CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04353947IREUpdated May 6, 2021

Induction and Recognition of Emotions

An observational study in Healthy Older Adults, Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by University of Valencia. Withdrawn at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-06.

Sponsored by University of Valencia · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
COVID 19
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
0
Ages
65 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the differences in cognitive function between healthy older adults, older adults with mild Alzheimer's type dementia and older adults with Parkinson's disease and if there are differences in valence assessment and activation that produce them a mood induction task. Subjects are assessed using neuropsychological tests and then a mood induction task based on movie clips is applied.

Read the detailed description

Different neuropsychological tests will be used to assess the differences in cognitive function in the different groups, whose scores are expected to be lower in the group of older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and older adults with Parkinson's disease (PD).

After studying the cognitive function in the different groups, we proceed to check through a task based on movie clips if there are also differences in the valence assessment (liking/disliking depending on the emotion induced by scenes from different films) and activation (excitement caused by each one of the movie scenes), hoping to find differences for the negative emotions taking into account the cognitive difficulties that both (the EA group and the EP group) may have for processing this type of cognitively more demanding information; instead, it is possible that the positivity effect continues to affect these patients so that for positive emotions there are no differences between the different groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Older Adults
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

  • Healthy older adults
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Mood induction
  • Positive emotions
  • Negative emotions
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Valencia is the lead sponsor of 349 studies on the registry; 73 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • Healthy older adults will be recruited from the Third Age Classrooms of the municipality of Quart de Poblet.
  • The older adults with mild Alzheimer's disease will be recruited through the Neurology Department of the General Hospital of Valencia.
  • The older adults with Parkinson's disease will be recruited through the Valencia Parkinson Association.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

For the group of healthy older adults:

  • MEC score greater than 26 points.
  • GDS between 1 and 3.

For the mild EA group:

  • MEC score between 18 and 23 points.
  • GDS between 3 and 4.

For the EP group:

  • MEC score greater than 23 points.
  • GDS between 1 and 3.
  • FAB score equal to or less than 11 points.

General Exclusion Criteria:

Participants cannot have:

  • Significant asymptomatic neurovascular disease
  • History of previous symptomatic stroke
  • Alcohol or drug abuse/dependence
  • Severe psychiatric symptoms
  • Depressive symptoms higher than mild
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy older adults

    Healthy older adults with 65 years or older

    Diagnostic Test: Mini Cognitive Examination (MCE) · Diagnostic Test: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) · Diagnostic Test: Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) · Diagnostic Test: Memory alteration test (M@T) · Diagnostic Test: Spanish-Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC) · Diagnostic Test: Barcelona test (BT) · Diagnostic Test: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT) · Diagnostic Test: Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) · Diagnostic Test: Auto-Assessment Manikins (SAM)

  • Older adults with Alzheimer's disease

    Older adults with Alzheimer's disease with 65 years or older

    Diagnostic Test: Mini Cognitive Examination (MCE) · Diagnostic Test: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) · Diagnostic Test: Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) · Diagnostic Test: Memory alteration test (M@T) · Diagnostic Test: Spanish-Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC) · Diagnostic Test: Barcelona test (BT) · Diagnostic Test: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT) · Diagnostic Test: Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) · Diagnostic Test: Auto-Assessment Manikins (SAM)

  • Older adults with Parkinson's disease

    Older adults with Alzheimer's disease with 65 years or older

    Diagnostic Test: Mini Cognitive Examination (MCE) · Diagnostic Test: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) · Diagnostic Test: Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) · Diagnostic Test: Memory alteration test (M@T) · Diagnostic Test: Spanish-Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC) · Diagnostic Test: Barcelona test (BT) · Diagnostic Test: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT) · Diagnostic Test: Frontal assessment battery (FAB) · Diagnostic Test: Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) · Diagnostic Test: Auto-Assessment Manikins (SAM)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMini Cognitive Examination (MCE)

    This test provides information on temporal and spatial orientation, fixation, concentration and calculation, memory and language and construction.

  • Diagnostic testBeck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

    This test evaluates the absence or presence of depressive symptoms.

  • Diagnostic testGlobal Deterioration Scale (GDS)

    This scale measures the level of deterioration of the subject.

  • Diagnostic testMemory alteration test (M@T)

    In this test different memory subtypes are evaluated.

  • Diagnostic testSpanish-Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC)

    This test is used to assess immediate memory, deferred memory and learning ability.

  • Diagnostic testBarcelona test (BT)

    This test evaluates categorical evocation and verbal fluency. The categorical recall subtest consists of recalling the maximum number of words linked to a specific category "animals" in 1 minute. In the case of verbal fluency, the subject is asked to evoke the maximum number of words that begin with the letter "p" in 3 minutes.

  • Diagnostic testRey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT)

    In this test, the person must carefully copy a complex geometric drawing, which must be memorized later. The first part evaluates multiple cognitive processes such as planning, motor skills, working memory, and visual-constructive and spatial skills. In the second part, memory is evaluated.

  • Diagnostic testFrontal assessment battery (FAB)

    This test is a composite tool for assessing executive functions related to the frontal lobe.

  • Diagnostic testPositive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)

    It is a self-report questionnaire made up of 20 items (10 of positive affect and another 10 of negative affect) that the subject must answer, obtaining in this way a score in positive affectivity (AP subscale) and another in negative affectivity (AN subscale).

  • Diagnostic testAuto-Assessment Manikins (SAM)

    It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses the emotional response of the subject, in this case, through a mood induction task that plays different films scenes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    This test is evaluated on a maximum of 30 points. Participants with scores equal to or below 23 would be considered cognitively deficient.

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes

  2. Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

    In this test, a score of 0-13 indicates absence of depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, and 29-63 severe depression.

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes

  3. Global Deterioration Scale (GDS)

    This scale indicates seven possible stages: 1. Absence of Cognitive Deficit; 2. Very slight cognitive deficit; 3. Mild Cognitive Deficit; 4. Moderate cognitive deficit; 5. Moderately severe cognitive deficit; 6. Severe cognitive deficit; 7. Very severe cognitive deficit.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  4. Memory alteration test (M@T)

    This cognitive test is evaluated on a maximum of 50 points. The optimal cut-off point for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment of the amnesiac type from subjective memory complaints is 37 points. The optimal cut-off point for Alzheimer's disease is 31 points.

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes

  5. Spanish-Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC)

    The evaluator reads a 16-word shopping list in five different essays and in each of them the evaluated person must mention those words that he or she remembers. After 20 minutes, the subject is asked to remember them again.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  6. Barcelona test (BT)

    In this test, the subject is considered to have a good categorical evocation when he is able to evoke more than 16 animals in 1 minute and a good verbal fluency when he is able to evoke more than 19 words beginning with "p" in 3 minutes.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  7. Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT)

    The direct score (PD) in the copy of the Rey figure that would leave 50% of the population below is 30 points, while in the reproduction of the Rey figure from memory the PD that would leave 50% below of the population is 21 points.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  8. Frontal assessment battery (FAB)

    The maximum score to be obtained in this test is 18 points. To consider that the subject presents alterations in the frontal lobe and, therefore, altered executive functions, his score must be equal to or less than 11 points.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  9. Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)

    The final score of this scale is the sum of the 10 terms on the positive scale and the sum of the 10 terms on the negative scale, with the value assigned for the responses on the positive scale being positive and negative for the responses on the negative scale.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  10. Auto-Assessment Manikins (SAM)

    This questionnaire measures the valence (liking/disliking depending on the emotion induced by scenes from different movies), the arousal (excitement caused by each of the movie scenes) and mastery or emotional control (self-perception of the control exerted on the environment and the emotion itself).

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Valencia
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fernandez-Aguilar L, Ricarte J, Ros L, Latorre JM. Emotional Differences in Young and Older Adults: Films as Mood Induction Procedure. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 3;9:1110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01110. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30018584 ↗
  • Carvalho S, Leite J, Galdo-Alvarez S, Goncalves OF. The Emotional Movie Database (EMDB): a self-report and psychophysiological study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Dec;37(4):279-94. doi: 10.1007/s10484-012-9201-6. PubMed 22767079 ↗
  • Alves H, Koch A, Unkelbach C. Why Good Is More Alike Than Bad: Processing Implications. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 4. PubMed 28063663 ↗
  • Alves H, Koch A, Unkelbach C. The differential similarity of positive and negative information - an affect-induced processing outcome? Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1224-1238. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1549022. Epub 2018 Nov 26. PubMed 30475089 ↗
  • Reed AE, Carstensen LL. The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 27;3:339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339. eCollection 2012. PubMed 23060825 ↗
  • Nashiro K, Mather M. Effects of emotional arousal on memory binding in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychol. 2011 Fall;124(3):301-12. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.3.0301. PubMed 21977692 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All the information of the study, as well as its results, will be shared in scientific publications and conferences related to the research area. The information that is intended to be published in scientific journals includes: 1) Study Protocol, 2) Statistical Analysis, 3) Informed Consent Form, 4) Clinical Study Results.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04353947
Lead sponsor
University of Valencia
Collaborators
Asociación Parkinson Valencia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 21, 2020
Start date
Mar 2, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2021

Study contacts

Juan C Melendez, Psychology
principal investigator · University of Valencia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion