ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04287959SWISHUpdated Jun 8, 2025

SWISH Trial (Strategies for Weaning Infants on Supportive High Flow)

An interventional study of High flow nasal cannula support in Respiratory Disease, Bronchiolitis, Viral and Infant Morbidity, sponsored by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 4 Weeks to 12 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-08.

Sponsored by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Weeks to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bronchiolitis is a common type of chest infection that tends to affect babies and young children under a year old. In older children and adults, the same viruses that cause bronchiolitis lead to the 'common cold'.

The symptoms of bronchiolitis are like a common cold and include a blocked or runny nose, a cough and a mildly raised temperature.

Bronchiolitis affects the bronchioles which are the smaller breathing tubes in the lungs. They produce more mucus than usual and become swollen, leading to a cough and a runny nose. In more severe cases, the tubes become clogged up with mucus which causes breathing problems.

In some babies, the breathing problems may present as breathing fast, with in-drawing of the muscles around the rib cage, and in rare cases, very young babies with bronchiolitis may stop breathing for brief periods ('apnoea'). The illness usually starts with a mild runny nose or cough, gets worse over three to five days or so, and then slowly gets better, usually lasting about 10 to 14 days in total.

Around 2 in 100 infants with bronchiolitis will need to spend some time in hospital during the course of their illness. This is usually for one of two reasons: they need oxygen treatment to keep their oxygen saturations within acceptable levels or they cannot manage to feed from the breast or a bottle because of a blocked nose or difficulty breathing.

Here at the Children's Hospital for Wales we are using 'High flow' to deliver oxygen. This is a relatively new concept on the general paediatric wards, and more established in a setting such as High Dependency Unit (HDU). However, we have been using it successfully on the wards for the last 3 years.

High flow device delivering a mixture of oxygen and air at high flow to help open the child's airways so that their lungs can add oxygen to their blood. It is given through a set of prongs (short plastic tubes) inserted just inside the nostrils.

Research has shown that the early use of high flow can reduce the chances of the child needing escalation of care to a high dependency unit or paediatric intensive care unit.

The investigators are interested in studying the process of weaning high flow support once the child is over the worst of their illness. This will enable the investigators to use the most effective method of weaning babies from their high flow, and ready for discharge. This has the potential to reduce the number of hours spent in hospital for babies and their parents or guardians.

Read the detailed description

Bronchiolitis is the commonest respiratory infection in infancy leading to hospital admission. 46 per 1000 infants were admitted to hospital with bronchiolitis in England in 2011 and more recent studies suggest this number has remained static. This has a significant cost burden on the NHS. Respiratory support, mainly oxygenation, and keeping infants well hydrated are the mainstay of management in hospital.

Respiratory support has traditionally been the domain of intensive care settings. This has been provided through an escalation of therapy from simple oxygen delivery by nasal cannula, to non-invasive ventilation with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and finally to intubation with mechanical ventilation. These latter two strategies require highly skilled staff, so are costly, and are associated with a greater incidence of adverse events including ventilator-induced lung injury, barotrauma, and potential neurotoxicity associated with sedation. Over the last decade High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy has emerged as a new method to provide respiratory support for bronchiolitis. HFNC therapy works by delivering an increased volume of air and oxygen into the nasal passages than standard sub-nasal oxygen therapy, using a higher flow of humidified and heated gas. These increased flow rates exceed peak inspiratory flow and thereby result in more efficient delivery of oxygen to the terminal airways. Physiological studies have demonstrated reduced work of breathing and improved gas exchange. The PARIS study has demonstrated that HFNC can be used in a ward setting to reduce admission rates to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). 12% of the study population receiving HFNC needed escalation to PICU compared to 23% receiving standard care (oxygen therapy). The safety data from the PARIS study shows no difference in adverse effects between HFNC and standard oxygen therapy. Numerous studies over the last three decades have investigated the role of various medications in managing infants with bronchiolitis including adrenaline, steroids, salbutamol, and hypertonic saline; none of these studies have definitively changed the outcome of the disease nor the length of stay in hospital. Although the PARIS study showed a reduction in number of patients requiring escalation of care, it did not demonstrate any difference to the total length of stay in hospital.

Aim Since HFNC is a relatively new method of providing respiratory support in bronchiolitis, there is lack of evidence on weaning strategy. The investigators primary aim is to examine the feasibility of different weaning strategies for infants, up to 12 months of age, supported on HFNC for bronchiolitis. The secondary outcomes include the time from decision to wean HFNC to the patient no longer requiring respiratory support and a safety assessment of the weaning strategies. This may lead to shorter total length of stay in hospital, without compromising their care. Infants with bronchiolitis who are on HFNC (the devices used will be Airvo 2, Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare) will be on a flow of 2L/kg/min (maximum 20L/min) and variable oxygen concentration to maintain target oxygen saturations >90%. The participants will be randomised into one of two arms for weaning a) titrating oxygen to FiO2 21% and then stopping HFNC b) titrating oxygen to FiO2 30% and switching HFNC to low flow oxygen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Disease
  • Bronchiolitis, Viral
  • Infant Morbidity
03

In context

Respiration Disorders

359 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiration Disorders; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 69 across 216 interventional studies indexed under Respiration Disorders.

Browse Respiration Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Weeks to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis
  • Age >4 weeks and \<12 months
  • Needs HFNC respiratory support in a ward setting for more than 12 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Requirement for imminent intubation and ventilation or having received mechanical ventilation during the current hospital admission
  • Requirement for imminent CPAP support
  • Pre-existing or concomitant, non-viral respiratory infection
  • Pre-existing respiratory disease
  • Ready to wean high-flow after \<12 hours of its initiation
  • Weight >10kg
  • Low level of consciousness
  • Apnoeas*
  • Cyanotic heart disease
  • Basilar skull fracture
  • Upper airway obstruction
  • Craniofacial malformations
  • Infants on home oxygen
  • Ex-premature infants (born at \<32 weeks gestation)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A: wean to 30%

    wean to 30% oxygen on high flow and then turn off high flow support and place onto standard low flow oxygen.

    Device: High flow nasal cannula support

  • Active comparator
    B: wean to 21%

    wean to 21% oxygen on high flow and then turn off high flow support and place directly into air.

    Device: High flow nasal cannula support

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh flow nasal cannula support

    airvo2 highflow devices will be used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Examine the feasibility of different weaning strategies for infants with bronchiolitis requiring HFNC.

    we will assess the following objective in this feasibility trial: • identify the proportion of eligible patients approached who consent to the study; We will use a traffic light system to determine progress to a multi-centre RCT.

    Time frame: This will be during the recruitment time of the study (2 years)

  2. Identify the proportion of recruited patients who supply secondary outcome data.

    We will assess the following objective: identify the proportion (percentage) of recruited patients who supply primary outcome data(time spent in hospital).

    Time frame: This will be during the recruitment time of the study (2 years)

  3. Assess the adherence of the teams on the ward to the weaning protocol assigned during randomisation.

    We will assess the following objective: to review the adherence to the weaning protocol assigned during randomisation, in particular if this can be complied with in a ward setting with a large number of healthcare staff. This will be measured as a yes or no response and calculated as a percentage/proportion.

    Time frame: This will be during the recruitment time of the study (2 years)

  4. Assess the acceptability of HFNC and the weaning strategy by parents and healthcare staff.

    We will assess the following objectives: to assess the acceptability of HFNC and the weaning strategy by parents and healthcare staff via questionnaires only.

    Time frame: This will be during the recruitment time of the study (2 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time taken to wean off the highflow machine as measured in minutes and hours.

    The main secondary outcome is the comparison of time taken from the patient being ready to wean HFNC to discontinuing any respiratory support. This will be measured in minutes and hours and a comparison made between the two intervention arms.

    Time frame: This will be during the recruitment time of the study (2 years)

  2. To assess the safety of the different weaning strategies used.

    The safety outcome measures comprise the following: * rates of failure to wean strategy (defined as fulfilment of the 'failure to wean criteria' which results in a patient becoming temporarily ineligible for oxygen weaning); * rates of respiratory escalation requiring CPAP or invasive ventilation (proportions); * rates of air leaks and other morbidities such as pnuemothorax or muscosal injury (proportions); * readmission rates within 14 days of discharge from hospital * mortality rates

    Time frame: This will be over the 2 years of recruitment time of the study.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital for Wales
    Cardiff, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 19 months.

Of 91 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Respiration Disorders, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's 19 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 111 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 24, 2020
First posted
Feb 27, 2020
StartActual
Oct 6, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jun 1, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2025
Last update
Jun 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04287959
Lead sponsor
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2020
Start date
Oct 6, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025
Completion
Jun 1, 2025
Last update
Jun 8, 2025

Study contacts

Martin O Edwards, PhD, BM
principal investigator · CAVUHB

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion