ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04363580Dépistage TTAUpdated Mar 12, 2026

Creation of Auditory Processing Disorder Screening Tool in French

An observational study in Auditory Processing Disorder, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-12.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Inconclusive results
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
16
Ages
7 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to validate a screening tool for auditory processing disorder in children of 7 to 13 years old. This screening tool was created based on literature and combines a questionnaire and a mini-battery of tests composed of verbal and nonverbal assessments.

Read the detailed description

Hearing plays a vital role in the development of a child. Hearing is based on two main systems: the peripheral system and the central system. Peripheral hearing, which includes the outer, middle, and inner ear and the auditory nerve, can detect sound signals.

For its part, the central system, which is composed of auditory structures from the auditory nerve to the brain, makes it possible to process these sound signals and to analyze them. Peripheral hearing damage will result in deafness while a problem in the central auditory system will be called auditory processing disorder. Peripheral deafness can be detected from birth through neonatal screening for deafness. The symptoms of an auditory processing disorder can easily be confused with those caused by attention deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity and a specific language disorder. Auditory processing disorder is often unknown in the medical and educational worlds, and children are referred late for consultation. In addition, the lack of French screening tests for auditory processing disorder and the long waiting lists for specialized consultations help to delay diagnosis and hinder early intervention. Auditory processing disorder affects about 2 to 3% of school-aged children.

The objective of the study is to validate a screening tool for auditory processing disorder in children of 7 to 13 years old. This screening tool was created based on literature and combines a questionnaire and a mini-battery of tests composed of verbal and nonverbal assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Auditory Processing Disorder

Keywords

  • Auditory processing disorder
  • Screening tool
  • Children
03

In context

Auditory Perceptual Disorders

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Auditory Perceptual Disorders; 3 are open to participants now.

Browse Auditory Perceptual Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children referred for an assessment of central auditory skills at ENT unit of Necker hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Child aged 7 to 13 on the day of enrollment.
  • Child referred for assessment of central auditory skills, who did not have an auditory processing disorder -type assessment before.
  • Hearing thresholds at both ears between 0 decibels Hearing Level (dB HL) and 15 dB HL at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 Hz. Absence of auditory neuropathy.
  • Child affiliated to a social security scheme.
  • Holders of parental authority who do not oppose the patient's participation in research.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known neurological disorder (epilepsy, cranial trauma, etc.).
  • Non medicated attention deficit since the presence of such a deficit can affect the child's performance during the auditory processing disorder assessment.
  • Intellectual disability since impairment of cognitive skills may also explain poor test performance (IQ \<80).
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients

    Children consulting for an assessment of central auditory skills

    Other: Auditory processing disorder screening tool

Interventions

  • OtherAuditory processing disorder screening tool

    Screening tool : a questionnaire completed by the parents and the child's teacher and a mini-battery of tests composed of verbal and nonverbal assessments. Questions for parents are grouped into four sections: * Reference pattern and portrait of the child. * Auditory history. * History of speech and language development. * School history. The teacher questionnaire has seven sections: * Portrait of the child. * Reading and writing. * Speaking. * Mathematics. * Music. * Memory. * Listening skills and understanding: * Concentration and organization. * Environment. Mini-battery of tests: * Dichotic Numeric Listening Test. * Identification test of 15 patterns of frequency-varying sounds at each ear. * Test of 10 monosyllables in noise per ear. * Auditory memory test by measuring the range of figures (instead of words in order to reduce the contribution of language processing).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity

    Comparison of the results of the auditory processing disorder screening tool with those obtained at the auditory processing disorder reference diagnostic battery. Sensitivity: Number of true positives / Number of true positives + Number of false negatives For the screening tool questionnaire, a score of 1 is given for each item for which parents or teachers believe that the child has a problem. A score of more than 50% on the questionnaire (or sub-section) suggests that the child is at risk of having an auditory processing disorder. The child would also be at risk when he fails at least one hearing test of the tool.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Specificity

    Comparison of the results of the auditory processing disorder screening tool with those obtained at the auditory processing disorder reference diagnostic battery. Specificity: Number of true negatives / Number of true negatives + Number of false positives For the screening tool questionnaire, a score of 1 is given for each item for which parents or teachers believe that the child has a problem. A score of more than 50% on the questionnaire (or sub-section) suggests that the child is at risk of having an auditory processing disorder. The child would also be at risk when he fails at least one hearing test of the tool.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
    Paris, 75015, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04363580
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 27, 2020
Start date
Sep 18, 2020
Primary completion
May 15, 2021
Completion
May 15, 2021
Last update
Mar 12, 2026

Study contacts

Natalie Loundon, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Isabelle Rouillon, MD
study director · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion