FM), percentage of FFM (%FFM) and FM index (FMI), as described in a previous study (Macedo AJP 2018). Both FMI and %FM are used as indicators of adiposity.

Estimate of sample size: The study sample size was calculated to detect a difference of 2 g/kg/day in growth velocity with a standard deviation 2.6 (Macedo, 2018; Tremblay, 2017) for normally distributed variables, a significance level of 0.05, and an 80% power; thus, a required sample of 67 infants (n1=33; n2+20%=34) was estimated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Growth
  • Body Composition
  • Prematurity
  • Breast Milk Collection
  • Nutrient Deficiency
  • Feeding Patterns
  • Adiposity
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 112 across 777 observational studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Very preterm newborn infants (born at \<33 weeks) that achieve full enteral feeding exclusively or predominantly with human milk

Inclusion criteria

  • newborn infants born at \<33 weeks of gestation,
  • admitted to the NICU of Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa (inborns and outborns),
  • exclusively or predominantly HM fed (>87.5% volume per day)
  • discharged alive.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • multiples of grade >2
  • diagnosis of innate metabolism disorder,
  • fed with formula for >12.5% of the daily volume intake for two or more consecutive full days ,
  • discharge with transference to other hospital,
  • unavailable for body composition analysis after discharge.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • target HM fortification

    Contemporary cohort fed HM with target fortification

    Dietary Supplement: target HM fortification

  • standard HM fortification

    Historical cohort fed HM with standard fortification

    Dietary Supplement: standard HM fortification

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementstandard HM fortification

    Based on the assumed energy and macronutrient composition of HM, the commercial multi-component HM fortifier was added, in order to compensate identified nutritional deficits.

  • Dietary supplementtarget HM fortification

    Based on the measured energy and macronutrient composition of HM, modular protein and fat supplements are added, in addition to the commercial multi-component HM fortifier, in order to correct identified specific nutritional deficits. For this purpose, an Excel program to calculate modular protein and fat supplements to be added to fortified HM was developed and registered (Nona R, Cardoso M, Portuguese Directorate of Intellectual Property Services, IGAC-DSPI, nº 480/2020, 26 February 2020)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. weight gain velocity rate

    average relative daily variation of body weight

    Time frame: from baseline (the first day of exclusive or predominantly feeding with fortified human milk) up to 40 weeks postmenstrual age or to home discharge, whatever comes first

  2. length velocity rate

    average relative weekly variation of body length

    Time frame: from baseline (the first day of exclusive or predominantly feeding with fortified human milk) up to 40 weeks postmenstrual age or to home discharge, whatever comes first

  3. head circumference velocity rate

    average relative weekly variation of head circumference

    Time frame: from baseline (the first day of exclusive or predominantly feeding with fortified human milk) up to 40 weeks postmenstrual age or to home discharge, whatever comes first

  4. adiposity (fat mass index)

    ratio of fat mass over squared body length

    Time frame: A single measurement performed up to 10 days after home discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. adiposity (fat mass percentage)

    proportion of fat mass on total body mass

    Time frame: A single measurement performed up to 10 days after home discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central
    Lisboa, 1150-199, Portugal
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Macedo I, Pereira-da-Silva L, Cardoso M. The fortification method relying on assumed human milk composition overestimates the actual energy and macronutrient intakes in very preterm infants. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Sep 17;4:22. doi: 10.1186/s40748-018-0090-4. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30237896 ↗
  • McLeod G, Sherriff J, Hartmann PE, Nathan E, Geddes D, Simmer K. Comparing different methods of human breast milk fortification using measured v. assumed macronutrient composition to target reference growth: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016 Feb 14;115(3):431-9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004614. Epub 2015 Dec 2. PubMed 26627899 ↗
  • Rochow N, Landau-Crangle E, Fusch C. Challenges in breast milk fortification for preterm infants. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 May;18(3):276-84. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000167. PubMed 25807355 ↗
  • Macedo I, Pereira-da-Silva L, Cardoso M. Associations of Measured Protein and Energy Intakes with Growth and Adiposity in Human Milk-Fed Preterm Infants at Term Postmenstrual Age: A Cohort Study. Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jul;35(9):882-891. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1626717. Epub 2018 Feb 2. PubMed 29532450 ↗
  • Henriksen C, Westerberg AC, Ronnestad A, Nakstad B, Veierod MB, Drevon CA, Iversen PO. Growth and nutrient intake among very-low-birth-weight infants fed fortified human milk during hospitalisation. Br J Nutr. 2009 Oct;102(8):1179-86. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509371755. Epub 2009 May 18. PubMed 19445820 ↗
  • Maas C, Wiechers C, Bernhard W, Poets CF, Franz AR. Early feeding of fortified breast milk and in-hospital-growth in very premature infants: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Nov 4;13:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-178. PubMed 24180239 ↗
  • Morlacchi L, Mallardi D, Gianni ML, Roggero P, Amato O, Piemontese P, Consonni D, Mosca F. Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study. J Transl Med. 2016 Jul 1;14(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y. PubMed 27370649 ↗
  • Polberger S. New approaches to optimizing early diets. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2009;63:195-204; discussion 204-8, 259-68. doi: 10.1159/000209982. PubMed 19346777 ↗
  • Cardoso M, Virella D, Macedo I, Silva D, Pereira-da-Silva L. Customized Human Milk Fortification Based on Measured Human Milk Composition to Improve the Quality of Growth in Very Preterm Infants: A Mixed-Cohort Study Protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):823. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020823. PubMed 33477964 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04400396
Lead sponsor
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central
Collaborators
Sociedade Portuguesa de Neonatologia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2020
Start date
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 16, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2020

Study contacts

Luis Pereira-da-Silva, MD, PhD
study director · Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion