CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04313283Updated Mar 10, 2023Results posted

Translating Peer-to-Peer Support Into a Clinical Setting

An interventional study of Parents Taking Action in Development Delay, Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Autism, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-10.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is not a lot of research focusing on Black and African American families raising young children with developmental delays. While the investigators know that early intervention helps children and their families, Black children with developmental delays are less likely to access such services. The causes for these racial disparities are largely unknown. Researchers have recommended caregiver support programming while on waitlists to improve caregiver-provider interactions and caregiver knowledge of the diagnostic process and developmental delays. Once a child is referred to a clinic for developmental concerns, long appointment waitlists contribute to further delays in timely diagnosis and treatment, as well as parental distress. Support programs for waitlisted families can begin to address these challenges. In this study, the investigators will examine a program called Parents Taking Action with families on a waitlist for a specialty developmental evaluation. The investigators will study if the program is feasible in this setting, if participants like the program, and if child and parent outcomes improve after participants have completed the program.

Read the detailed description

Partners at the University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB) School of Medicine (SOM), School of Social Work (SSW), and community collaborators will pilot an intervention focused on Black and African-American children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (hereafter, autism) and other developmental delays. The research fills several gaps in the academic literature. First, there is a dearth of intervention research focusing on Black families raising young children with autism. Early intervention significantly improves child and family outcomes across childhood and into adulthood. Yet, Black children with autism are less likely to access such services. Even when controlling for socioeconomic status, racial disparities in autism and developmental disability diagnoses and services persist. The causes for these socioeconomic and racial disparities are largely unknown. Researchers have recommended caregiver support programming while on waitlists to improve caregiver-provider interactions and caregiver knowledge of the diagnostic process; yet, such interventions have not been described in the literature.

SSW researchers led a community-based trial to adapt a peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action, for low-income Black families raising children with autism in Baltimore. The psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention, led by trained Parent Leaders, is unique in that it considers families' cultural and socioeconomic characteristics. Our social work team worked closely with our community advisory board to make cultural adaptations to the manual for use in Baltimore with a majority Black population. Our social work team has since further adapted the program to deliver content in two six-week modules (12 weeks total).

Despite the social work team's efforts to understand and address racial autism disparities, a wholly community-based model has limitations. Once a child is referred to a clinic for developmental concerns, long appointment waitlists contribute to further delays in timely diagnosis and treatment, as well as parental distress. Wait times also contribute to appointment absenteeism, which further delays timely access to care. A study suggested support programs for waitlisted families can begin to address these challenges. In total, these studies have suggested an integrated community-clinical model can provide critical supports to children and their families while on a waitlist and strengthen connections between families and clinical providers. Thus, this project will test the feasibility, acceptability, and short-term outcomes of a peer-led program, Parents Taking Action with a clinical sample.

02

Conditions studied

  • Development Delay
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Autism

Keywords

  • Developmental delays
  • Parenting
  • Autism
03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 687 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 63 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Parent or other primary caregiver of a child age eight years or younger on University of Maryland Baltimore, Developmental-Behavioral waiting list for autism or developmental concerns
  • Identify self or child as Black or African American.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or other primary caregiver is younger than 18 years old
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Parents Taking Action

    A peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action is the psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention led by trained Parent Leaders for 12 weeks.

    Behavioral: Parents Taking Action

Interventions

  • BehavioralParents Taking Action

    A peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action is the psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention led by trained Parent Leaders.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parenting Stress

    Autism Parenting Stress Index (APSI): This measure includes 13 items that assess core autism symptoms, comorbid behaviors, and comorbid physical behaviors. Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5. Possible range is 0-65. Higher scores indicate more parenting stress.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depression

    Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)- This measure contains 20 items assess 4 separate factors: depressive affect, somatic symptoms, positive affect, and interpersonal relations. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Possible range is 0-60. A score of 16 points or more considered depressed.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

  2. Family Functioning

    Family Outcomes Survey-Revised (FOS-R): This measure was developed to provide child and family outcomes for evaluation the effectiveness of early intervention program. This measure includes 24 items assessing five outcomes (1) family needs/strengths (4 items); (2) advocacy (5 items); (3) child learning support (4 items); (4) social support (5 items); and (5) community access (6 items). Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Possible range is 24-120. Higher scores indicate better family functioning.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

  3. Fidelity

    Procedural Fidelity Checklist Self-Assessment for Promotora Home Visits: This measurement was developed to evaluate Parent Leaders' fidelity on the program delivery. This measure includes 16 items the Parent Leader completes after every program session. Each item is based on two responses: (1) I did this; (2) I did not this. Possible range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate less fidelity.

    Time frame: Weekly through intervention (12 weeks total)

  4. Child Behavior

    Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF)- This measure includes 76 item in two sections, reported separately: positive social behavior and problem behavior. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Section 1 (positive social behavior) contains 10 items and scores range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate more positive social behavior. Section 2 (problem behavior) contains 66 items and scores range from 0-198. Higher scores indicate more child behavior problems.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 10, 2023

Participant flow

We recruited participants whose child was waitlisted for an autism or developmental evaluation. 36 participants consented to participate in the single-arm study, but 17 of them did not receive the intervention because they did not complete baseline measures (n=12) or did not begin the intervention (n=5). Thus, 19 people began the intervention. Of these, 15 completed the intervention and all data points; the remaining 4 only completed part of the intervention and did not complete all data points.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParents Taking Action
Started19
Completed15
Not completed4
Withdrew: Did not complete intervention4

Outcome measures

PrimaryParenting Stress

Autism Parenting Stress Index (APSI): This measure includes 13 items that assess core autism symptoms, comorbid behaviors, and comorbid physical behaviors. Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5. Possible range is 0-65. Higher scores indicate more parenting stress.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parenting Stress
score on a scaleParents Taking Action
Pre-intervention14.4 ± 11.4
Post-intervention12.2 ± 8.52
SecondaryDepression

Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)- This measure contains 20 items assess 4 separate factors: depressive affect, somatic symptoms, positive affect, and interpersonal relations. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Possible range is 0-60. A score of 16 points or more considered depressed.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Depression
score on a scaleParents Taking Action
Pre-intervention15.2 ± 9.7
Post-intervention10.6 ± 8.35
SecondaryFamily Functioning

Family Outcomes Survey-Revised (FOS-R): This measure was developed to provide child and family outcomes for evaluation the effectiveness of early intervention program. This measure includes 24 items assessing five outcomes (1) family needs/strengths (4 items); (2) advocacy (5 items); (3) child learning support (4 items); (4) social support (5 items); and (5) community access (6 items). Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Possible range is 24-120. Higher scores indicate better family functioning.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Family Functioning
score on a scaleParents Taking Action
Pre-intervention85.5 ± 12.3
Post-intervention99.7 ± 14.4
SecondaryFidelity

Procedural Fidelity Checklist Self-Assessment for Promotora Home Visits: This measurement was developed to evaluate Parent Leaders' fidelity on the program delivery. This measure includes 16 items the Parent Leader completes after every program session. Each item is based on two responses: (1) I did this; (2) I did not this. Possible range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate less fidelity.

Time frame:
Weekly through intervention (12 weeks total)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Fidelity
score on a scaleParents Taking Action
Fidelity98 ± .04
SecondaryChild Behavior

Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF)- This measure includes 76 item in two sections, reported separately: positive social behavior and problem behavior. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Section 1 (positive social behavior) contains 10 items and scores range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate more positive social behavior. Section 2 (problem behavior) contains 66 items and scores range from 0-198. Higher scores indicate more child behavior problems.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Child Behavior
score on a scaleParents Taking Action
Pre-intervention (positive social behavior total score)11.0 ± 4.4
Post-intervention (positive social behavior total score)12.1 ± 5.5
Pre-intervention (problem behavior total score)45.3 ± 32.6
Post-intervention (problem behavior total score)37.5 ± 19.7

Adverse events

Collected over We collected data on all participants while they were enrolled in the study, which lasted through completion of baseline data until post-intervention data collection (approximately 12 weeks). This single-arm was minimal risk and only involved participants engaging in a psychoeducational parenting program. In order to reduce risks and promote participant safety, we developed a Safety Plan for any emergencies or distress, as well as a Resource List for any parents seeking additional support.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Parents Taking Action0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

19 people began the intervention; however, only 15 completed the intervention. The results here are based on 15 participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Parents Taking Action
Mean37.3 ± 11.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Parents Taking Action
Female14
Male1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Parents Taking Action
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American15
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Employment Status
Employment Status(Participants)Parents Taking Action
Employed full-time5
Employed part-time4
Self-employed4
Unemployed2
Marital Status
Marital Status(Participants)Parents Taking Action
Never married8
Married5
Divorced1
Other1
Education Level
Education Level(Participants)Parents Taking Action
High school graduate9
College graduate3
Graduate/professional school3
Annual Household Income (USD)
Annual Household Income (USD)(Participants)Parents Taking Action
<$10,0005
$10,000 - $29,9993
$30,000 - $49,9993
$50,000 - $69,9991
≥$70,0001
Don't know/not sure2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Maryland
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Magana S, Lopez K, Salkas K, Iland E, Morales MA, Garcia Torres M, Zeng W, Machalicek W. A Randomized Waitlist-Control Group Study of a Culturally Tailored Parent Education Intervention for Latino Parents of Children with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jan;50(1):250-262. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04252-1. PubMed 31606887 ↗
  • Kuhn JL, Vanegas SB, Salgado R, Borjas SK, Magana S, Smith DaWalt L. The Cultural Adaptation of a Transition Program for Latino Families of Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Fam Process. 2020 Jun;59(2):477-491. doi: 10.1111/famp.12439. Epub 2019 Mar 7. PubMed 30844083 ↗
  • Shaia WE, Nichols HM, Dababnah S, Campion K, Garbarino N. Brief Report: Participation of Black and African-American Families in Autism Research. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 May;50(5):1841-1846. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03926-0. PubMed 30805765 ↗
  • Dababnah S, Shaia WE, Campion K, Nichols HM. "We Had to Keep Pushing": Caregivers' Perspectives on Autism Screening and Referral Practices of Black Children in Primary Care. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018 Oct;56(5):321-336. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-56.5.321. PubMed 30273522 ↗
  • Koegel LK, Koegel RL, Ashbaugh K, Bradshaw J. The importance of early identification and intervention for children with or at risk for autism spectrum disorders. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;16(1):50-6. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.861511. Epub 2013 Dec 11. PubMed 24328352 ↗
  • Feinberg E, Silverstein M, Donahue S, Bliss R. The impact of race on participation in part C early intervention services. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 May;32(4):284-91. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3182142fbd. PubMed 21389865 ↗
  • Nguyen CT, Krakowiak P, Hansen R, Hertz-Picciotto I, Angkustsiri K. Sociodemographic Disparities in Intervention Service Utilization in Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Dec;46(12):3729-3738. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2913-3. PubMed 27639855 ↗
  • Mandell DS, Ittenbach RF, Levy SE, Pinto-Martin JA. Disparities in diagnoses received prior to a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Oct;37(9):1795-802. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0314-8. Epub 2006 Dec 8. PubMed 17160456 ↗
  • Denman K, Smart C, Dallos R, Levett P. How Families Make Sense of Their Child's Behaviour When on an Autism Assessment and Diagnosis Waiting List. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Nov;46(11):3408-3423. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2873-7. PubMed 27480420 ↗
  • Kalb LG, Freedman B, Foster C, Menon D, Landa R, Kishfy L, Law P. Determinants of appointment absenteeism at an outpatient pediatric autism clinic. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(9):685-97. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31826c66ef. PubMed 23095496 ↗
  • Connolly M, Gersch I. A support group for parents of children on a waiting list for an assessment for autism spectrum disorder. Educational Psychology in Practice. 2013; 29(3): 293-308.

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 1, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04313283
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Collaborators
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Responsible party
Sarah Dababnah (Associate Professor, University of Maryland, Baltimore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 18, 2020
Start date
Sep 16, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2021
Completion
Oct 31, 2021
Results posted
Mar 10, 2023
Last update
Mar 10, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion