ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04349826ACT-South AsiaUpdated Jan 15, 2026

The Azithromycin and Cefixime Treatment of Typhoid in South Asia Trial (ACT-South Asia Trial)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever, sponsored by Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam. Completed at 1 site in Nepal. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-15.

Sponsored by Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric) fever affects more than 11 million children and adults globally each year including 7 million in South Asia. Up to 1% of patients who get typhoid may die of the disease and, in those that survive, a prolonged period of ill health and catastrophic financial cost to the family may follow. In the last 20 years, treatment of typhoid fever with a 7-day course of a single oral antimicrobial, such as ciprofloxacin, cefixime or azithromycin, given in an out-patient setting has led to patient recovery in 4 to 6 days without the need for expensive hospitalization. Increasing antimicrobial resistance in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, threatens the effectiveness of these treatments and increases the risk of prolonged illness and severe disease. The recent emergence of a particularly resistant typhoid strain in Pakistan, and subsequent international spread, adds urgency to this problem and Salmonella is now listed as a high (Priority 2) pathogen by world health organisation.

Treatment with combinations of antimicrobials may be more effective for treating typhoid fever and mitigate the problems of resistance. This suggestion is based on expert opinion but not backed up by good quality evidence. The ACT-South Asia study aims to compare a combination of azithromycin and cefixime with azithromycin alone in the outpatient treatment of clinically suspected and confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever. The total recruitment will be 1500 patients across sites in Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan. A placebo (sugar pill) will be used instead of cefixime in the single drug arm so that neither the patient nor the study team know which patient is receiving which treatment.Investigators will assess whether treatment outcomes are better with the combination after one week of treatment and at one and three month follow-up. Both antimicrobials are widely used and have excellent safety profiles. If the combination treatment is better than the single antibiotic treatment, this will be an important result for patients across South Asia and other typhoid endemic areas. This study will additionally investigate the financial implications for families and health system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Typhoid Fever

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Uncomplicated Typhoid Fever
  • Azithromycin
  • Cefixime
  • treatment failure
03

In context

Typhoid Fever

76 studies on the registry are indexed under Typhoid Fever; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,150 is above the median of 147 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Typhoid Fever.

Browse Typhoid Fever studies →

Lead sponsor

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A history of fever at presentation for ≥ 72 hours and a documented fever (≥37.5oC (axillary) or ≥38oC (oral))
  • Age ≥ 2 years (and ≥ 10kg) to 65 years
  • No clear focus of infection on initial clinical evaluation
  • Malaria rapid Diagnostic test( RDT) negative; dengue nonstructural protein(NS) 1 RDT negative; scrub typhus RDT negative; c-reactive protein(CRP) rapid test ≥10 mg/L
  • Able to take oral treatment
  • Able to attend for follow-up and can be contacted by telephone
  • Written fully to participate in the study including assent for children in addition to parental/legal guardian consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of fever for >14 days
  • Pregnant or positive pregnancy test or breast-feeding
  • Presence of clinical symptoms or signs indicating a focal infection such as pneumonia; urinary infection, meningitis, eschar
  • Obtundation, haemodynamic shock, visible jaundice, gastrointestinal bleeding or any signs of severe disease that may require immediate hospitalisation
  • Being treated for TB or or severe acute malnutrition
  • Patients with cardiac disease
  • Patient requiring intravenous antibiotics for any reason
  • Previous history of to any of the treatment options
  • Either of the trial drugs are for any reason (e.g. drug interactions)
  • Has received azithromycin or cefixime in the last five days
  • Receiving another antimicrobial and responding clinically to the treatment as judged by the attending clinician.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Azithromycin+Cefixime

    Azithromycin 20mg/kg/day oral dose once daily (maximum 1gm/day) AND Cefixime 20-30mg/kg/day oral dose in two divided doses (maximum 400mg bd) for 7 days.

    Drug: Azithromycin · Drug: Cefixime

  • Placebo comparator
    Azithromycin+placebo

    Azithromycin 20mg/kg/day oral dose once daily (Max 1gm/day) for 7 days AND Cefixime-matched placebo for 7 days.

    Drug: Azithromycin · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Azithromycin 20 mg/kg/day for 7 days

  • cefixime 20-30 mg/kg/day for 7 days

  • DrugPlacebo

    cefixime-matched placebo for 7 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment Failure

    A composite outcome of treatment failure by the 28th day after the initiation of treatment will be defined by either of the following events: 1.Clinical failure: persistence of fever on day 7 (168 h) post treatment initiation OR The need for rescue treatment as judged by the Trial Clinician OR The development of any complication (e.g., clinically significant bleeding, fall in the Glasgow Coma Scale score, perforation of the gastrointestinal tract) OR Syndromic enteric fever relapse within 28 days of initiation of treatment. 2.Microbiological failure: a positive blood-culture for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi on day 7 of treatment regardless of the presence of fever (microbiological failure) OR blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever relapse within 28 days of initiation of treatment.

    Time frame: Within 28 days of treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fever clearance time (FCT) in patients in each treatment arm

    The FCT will be the time from the first dose of a study drug until a temperature of \< 37.5°C (axillary); \< 38.0°C (oral) has been achieved

    Time frame: at least 2 days

  2. Time from onset of treatment to treatment failure

    The time to treatment failure will be the time from the first dose of a study drug until an event occurs defined as a treatment failure

    Time frame: Within 28 days of treatment initiation

  3. Time from symptom onset to treatment failure

    The time to treatment failure will be the time from the day of the first symptom until an event occurs defined as a treatment failure

    Time frame: Within 28 days of treatment initiation

  4. Adverse event

    Adverse events will be graded (grade 3/4 adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse events of any grade leading to modification of study drug dose or interruption/early discontinuation);

    Time frame: Within 90 days

  5. faecal carriage of S.Typhi or S.Paratyphi

    Positive culture of faeces sample for S.Typhi or S.Paratyphi

    Time frame: One and three month follow-up

  6. cost effectiveness of treatment

    The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will comprise of the total costs per case, real outpatient and in-patient costs, total direct and indirect costs for the family and healthcare system and health outcomes converted to Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). The cost per DALY averted will be compared against multipliers of the gross domestic product/capita in each of the four countries to establish the cost-effectiveness of the combination regimen.

    Time frame: Initiation of treatment and one month follow-up visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Patan Hospital
    Lalitpur, Bagmati, Nepal
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Butler T, Sridhar CB, Daga MK, Pathak K, Pandit RB, Khakhria R, Potkar CN, Zelasky MT, Johnson RB. Treatment of typhoid fever with azithromycin versus chloramphenicol in a randomized multicentre trial in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Aug;44(2):243-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.2.243. PubMed 10473232 ↗
  • Chinh NT, Parry CM, Ly NT, Ha HD, Thong MX, Diep TS, Wain J, White NJ, Farrar JJ. A randomized controlled comparison of azithromycin and ofloxacin for treatment of multidrug-resistant or nalidixic acid-resistant enteric fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Jul;44(7):1855-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1855-1859.2000. PubMed 10858343 ↗
  • Trivedi NA, Shah PC. A meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of azithromycin over the alternate drugs used for treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever. J Postgrad Med. 2012 Apr-Jun;58(2):112-8. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.97172. PubMed 22718054 ↗
  • Dolecek C, Tran TP, Nguyen NR, Le TP, Ha V, Phung QT, Doan CD, Nguyen TB, Duong TL, Luong BH, Nguyen TB, Nguyen TA, Pham ND, Mai NL, Phan VB, Vo AH, Nguyen VM, Tran TT, Tran TC, Schultsz C, Dunstan SJ, Stepniewska K, Campbell JI, To SD, Basnyat B, Nguyen VV, Nguyen VS, Nguyen TC, Tran TH, Farrar J. A multi-center randomised controlled trial of gatifloxacin versus azithromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children and adults in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2008 May 21;3(5):e2188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002188. PubMed 18493312 ↗
  • Parry CM, Ho VA, Phuong le T, Bay PV, Lanh MN, Tung le T, Tham NT, Wain J, Hien TT, Farrar JJ. Randomized controlled comparison of ofloxacin, azithromycin, and an ofloxacin-azithromycin combination for treatment of multidrug-resistant and nalidixic acid-resistant typhoid fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):819-25. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00447-06. Epub 2006 Dec 4. PubMed 17145784 ↗
  • Girgis NI, Butler T, Frenck RW, Sultan Y, Brown FM, Tribble D, Khakhria R. Azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in a randomized trial in Egypt that included patients with multidrug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun;43(6):1441-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1441. PubMed 10348767 ↗
  • Giri A, Karkey A, Dongol S, Arjyal A, Maharjan A, Veeraraghavan B, Paudyal B, Dolecek C, Gajurel D, Phuong DNT, Thanh DP, Qamar F, Kang G, Hien HV, John J, Lawson K, Wolbers M, Hossain MS, Sharifuzzaman M, Luangasanatip N, Maharjan N, Olliaro P, Rupali P, Shakya R, Shakoor S, Rijal S, Qureshi S, Baker S, Joshi S, Ahmed T, Darton T, Bao TN, Lubell Y, Kestelyn E, Thwaites G, Parry CM, Basnyat B. Azithromycin and cefixime combination versus azithromycin alone for the out-patient treatment of clinically suspected or confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in South Asia: a randomised controlled trial protocol. Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Nov 12;6:207. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16801.2. eCollection 2021. PubMed 35097222 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymised individual participant data will be made available to researcher and public as supporting material via open access journal and /or upon request by qualified research group.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 55 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2020
First posted
Apr 16, 2020
StartActual
May 23, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Jan 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04349826
Lead sponsor
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam
Collaborators
University of Oxford, Medical Research Council, Department for International Development, United Kingdom, Wellcome Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2020
Start date
May 23, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Jan 15, 2026

Study contacts

Buddha Basnyat, MBBS,Msc,MD
principal investigator · University of Oxford

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cefixime

Start the discussion