CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04366674Updated Apr 29, 2020

Mordified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini in Cleft Palate Repair

An interventional study of cleft palate repair in Cleft Palate, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 60 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-29.

Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2013, registered Apr 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
71
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Months to 60 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

to study the benefical audiological and/or otological effect by mordified restoration of tensor veli palatini in cleft palate repair compared to traditional Langenbeck's repair and merely levator veli palatini restoration.

Read the detailed description

71 patients with cleft palate received surgery were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: patients who received Langenbeck surgery without specific restoration of levator veli palatini or tensor veli palatini. Group 2: patients who received palate surgery with special levator veli palatini restoration. Group 3: patients who received palate surgery with modified tensor veli palatini restoration. The conductive auditory brainstem response and 226 Hz tympanometry were used to test the audiological and otological status of the three groups. Preoperative and postoperative results were compared intragroup and intergroup.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cleft Palate

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cleft Palate

131 studies on the registry are indexed under Cleft Palate; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 71 is above the median of 40 across 85 interventional studies indexed under Cleft Palate.

Browse Cleft Palate studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking Union Medical College Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,115 studies on the registry; 463 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 60 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of cleft palate.
  • Primary palate repair.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe general disease
  • Confirmed hereditary hearing loss or neuropathic hearing loss.
  • Received any kind of audiological or otological therapy before.
  • Patients and/or his/her don't want to continue the clinical trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
71 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Langerbeck's repair

    Langerbeck's repair of cleft palate,without specific restoration of levator veli palatini or tensor veli palatini. Incisions along the margins of the cleft at the junction of oral and nasal mucosa. Lateral relaxing incisions were performed and the mucoperiosteal flap of hard palate were elevated on both sides except the ones with only soft palate cleft. The anterior end of the mucoperiosteal flap may be cut off for the purpose of tension relieving and would be resutured to the anterior area during closing. In the soft palate, the division was made between the oral mucous layer and the palatal musculature layer. Hamulus were broken for closing the cleft without tension. Closing was done by two seperated layers, one layer of nasal mucosa-palatal muscle, and one layer of oral mucosa.

    Procedure: cleft palate repair

  • Active comparator
    restoration of levator veli palatini

    The incision was made similar to Langerbeck's repair. During disection, the levator veli palatini was identified after the elevation of flap. The levator veli palatini was separate from the oral and nasal mucosa. During closing, the anterior end of levator veli palatini was rotated towards the midline and the two muscle bundle from the two sides were sutured in the midline. In this process, the tensor veli palatini was not intentionally identified or dissected.

    Procedure: cleft palate repair

  • Experimental
    mordified restoration of tensor veli palatini

    Incision was made similar to Langerbeck's repair. During disection, the tensor veli palatini was identified after flap elevation. Its tendinous fibers was released from but still connected to the pterygoid process without breaking the hamulus or cutting off the tendinous fibers. If the tension is too strong during suturing, the tensor tendon could be partly dissected laterally meanwhile be kept continuity medially so that the tensor veli palatini could be rotated more medially. The levator veli palatini, tensor veli palatini, together with the palatine aponeurosis and the nasal mucosa from two sides were sutured in the middle line. The tensor veli palatini may not be jointed to the contralateral one directly.

    Procedure: cleft palate repair

Interventions

  • Procedurecleft palate repair

    restoration of tensor veli palatini for the purpose of the muscle function recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hearing level

    Auditory brainstem response was tested in all three groups after surgery. The air conductive hearing threshold was used to assess the hearing level.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  2. The otological status of middle ear

    226 tympanometry was tested in all three groups after surgery. The results of 226 Hz tympanometry were classified based on Liden/Jerger classification. Four classes of tympanometry results were included.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  3. Hearing level

    Auditory brainstem response was tested in all three groups before surgery. The air conductive hearing threshold was used to assess the hearing level.

    Time frame: 0 to 3 months before surgery

  4. The otological status of middle ear

    226 tympanometry was tested in all three groups before surgery. The results of 226 Hz tympanometry were classified based on Liden/Jerger classification. Four classes of tympanometry results were included.

    Time frame: 0 to 3 months before surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04366674
Lead sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Responsible party
Lian Zhou (Prof., Peking Union Medical College Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 29, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2013
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Apr 29, 2020

Study contacts

Lian Zhou, D.D.S
principal investigator · Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion