ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04336163Updated Jan 30, 2024Results posted

Skin Imaging to Inform Laser Treatments

An interventional study of Optical Coherence Tomography in Port-Wine Stain, Rosacea and Telangiectasia, sponsored by University of California, Irvine. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-30.

Sponsored by University of California, Irvine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
All 55 subjects enrolled in the study completed the initial study procedures, but due to the pandemic and the prolonged period where we were unable to follow up patients, we were not able to complete the aims for this protocol.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2019, registered Mar 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
4 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to obtain information (such as lesion depth, depth of the most superficial part of the lesion, and the size and density of blood vessels) with the assistance of an imaging device, and use this information to assist in selection of laser settings for the treatment of skin conditions. The imaging modality is called Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Multiple laser modalities will be used, including intense pulsed light lasers (BroadBand Light, Profractional Sciton), pulsed dye lasers (Vbeam Perfecta, Candela), long-pulse 755nm lasers (GentleLASE, Candela), Sciton long-pulse 1064nm lasers, and non-ablative and ablative fractional resurfacing lasers (Profractional, Sciton). All of the lasers noted above are the only ones that will be used in this study. These lasers have 510k clearance and are being used as per their approved indications in this study. The choice of laser type is based on the skin lesion and is recommended by the physician, and the subjects who are going to enroll in this study will already be planned to undergo laser treatment as a standard of care for their condition. This is a pilot study that will explore the utility of skin imaging in guiding the laser treatment of skin lesions.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this research is to assist laser treatment of skin conditions by imaging the skin to obtain information about lesional skin. This is a pilot study that will explore the utility of skin imaging in guiding the laser treatment of skin lesions. This study will utilize Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Data acquisition of the skin will guide laser treatment by providing information on skin lesion characteristics.

There have been shown to be many applications for OCT. This imaging modality has been used to examine normal skin, burn scars, hemangiomas, nevus flammeus, fibrosarcomas, rosacea, and telangiectasias. Skin conditions to be studied include vascular lesions, scars, and inflammatory conditions. Normal and lesional skin will be assessed.

Currently, laser settings are selected without the assistance of imaging. Imaging with OCT provides more information about the characteristics of the skin lesion (such as lesion depth, depth of the most superficial part of the lesion, and the size and density of blood vessels), which could allow for more informed selection of laser settings to treat individual skin lesions. OCT has been used to examine laser treatments as well, but the proposed protocol would include the use of OCT to examine the stated skin lesions above before and after laser treatment in order to compare to historical/prospective controls that did not undergo OCT imaging. The goal of this study is to optimize laser treatment with the assistance of OCT and guide future laser treatments.

OCT is an imaging modality that uses light to image turbid media such as living tissues, and has been successfully used to generate high resolution (\~10 micron) cross-sectional images of tissue microstructure in the human retina, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary tract. OCT systems are now commercially available for ophthalmic and dermatologic use, and there are several clinical reports on the use of OCT in the vascular system and aero digestive tract, Ophthalmology, Pleural disorder, Neural tissue, Aneurysm healing, and Oral Pathology. This device focuses low power non-laser broad band infrared light onto tissue and does not involve input of significant amounts of energy into the subject; no temperature rise occurs. Because the wavelength of light used for imaging does not have adverse tissue effects, there is no risk.

Imaging with OCT provides information about the characteristics of the skin lesion (such as lesion depth, depth of the most superficial part of the lesion, and the size and density of blood vessels). OCT poses no known risks to the patients.

A multitude of studies have been conducted that validate the utility of OCT in imaging many types of skin lesions. Vascular lesions formulate a good portion of skin diseases studied by OCT, which includes rosacea, port-wine stain, hemangiomas, fibrosarcomas, cherry angiomas, and telangiectasias. Other studies have examined imaging of burn scars, the micro-circulation of the skin, and vascular changes with topical medical application. In all of these studies, OCT imaging aided treatment as well as provided a method to assess treatment outcome.

For port-wine stains, OCT has provided information such as vessel diameter and depth, which was discovered to be quite variable in port-wine stains, indicating that tailored laser treatments are likely to improve result. Byers et al. noted that OCT was a robust and non-invasive method for observing longitudinal dynamics of the subcutaneous microcirculation of tumors. Telangiectasias are a prominent feature of rosacea, and OCT has elucidated information about their treatment with intense-pulsed light to simply examine the effect of the treatment on the targeted lesions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Port-Wine Stain
  • Rosacea
  • Telangiectasia
  • Angioma

Keywords

  • Optical Coherence Tomography
  • Pulsed Dye Laser
  • Port-Wine Stain
  • Rosacea
  • Telangiectasia
  • Angioma
03

In context

Port-Wine Stain

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Port-Wine Stain; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is above the median of 29 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Port-Wine Stain.

Browse Port-Wine Stain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Irvine is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 41 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must meet the following inclusion criteria:

  • Ability to understand and carry out subject instructions or be represented by a legally authorized guardian or representative.
  • Ages 4 and older. Patients younger than 4 may have difficulty cooperating with the OCT measurements because each measurement requires the patient to remain still for approximately 30 seconds.
  • Seeks and is scheduled for laser treatment of a skin lesion. Exclusion Criteria

Any of the following will exclude participation in the study:

  • Inability to understand and/or carry out subject instructions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prospective Study Group

    For the experimental group, the laser surgeon will be exposed to the OCT measurements and will select laser settings and determine treatment parameters based on the measurements.

    Device: Optical Coherence Tomography

  • Other
    Prospective Control Group

    For the control group, the laser surgeon will not be exposed to the OCT measurements and will select laser settings and determine treatment parameters based on standard of care, intuition, and experience.

    Device: Optical Coherence Tomography

Interventions

  • DeviceOptical Coherence Tomography

    Skin imaging to determine vascular characteristics such as plexus depth, vessel diameter, and vessel density.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Change in Photographed Lesion

    Primary outcome variable includes assessment of change in photographed lesion. Two board-certified dermatologists will grade the degree of change of the photographed lesion in quartiles (no change or darkening=0-25, mild lightening=26-50, good lightening=51-75, excellent lightening=76-95, complete resolution=96-100).

    Time frame: Through study completion; average of one year

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Scarring, Blistering, Bruising, and Scabbing

    Any adverse effects of treatment such as scarring, blistering, bruising, and scabbing.

    Time frame: Through study completion; average of one year

07

Results

Posted Jan 30, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneProspective Study GroupProspective Control Group
Started550
Completed00
Not completed550
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up550

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment of Change in Photographed Lesion

Primary outcome variable includes assessment of change in photographed lesion. Two board-certified dermatologists will grade the degree of change of the photographed lesion in quartiles (no change or darkening=0-25, mild lightening=26-50, good lightening=51-75, excellent lightening=76-95, complete resolution=96-100).

Time frame:
Through study completion; average of one year

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Scarring, Blistering, Bruising, and Scabbing

Any adverse effects of treatment such as scarring, blistering, bruising, and scabbing.

Time frame:
Through study completion; average of one year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Scarring, Blistering, Bruising, and Scabbing
ParticipantsProspective Study GroupProspective Control Group
Number of Participants With Scarring, Blistering, Bruising, and Scabbing00

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline to study completion, on average 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Prospective Study Group0/55 (0%)0/55 (0%)0/55 (0%)
Prospective Control Group———

Baseline characteristics

55 experimental group subjects were consented to this study. However, due to the global pandemic, subjects could not come for study visits, which significantly precluded the study team from following up with the subjects for several months. Therefore, the study was terminated. The preoperative photographs could not be compared to the postoperative photographs since the subjects could not be followed.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Prospective Study GroupProspective Control GroupTotal
<=18 years8—8
Between 18 and 65 years38—38
>=65 years9—9
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Prospective Study GroupProspective Control GroupTotal
Mean46 (4 to 89)—46 (4 to 89)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Prospective Study GroupProspective Control GroupTotal
Female45045
Male10010
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Prospective Study GroupProspective Control GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino0—0
Not Hispanic or Latino15—15
Unknown or Not Reported40—40
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Prospective Study GroupProspective Control GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian808
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White40040
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported707
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Prospective Study GroupProspective Control GroupTotal
United States55—55
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Irvine
    Irvine, California 92617, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Waibel JS, Holmes J, Rudnick A, Woods D, Kelly KM. Angiographic optical coherence tomography imaging of hemangiomas and port wine birthmarks. Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Mar 22. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22816. Online ahead of print. PubMed 29566276 ↗
  • Waibel JS, Rudnick AC, Wulkan AJ, Holmes JD. The Diagnostic Role of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in Measuring the Depth of Burn and Traumatic Scars for More Accurate Laser Dosimetry: Pilot Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Nov 1;15(11):1375-1380. PubMed 28095550 ↗
  • Byers RA, Fisher M, Brown NJ, Tozer GM, Matcher SJ. Vascular patterning of subcutaneous mouse fibrosarcomas expressing individual VEGF isoforms can be differentiated using angiographic optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Sep 19;8(10):4551-4567. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.004551. eCollection 2017 Oct 1. PubMed 29082084 ↗
  • Aldahan AS, Chen LL, Tsatalis JP, Grichnik JM. Optical Coherence Tomography Visualization of a Port-Wine Stain in a Patient With Sturge-Weber Syndrome. Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jun;43(6):889-891. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001055. No abstract available. PubMed 28541265 ↗
  • Themstrup L, Ciardo S, Manfredi M, Ulrich M, Pellacani G, Welzel J, Jemec GB. In vivo, micro-morphological vascular changes induced by topical brimonidine studied by Dynamic optical coherence tomography. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Jun;30(6):974-9. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13596. Epub 2016 Feb 25. PubMed 26916576 ↗
  • Aldahan AS, Mlacker S, Shah VV, Chen LL, Nouri K, Grichnik JM. Utilization of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of Cherry Hemangiomas. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Jun 1;15(6):713-4. PubMed 27272077 ↗
  • Themstrup L, Welzel J, Ciardo S, Kaestle R, Ulrich M, Holmes J, Whitehead R, Sattler EC, Kindermann N, Pellacani G, Jemec GB. Validation of Dynamic optical coherence tomography for non-invasive, in vivo microcirculation imaging of the skin. Microvasc Res. 2016 Sep;107:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 25. PubMed 27235002 ↗
  • Urban J, Siripunvarapon AH, Meekings A, Kalowitz A, Markowitz O. Optical coherence tomography imaging of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea during treatment with brimonidine topical gel 0.33%: a potential method for treatment outcome assessment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Jul;13(7):821-6. PubMed 25007365 ↗
  • Ring HC, Mogensen M, Banzhaf C, Themstrup L, Jemec GB. Optical coherence tomography imaging of telangiectasias during intense pulsed light treatment: a potential tool for rapid outcome assessment. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013 May;305(4):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s00403-013-1331-z. Epub 2013 Mar 2. PubMed 23455486 ↗
  • Mogensen M, Bojesen S, Israelsen NM, Maria M, Jensen M, Podoleanu A, Bang O, Haedersdal M. Two optical coherence tomography systems detect topical gold nanoshells in hair follicles, sweat ducts and measure epidermis. J Biophotonics. 2018 Sep;11(9):e201700348. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700348. Epub 2018 Jun 19. PubMed 29611306 ↗
  • Banzhaf CA, Thaysen-Petersen D, Bay C, Philipsen PA, Mogensen M, Prow T, Haedersdal M. Fractional laser-assisted drug uptake: Impact of time-related topical application to achieve enhanced delivery. Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Apr;49(4):348-354. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22610. Epub 2016 Nov 25. PubMed 27885682 ↗
  • Olesen UH, Mogensen M, Haedersdal M. Vehicle type affects filling of fractional laser-ablated channels imaged by optical coherence tomography. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Apr;32(3):679-684. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2168-z. Epub 2017 Feb 17. PubMed 28213875 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All co-researchers and research personnel only on this IRB protocol will have access to IPD.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 33 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2024, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 18, 2020
First posted
Apr 7, 2020
StartActual
Sep 20, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 8, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 8, 2022
Results first posted
Jan 30, 2024
Last update
Jan 30, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04336163
Responsible party
Kristen Kelly (Professor of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 7, 2020
Start date
Sep 20, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 8, 2022
Completion
Jul 8, 2022
Results posted
Jan 30, 2024
Last update
Jan 30, 2024

Study contacts

Kristen M Kelly, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Irvine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion