CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04348656CONCOR-1Updated Mar 3, 2022Results posted

CONvalescent Plasma for Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 Respiratory Illness (CONCOR-1)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Convalescent plasma in COVID-19, sponsored by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation. Terminated at 73 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-03.

Sponsored by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study was terminated after the planned interim analysis as the pre-defined futility threshold was met
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
940
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is currently no treatment available for COVID-19, the acute respiratory illness caused by the novel SAR-CoV-2. Convalescent plasma from patients who have recovered from COVID-19 that contains antibodies to the virus is a potential therapy. On March 25th, 2020, the FDA approved the use of convalescent plasma under the emergency investigational new drug (eIND) category. Randomized trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 convalescent plasma for acute COVID-19 infection.

The objective of the CONCOR-1 trial is to determine the efficacy of transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma to adult patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 infection at decreasing the frequency of in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

It is hypothesized that treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients with convalescent plasma early in their clinical course will reduce the risk of death, and that other outcomes will be improved including risk of intubation, and length of ICU and hospital stay.

This pan-Canadian clinical trial has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on health care resources including reducing the need for ICU beds and ventilators.

Read the detailed description

Problem to be addressed: In December 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee (Wuhan, China) identified an outbreak of viral pneumonia cases of unknown cause. Coronavirus RNA was quickly identified in some of these patients.This novel coronavirus has been designated SARS-CoV-2, and the disease caused by this virus has been designated COVID-19.Outbreak forecasting and mathematical modelling suggest that these numbers will continue to rise [1] in many countries over the coming weeks to months.Global efforts to evaluate novel antivirals and therapeutic strategies to treat COVID-19 have intensified. There is an urgent public health need for rapid development of novel interventions. At present, there is no specific antiviral therapy for coronavirus infections.

Passive immunization:Passive immunization consists in the transfer of antibodies from immunized donor to non-immunized individual in order to transfer transient protection against an infective agent. A physiological example of passive immunization is the transfer of maternal IgG antibodies to the foetus through the placenta to confer humoral protection to newborns in the first years of life. Passive immunization differs from active immunization in which the patient develops their own immune response following contact with the infective agent or vaccine.

Known potential risks and benefits: There is a theoretical risk of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADE) through which virus targeted by non-neutralizing antibodies gain entry into macrophages. Another theoretical risk is that antibody administration to those exposed to SARS-CoV-2 may avoid disease but modify the immune response such that those individuals mount attenuated immune responses, which would leave them vulnerable to subsequent re-infection. Finally, there are risks associated with any transfusion of plasma including transmission of blood transmitted viruses (e.g. HIV, HBV, HCV, etc.), allergic transfusion reactions, including anaphylaxis, febrile non hemolytic transfusion reaction, transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusion associated cardiac overload (TACO), and hemolysis should ABO incompatible plasma be administered. Potential benefits of COVID-19 convalescent plasma include improved survival, improvement in symptoms, decreased risk in intubation for mechanical ventilation, decrease risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, shortened hospitalization time and suppression of viral load.

Mechanism of action: Transfusion of apheresis frozen plasma (AFP) from COVID-19 convalescent patients allows the transfer of donor neutralizing antibodies directed against SARS-CoV2 antigens to the recipient, thus allowing the generation of passive immunization. Naturally produced human antibody are polyclonal, meaning they are directed against a variety of different viral antigens and epitopes allowing for a general neutralizing effect against the virus rather than focussing on a specific target. Administration of convalescent plasma has been associated with rapid decrease in viral load. It is also possible that passive immunization contributes to improved cell-mediated immunity by favoring the phagocytosis and presentation of viral antigens to host T cells.

Participant recruitment:Only hospitalized COVID-19 patients are eligible so recruitment efforts will be focused on identified consecutive patients admitted to hospital with acute COVID-19 infection. No other external recruitment efforts are planned. At each participating hospital, a process for identifying patients with COVID-19 will be established.

Donor recruitment for Canadian sites: Recovered COVID-19 patients will be identified as potential donors in collaboration with provincial public health services, local health authorities, and individual co-investigators involved in the study. Potential donors may also be recruiting following self-identification on the routine donor questionnaire or through social media. They will be contacted by phone and invited to participate in the program as potential donors. After obtaining verbal consent and reviewing donor selection criteria, eligible participants will be directed to a Héma-Québec collection or Canadian Blood Services apheresis collection site in their area to donate.

Criteria for donors: All donors will need to meet the criteria set forth in the Manual of donor selection criteria in use at Héma-Québec or Canadian Blood ServicesIn addition, donors will require:

  • Prior diagnosis of COVID-19 documented by a PCR test at time of infection or by positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology following infection
  • Male donors, or female donors with no pregnancy history or with negative anti-HLA antibodies
  • At least 6 days since last plasma donation
  • Provided informed consent
  • A complete resolution of symptoms at least 14 days prior to donation

Donor recruitment for United States sites: Recovered COVID-19 patients are being recruited through the New York Blood Center and Weill Cornell Medicine in separate protocols. Potential donors can self-refer via websites but also be referred by physicians or identified via the medical record system. Only donors with laboratory-confirmed history of COVID-19 will be screened. After providing consent and reviewing FDA and NYBC donor eligibility criteria, donors are screened for the presences of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the nasopharynx if screening within 14 days of complete resolution in accordance with current FDA guidance. Criteria for donation are subject to change based on future revision of FDA guidance. Those found to be eligible will be referred to NYBC for donation.

Criteria for donors:

  • Provision of informed consent
  • Aged 18 to 70 years. Donors are not longer eligible after their 71st birthday.
  • Documented molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR by nasopharyngeal swab, oropharyngeal swab, or sputum or detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in serum.
  • Complete resolution of COVID-19 symptoms at least 14 days prior to donation
  • Not currently pregnant or pregnant within 6 weeks by self-report
  • Male donors, or females with no pregnancy history or with negative anti-HLA antibodies
  • Meets blood donor criteria specified by NYBC, which is consistent with FDA regulations.

Donors will be allowed to donate every 7 days. The following information will be collection from donors: ABO group, sex, age, date of onset of symptoms (when available), date of resolution of symptoms (when available), CCP collection date(s).

Randomization procedures: Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (convalescent plasma vs standard of care). Patients will be randomized using a secure, concealed, computer-generated, web-accessed randomization sequence. Randomization will be stratified by centre and age (\<60 and ≥ 60 years). Within each stratum, variable permuted block sized will be used. This approach will ensure that concealment of the treatment sequence is maintained.

Duration of follow-up: Subjects will be followed daily until hospital discharge or death. Patients discharged from hospital before Day 30 will be contacted by telephone on Day 30 ± 3 days to ascertain any AEs, vital status (dead/alive), hospital readmission and need for mechanical ventilation after discharge. Patients discharged from hospital will be contacted at Day 90+/- 7 days to determine vital status. Patients with a prolonged hospital admission will be censored at Day 90. The local study coordinator will collect all study data and record the data in the electronic CRF or paper CRF as per study procedures for each site.

Duration of study: For an individual subject, the study ends 90 days after randomization. The overall study will end when the last randomized subject has completed 90 day follow-up. We estimate that all patient will be enrolled in a period of 6 months, data on the primary endpoint will be available 30 days after last patient enrollment and data on all secondary endpoints will be available after 90-day from last patient enrollment.

Sample size considerations: Assuming a baseline risk of intubation or death of 30% in hospitalized patients with standard of care, a sample size of 1200 (800 in the convalescent plasma arm, and 400 in the standard of care arm) would provide 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction of 25% with convalescent plasma therapy using a 2-tailed test at level α = 0.05 and a 2:1 randomization.

Interim analysis: A single interim analysis is planned when the primary outcome (intubation or mortality at 30 days) is available for 50% of the target sample. An O'Brien-Fleming stopping rule will be used at that time, but treated as a guideline, so there is minimal impact on the threshold for statistical significance for the final significance test of the primary outcome. A DSMB will monitor ongoing results to ensure patient well-being and safety as well as study integrity. The DSMB will be asked to recommend early termination or modification only when there is clear and substantial evidence of a treatment difference.

Final analysis plan: The primary analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat population which will include data from all individuals who have been randomized. Outcomes will be attributed to the arm to which individuals were randomized irrespective of whether they received the planned intervention (e.g. plasma from a convalescent COVID-19 donor).

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Convalescent plasma
  • Transfusion
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Passive immunization
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 940 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥16 years old (>18 years of age in the United States)
  • Admitted to hospital with confirmed COVID-19 respiratory illness
  • Receiving supplemental oxygen
  • 500 mL of ABO compatible convalescent plasma is available

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Onset of respiratory symptoms >12 days prior to randomization
  • Intubated or plan in place for intubation
  • Plasma is contraindicated (e.g. history of anaphylaxis from transfusion)
  • Decision in place for no active treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
940 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Convalescent plasma

    \~500 mL ABO compatible convalescent apheresis plasma

    Biological: Convalescent plasma

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Treated as per institutional standard of care.

Interventions

  • BiologicalConvalescent plasma

    Patients will receive 500 mL of convalescent plasma (from one single-donor unit of 500 mL or 2 units of 250 mL from 1-2 donations) collected by apheresis from donors who have recovered from COVID-19 and frozen (1 year expiration date from date of collection). The plasma unit will be thawed as per standard blood bank procedures and infused into the patient slowly over 4 hours. When administering 2 units of 250 mL, the 2nd unit will be administered after the first, and no longer than 12 hours later. The patient will be monitored for adverse events as per each site's policies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Were Intubated or Died

    Endpoint of the need for intubation or patient death

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Intubation or In-hospital Death

    Time in days from randomization to occurrence of intubation or death

    Time frame: Day 30

  2. Ventilator-free Days by Day 30

    Number of days off ventilator at 30 days

    Time frame: Day 30

  3. Death by Day 30

    Occurrence of patient death at 30 days

    Time frame: Day 30

  4. Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    Number of days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) over the 30-day period following randomization

    Time frame: Day 30

  5. Need for Renal Replacement Therapy

    Need for new renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: Day 30

  6. Need for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

    Requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

    Time frame: Day 30

  7. Development of Myocarditis

    New diagnosis of myocarditis

    Time frame: Day 30

  8. In-hospital Death

    Occurrence of death while in hospital, censored at 90 days. Patients who were still in hospital at Day 30 were followed until Day 90 to capture in-hospital mortality.

    Time frame: Day 90

  9. Time to In-hospital Death

    Time to in-hospital death at 90 days. Patients who were still in hospital at Day 30 were followed until Day 90 to capture in-hospital mortality.

    Time frame: Day 90

  10. Length of Stay in Hospital

    Number of days from randomization to death or hospital discharge. Patients still in hospital at Day 30 were followed until Day 90 to capture death or discharge from hospital.

    Time frame: Day 90

  11. Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Serious Adverse Events

    Number of participants with Grade 3 and 4 (CTCAE v4.0) serious adverse events, and cumulative incidence of Grade 3 and 4 serious adverse events (using MedDRA AE terms)

    Time frame: Day 30

  12. Number of Participants With CCP Transfusion-associated Adverse Events (AE)

    Number of participants experiencing CCP transfusion-associated adverse events (AE), as defined by the International Society of Blood Tranfusion (ISBT ) classification

    Time frame: Day 30

  13. Number of Participants With Grade 3, 4, or 5 Serious Adverse Events

    Number of Participants with Grade 3-5 (CTCAE v4.0) serious adverse events reported to Day 30

    Time frame: Day 30

  14. Patient Reported Outcome Using Change in EQ-5D-5L Score

    Change in score on EQ-5D-5L instrument at Day 30 as compared to baseline. The EQ-5D-5L measures health-related quality of life in five dimensions, namely, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients can report five level impairment, reflecting no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems in each dimension. The range of possible values is -0.148 to 0.949, with a higher score reflecting a better outcome. For the change in score, a positive number indicates that the scores improved from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

  15. Patient Reported Outcome- Quality-adjusted Life Days

    Quality-adjusted life days calculated using the EQ-5D-5L score. Quality-adjusted life days is a measure of how well a patient lives for how long. It combines the length of life and quality of life into one value. This is calculated by multiplying the health utility (derived from the EQ-5D-5L score) by the amount of time the patient is alive during the study period. A higher number is better.

    Time frame: Day 30

  16. Cost of Intervention and Hospital Stay

    Cost per patient calculated using cost of the intervention and costs of the hospital stay

    Time frame: Day 30

07

Results

Posted Mar 3, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Started627313
Baseline population625313
Intention to treat analysis614307
Per protocol analysis548303
Completed614307
Not completed136
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up116

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Were Intubated or Died

Endpoint of the need for intubation or patient death

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Were Intubated or Died
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Number of Participants Who Were Intubated or Died19986
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · wald test · p = 0.18 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.94 to 1.43
SecondaryTime to Intubation or In-hospital Death

Time in days from randomization to occurrence of intubation or death

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to Intubation or In-hospital Death
daysConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Time to Intubation or In-hospital Death22.8 ± 11.023.4 ± 11.0
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · Regression, Cox · p = 0.30 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.14 · 95% CI 0.89 to 1.47
SecondaryVentilator-free Days by Day 30

Number of days off ventilator at 30 days

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · days
Ventilator-free Days by Day 30
daysConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Ventilator-free Days by Day 3023.4 ± 10.424.0 ± 10.5
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.41 · Mean difference (final values): -0.6 · 95% CI -2.1 to 0.7bootstrap estimates based on resampling process
SecondaryDeath by Day 30

Occurrence of patient death at 30 days

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death by Day 30
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Death by Day 3014163
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · wald test · p = 0.40 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.12 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.46
SecondaryLength of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Number of days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) over the 30-day period following randomization

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
daysConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)4.3 ± 7.93.7 ± 7.1
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.22 · Mean difference (final values): 0.7 · 95% CI -0.3 to 1.7
SecondaryNeed for Renal Replacement Therapy

Need for new renal replacement therapy

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Need for Renal Replacement Therapy
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Need for Renal Replacement Therapy106
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.72 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.31 to 2.27bootstrap estimates based on resampling process
SecondaryNeed for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Need for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Need for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)01
SecondaryDevelopment of Myocarditis

New diagnosis of myocarditis

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Development of Myocarditis
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Development of Myocarditis00
SecondaryIn-hospital Death

Occurrence of death while in hospital, censored at 90 days. Patients who were still in hospital at Day 30 were followed until Day 90 to capture in-hospital mortality.

Time frame:
Day 90
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
In-hospital Death
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
In-hospital Death15669
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · wald test · p = 0.33 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.45
SecondaryTime to In-hospital Death

Time to in-hospital death at 90 days. Patients who were still in hospital at Day 30 were followed until Day 90 to capture in-hospital mortality.

Time frame:
Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to In-hospital Death
daysConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Time to In-hospital Death16.3 ± 17.114.8 ± 16.3
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · Regression, Cox · p = 0.91 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.02 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.35competing risk analysis
SecondaryLength of Stay in Hospital

Number of days from randomization to death or hospital discharge. Patients still in hospital at Day 30 were followed until Day 90 to capture death or discharge from hospital.

Time frame:
Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Stay in Hospital
daysConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Length of Stay in Hospital16.3 ± 17.114.8 ± 16.3
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · Regression, Cox · p = 0.18 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.04
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Serious Adverse Events

Number of participants with Grade 3 and 4 (CTCAE v4.0) serious adverse events, and cumulative incidence of Grade 3 and 4 serious adverse events (using MedDRA AE terms)

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Serious Adverse Events9230
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · wald test · p = 0.03 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.53 · 95% CI 1.04 to 2.26
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · Regression, Cox · p = 0.02 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.70 · 95% CI 1.08 to 2.69competing risk analysis
SecondaryNumber of Participants With CCP Transfusion-associated Adverse Events (AE)

Number of participants experiencing CCP transfusion-associated adverse events (AE), as defined by the International Society of Blood Tranfusion (ISBT ) classification

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With CCP Transfusion-associated Adverse Events (AE)
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Number of Participants With CCP Transfusion-associated Adverse Events (AE)350
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Grade 3, 4, or 5 Serious Adverse Events

Number of Participants with Grade 3-5 (CTCAE v4.0) serious adverse events reported to Day 30

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3, 4, or 5 Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Number of Participants With Grade 3, 4, or 5 Serious Adverse Events20581
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · wald test · p = 0.03 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.27 · 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcome Using Change in EQ-5D-5L Score

Change in score on EQ-5D-5L instrument at Day 30 as compared to baseline. The EQ-5D-5L measures health-related quality of life in five dimensions, namely, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients can report five level impairment, reflecting no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems in each dimension. The range of possible values is -0.148 to 0.949, with a higher score reflecting a better outcome. For the change in score, a positive number indicates that the scores improved from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Reported Outcome Using Change in EQ-5D-5L Score
units on a scaleConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Patient Reported Outcome Using Change in EQ-5D-5L Score0.150 ± 0.25880.157 ± 0.2859
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcome- Quality-adjusted Life Days

Quality-adjusted life days calculated using the EQ-5D-5L score. Quality-adjusted life days is a measure of how well a patient lives for how long. It combines the length of life and quality of life into one value. This is calculated by multiplying the health utility (derived from the EQ-5D-5L score) by the amount of time the patient is alive during the study period. A higher number is better.

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · quality adjusted life days
Patient Reported Outcome- Quality-adjusted Life Days
quality adjusted life daysConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Patient Reported Outcome- Quality-adjusted Life Days17.959 ± 9.036318.037 ± 8.9771
SecondaryCost of Intervention and Hospital Stay

Cost per patient calculated using cost of the intervention and costs of the hospital stay

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · Canadian dollars
Cost of Intervention and Hospital Stay
Canadian dollarsConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Cost of Intervention and Hospital Stay23516.74 ± 21373.8020025.05 ± 17957.57
Statistical analysis
  • Convalescent Plasma vs Standard of Care · Icer (cad): -44623.01 · 95% CI -525369.24 to 436123.22ICER is reported in Canadian dollars. 95% CI is calculated by 1000 bootstrap sampling using bias-corrected accelerated method.

Adverse events

Collected over AEs: 30 days; any death (in-hospital or otherwise): 30 days. Participants still in hospital at 30 days were followed for 90 days for in-hospital death only (no AE collection and no follow up once discharged past Day 30).. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Convalescent Plasma160/625 (25.6%)205/614 (33.4%)110/614 (17.9%)
Standard of Care70/313 (22.4%)81/307 (26.4%)35/307 (11.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 57
Most frequent serious events
EventConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
Respiratory FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders70/61433/307
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders57/61422/307
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders12/6147/307
Death NOSGeneral disorders14/6144/307
SepsisInfections and infestations11/6145/307
Adult respiratory distress syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/6142/307
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders - OtherRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/6143/307
Lung infectionInfections and infestations6/6144/307
HypotensionVascular disorders8/6140/307
Multi-organ failureGeneral disorders6/6143/307
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventConvalescent PlasmaStandard of Care
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders18/6146/307
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations17/6148/307
Infections and infestations, otherInfections and infestations13/6147/307
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders14/6143/307
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/6145/307
HypertensionVascular disorders11/6142/307
HypermagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders9/6141/307
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders8/6141/307
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations7/6142/307

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
Mean67.7 ± 16.067.1 ± 14.867.5 ± 15.6
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
>= 60 years438218656
< 60 years18795282
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
Female256128384
Male369185554
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
White305153458
Asian10446150
Hispanic or Latino34943
Black251136
Other382866
Unknown11966185
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
Canada529265794
United States8945134
Brazil7310
Pregnancy present at randomization
Pregnancy present at randomization(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
Count of participants415
ABO blood group
ABO blood group(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
O270113383
A235121356
B8957146
AB312253
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m^2)Convalescent PlasmaStandard of CareTotal
Mean30.0 ± 7.530.0 ± 7.430.0 ± 7.4

12 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

73 sites
  • Brooklyn Hospital
    Brooklyn, New York 11201, United States
  • Lower Manhattan Hospital
    New York, New York 10038, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (HUAP)
    Niterói, 24070-035, Brazil
  • Hemario
    Rio De Janeiro, 20211-030, Brazil
  • Peter Lougheed Center
    Calgary, Alberta T1Y 6J4, Canada
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
  • Rockyview General Hospital
    Calgary, Alberta T2V 1P9, Canada
  • University of Alberta - Royal Alexandra Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T5H 3V9, Canada
  • University of Alberta Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • Sturgeon Community Hospital
    St. Albert, Alberta T8N 6C4, Canada
  • Fraser Health Authority - Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Centre
    Abbotsford, British Columbia V2S 0C2, Canada
  • Vancouver General Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
  • St. Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • Royal Jubilee Hospital
    Victoria, British Columbia V8R 1J8, Canada
  • Victoria General Hospital
    Victoria, British Columbia V8Z 6R5, Canada
  • St. Boniface General Hospital
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada
  • Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9, Canada
  • Grace General Hospital
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3J 3M7, Canada
  • Vitalité Health Network - Acadie-Bathurst
    Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 4L7, Canada
  • Vitalité Health Network - Restigouche
    Campbellton, New Brunswick E3N 3G2, Canada
  • Vitalité Health Network- Northwest
    Edmundston, New Brunswick E3V 4E4, Canada
  • Dr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital Centre
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 2Z3, Canada
  • Lakeridge Health Ajax Pickering
    Ajax, Ontario L1S 2J4, Canada
  • Hamilton General Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
  • Juravinski Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8V 1C3, Canada
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare
    Hamilton, Ontario M6R 1B5, Canada
  • Grand River Hospital
    Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1G3, Canada
  • St. Mary's Hospital
    Kitchener, Ontario N2M 1B2, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Victoria Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
  • Markham Stouffville Hospital
    Markham, Ontario L3P 7P3, Canada
  • Trillium Health Partners - Mississauga Hospital
    Mississauga, Ontario L5B 1B8, Canada
  • Trillium Health Partners - Credit Valley
    Mississauga, Ontario L5M 2N1, Canada
  • North York General Hospital
    North York, Ontario M2K 1E1, Canada
  • Lakeridge Health Oshawa
    Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
  • Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
  • Queensway Carleton Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario K2H 8P4, Canada
  • Bluewater Health
    Sarnia, Ontario N7T 6S3, Canada
  • Scarborough Health Network, Centenary Hospital
    Scarborough, Ontario M1E 4B9, Canada
  • Scarborough Health Network, General Hospital
    Scarborough, Ontario M1P 2V5, Canada
  • Scarborough Health Network, Birchmount Hospital
    Scarborough, Ontario M1W 3W3, Canada
  • Niagara Health System - St. Catherines
    St. Catherines, Ontario L2S 0A9, Canada
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Unity Health St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
  • Sinai Health System
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
  • Toronto Western Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
  • Unity Health, St. Joseph's Health Care Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M6R 1B5, Canada
  • Windsor Regional Hospital - Metropolitan Campus
    Windsor, Ontario N8W 1L9, Canada
  • Windsor Regional Hospital - Ouellette Campus
    Windsor, Ontario N9A 1E1, Canada
  • L'Hopital Chicoutimi
    Chicoutimi, Quebec G7H 5H6, Canada
  • Hôpital de la Cité-de-la-Santé
    Laval, Quebec H7M 3L9, Canada
  • Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne
    Longueuil, Quebec J4V 2H1, Canada
  • Hotel Dieu Hospital of Lévis
    Lévis, Quebec G6V 3Z1, Canada
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
    Montréal, Quebec H1T 2M4, Canada
  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
    Montréal, Quebec H2X 3E4, Canada
  • Montréal General Hospital
    Montréal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine
    Montréal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
  • Jewish General Hospital
    Montréal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada
  • McGill University Health Centre
    Montréal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal
    Montréal, Quebec H4J 1C5, Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec - Université Laval
    Quebec City, Quebec G1R 2J6, Canada
  • Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et pneumologie de Québec
    Quebec City, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada
  • Centre hospitalier régional de St-Jérôme
    Saint-Jérôme, Quebec J7Z 5T3, Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) - Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1G 2E8, Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) - Hôpital Fleurimont
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5H3, Canada
  • Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire régional de Trois-Rivières
    Trois-Rivières, Quebec G8Z 3R9, Canada
  • Regina General Hospital
    Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 0W5, Canada
  • Pasqua Hospital
    Regina, Saskatchewan S4T 1A5, Canada
  • St. Paul's Hospital
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7M 0Z9, Canada
  • Royal University Hospital
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):689-697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9. Epub 2020 Jan 31. Erratum In: Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):e41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30302-0. PubMed 32014114 ↗
  • 2. FDA USFDA. Investigational COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma - Emergency INDs [Web]. 2020 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/investigational-new-drug-ind-or-device-exemption-ide-process-cber/investigational-covid-19-convalescent-plasma-emergency-inds accessed March 26th 2020.
  • Begin P, Callum J, Jamula E, Cook R, Heddle NM, Tinmouth A, Zeller MP, Beaudoin-Bussieres G, Amorim L, Bazin R, Loftsgard KC, Carl R, Chasse M, Cushing MM, Daneman N, Devine DV, Dumaresq J, Fergusson DA, Gabe C, Glesby MJ, Li N, Liu Y, McGeer A, Robitaille N, Sachais BS, Scales DC, Schwartz L, Shehata N, Turgeon AF, Wood H, Zarychanski R, Finzi A; CONCOR-1 Study Group; Arnold DM. Convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2012-2024. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01488-2. Epub 2021 Sep 9. Erratum In: Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01667-1. PubMed 34504336 ↗
  • Begin P, Callum J, Heddle NM, Cook R, Zeller MP, Tinmouth A, Fergusson DA, Cushing MM, Glesby MJ, Chasse M, Devine DV, Robitalle N, Bazin R, Shehata N, Finzi A, McGeer A, Scales DC, Schwartz L, Turgeon AF, Zarychanski R, Daneman N, Carl R, Amorim L, Gabe C, Ellis M, Sachais BS, Loftsgard KC, Jamula E, Carruthers J, Duncan J, Lucier K, Li N, Liu Y, Armali C, Kron A, Modi D, Auclair MC, Cerro S, Avram M, Arnold DM. Convalescent plasma for adults with acute COVID-19 respiratory illness (CONCOR-1): study protocol for an international, multicentre, randomized, open-label trial. Trials. 2021 May 4;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05235-3. PubMed 33947446 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 15, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 19, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04348656
Lead sponsor
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Collaborators
Canadian Blood Services, Héma-Québec, University of Toronto, Université de Montréal, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Blood Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2020
Start date
Mar 14, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2021
Completion
Jun 16, 2021
Results posted
Mar 3, 2022
Last update
Mar 3, 2022

Study contacts

Donald M Arnold, MD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion