ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04326270Updated Mar 30, 2020

Crossover Comparison of Tidal Volume Delivery During Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Preterm Infants: Infant Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Prongs

An interventional study of Nasal interface in Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, sponsored by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-30.

Sponsored by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2019, registered Mar 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Crossover bedside clinical study to examine relative tidal volume delivery during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and directly compare the RAM® infant cannula to a nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) delivery system in vivo. The study population will consist of preterm neonates with mild respiratory insufficiency who are receiving NIPPV, non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV NAVA), or nCPAP.

Read the detailed description

Bedside crossover study of neonates with mild respiratory distress receiving NIPPV. Infants serve as their own controls and are randomized to initial interface of either RAM® infant cannula or Miniflow® nCPAP prongs. Infants are instrumented with the following monitoring equipment: Edi orogastric tube to measure electrical activity of the diaphragm, transcutaneous monitor to measure transcutaneous CO2 and O2, pulse oximeter to measure heart rate and oxygen saturation, and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) bands around the chest and abdomen to measure breathing movements and relative Vt (arbitrary units, a.u.). Data are continuously and simultaneously acquired using a data acquisition system. After 10 minutes of stabilization, infants receive 5 minutes of NIPPV on each of a sequence of four commonly used pressure settings (expressed as peak inspiratory pressure / positive end expiratory pressure): 16/5, 16/8, 20/5, 20/8. This sequence is not randomized and is constant between interfaces. Subjects are then placed on the alternate interface, and the sequence is repeated. Events ("breaths") are separated into 3 types: patient effort synchronized with NIPPV breaths (type I), NIPPV breaths without patient effort (type II), and patient effort without NIPPV breaths (type III).

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant

Keywords

  • nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation
  • non-invasive ventilation
  • nasal continuous positive airway pressure prongs
  • infant nasal cannula
  • tidal volume
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronologic age less than 28 days
  • Gestational age at birth between 24 weeks 0 days to 34 weeks 6 days
  • Currently receiving NIPPV, NIV NAVA, or nCPAP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Oxygen requirement greater than 40%
  • Peak inspiratory pressure greater than 20 cm H2O
  • Major congenital anomalies of the heart or lungs
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    nCPAP prongs

    Device: Nasal interface

  • Active comparator
    Infant cannula

    Device: Nasal interface

Interventions

  • DeviceNasal interface

    Randomized to initial interface of nCPAP prongs or infant cannula

    Also known as: Neotech RAM infant cannula, Miniflow Nasal CPAP Prongs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Relative tidal volume delivery, breath type I

    Relative tidal volume measured in arbitrary units (AU) via RIP bands during synchronized breaths

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Relative tidal volume delivery, breath type II

    Relative tidal volume measured in arbitrary units (AU) via RIP bands during ventilator-driven breaths

    Time frame: 1 hour

  3. Relative tidal volume delivery, breath type III

    Relative tidal volume measured in arbitrary units (AU) via RIP bands during patient-driven breaths

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ventilator pressure delivery

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Ventilator flow delivery

    Time frame: 1 hour

  3. Heart rate

    Time frame: 1 hour

  4. Oxygen saturation

    Time frame: 1 hour

  5. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension

    Time frame: 1 hour

  6. Transcutaneous oxygen tension

    Time frame: 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
    • Ashley Lynch, M.D. · Contact · allynch@uams.edu · 501-412-0988
    • Ashley L Lynch, M.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lynch AL, Matlock DN, Akmyradov C, Weisner MD, Beck J, Sinderby C, Courtney SE. Tidal volume delivery during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: infant cannula vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure prongs. J Perinatol. 2024 Feb;44(2):244-249. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01846-7. Epub 2023 Dec 21. PubMed 38129599 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2020, 15 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 26, 2020
First posted
Mar 30, 2020
StartActual
Mar 7, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2020
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2020
Last update
Mar 30, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04326270
Responsible party
Ashley L. Lynch (Principle Investigator, Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 30, 2020
Start date
Mar 7, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 30, 2020

Study contacts

Ashley Lynch, M.D.
Contact
allynch@uams.edu
501-412-0988

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion