CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04302948TEALUpdated Jan 25, 2024

Rapid HCV RNA Testing and LInkage to Care

An interventional study of HCV RNA screening in Hepatitis C, Chronic, sponsored by University of New Mexico. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-25.

Sponsored by University of New Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
COVID-19 quarantines disrupted study and funding ended.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing treatment as usual (TaU) for HCV screening (rapid anti-HCV screening and referral) to a intervention screening that includes TaU plus a rapid point-of-care HCV RNA test in persons experiencing homelessness. The primary outcome of interest is linkage-to-care. Linkage to care is defined as evaluation by a health care provider for HCV infection within 30 days of baseline screening and referral. We will compare the proportion of patients who are evaluated by a provider within the 30 day window in each study arm: (1) participants who screened positive with rapid anti-HCV and are referred for evaluation) and (2) Rapid HCV RNA plus TaU (those who tested positive with both rapid anti-HCV and confirmatory RNA and are also referred to a provider.) Secondarily, the investigators will also assess HCV RNA levels in both groups twelve weeks after treatment ends (24 to 36 weeks after anti-HCV screening) to determine the percent of individuals who achieved sustained virologic response (SVR12), which is a marker for cure.

Read the detailed description
  • The goal of this study is to simplify the HCV testing process using combined rapid screening and confirmation in order to reduce early barriers and improve linkage to care among a vulnerable high-risk homeless population. The investigators are partnering with Albuquerque Health Care for the Homeless (AHCH) to conduct rapid testing and provide counseling, test results, and referrals directly on site.
  • After Rapid HCV testing the investigators will randomize participants to 1) counseling and referral to a provider, or 2) Rapid RNA testing plus counseling and referrals to a provider.

The study's primary is to to assess linkage to care, which is the percent of subjects who are evaluated by a provider specifically for HCV infection in both groups. Linkage to care will be determined via medical chart abstraction 30 days after testing. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a 30% absolute difference in linkage to care between study arms, with a higher percent of participants in the combined rapid testing group being linked to a provider for evaluation relative to the control group (rapid anti-HCV alone).

  • The study's second aim is exploratory in nature and sequentially follows the first aim. The investigators will also assess HCV Cascade of care in both group, and by medical chart abstraction (up to 36 weeks after study entry) to determine the number and proportion of individuals who achieved sustained virologic response (SVR12), which is a marker for cure.
  • The study's third aim is a qualitative inquiry into the use of supportive services by participants during treatment. Such services may include social work, case management, patient navigation, participation in support groups, etc. The investigators will review medical charts for this information. The investigators are interested to see if more individuals in one study arm will access one or more of these supportive services compared to the other study arm.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C, Chronic

Keywords

  • Diagnostics
  • Point-of-care system
03

In context

Hepatitis C

2,321 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 102 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 79 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

University of New Mexico is the lead sponsor of 306 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Report being homeless and meet the Albuquerque Healthcare for the homeless HCH operating definition of homeless

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having stable housing
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Treatment as usual

    TaU includes screening for anti-HCV using a rapid point-of-care (PoC) test to screen for exposure to HCV followed by counseling, brief education and referral to provider for further evaluation for HCV treatment.

  • Experimental
    Rapid PoC RNA testing

    Intervention arm includes Tau ( screening for anti-HCV using a rapid point-of-care (PoC) test, and a rapid PoC screening test for HCV RNA, counseling plus, brief education and referral to a provider for further evaluation for HCV treatment. Rapid HCV RNA testing will be conducted using Cepheid Xpert (r) system.

    Other: HCV RNA screening

Interventions

  • OtherHCV RNA screening

    The Cepheid Xpert testing requires a fingerstick to obtain blood spots which are then tested for HCV RNA. Results available within one to two hours, facilitating counseling for patients to link to care.

    Also known as: Cepheid Xpert system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants in each study arm who are evaluated by a provider specifically for HCV infection after screening

    Evaluation HCV infection by a health care provider will be assessed as having attended a clinic visit based on medical record review

    Time frame: Within 30 days of anti-HCV screening

Secondary outcomes

  1. The proportion of patients in each study arm who achieve sustained viral response (SVR-12)

    SVR-12 weeks after end of treatment based on medical record review.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after end of treatment, representative of 24-36 weeks after anti-HCV screening

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients in each study arm who have receive any HCV-treatment related support services

    Case-management, patient navigation, participation in support groups or other supportive services.

    Time frame: 24 to 36 weeks after anti-HCV screening

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Albuquerque HealthCare for the Homeless
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04302948
Lead sponsor
University of New Mexico
Responsible party
Kimberly Page (Professor, University of New Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2020
Start date
Mar 2, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2020
Completion
Apr 1, 2020
Last update
Jan 25, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion