CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04391348PET-HCC01Updated Nov 18, 2023

Combination PET With 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 18 F-choline in Patient With HCC

An interventional study of PET-TDM with 18F-FDG + PET-TDM with 18F-fluorocholine in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
230
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this protocol is to obtain a better match between the actual staging and the proposed treatment in order to avoid inadequate treatments at risk of complications. In patients with HCC classified as BCLC A to C, the combination of 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine PET- TomoDensitoMetry (TDM) with conventional imaging would clinically significantly modify the therapeutic strategy initially planned by conventional imaging alone. This change in therapeutic strategy would be from curative to palliative treatment or from loco-regional palliative to systemic palliative treatment. 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine PET-CT scans will be performed after inclusion of the patient in the study and prior to multidisciplinary consultation meeting for treatment discussion.

Read the detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of death from cancer worldwide, developing on cirrhosis in 90% of cases. The prognosis of patients with HCC remains poor with an overall survival of around 10% at 5 years for all tumor stages combined. The diagnosis of HCC relies on non-invasive conventional imaging criteria (computed tomography [CT] and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and/or histology. Conventional imaging (liver CT and/or MRI and lung CT) enables HCC staging according to the Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, linking each stage to therapeutic modalities. Accurate staging with reliable imaging methods is therefore crucial to determine the best treatment strategy. The principal objective is to demonstrate that the identification of new tumor lesions by an experimental procedure combining 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine PET-CT scans in patients with HCC, modifies the initially planned therapeutic strategy of a curative treatment palliative treatment, from locoregional palliative treatment to systemic palliative treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Positron Emission Tomography
  • 18F-FDG
  • 18 F-Fluorocholine
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 230 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients> 18 years old
  • First diagnosis of HCC (no previous treatments received)
  • Diagnosis of HCC according to The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) 2012 criteria by "non-invasive" imaging on cirrhosis or by histology on cirrhosis or non-cirrhotic liver
  • BCLC tumor stage A to C (excluding BCLC C with extrahepatic metastases) according to conventional imaging
  • Will be able to have a PET scanner within 4 weeks after the inclusion visit
  • Ability to stay 20 minutes longer for PET-CT scans
  • Need for oral, intra-uterine or mechanical contraception for women of childbearing age
  • Written consent for participation in the study
  • Having medical insurance coverage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients classified BCLC stage 0 (single HCC less than 2 cm)
  • Patients classified as BCLC stage C with extrahepatic metastases
  • Decreased cirrhosis (Child Pugh C) and / or patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 2 to 4 not candidates for liver transplantation
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (defined by blood glucose> 1.7 g / L at the time of inclusion)
  • Hypersensitivity to 18F Fluorocholine or 18F-FDG or any of the excipients
  • Creatinine clearance \<40 mL / min
  • Contraindication to MRI: pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator not compatible with MRI, neurostimulator, cochlear implant, intracerebral ferromagnetic vascular clip, intraocular or cerebral metallic foreign bodies, insulin pump
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Patient under tutorship or curatorship or safeguard of justice
  • Known allergy to iodine
  • Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Patients with care "State Medical Aid"
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
230 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PET-TDM

    PET-TDM with 18F-FDG and PET-TDM with 18F-fluorocholine

    Radiation: PET-TDM with 18F-FDG + PET-TDM with 18F-fluorocholine

Interventions

  • RadiationPET-TDM with 18F-FDG + PET-TDM with 18F-fluorocholine

    Experimental procedure combining PET-TDM with 18F-FDG and PET-TDM with 18F-Fluorocholine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Demonstrate that the identification of new tumour lesions by an experimental procedure combining PET-TDMs with 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine in patients with HCC modifies the initially planned therapeutic strategy

    The primary objective of the study will be evaluated by the proportion of patients with a first diagnosis of HCC whose treatment initially planned in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting is modified by the combined use of PET-TDMs at 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine in combination with conventional imaging compared to conventional imaging alone.

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients for whom a curative treatment initially planned on the basis of conventional imaging has been modified, for a loco-regional or systemic palliative treatment by the experimental procedure (18F-FDG and 18F PET-CTs) -Fluorocholine)

    The proportion of patients for whom curative treatment initially planned on the basis of conventional imaging has been modified for loco-regional or systemic palliative treatment by the experimental procedure (PET-TDMs at 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine).

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

  2. Modification of the BCLC tumor stage initially evaluated by conventional imaging on the basis of each PET-TDM (18F-FDG alone, 18F-Fluorocholine alone) separately and then the combination of both (combination of PET-TDMs with 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine

    The proportion of modification of the tumor status to a more advanced status in the BCLC classification using PET/CT using 18F-FDG alone, 18F-Fluorocholine alone and then the combination of both in association with conventional imaging compared to conventional imaging alone

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

  3. Identification as a HCC of at least one additional tumour lesion using the experimental procedure (each PET-TDM separately and then the combination of both) compared to conventional imaging alone

    The proportion of patients with an additional tumor lesion detected by 18F-FDG-PET alone, with 18F-Fluorocholine alone and then the combination of both, whose tumor nature is confirmed histologically or by imaging follow-up

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

  4. Description of the differences in diagnostic performance of the experimental procedure compared to the diagnostic gold standard (non-invasive criteria and/or tumor histology)

    The proportion of new intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic lesions detected by PET-TDMs at 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine and confirmed as HCC on histology or by imaging follow-up

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

  5. Cost-effectiveness between PET-TDMs at 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine associated with conventional imaging versus conventional imaging alone

    The (incremental) cost-effectiveness ratio of 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine PET-CTs associated with conventional imaging versus conventional imaging alone

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

  6. Number of patients who had an additional examination proposed by the MCM (multidisciplinary consultation meeting) following the PET-TDMs performed

    The number of patients who have had an additional complementary examination (biopsy or new imaging for example) proposed by the MCM following 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluorocholine PET-CT scans will be collected prospectively

    Time frame: through multidisciplinary concertation meeting an average of 3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NAULT
    Bobigny, 93000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nault JC, Sutter O, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Seror O. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):783-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13. PubMed 29031662 ↗
  • Cadier B, Bulsei J, Nahon P, Seror O, Laurent A, Rosa I, Layese R, Costentin C, Cagnot C, Durand-Zaleski I, Chevreul K; ANRS CO12 CirVir and CHANGH groups. Early detection and curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in France and in the United States. Hepatology. 2017 Apr;65(4):1237-1248. doi: 10.1002/hep.28961. Epub 2017 Feb 8. PubMed 28176349 ↗
  • Bertagna F, Bertoli M, Bosio G, Biasiotto G, Sadeghi R, Giubbini R, Treglia G. Diagnostic role of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Int. 2014 Oct;8(4):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9566-0. Epub 2014 Sep 3. PubMed 26202754 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04391348
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2020
Start date
Jul 17, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 28, 2023
Completion
Apr 28, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Jean Charles NAULT, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion