CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04304183Updated Nov 27, 2023

Defecation Function and Quality of Life in the Patients Treated With Surgery for Slow Transit Constipation

An observational study in Defecation Function and Quality of Life, sponsored by Third Military Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-27.

Sponsored by Third Military Medical University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2019; still recruiting 7 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although surgical options for slow transit constipation (STC) have been proven to be a definite treatment, improvements in the associated defecation function and quality of life are rarely studied. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of total or subtotal colectomy, with respect to short- and long-term defecation function and overall quality of life in 5-year regular follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Constipation is an ever-growing problem and one of the most common gastrointestinal symptoms, affecting 10-15% of adults in the USA and 8.2% of the general population in China. Slow-transit constipation, representing 15\~30% constipated patients, is characterized by a loss in the colonic motor activity. Factors such as increasing age, female sex, physical inactivity, endocrine, metabolism, neurological factors, drug use, and depression are associated with constipation. While most patients with constipation are mild and treated easily by a behavioral and medical way, a minority of patients suffering from long-term intractable symptoms and poor quality of life and showing no response to any medical interventions are ultimately recommended for surgery.

Since the effectiveness of colectomy for constipation was first reported by Lane a century ago, surgical treatment for constipation has been greatly developed[6], including ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), cecorectal anastomosis(CRA), colonic exclusion, antegrade enemas (the Malone procedure), modified Duhamel surgery, and permanent ileostomy. Currently, the main surgical procedures for STC are IRA and CRA, which have been widely confirmed to increase bowel-movement frequency in a huge number of patients. However, the reported outcomes of colectomy are controversial and conflicting.In these studies, lack of prospectively defined follow-up intervals is a general problem. Moreover, long-term outcomes of surgery for STC are rarely reported. Furthermore, negatively persistent symptoms including abdominal pain, bloating, intractable diarrhea, malnutrition, constipation recurrence, fecal incontinence, and intestinal obstruction are not uncommon following surgery, adversely affecting defecation function and quality of life following these procedures.

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of total or subtotal colectomy, with respect to short- and long-term defecation function and overall quality of life during 5-year regular follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Defecation Function
  • Quality of Life

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Slow transit constipation
  • Defecation function
  • Quality of life
03

In context

Constipation

1,018 studies on the registry are indexed under Constipation; 140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 129 observational studies indexed under Constipation.

Browse Constipation studies →

Lead sponsor

Third Military Medical University is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients diagnosed with STC in the investigator's department were preoperatively included.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The clinical manifestations all met the Roman IV standard for the diagnosis of functional constipation.
  2. Patients with severe constipation symptoms were unable to defecate naturally and need laxatives to assist defecation or still unable to defecate.
  3. Colonic transport tests showed that the opaque X-ray markers remained more than 20% after 72 hours.
  4. All conservative treatment for more than 1 year failed.
  5. Patients had a strong desire for surgery, and no other contraindications to surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Megacolon was detected with barium enema examination.
  2. Colonoscopy suggested the presence of intestinal organic lesions or a history of colorectal cancer treatment.
  3. Gastric and small intestinal transport dysfunction.
  4. There are depression, anxiety and other mental symptoms.
  5. Constipation type irritable bowel syndrome.
  6. History of inflammatory bowel disease.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • slow transit constipation

    patients diagnosed with slow transit constipation had undergone surgery.

    Procedure: total colectomy, ileorectal anastomosis

Interventions

  • Proceduretotal colectomy, ileorectal anastomosis

    all patients underwent total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.The anastomosis was stapled in all patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of bowel movements

    the number of bowel movements will be recorded in terms of times per week.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  2. The scales of Wexner Constipation

    the scales of Wexner Constipation will be recorded in terms of scores.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  3. The scales of Wexner Incontinence

    the scales of Wexner Incontinence will be recorded in terms of scores.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  4. The incidence of abdominal pain

    the incidence of abdominal pain will be recorded in terms of percent.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  5. The incidence of bloating

    the incidence of bloating will be recorded in terms of percent.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  6. The incidence of diarrhea

    the incidence of diarrhea will be recorded in terms of percent.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  7. The incidence of straining

    the incidence of straining will be recorded in terms of percent.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  8. The incidence of laxative

    the incidence of laxative will be recorded in terms of percent.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  9. The incidence of enema use

    the incidence of enema use will be recorded in terms of percent.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  10. The scales of Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index

    the scales of Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index will be recorded in terms of scores.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

  11. The short-form(SF)-36 survey

    There are eight spheres in the SF-36 survey, including physical function, role physical, role emotional, physical pain, vitality, mental health, social function and general health. Results of each sphere will be recorded in terms of scores.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with complications

    Postoperative complications includes short-term and long-term complications, such as ileus, anastomotic leak, small intestinal obstruction, constipation recurrence and so on. Number of Participants with complications will be recorded.

    Time frame: from the pre-operation to the five years following surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Weidong Tong
    Yuzhong, Chongqing 400042, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wei D, Cai J, Yang Y, Zhao T, Zhang H, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Cai F. A prospective comparison of short term results and functional recovery after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis with short colonic reservoir vs. long colonic reservoir. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 18;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0257-7. PubMed 25887580 ↗
  • Macha MR. The feasibility of laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis in community practice for slow transit constipation. Am J Surg. 2019 May;217(5):974-978. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 26. PubMed 30948148 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04304183
Lead sponsor
Third Military Medical University
Responsible party
Weidong Tong (Professor, Third Military Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 27, 2023

Study contacts

Yue Tian, MD
Contact
ty11860602@163.com
18523159554 ext. 02368757955
Weidong Tong, MD
Contact
vdtong@163.com
02368757955 ext. 02368757955
Weidong Tong, MD
study chair · Army Military Medical University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion