ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04311957Updated Aug 3, 2020

Continuation of Protease-Inhibitor Based Second-Line Therapy vs. Switch to B/F/TAF in Virologically Suppressed Adults

A Phase 4 interventional study of Continuation of boosted PI and B/F/TAF in HIV-1-infection and Antiretroviral Therapy, sponsored by Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic. Status unknown at 1 site in Haiti. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-03.

Sponsored by Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
386
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized trial compares the efficacy of switching to a fixed-dose combination of B/F/TAF versus continuing a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) regimen in HIV-1 infected participants who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA \<200 copies) on a second-line bPI regimen. Half of participants will receive B/F/TAF and half will continue a bPI regimen. The hypothesize is that B/F/TAF will have efficacy that is non-inferior to the boosted PI regimen.

Read the detailed description

The second generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) dolutegravir (DTG) and bictegravir (BIC) are widely prescribed for the treatment of HIV, due to their favorable tolerability and toxicity profile, durable efficacy, and high barrier to resistance. However, there are limited data to guide the management of patients who are already virally suppressed on a second-line bPI regimen.

Though bPIs have a high barrier to resistance and durable virologic efficacy, they have several important drug-drug interactions, are associated with unfavorable long-term metabolic effects, and may be poorly tolerated. For these reasons, a second-generation INSTI would be preferable to a boosted PI regimen, as long INSTIs are demonstrated to have non-inferior efficacy for patients who are already suppressed on a second-line bPI regimen.

In the proposed study, the efficacy of continuing the bPI regimen will be compared to switching to B/F/TAF.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV-1-infection
  • Antiretroviral Therapy

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Second-line therapy
  • Integrase strand transfer inhibitor
  • Protease inhibitor
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The ability and willingness to give .
  • Age ≥18 years
  • History of meeting WHO criteria for immunologic or virologic failure after receipt of a treatment regimen for ≥6 months
  • Currently receiving a second-line ART regimen including either ATVr or LPVr + 2 NRTIs for ≥6 months
  • At least one -1 RNA \<200 copies/mL within 12 months prior to enrollment, and no HIV-1 RNA of at least 200 copies/mL during this period.
  • Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<200 copies/mL at Screening Visit.
  • ≥ 50 mL/min according to the MDRD study equation for
  • Hepatic transaminases ( and ALT) \</=5X (ULN)
  • No active TB
  • Women of childbearing age must agree to take reliable

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active World Health Organization Stage 3 or 4 condition
  • Treatment with an INSTI in the past
  • Gap in care of at least one month in the prior six months
  • Current alcohol or substance use judged by investigator to potentially interfere with participant study compliance
  • History of poor adherence, that in the opinion of the investigator, would potentially interfere with study compliance
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding at screening visit
  • Planning to transfer care
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
386 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Boosted PI Group

    Continuation of the same second-line regimen taken prior to entry: This includes either Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPVr) 400 mg/100 mg BID or Atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) 300 mg/100 mg QD plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

    Drug: Continuation of boosted PI

  • Experimental
    B/F/TAF Group

    Combination tablet of bictegravir 50 mg/emtricitabine 200 mg/tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (B/F/TAF) administered orally, once daily.

    Drug: B/F/TAF

Interventions

  • DrugContinuation of boosted PI

    Continuation of the same second-line regimen taken prior to entry: LPVr 400 mg/100 mg BID or ATVr 300 mg/100 mg QD + 2 NRTIs

  • DrugB/F/TAF

    Drug pages: Bictegravir · Emtricitabine · Tenofovir alafenamide

    Single-tablet, fixed dose combination of bictegravir 50 mg/emtricitabine 200 mg/tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (B/F/TAF) administered orally, once daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Virologic failure - 200 Copies/mL cut-off

    Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA at least 200 copies/mL at Week 48 as defined by the US FDA-defined snapshot algorithm

    Time frame: Week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. Virologic failure - 50 Copies/mL cut-off

    Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA at least 50 copies/mL at Week 48 as defined by the US FDA-defined snapshot algorithm

    Time frame: Week 48

  2. Virologic failure - 1000 Copies/mL cut-off

    Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/mL at Week 48 as defined by the US FDA-defined snapshot algorithm

    Time frame: Week 48

  3. Tolerability as measured by discontinuing medication

    Proportion of participants discontinuing therapy for drug-related adverse events

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  4. Adverse events

    Proportion of participants with 1 or more NIH Division of AIDS Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (at least 1 grade increase from baseline)

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  5. Change in cholesterol

    Median change in cholesterol

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  6. Change in weight

    Median change in weight in kilograms

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  7. Change in body mass index

    Median change in body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters)

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  8. Weight gain of 10% or greater

    Proportion of participants with weight gain of at least 10% (in kilograms)

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  9. Change in waist circumference

    Median change in waist circumference

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  10. Waist to hip ratio

    Median change in waist to hip ratio

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

  11. Adherence

    Median adherence as measured by pharmacy refill records

    Time frame: Entry to 48 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GHESKIO
    Port-au-Prince, Haiti
    • Patrice Severe, MD · Contactpatsevere@gheskio.org · 3448-5963
    • Samuel Pierre, MD · Contactspierre@gheskio.org · 3740-7711
    • Patrice Severe, MD · Principal investigator
    • Samuel Pierre, MD · Sub investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2020; primary completion for May 2022, 20 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2020
First posted
Mar 17, 2020
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2022
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2022
Last update
Aug 3, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04311957
Lead sponsor
Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic
Collaborators
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM), Analysis Group, Inc., Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 17, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2020

Study contacts

Patrice Severe, MD
Contact
patsevere@gheskio.org
718-962-4585
Serena Koenig, MD
Contact
skoenig@bwh.harvard.edu
617-413-4090
Patrice Severe, MD
principal investigator · Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic
Serena Koenig, MD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Bictegravir · Emtricitabine · Tenofovir alafenamide

Start the discussion