CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04385888Updated Aug 26, 2025Results posted

Effects of Low-calorie Sweetened Beverage Restriction in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

An interventional study of Low-calorie sweetener restriction in Type 1 Diabetes, sponsored by Allison Sylvetsky (Meni). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-26.

Sponsored by Allison Sylvetsky (Meni) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will investigate whether low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) are helpful or harmful for preventing diabetes complications among children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).

Read the detailed description

Eligible participants will be scheduled for a baseline visit. During the week prior, they will be instructed to continue usual dietary habits and complete an online photo-assisted food record, with parental assistance. At the baseline visit, height and weight will be measured, a spot urine sample will be collected, and a blood draw will be performed. Participants will have their CGM data for the past two weeks downloaded. In a subset of participants, an abdominal MRI will also be performed.

Subjects will then be randomized to either: 1) low-calorie sweetener (LCS) restriction or 2) continuation of usual LCS intake (control). All participants (both groups) and their parent will undergo a brief, 20-minute orientation where the PI and study dietitian will provide an introduction to the study, instructions on completing food records, education on CGM. Those in the intervention group will be given sample replacement beverages and a brochure on avoiding LCS to take home which will include a list of specific foods and beverages containing LCS to avoid during the study. Participants in the control group will be counseled on healthy eating as those in the intervention group (in accordance with standard dietary guidance for T1D management), with the exception of information and resources for avoiding LCS.

In both groups, text messages will be sent to parents 3X/week with reminders that their child should avoid LCS or continue usual intake, per randomization. Adherence will be monitored through collection of spot-urine samples for measurement of sucralose and ace-K concentrations. daily text message beverage logs completed by the parent, and photo-assisted food records with parent assistance in Weeks 0, 1, 6, and 12. During Week 6, participants and their parent will attend a mid-intervention telemedicine booster visit, during which the PI and/or study RA will reinforce the intervention and remind participants to mail back a spot urine sample using materials provided by the study team at baseline. Participants will be reminded of the study instructions, including the importance of inserting the DEXCOM G6 sensor (provided by study team) at the beginning of Week 11.

At the end of Week 12, participants and their parent will return for follow-up. Participants will have their CGM data downloaded using DEXCOM Clarity™ software. Height and weight will be measured and a second blood draw performed. Those who had an MRI at the baseline visit (n=30) will undergo a second abdominal MRI. Those randomized to the intervention will be purposefully sampled and asked to complete a \~20 minute qualitative interview and \~5 minute satisfaction survey, together with their parent, about their study experience and the challenges of LCSB restriction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 40 across 2,649 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Allison Sylvetsky (Meni) as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Child 6-12 years old
  2. Report consumption of ≥ 12 oz. beverages with sucralose (+/- ace-K) or aspartame+ace-K per day
  3. Child has had a diagnosis of T1D for at least one year
  4. Parent/guardian has reliable phone and internet access
  5. Parent/guardian and child both speak English
  6. Child is enrolled in the Diabetes Program at Children's National Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Child under 6 years of age
  2. Child older than 12 years of age
  3. Child consumes foods with low-calorie sweeteners more than 3 times per week
  4. Child consumes condiments with low-calorie sweeteners more than 3 times per week
  5. Child has poorly managed chronic disease other than T1D or is taking medications other than insulin
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low-calorie sweetener restriction

    Participants will be instructed to avoid low-calorie sweetened beverages and other sources of low-calorie sweeteners, and to instead consume unsweetened alternatives, such as plain or sparkling water for 12 weeks.

    Behavioral: Low-calorie sweetener restriction

  • No intervention
    Usual consumption/control

    Participants will continue low-calorie sweetener consumption, as usual.

Interventions

  • BehavioralLow-calorie sweetener restriction

    Participants will avoid low-calorie sweetened beverages and other sources of low-calorie sweeteners for 12 weeks and will instead consume unsweetened alternatives, such as still or sparkling water

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Glycemic Variability

    Change in Time in Range (TIR)

    Time frame: Baseline vs Weeks 11-12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visceral Adiposity

    Change in visceral fat area will be assessed using DXA. Due to COVID-19, very few participants were able to have visceral fat measured pre and post intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline vs. Week 12

  2. Change in Inflammatory Cytokines (TNF-alpha)

    We will collect a blood sample to measure TNF-alpha and calculate the change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline vs Week 12

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2025

Participant flow

Run-in Period
Participant flow — Run-in Period
MilestoneLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: Parents
Started16151615
Completed15131513
Not completed1212
Randomized to Intervention or Control
Participant flow — Randomized to Intervention or Control
MilestoneLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: Parents
Started15131513
Completed13131313
Not completed2020

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlycemic Variability

Change in Time in Range (TIR)

Time frame:
Baseline vs Weeks 11-12
Reported as:
Mean · percent
Glycemic Variability
percentLow-calorie Sweetener RestrictionUsual Consumption/ControlLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: Parents
Glycemic Variability2.00 ± 2.593.91 ± 2.59——
SecondaryVisceral Adiposity

Change in visceral fat area will be assessed using DXA. Due to COVID-19, very few participants were able to have visceral fat measured pre and post intervention.

Time frame:
Baseline vs. Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · % body fat
Visceral Adiposity
% body fatLow-calorie Sweetener RestrictionUsual Consumption/ControlLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: Parents
Visceral Adiposity0.1 ± 1.11.0 ± 0.8——
SecondaryChange in Inflammatory Cytokines (TNF-alpha)

We will collect a blood sample to measure TNF-alpha and calculate the change from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline vs Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Change in Inflammatory Cytokines (TNF-alpha)
pg/mLLow-calorie Sweetener RestrictionUsual Consumption/ControlLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: Parents
Change in Inflammatory Cytokines (TNF-alpha)0.08 ± 0.07-0.23 ± 0.08——

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected for each participant during the 14 weeks they were enrolled in the study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: Children0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Usual Consumption/Control: Children0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)
Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: Parents0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Usual Consumption/Control: Parents0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics were not collected for parents.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: ParentsTotal
Mean9.7 ± 1.89.7 ± 2.3——9.7 ± 2.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: ParentsTotal
Female77——14
Male86——14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: ParentsTotal
Hispanic or Latino11——2
Not Hispanic or Latino1412——26
Unknown or Not Reported00——0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: ParentsTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00——0
Asian00——0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00——0
Black or African American66——12
White86——14
More than one race11——2
Unknown or Not Reported00——0
BMI percentile
BMI percentile(percentile)Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: ParentsTotal
Mean62.1 ± 29.073.9 ± 15.0——67.6 ± 23.9
Time since type 1 diabetes diagnosis
Time since type 1 diabetes diagnosis(years)Low-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ChildrenUsual Consumption/Control: ChildrenLow-calorie Sweetener Restriction: ParentsUsual Consumption/Control: ParentsTotal
Mean4.0 ± 2.94.4 ± 2.1——4.2 ± 2.5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's National Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sylvetsky AC, Moore HR, Kaidbey JH, Halberg SE, Cogen FR, DiPietro L, Elmi A, Goran MI, Streisand R. Rationale and design of DRINK-T1D: A randomized clinical trial of effects of low-calorie sweetener restriction in children with type 1 diabetes. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106431. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106431. Epub 2021 May 8. PubMed 33974993 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 25, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04385888
Lead sponsor
Allison Sylvetsky (Meni)
Collaborators
Children's National Research Institute
Responsible party
Allison Sylvetsky (Meni) (Principal Investigator, George Washington University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 13, 2020
Start date
Oct 28, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2023
Completion
Dec 30, 2023
Results posted
Aug 26, 2025
Last update
Aug 26, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion