CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04339036CapTemY90Updated Jun 4, 2026

CapTemY90 for Grade 2/3 NET Liver Metastases

A Phase 2 interventional study of Capecitabine Oral Product and Temozolomide Oral Product in Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade 2 and Neuroendocrine Tumors, sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2021; still recruiting 5 years later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2 evaluation of hepatic-progression free survival among patients with Grade 2 liver-dominant NET metastases undergoing combination therapy with CapTem and Y90 radioembolization.The hypothesis is to confirm safety and to assess if disease control is improved relative to expectation from either therapy alone.

A Grade 3 arm was added in 2025.

Read the detailed description

Patients with liver-dominant Grade 2/3 NET metastases from any primary will start CapTem and undergo simulation angiography for radioembolization planning during the first cycle. If they tolerate CapTem and are not excluded from radioembolization, then TARE will be performed on Day 7 of Cycle 2, with additional TARE of Day 7 of cycle 3 or 4 as needed to treat the entire tumor burden. Patients will remain on CapTem until progression or intolerance.

Primary outcome measure is hepatic progression-free survival.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade 2
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neuroendocrine Tumors

676 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors; 169 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 42 across 464 interventional studies indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Browse Neuroendocrine Tumors studies →

Lead sponsor

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine is the lead sponsor of 446 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of histologic grade 2 or 3 well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with unresectable liver metastases (primary tumor or other extrahepatic disease may be present)
  • Patients with at least one measurable liver metastases, with size > 1cm (RECIST criteria)
  • Patients with liver dominant disease defined as ≥50% tumor body burden confined to the liver
  • Liver tumor burden does not exceed 50% of the liver volume
  • Patent main portal vein
  • At least 4 weeks since last administration of last chemotherapy and /or radiotherapy
  • Age >18 years.
  • Life expectancy of greater than 6 months.
  • ECOG performance status 0-2.
  • Adequate liver function as measured by: Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0mg/dl, ALT, AST ≤5 times ULN, albumin ≥2.5g/dl.
  • Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:
  • platelets >100,000/mcL (may be corrected by transfusion)
  • serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl
  • INR \<1.6, (may be corrected by transfusion)
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Women of child bearing potential and fertile men are required to use effective contraception (negative urine or serum βHCG for women of child-bearing age)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to capecitibine or temozolomide
  • Contraindicated for both contrast-enhanced MRI and CT
  • Patients previously treated with transarterial embolization (with or without chemotherapy) or with radioembolization (Y-90 microspheres)
  • Contraindication for radioembolization procedures:
  • excessive hepatopulmonary shunt as determined by the investigator
  • inability to deliver Y90 microspheres without risk of non-target embolization of extra-hepatic structures
  • Subjects consenting to the trial who fail their simulation angiography will be removed from the study and replaced.
  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents.
  • Absolute contraindication to intravenous iodinated contrast (Hx of significant previous contrast reaction, not mitigated by appropriate pre-medication).
  • Choledochoenteric anastomosis, transpapillary stent or sphincterotomy of duodenal papilla;
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant and lactating women are ineligible
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oral CapTem + Y90 Radioembolization

    Capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily orally for 14 days and temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally on Days 10-14, with 14 days between cycles, to be continued until 1) disease progression or 2) intolerable toxicities. Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) on Day 7 of cycle 2 and, if needed for the other lobe, Day 7 of either cycle 3 or 4.

    Drug: Capecitabine Oral Product · Drug: Temozolomide Oral Product · Combination Product: transarterial radioembolization

Interventions

  • DrugCapecitabine Oral Product

    Capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily orally for 14 days

    Also known as: Xeloda

  • DrugTemozolomide Oral Product

    temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally on Days 10-14, with 14 days between cycles

    Also known as: Temodar

  • Combination producttransarterial radioembolization

    Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) on Day 7 of cycle 2 and, if needed for the other lobe, Day 7 of either cycle 3 or 4.

    Also known as: TARE, y90

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intra-hepatic progression-free survival

    Intra-hepatic progression-free survival by RECIST 1.0 is defined as the time from initiation of study therapy until first documented intra-hepatic disease progression, death due to any cause or last scan date that documented intra-hepatic progression-free status.

    Time frame: 2 years. Time from initiation of study therapy until first documented intra-hepatic disease progression, death due to any cause or last scan date that documented intra-hepatic progression-free status.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Progression free survival

    Overall progression-free survival is defined as the time from initiation of study therapy until first documented intra- or extra-hepatic disease progression, death due to any cause or last scan date that documented progression-free status

    Time frame: 2 years. time from initiation of study therapy until first documented intra- or extra-hepatic disease progression, death due to any cause or last scan date that documented progression-free status

  2. Intra-hepatic tumor responses by RECIST

    Intra-hepatic tumor responses will be evaluated by RECIST.

    Time frame: 2 years. from time of initiation of study therapy until subject comes off of study, or study closes

  3. Intra-hepatic tumor responses by EASL

    Intra-hepatic tumor responses will be evaluated by EASL criteria.

    Time frame: 2 years. from time of initiation of study therapy until subject comes off of study, or study closes

  4. extra-hepatic tumor responses

    extra-hepatic tumor responses will be evaluated by RECIST.

    Time frame: 2 years. from time of initiation of study therapy until subject comes off of study, or study closes

  5. Number of participants with systemic toxicities

    Systemic toxicities will be individually assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.

    Time frame: From period of enrollment to 24 months after last treatment

  6. Number of participants with hepatic toxicities

    Hepatic toxicities will be individually assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.

    Time frame: From period of enrollment to 24 months after last treatment

  7. Change in CgA over time

    The primary marker is CgA. Additional cancer site-specific (i.e., gastrinoma) markers may also be assayed.

    Time frame: Tumor markers will be assessed at baseline and then every 3 months for 24 months.

  8. Quality of Life by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Neuroendocrine tumor

    Quality of Life will be measure by a validated NET-specific instrument, EORTC. Scale is 0-100, higher scores indicate worse symptoms/functioning

    Time frame: Quality of life will be measured at baseline and then every 3 months for 24 months .

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • UC San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
    • Lindsay Thornton, MD · Contact · lxt404@miami.edu · 305-243-5509
    • Lindsay Thornton, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Buffalo, New York 14203, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Modlin IM, Moss SF, Chung DC, Jensen RT, Snyderwine E. Priorities for improving the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1282-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn275. Epub 2008 Sep 9. PubMed 18780869 ↗
  • Norheim I, Oberg K, Theodorsson-Norheim E, Lindgren PG, Lundqvist G, Magnusson A, Wide L, Wilander E. Malignant carcinoid tumors. An analysis of 103 patients with regard to tumor localization, hormone production, and survival. Ann Surg. 1987 Aug;206(2):115-25. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198708000-00001. PubMed 2440390 ↗
  • Talamonti MS, Stuart K, Yao JC. Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: how aggressive should we be? In: Perry M, ed. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2004 Education Book. Alexandria: American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2004;206-215.
  • Arnold R, Trautmann ME, Creutzfeldt W, Benning R, Benning M, Neuhaus C, Jurgensen R, Stein K, Schafer H, Bruns C, Dennler HJ. Somatostatin analogue octreotide and inhibition of tumour growth in metastatic endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumours. Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):430-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.3.430. PubMed 8675099 ↗
  • Saltz L, Trochanowski B, Buckley M, Heffernan B, Niedzwiecki D, Tao Y, Kelsen D. Octreotide as an antineoplastic agent in the treatment of functional and nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer. 1993 Jul 1;72(1):244-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930701)72:13.0.co;2-q. PubMed 8389666 ↗
  • Rinke A, Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, Klose KJ, Barth P, Wied M, Mayer C, Aminossadati B, Pape UF, Blaker M, Harder J, Arnold C, Gress T, Arnold R; PROMID Study Group. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4656-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8510. Epub 2009 Aug 24. PubMed 19704057 ↗
  • Caplin ME, Pavel M, Cwikla JB, Phan AT, Raderer M, Sedlackova E, Cadiot G, Wolin EM, Capdevila J, Wall L, Rindi G, Langley A, Martinez S, Blumberg J, Ruszniewski P; CLARINET Investigators. Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):224-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1316158. PubMed 25014687 ↗
  • Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, Haas T, Lincy J, Lebwohl D, Oberg K; RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):514-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290. PubMed 21306238 ↗
  • Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL, Bang YJ, Borbath I, Lombard-Bohas C, Valle J, Metrakos P, Smith D, Vinik A, Chen JS, Horsch D, Hammel P, Wiedenmann B, Van Cutsem E, Patyna S, Lu DR, Blanckmeister C, Chao R, Ruszniewski P. Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):501-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003825. PubMed 21306237 ↗
  • Gaba RC. Chemoembolization practice patterns and technical methods among interventional radiologists: results of an online survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):692-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7066. PubMed 22358011 ↗
  • Kennedy AS, Dezarn WA, McNeillie P, Coldwell D, Nutting C, Carter D, Murthy R, Rose S, Warner RR, Liu D, Palmedo H, Overton C, Jones B, Salem R. Radioembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using resin 90Y-microspheres: early results in 148 patients. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun;31(3):271-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31815e4557. PubMed 18525307 ↗
  • Saxena A, Chua TC, Bester L, Kokandi A, Morris DL. Factors predicting response and survival after yttrium-90 radioembolization of unresectable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: a critical appraisal of 48 cases. Ann Surg. 2010 May;251(5):910-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d24a. PubMed 20395859 ↗
  • Memon K, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Riaz A, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Gupta R, Nikolaidis P, Miller FH, Yaghmai V, Gates VL, Atassi B, Newman S, Omary RA, Benson AB 3rd, Salem R. Radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: safety, imaging, and long-term outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 1;83(3):887-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.041. Epub 2011 Dec 2. PubMed 22137020 ↗
  • Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, Krenning E, Oberg K, Steinmuller T, Anlauf M, Wiedenmann B, Salazar R; Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95(2):157-76. doi: 10.1159/000335597. Epub 2012 Feb 15. No abstract available. PubMed 22262022 ↗
  • Strosberg JR, Fine RL, Choi J, Nasir A, Coppola D, Chen DT, Helm J, Kvols L. First-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide in patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. Cancer. 2011 Jan 15;117(2):268-75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25425. Epub 2010 Sep 7. PubMed 20824724 ↗
  • Fine RL, Gulati AP, Krantz BA, Moss RA, Schreibman S, Tsushima DA, Mowatt KB, Dinnen RD, Mao Y, Stevens PD, Schrope B, Allendorf J, Lee JA, Sherman WH, Chabot JA. Capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) for metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine cancers: The Pancreas Center at Columbia University experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;71(3):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2055-z. Epub 2013 Jan 31. PubMed 23370660 ↗
  • Cives M, Ghayouri M, Morse B, Brelsford M, Black M, Rizzo A, Meeker A, Strosberg J. Analysis of potential response predictors to capecitabine/temozolomide in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016 Sep;23(9):759-67. doi: 10.1530/ERC-16-0147. PubMed 27552969 ↗
  • Cohen SJ, Konski AA, Putnam S, Ball DS, Meyer JE, Yu JQ, Astsaturov I, Marlow C, Dickens A, Cade DN, Meropol NJ. Phase I study of capecitabine combined with radioembolization using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres) in patients with advanced cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;111(2):265-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.344. Epub 2014 Jul 1. PubMed 24983373 ↗
  • Hickey R, Mulcahy MF, Lewandowski RJ, Gates VL, Vouche M, Habib A, Kircher S, Newman S, Nimeiri H, Benson AB, Salem R. Chemoradiation of hepatic malignancies: prospective, phase 1 study of full-dose capecitabine with escalating doses of yttrium-90 radioembolization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1025-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.040. PubMed 24661655 ↗
  • Vinik E, Carlton CA, Silva MP, Vinik AI. Development of the Norfolk quality of life tool for assessing patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2009 Apr;38(3):e87-95. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31819b6441. PubMed 19276865 ↗
  • Vinik E, Silva MP, Vinik AI. Measuring the relationship of quality of life and health status, including tumor burden, symptoms, and biochemical measures in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;40(1):97-109, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.12.008. PubMed 21349413 ↗
  • Yadegarfar G, Friend L, Jones L, Plum LM, Ardill J, Taal B, Larsson G, Jeziorski K, Kwekkeboom D, Ramage JK; EORTC Quality of Life Group. Validation of the EORTC QLQ-GINET21 questionnaire for assessing quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):301-10. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.560. Epub 2013 Jan 15. PubMed 23322194 ↗
  • Soulen MC, van Houten D, Teitelbaum UR, Damjanov N, Cengel KA, Metz DC. Safety and Feasibility of Integrating Yttrium-90 Radioembolization With Capecitabine-Temozolomide for Grade 2 Liver-Dominant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Pancreas. 2018 Sep;47(8):980-984. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001115. PubMed 30028446 ↗
  • Kunz PL, Graham NT, Catalano PJ, Nimeiri HS, Fisher GA, Longacre TA, Suarez CJ, Martin BA, Yao JC, Kulke MH, Hendifar AE, Shanks JC, Shah MH, Zalupski MM, Schmulbach EL, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Strosberg JR, O'Dwyer PJ, Benson AB 3rd. Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211). J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;41(7):1359-1369. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01013. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PubMed 36260828 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04339036
Lead sponsor
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 8, 2020
Start date
Oct 7, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Soulen, MD
Contact
michael.soulen@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
855-216-0098
Michael Soulen
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion