ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04293523A-MOREUpdated Sep 22, 2026

A 48-Month Study to Evaluate Long-Term Effectiveness of Elocta on Joint Health

An observational study in Hemophilia A, sponsored by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. Completed at 53 sites in 14 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
427
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 48-month observational, prospective, multicentre study. The overall aim of the study is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of Elocta treatment on joint health in patients treated prophylactically with Elocta in a real-world setting.

Read the detailed description

Haemophilia A is a rare genetic disorder estimated to occur in one out of 10,000 live births, characterized by a deficiency in coagulation factor VIII causing impaired haemostasis and prolonged bleeding episodes. Moderate haemophilia, defined as \< 5%, and severe haemophilia, defined as \< 1% of normal factor VIII activity result in frequent and spontaneous bleeds into muscles and joints, commonly the elbows, knees, and ankles. Bleeding into joints can cause acute pain and swelling and can result in reduced joint range of motion, long-term cartilage damage and debilitating haemophilic arthropathy. Early use of prophylaxis with factor VIII replacement is recommended following diagnosis of haemophilia A to maintain joint health and prevent joint destruction. However, despite the use of prophylaxis many patients still experience joint bleeds which may lead to joint deterioration over time. The risk of joint bleeds increases with the amount of time spent below certain FVIII trough levels, e.g. 1, 3 or 5 IU/dL. Thus, there is probably a relation between the intensity of the prophylactic treatment regimen and joint health. Elocta is an extended half-life rFVIII product (EHL rFVIII), with a slower clearance as compared to conventional FVIII products. Treatment with Elocta will therefore provide the treater with a greater flexibility for individualizing prophylaxis as compared to conventional FVIII. Higher trough levels can be reached with Elocta without increasing factor usage or injection frequency. The treater can instead choose to reduce the injection frequency or the factor consumption without lowering trough levels.

Patients may limit their physical activities due to fear of bleeding if they are unaware of their current FVIII level. Patient apps and wearables are now available which allow patients to view their predicted FVIII levels, and capture health-related data (such as bleedings, pain, well-being, physical activity levels etc.). This data can be shared with the treating physician supporting the planning to individualize the patient's factor treatment based on current lifestyle, health status and physical activity levels. Florio, a certified medical device used as part of routine clinical practice, is such an app, and the data output and patient feedback on their activity levels and sense of protection while using Florio will be analysed as exploratory objectives in this study.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Elocta on joint health over a long observation period (48 months). The study will also explore the influence on long term joint health of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens leading to different trough levels and if the extent of patients' physical activity levels can be associated with predicted FVIII levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Joint health
  • HEAD-US
  • HJHS
03

In context

Hemophilia A

844 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 138 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 427 is above the median of 81 across 310 observational studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Swedish Orphan Biovitrum is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients diagnosed with haemophilia A regardless of severity, of any gender and age, on factor treatment with Elocta according to usual clinical practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provided signed and dated by the patient, or the patient's legally authorized representative(s) for patients under the legal age, before any study-related activities are undertaken. Assent should be obtained from paediatric patients according to local regulations
  • Have a diagnosis of haemophilia A
  • At enrolment on prophylactic treatment with Elocta, independent of participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolment in another concurrent clinical interventional study, or intake of an Medicinal Product (IMP), within three months prior to inclusion in this study
  • Presence of factor VIII antibodies (inhibitors) (≥0.60 Bethesda Unit [BU]/mL) at the latest available inhibitor test
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
427 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Hemophilia A patients

    All patients diagnosed with haemophilia A regardless of severity, on factor treatment with Elocta according to usual clinical practice.

    Drug: ELOCTA

Interventions

  • DrugELOCTA

    Extended half-life factor VIII product

    Also known as: ELOCTATE, efmoroctocog alfa, rFVIIIFc

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Joint health: Target joint development

    Number of target joints

    Time frame: 48 months

  2. Joint health: Target joint resolution

    Number of resolved target joints

    Time frame: 48 months

  3. Joint health: Target joint recurrence

    Number of recurring target joints

    Time frame: 48 months

  4. Joint health: Annualised joint bleeding rate (AJBR) for treated bleeds

    Number of joint bleeding events per year, for treated bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease Activity (hypertrophic synovium) and Disease Damage (Cartilage or Bone) scores for elbows, knees and ankles

    The Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound (HEAD-US) protocol will be used. The total score represents the sum of item scores for abnormalities detected. Its values range from 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 48 months

  2. Global Gait Score, and/or joint score items for elbows, knees and ankles.

    The Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) system will be used. Global Gait Score, and/or Joint score items (swelling, duration of swelling, muscle atrophy, axial alignment, crepitus on motion, flexion loss, instability, extension loss, joint pain, strength, gait) for elbows, knees and ankles. The minimum score per joint is 0, the maximum score is 20. The overall total joint score (range 0-120) is the sum of the 6 six index joint (elbows, knees and ankles) scores. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 48 months

  3. Joint and physical evaluation for elbows, knees and ankles.

    The WFH Physical Examination Score (AKA Gilbert Score) will be used. Joint evaluation (pain, bleeding, physical examination and radiologic evaluation) and physical evaluation (swelling, muscle atrophy, axial deformity, crepitus on motion, range of motion, flexion contracture, and instability). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 48 months

Other outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of Elocta: Annualised bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds

    Number of bleeding events per year, for treated bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

  2. Effectiveness of Elocta: Annualised bleeding rate (ABR) for all bleeds

    Number of bleeding events per year, for all bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

  3. Effectiveness of Elocta: Occurrence of zero (0) joint bleeds

    Percentage (%) of study population with zero (0) joint bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

  4. Effectiveness of Elocta: Work productivity and impairment

    Assessed by WPAI-SHP questionnaire

    Time frame: 48 months

  5. Effectiveness of Elocta: Quality of Life

    Assessed by Haemo-QoL/Haem-A-QoL questionnaire

    Time frame: 48 months

  6. Effectiveness of Elocta: Physical activity level

    Assessed by the Saltin-Grimby scale

    Time frame: 48 months

  7. Effectiveness of Elocta: Quality of Life

    Assessed by EQ-5D-5L/EQ-5D-Y questionnaire

    Time frame: 48 months

  8. Effectiveness of Elocta: Severity of joint health

    Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Severity of Joint Health questionnaire

    Time frame: 48 months

  9. Effectiveness of Elocta: FVIII plasma levels

    Percentage (%) of FVIII plasma level

    Time frame: 48 months

  10. Effectiveness of Elocta: Usage of pain and anti-inflammatory medication

    Assessed by medication dose

    Time frame: 48 months

  11. Effectiveness of Elocta: Usage of pain and anti-inflammatory medication

    Assessed by total number of exposure days per medication

    Time frame: 48 months

  12. Usage of Elocta: Annualised injection frequency per subject

    Assessed by prescription

    Time frame: 48 months

  13. Usage of Elocta: Annualised factor consumption per subject

    Assessed by prescription \[IU/kg\]

    Time frame: 48 months

  14. Usage of Elocta: Adherence

    Investigator assessed (Percentage (%))

    Time frame: 48 months

  15. Exploratory Objective

    Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Time frame: 48 months

  16. Exploratory Objective: Impact of florio HAEMO on patients' sense of protection and their activity level

    Results from questionnaire on impact of florio HAEMO tools on patients' sense of protection and their activity level

    Time frame: 48 months

  17. Exploratory Objective: Explore adherence to prescribed treatment regimen

    florio HAEMO captured treatment adherence scores

    Time frame: 48 months

  18. Exploratory Objective: Explore relationship between predicted FVIII levels and physical activity

    florio HAEMO captured predicted FVIII levels, florio HAEMO captured physical activity (type, duration, heart rate and steps)

    Time frame: 48 months

  19. Exploratory Objective: Explore timing of bleeds in relation to predicted FVIII levels and physical activity

    florio HAEMO captured bleed data (timing, location, cause, treated/untreated), florio HAEMO captured injection data (time, dose), florio HAEMO captured predicted FVIII levels

    Time frame: 48 months

  20. Exploratory Objective: Explore the use of Florio to characterise pain and well-being

    florio HAEMO captured pain data (time, location, cause, intensity), florio HAEMO captured well-being data

    Time frame: 48 months

  21. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Target joint development, resolution and recurrence

    Time frame: 48 months

  22. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Annualised joint bleeding rate (AJBR) for treated bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

  23. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Ultrasound (HEAD-US)

    Time frame: 48 months

  24. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Clinical joint scoring (HJHS)

    Time frame: 48 months

  25. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Annualised bleeding rate (ABR) (based on bleeding episodes assessed according to local practice) for all bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

  26. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Occurrence of zero (0) joint bleeds

    Time frame: 48 months

  27. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Quality of Life assessed by Haemo-QoL/Haem-A-QoL

    Time frame: 48 months

  28. Exploratory Objective: Influence of different Elocta prophylaxis regimens on long term joint health

    Physical activity level assessed by the Saltin-Grimby scale

    Time frame: 48 months

07

Study locations

53 sites
  • University Hospital Brno
    Brno, Czechia
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, Czechia
  • Dept. of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Motol
    Prague, Czechia
  • Lastehaigla, Tallinn (Tallinn Children´s Hospital)
    Tallinn, Estonia
  • The North Estonia Medical Centre Hematoloogiakeskus, Regionalhaigla
    Tallinn, Estonia
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital, New Children Hospital
    Helsinki, Finland
  • Turku University Central Hospital, Paediatric and adolescent haematology and oncology clinic
    Turku, Finland
  • Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum
    Berlin, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn AöR, Institut für Experimentelle Hämatologie und Transfusionsmedizin
    Bonn, Germany
  • Hämostaseologie/Hämophiliezentrum, Medizinische Klinik 2 Institut für Transfusionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt - Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    Hanover, Germany
  • Werlhof-Institut für Hämostaseologie GmbH
    Hanover, Germany
  • SRH-Klinikum Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • HZRM Hämöphilie Zentrum Rhein Main
    Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany
  • Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital am Universitätsklinikum München
    München, Germany
  • Ippokrateio Hospital Thessaloniki (adult department)
    Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Ippokrateio Hospital Thessaloniki (pediatric department)
    Thessaloniki, Greece
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (Centro Emofilia Policlinico - Pediatria U.O.)
    Bari, Italy
  • AUSL Romagna Centro Emofilia U.O.C., Medicina Trasfusionale Dipartimento Patologia, Clinica Ospedale M. Bufalini
    Cesena, Italy
  • Giannina Gaslini Institute
    Genova, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milan, Italy
  • University Hospital of Parma, AOUP, Haemophilia Center
    Parma, Italy
  • Uo Malattie Emorragiche e Trombotiche Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Universitá Catolica del Sacro Coure
    Rome, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Regina Margherita
    Torino, Italy
  • University Medical Center Groningen/UMCG
    Groningen, Netherlands
  • The Royal Hospital
    Muscat, Oman
  • Dr Suliman Al Habib Hospital Riyadh
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • King Faisal Specialised Hospital, KFSH Riyadh, Children
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital KFSH, Adults
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Riyadh Military Hospital (P.S.M.C)
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana Division of Paediatrics
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Sant Johan De Deu
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Cruces
    Cruces, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Donostia
    Donostia / San Sebastian, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya
    Málaga, Spain
  • Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
    Murcia, Spain
  • Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
    Navarro, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA)
    Oviedo, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases
    Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
    Seville, Spain
  • Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro
    Vigo, Spain
  • Hematologimottagning Sahlgrenska
    Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital Malmö
    Malmö, Sweden
  • Universitätsklinik für Hämatologie und Hämatologisches Zentrallabor Inselspital
    Bern, Switzerland
  • Service et Laboratoire central d'hématologie, Adults
    Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Zentrum für Labormedizin
    Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
  • Universitätsspital Zürich Klinik für Medizinische Onkologie und Hämatologie
    Zurich, Switzerland
  • East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Kent and Canterbury Hospital
    Canterbury, United Kingdom
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital, Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2020 to primary completion in May 2026, 73 months.

Of 53 industry-sponsored observational studies under Hemophilia A, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 79. This study's 73 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 131 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 79.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2020
First posted
Mar 3, 2020
StartActual
Mar 30, 2020
Primary completionActual
May 4, 2026
CompletionActual
May 4, 2026
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04293523
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 3, 2020
Start date
Mar 30, 2020
Primary completion
May 4, 2026
Completion
May 4, 2026
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Study Physician
study director · Swedish Orphan Biovitrum

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion