ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04311827Updated Aug 25, 2022

Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Improving Pain and Respiratory Function in Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures

An observational study in Rib Fracture Multiple, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-25.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
39
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational study which will evaluate the efficacy of the serratus anterior plane block for treating pain and respiratory capacity in patients with multiple rib fractures. When resources are available for a SAPB to be performed, patients will receive this block in addition to traditional pain medications, while at other times, patients will receive traditional pain medications only.

Read the detailed description

Pain management by systemic analgesics and by nerve blocks are both standard of care and used in Emergency Department (ED) depending on the resources available. Not all ED physicians are trained or comfortable with the serratus anterior nerve block and thus it is not always available to patients and is provider dependent.

This is an observational study where patients with multiple rib fractures will receive either a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in addition to traditional forms of pain control when providers trained to perform the block are available, or will receive traditional forms pain control if trained personnel are not available. In addition to the serratus anterior plane block, standard forms of pain control in the Stanford Emergency Department include: oral or parenteral acetaminophen, oral or parenteral NSAIDs, oral or parenteral opiates, parenteral lidocaine, and parenteral ketamine.

Retrospective evaluation of the allocation of patients to either nerve block or no nerve block will be dictated by physician ability, time and resources to do the block. The efficacy of the block will be evaluated by serial measurements of pain score and respiratory capacity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rib Fracture Multiple
03

In context

Fractures, Multiple

14 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Multiple; 4 are open to participants now.

Browse Fractures, Multiple studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,168 studies on the registry; 431 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants will be patients who are 18 years and older (of all genders and ethnic backgrounds) presenting to the Stanford University Emergency Department with multiple, acute, unilateral, antero-lateral rib fractures who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age greater or equal to 18 years of age
  2. Presentation to Stanford University Hospital Emergency Department within 12 hours of a traumatic incident
  3. Three or more anterior and/or lateral unilateral rib fractures diagnosed by CT
  4. GCS 15, with the ability to discern and describe pain from rib fractures and give consent
  5. Presentation to the Emergency Department between 7am and 11pm (for identification by research assistants)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Posterior rib fractures
  2. Bilateral rib fractures
  3. Sternal fracture
  4. Known allergy to local anesthetics
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Significant coagulopathy
  7. Hemodynamic instability
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Serratus anterior plane block and traditional analgesia

    Serratus anterior plane block (Bupivacaine 75mg injected into facial plane once) Acetaminophen 1000mg IV every 6 hours as needed Toradol 15mg IV every 6 hours as needed Morphine 4mg every 2 hours as needed Hydromorphone 0.5mg IV every 2 hours as needed

    Other: Serratus Anterior Plane Block

  • Traditional analgesia

    Serratus anterior plane block (Bupivacaine 75mg injected into facial plane once) Acetaminophen 1000mg IV every 6 hours as needed Toradol 15mg IV every 6 hours as needed Morphine 4mg every 2 hours as needed Hydromorphone 0.5mg IV every 2 hours as needed

Interventions

  • OtherSerratus Anterior Plane Block

    Injection of bupivacaine 75mg above the serratus anterior facial plane in the anterior axillary line

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain score

    Patient reported pain score from 0-10 (0 - no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Before and 3 hours after analgesia administration

  2. Change in incentive spirometry volume

    Maximum inspiratory respiratory volume (measured in ml) recorded on single use of incentive spirometer device

    Time frame: Before and 3 hours after analgesia administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analgesia administration

    Dosage of analgesic medications administered for pain during ED visit and hospital stay

    Time frame: Up to 3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University Hospital
    Palo Alto, California 94305, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring AA, Dixon B, Clattenburg E, Nagdev A. Successful emergency pain control for posterior rib fractures with ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;36(8):1391-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.060. Epub 2017 Dec 28. PubMed 29301653 ↗
  • Battle CE, Hutchings H, Evans PA. Risk factors that predict mortality in patients with blunt chest wall trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2012 Jan;43(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 22. PubMed 21256488 ↗
  • Galvagno SM Jr, Smith CE, Varon AJ, Hasenboehler EA, Sultan S, Shaefer G, To KB, Fox AD, Alley DE, Ditillo M, Joseph BA, Robinson BR, Haut ER. Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Trauma Anesthesiology Society. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5):936-951. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001209. PubMed 27533913 ↗
  • Flagel BT, Luchette FA, Reed RL, Esposito TJ, Davis KA, Santaniello JM, Gamelli RL. Half-a-dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality. Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):717-23; discussion 723-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.022. PubMed 16269301 ↗
  • Ho AM, Karmakar MK, Critchley LA. Acute pain management of patients with multiple fractured ribs: a focus on regional techniques. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Aug;17(4):323-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328348bf6f. PubMed 21716105 ↗
  • Thiruvenkatarajan V, Cruz Eng H, Adhikary SD. An update on regional analgesia for rib fractures. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):601-607. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000637. PubMed 30020155 ↗
  • Adhikary SD, Liu WM, Fuller E, Cruz-Eng H, Chin KJ. The effect of erector spinae plane block on respiratory and analgesic outcomes in multiple rib fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2019 May;74(5):585-593. doi: 10.1111/anae.14579. Epub 2019 Feb 10. PubMed 30740657 ↗
  • Durant E, Dixon B, Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring A. Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block for ED rib fracture pain control. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):197.e3-197.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Jul 19. No abstract available. PubMed 27595172 ↗
  • Todd SR, McNally MM, Holcomb JB, Kozar RA, Kao LS, Gonzalez EA, Cocanour CS, Vercruysse GA, Lygas MH, Brasseaux BK, Moore FA. A multidisciplinary clinical pathway decreases rib fracture-associated infectious morbidity and mortality in high-risk trauma patients. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.048. PubMed 17161098 ↗
  • Martin TJ, Eltorai AS, Dunn R, Varone A, Joyce MF, Kheirbek T, Adams C Jr, Daniels AH, Eltorai AEM. Clinical management of rib fractures and methods for prevention of pulmonary complications: A review. Injury. 2019 Jun;50(6):1159-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 22. PubMed 31047683 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2020 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 21 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 10, 2020
First posted
Mar 17, 2020
StartActual
Mar 3, 2020
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Aug 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04311827
Collaborators
Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Responsible party
Youyou Duanmu (Clinical Assistant Professor, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 17, 2020
Start date
Mar 3, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Aug 25, 2022

Study contacts

Youyou Duanmu, MD, MPH
principal investigator · STANFORD HOSPITAL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion