CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04373538Updated Sep 29, 2021

Improving Well-being by Improving Memory for Treatment for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction

An interventional study of Trans-C for sleep and circadian function + Memory Support in Sleep Disorder and Circadian Dysregulation, sponsored by University of California, Berkeley. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-29.

Sponsored by University of California, Berkeley · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
55 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mental illness is often chronic, severe, and difficult to treat. Though there has been significant progress towards establishing effective and efficient interventions for psychological health problems, many individuals do not gain lasting benefits from these treatments. The Memory Support Intervention (MSI) was developed utilizing existing findings from the cognitive science literature to improve treatment outcomes. In this study, the investigators aim to conduct an open trial that includes individuals 55 years and older to assess if a simplified version of the Memory Support Intervention improves sleep and circadian functioning, reduces functional impairment, and improves patient memory for treatment.

Read the detailed description

Given the huge burden associated with mental illness, a major challenge ahead is to hasten progress toward developing and testing highly efficient and effective interventions for psychological health problems. Progress toward establishing evidence-based psychosocial treatments for most types of mental illness has been excellent, particularly the cognitive and behavioral treatments (CBT). However, much work remains. The effect sizes are moderate, gains may not persist, and there are patients who derive little or no benefit. Even under optimal conditions, treatment failure is too common. Hence, the challenge is to improve outcomes. Seminal progress toward meeting this challenge must include innovations that are safe, powerful, inexpensive and simple (for fast and effective dissemination).

The proposed research seeks to extend the investigators' program of research on one such innovation. With an R34 and an R01 from NIMH, the investigators have been seeking to improve outcome by improving memory for the content of therapy sessions. To achieve this goal, the investigators have developed and adapted existing findings from the education and cognitive science literatures. The resulting Memory Support Intervention (MSI) involves a series of specific procedures that support the encoding and retrieval stages of an episodic memory.

This line of research arises from several lines of evidence: (a) memory for the content of therapy sessions is poor and (b) memory impairment is modifiable. Although the outcomes will be relevant to psychosocial treatments for a broad range of problems, the focus of this proposal is one treatment for sleep and circadian dysfunction because (a) sleep problems are one of the most prevalent psychological health problems, (b) there is substantial and promising evidence for the efficacy of the transdiagnostic sleep and circadian (TranS-C), yet there is also room for improvement in outcome and (c) sleep problems are associated with memory impairment.

This pilot study will be conducted in order to collect data on individuals who are 55 years and older because memory functioning can decline over this phase of the lifespan. Sleep and circadian problems are also common.

The aim is: To conduct an open trial that includes n = 40 individuals 55 years and older to assess if the Memory Support Intervention (a) improves sleep and circadian functioning, (b) reduces functional impairment and (c) improves patient memory for treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Disorder
  • Circadian Dysregulation
03

In context

Sleep Wake Disorders

788 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Wake Disorders; 186 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 62 across 548 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Wake Disorders.

Browse Sleep Wake Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Berkeley is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 55 years and older
  • English language fluency
  • Exhibit a sleep or circadian disturbance as determined by endorsing 4 "quite a bit" or 5 "very much" (or the equivalent for reverse scored items) on one or more PROMIS-SD questions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active and progressive mental or physical illness or neurological degenerative disease
  • Night shift work >2 nights per week in the past 3 months
  • Not able and willing to participate in and/or complete the assessments and participate in the treatment
  • Current suicide risk sufficient to preclude treatment on an outpatient basis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Memory Support Intervention

    Behavioral: Trans-C for sleep and circadian function + Memory Support

Interventions

  • BehavioralTrans-C for sleep and circadian function + Memory Support

    The Memory Support Intervention will be delivered interwoven with Trans-C. The Memory Support Intervention is designed to improve patient memory for treatment and involves a series of specific procedures that support the encoding and retrieval stages of episodic memory. The memory support strategies are proactively, strategically and intensively integrated into treatment-as-usual to support encoding. Memory support is delivered alongside each 'treatment point', defined as a main idea, principle, or experience that the treatment provider wants the patient to remember or implement as part of the treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-level outcome: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Disturbance

    Assesses perceived functional impairments related to sleep problems using a self-report questionnaire. The minimum value is 8. The maximum value is 40. Higher scores mean more sleep disturbance (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  2. Sheehan Disability Scale

    Assesses functional impairment on a scale from 0 to 30, where higher scores mean higher impairment

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Affect Scale

    Positive affect scores can range from 10-15, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  2. Perceived Stress Scale

    Individual scores on the Perceived Stress Scale can range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  3. Satisfaction with Life Scale

    5-item instrument designed to measure global cognitive judgements of satisfaction with one's life. Scores can range from 5-35 with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction with life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  4. Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire

    Measures the credibility and expectation of improvement from the treatment. Scores can range from 9- 81 with higher scores indicating higher treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: At treatment Week 2 and at post-treatment which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  5. Means and Variability of sleep efficiency (Daily Sleep Diary)

    Daily Sleep Diary means and variability for sleep efficiency (total sleep time/time in bed X 100), Total sleep time (TST), Total wake time (TWT), bedtime, waketime.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  6. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Related Impairment

    Assesses perceived functional impairments related to sleep problems in a self-report questionnaire. The minimum value is 16. The maximum value is 80. Higher scores mean more sleep related problems (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  7. Composite Sleep Health Score

    Composite Sleep Health Score which is defined as the sum of scores on 6 sleep health dimensions: Regularity (Midpoint fluctuation), Satisfaction (Sleep quality question on PROMIS-SD), Alertness (Daytime sleepiness question on PROMIS-SRI), Timing (Mean midpoint), Efficiency (Sleep efficiency) and Duration (Total Sleep Time).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  8. British Columbia Complaints Inventory

    Assessed perceived cognitive difficulties, scale consists of 6 items. Scores can range from 0-18 with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived cognitive difficulties

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  9. Mutlidimensional Fatigue Inventory

    20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue. Scores can range from 20-100 with higher total scores corresponding with more acute levels of fatigue

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  10. Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

    Used to assess the frequency with which people experienced cognitive failures. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cognitive failures.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  11. Epworth Sleepiness Scale

    Used to assess daytime sleepiness. Scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  12. Memory for Treatment

    Recall on the Patient Treatment Recall Task

    Time frame: At post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  13. Generalization Task Questionnaire

    Measures how treatment gains sustained during therapy have generalized to the participant's thinking and functioning during every day life

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  14. Acceptability Intervention Measure

    Assess provider perceptions of the appropriateness of the treatment intervention using a self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Through therapy completion, an average of 8 weeks

  15. Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    Assesses provider perceptions of the appropriateness of the treatment intervention using a self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Through therapy completion, an average of 8 weeks

  16. Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Assesses provider perceptions of the feasibility of the intervention using a self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Through therapy completion, an average of 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. STOP-BANG Questionnaire

    Scores range from 0-8 with higher scores associated with higher risk of experiencing sleep apnea

    Time frame: Baseline only

  2. Screen for periodic limb movement disorder

    Restless Leg Syndrome Questions

    Time frame: Baseline only

  3. Medication Dosage

    Collect dose, type, frequency and changes in medications

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  4. Medication Type

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  5. Medication Use Frequency

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  6. Change in Medications

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  7. Semi-structured interview

    Assess patient perceptions of treatment

    Time frame: Only at post-treatment which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Berkeley
    Berkeley, California 94720-1650, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04373538
Lead sponsor
University of California, Berkeley
Responsible party
Allison Harvey (Professor, University of California, Berkeley) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2020
Start date
May 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2021
Completion
Jun 25, 2021
Last update
Sep 29, 2021

Study contacts

Allison Harvey, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, Berkeley

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion