CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04334161DEEP1BUpdated Aug 10, 2021

Evaluation of the Neuro-endocrine Response to Post-prandial Hyperinsulinaemic Hypoglycaemia.

An observational study in Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass and Post Prandial Hypoglycemia, sponsored by Lia Bally. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-10.

Sponsored by Lia Bally · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
32
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the neuro-endocrine response to hypoglycaemia in PHH vs. non-PHH post-gastric bypass individuals.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is a major global public health concern, for which the most effective therapy is bariatric surgery. Beyond weight loss, bariatric surgery exerts powerful effects on glucose metabolism, achieving complete type 2 diabetes remission in up to 70% of cases. An exaggeration of these effects, however, can result in an increasingly recognized metabolic complication known as postprandial hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (PHH). The condition manifests 1-3 years after surgery with hypoglycaemic episodes after meals. Emerging data suggest that PHH is more frequent than previously thought and affects approximately 30% of postoperative patients, more commonly after gastric bypass than sleeve gastrectomy . Despite such frequency, the underlying pathophysiology of PHH remains incompletely understood.

A striking finding in PHH patients is the observed lack of insulin suppression and inadequate glucagon response to the sharply falling glucose levels. The blunted glucagon response to hypoglycaemia may result from altered alpha-cell function (acute or chronic) and an interaction with gut hormones (e.g. glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) that is known to exert glucagon-inhibitory effects) or altered brain signalling. It is conceivable that, both, lack of endogenous insulin suppression in response to falling postprandial blood glucose levels and impaired glucagon secretion contribute to PHH.

Further neuroendocrine regulatory processes to counteract hypoglycaemia involve catecholamines, cortisol, growth hormone and autonomic nervous system activity. Two previous studies examined counter-regulatory hormones during experimentally induced hypoglycaemia in patients after gastric bypass surgery and found lower levels than before surgery, suggesting that bariatric surgery per se influences counter-regulation to hypoglycaemia. Underlying mechanisms remain speculative. Of note, impaired neuroendocrine counter-regulation to hypoglycaemia is further supported by the high proportion of asymptomatic patients, which may be reflective of impaired hypoglycaemia awareness. The role of counter-regulatory hormones in PHH patients remains not fully understood.

Apart from the neuroendocrine milieu, effectiveness of hypoglycaemia counter-regulation depends on the capacity to provide glucose from the liver, also known as endogenous glucose production. In healthy humans, approximately 85% of the glucose produced by the liver during the initial 60-90min of hypoglycaemia is derived from liver glycogen. Postprandial hepatic glycogen stores, in turn, depend heavily on the hepatic glucose uptake following a meal. Postprandial hepatic glucose disposal and mobilization of hepatic glucose during hypoglycaemia in PHH patients remain unexplored to date.

There is currently no evidence, that increased insulin sensitivity is implicated in the pathophysiology of PHH. Conversely, previous studies suggested increased non-insulin dependent whole body glucose uptake in PHH compared to non-PHH in the light of similar or even decreased insulin sensitivity.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the neuro-endocrine response to hypoglycaemia in PHH vs. non-PHH post-gastric bypass individuals. The investigators hypothesize that the glucagon response to standardized and controlled hypoglycaemia is significantly diminished in PHH vs. non-PHH post-gastric bypass individuals. Involvement of non-surgical non-PHH controls and sleeve-gastrectomy non-PHH controls will allow to explore effects of bariatric surgery on counter-regulatory mechanisms to hypoglycaemia, including differences between procedures (gastric bypass vs. sleeve gastrectomy).

02

Conditions studied

  • Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass
  • Post Prandial Hypoglycemia

Keywords

  • Counter-regulation to hypoglycemia
  • Neuro-endocrine response
  • Glucagon
03

In context

Congenital Hyperinsulinism

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital Hyperinsulinism; 7 are open to participants now.

Browse Congenital Hyperinsulinism studies →

Lead sponsor

Lia Bally is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants will be recruited by referral from our outpatient endocrine clinic and collaborating Centres of Excellence for Metabolic Surgery. Non-surgical controls will be recruited through advertisement according to guidelines from swissethics.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ≥1 year ago
  • PHH defined as postprandial plasma or sensor glucose\<3.0mmol/l according to the International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (1) and exclusion of other causes of hypoglycaemia

Inclusion criteria for non-PHH surgical controls (Group 2 and 3):

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Group 2) or sleeve gastrectomy (Group 3) ≥1 year ago
  • No evidence of PHH

Inclusion criteria for non-PHH non-surgical controls (Group 4):

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Absence of any condition or previous surgery known to affect gastro-intestinal integrity and food absorption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria for all Groups:

  • Clinically relevant weight changes (≥5%) within the past 3 months
  • Incapacity to give informant consent
  • Historical or current diabetes based on HbA1c ≥6.5% without glucose-lowering treatment
  • Haemoglobin level below 13.5 g/l
  • Ongoing treatment with glucose-lowering drugs, anorectic drugs, steroids or any medications known to affect gastric motility
  • Active heart, lung, liver, gastrointestinal, renal or neurological disease
  • Inability to follow study procedures
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • PHH patients

    Patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ≥1 year ago and confirmed postprandial hyperglycaemic hypoglycaemia (PHH). PHH is defined as postprandial plasma or sensor glucose\<3.0mmol/l according to the International Hypoglycaemia Study Group and exclusion of other causes of hypoglycaemia

    Combination Product: Administration of glucose and controlled induction of hypoglycaemia.

  • non-PHH gastric bypass patients

    Patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ≥1 year ago without evidence of PHH.

    Combination Product: Administration of glucose and controlled induction of hypoglycaemia.

  • non-PHH sleeve gastrectomy patients

    Patients with sleeve gastrectomy ≥1 year ago without evidence PHH.

    Combination Product: Administration of glucose and controlled induction of hypoglycaemia.

  • non-PHH non-surgical controls

    Absence of any conditions or previous surgery known to affect gastro-intestinal integrity and food absorption.

    Combination Product: Administration of glucose and controlled induction of hypoglycaemia.

Interventions

  • Combination productAdministration of glucose and controlled induction of hypoglycaemia.

    Functional metabolic test involving a 15g oral glucose load (enriched with 1.5% U-13C glucose) and subsequent controlled 20min hypoglycaemic clamp period. Neuroendocrine response will be assessed using frequent blood samples for hormones and metabolites, continuous heart rate monitoring and evaluation for hypoglycaemic symptoms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Glucagon response during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as defined using the area under the concentration curve (AUC)

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response of C-peptide during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  2. Response of cortisol during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  3. Response of adrenaline during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  4. Response of noradrenaline during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  5. Response of growth hormone during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  6. Response of Glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  7. Response of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  8. Response of peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY) during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  9. Response of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  10. Endogenous glucose production during the 20min hypoglycaemic period as defined using the AUC of the rate of endogenous glucose production (Total rate of glucose appearance-Rate of glucose infusion)

    Time frame: 20 minutes of the hypoglycaemic period (from 150 to 170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

Other outcomes

  1. Time course of the hormonal response during the whole experiment.

    Assessed hormones: insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, cortisol, adrenaline, noradrenaline, Growth Hormone, Glucagon-like peptide 1 \[GLP-1\], glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide \[GIP\], peptide tyrosine tyrosine \[PYY\], pancreatic polypeptide \[PP\]

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  2. Time course of rate of glucose appearance (Ra total) during the whole experiment

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  3. Time course of rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) during the whole experiment

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  4. Time course of rate of meal-derived glucose appearance (Ra oral) during the whole experiment

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  5. Time course of rate of endogenous glucose production (EGP) during the whole experiment

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  6. Total beta-cell function (total beta-cell glucose responsiveness)

    Calculated from the oral c-peptide minimal model

    Time frame: Calculated from time of the oral glucose load (T0) to 120 minutes after the oral glucose load (T120)

  7. Dynamic beta-cell function (dynamic beta-cell glucose responsiveness)

    Calculated from the oral c-peptide minimal model

    Time frame: Calculated from time of the oral glucose load (T0) to 120 minutes after the oral glucose load (T120)

  8. Static beta-cell function indices (static beta-cell glucose responsiveness)

    Calculated from the oral c-peptide minimal model

    Time frame: Calculated from time of the oral glucose load (T0) to 120 minutes after the oral glucose load (T120)

  9. Insulin clearance

    Calculated using the oral minimal model

    Time frame: Calculated from time of the oral glucose load (T0) to 120 minutes after the oral glucose load (T120)

  10. Hepatic insulin extraction

    Calculated using the oral minimal model

    Time frame: Calculated from time of the oral glucose load (T0) to 120 minutes after the oral glucose load (T120)

  11. Heart rate in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  12. Heart rate variability (low to high frequency power ratio) in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  13. Heart rate variability (high frequency power) in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  14. Heart rate variability (low frequency power) in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  15. Systolic blood pressure in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  16. Diastolic blood pressure in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  17. Time course of haematocrit during the whole experiment

    Time frame: From the start of the experiment (100 minutes before the oral glucose load) until the end of the experiment (170 minutes after the oral glucose load)

  18. Autonomous symptoms in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia according to the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale.

    Sum of the scores of the autonomous symptoms from the Edinburgh hypoglycemia Scale. Each score is based on the patient's evaluation of the respective symptom using a Likert scale (1-7). A higher score means a more intense hypoglycaemia feeling.

    Time frame: 40 minutes after the oral glucose load

  19. Autonomous symptoms in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia according to the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale.

    Sum of the scores of the autonomous symptoms from the Edinburgh hypoglycemia Scale. Each score is based on the patient's evaluation of the respective symptom using a Likert scale (1-7). A higher score means a more intense hypoglycaemia feeling.

    Time frame: 100 minutes after the oral glucose load

  20. Autonomous symptoms in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia according to the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale.

    Sum of the scores of the autonomous symptoms from the Edinburgh hypoglycemia Scale. Each score is based on the patient's evaluation of the respective symptom using a Likert scale (1-7). A higher score means a more intense hypoglycaemia feeling.

    Time frame: 140 minutes after the oral glucose load

  21. Neuroglycopenic symptoms in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia according to the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale.

    Sum of the scores of the neuroglycopenic symptoms from the Edinburgh hypoglycemia Scale. Each score is based on the patient's evaluation of the respective symptom using a Likert scale (1-7). A higher score means a more intense hypoglycaemia feeling.

    Time frame: 40 minutes after the oral glucose load

  22. Neuroglycopenic symptoms in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia according to the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale.

    Sum of the scores of the neuroglycopenic symptoms from the Edinburgh hypoglycemia Scale. Each score is based on the patient's evaluation of the respective symptom using a Likert scale (1-7). A higher score means a more intense hypoglycaemia feeling.

    Time frame: 100 minutes after the oral glucose load

  23. Neuroglycopenic symptoms in response to the meal and during hypoglycaemia according to the Edinburgh Hypoglycaemia Scale.

    Sum of the scores of the neuroglycopenic symptoms from the Edinburgh hypoglycemia Scale. Each score is based on the patient's evaluation of the respective symptom using a Likert scale (1-7). A higher score means a more intense hypoglycaemia feeling.

    Time frame: 140 minutes after the oral glucose load

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04334161
Lead sponsor
Lia Bally
Responsible party
Lia Bally (Professor, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 6, 2020
Start date
Oct 2, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 13, 2021
Completion
Jul 13, 2021
Last update
Aug 10, 2021

Study contacts

Lia Bally, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital Bern & University of Bern

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion