ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04282720Updated Apr 8, 2026Results posted

SurgiMend Mesh at the Hiatus

An interventional study of SurgiMend Mesh in Hiatal Hernia, sponsored by Kettering Health Network. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.

Sponsored by Kettering Health Network · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective, single-arm, open-label study to evaluate re-occurrence and quality of life in subjects undergoing primary Hiatal hernia repair using SurgiMend biological mesh. Up to 15, with a target of 10, subjects are planned to be enrolled at one site. All subjects will receive the SurgiMend mesh during surgery. Data collected will be compared to historical data.

Subjects will complete a pre-operative visit. After surgery, in addition to any standard of care visits, subjects will complete 3- and 6-month follow-ups involving a phone QOL survey and will have an upper GI series at 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hiatal Hernia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hernia, Hiatal

87 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Hiatal; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 100 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Hiatal.

Browse Hernia, Hiatal studies →

Lead sponsor

Kettering Health Network is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of type 3 or 4 hiatal hernia (8)
  • Subject is able to give
  • Adults at least 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant
  • Prior hiatal hernia repair
  • Prior gastric surgery
  • Prior foregut surgery
  • Known esophageal dysfunction or dysmotility
  • Cirrhosis or ascites
  • Known
  • Known allergy to biologic mesh
  • Known allergy to barium or other contrast material used in UGI
  • Religious objection to animal implant
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Prisoners
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    SurgiMend Mesh

    SurgiMend Mesh - FDA approved noncross-linked bovine dermis biologic mesh. SurgiMend Mesh will be used according to FDA approved recommendations for the use of abdominal wall hernia reinforcement. SurgiMend is intended for implantation to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists and for surgical repair of damaged or ruptured soft tissue membranes. SurgiMend is specifically indicated for: Hernia repair including abdominal, inguinal, femoral, diaphragmatic, scrotal, umbilical, and incisional hernias.

    Device: SurgiMend Mesh

Interventions

  • DeviceSurgiMend Mesh

    Following placement of SurgiMend mesh during laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair, patient will be scheduled for follow up using an upper GI series to check for recurrence of the hiatal hernia. Follow up upper GIs will be performed at 6 months post-surgery. Subjects will also complete a QOL survey to assess other GI associated symptoms before and after surgical repair. The QOL survey can be administered by phone by study team members

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence Rate

    Recurrence rate will be analyzed by a Upper gastrointestinal tract radiography (UGI) and clinical evaluation in conjunction with patient's reported physiological assessment per the GERD-HRQL.

    Time frame: 6 months post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Using GERD-HRQL Scale

    GERD-HRQL was developed to measure the typical symptoms of GERD and the effect on a patient's quality of life. Scale is 0-5 with 0 being no symptoms and 5 being symptoms are incapacitating. Total score is calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-15 with greatest possible score (worst symptoms) = 75 and lowest possible score (no symptoms) = 0. The total score is made up of two sub scores which addressed heartburn and regurgitation symptoms and are reported separately in a heartburn score and regurgitation score as well as the total GERD-HRQL score. The follow up scores were combined due to some participants not having specific follow up information.

    Time frame: 6 month post surgery

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSurgiMend Mesh
Started9
Completed9
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryRecurrence Rate

Recurrence rate will be analyzed by a Upper gastrointestinal tract radiography (UGI) and clinical evaluation in conjunction with patient's reported physiological assessment per the GERD-HRQL.

Time frame:
6 months post surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Recurrence Rate
ParticipantsSurgiMend Mesh
No recurrence of hernia6
recurrence of hernia3
SecondaryQuality of Life Using GERD-HRQL Scale

GERD-HRQL was developed to measure the typical symptoms of GERD and the effect on a patient's quality of life. Scale is 0-5 with 0 being no symptoms and 5 being symptoms are incapacitating. Total score is calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-15 with greatest possible score (worst symptoms) = 75 and lowest possible score (no symptoms) = 0. The total score is made up of two sub scores which addressed heartburn and regurgitation symptoms and are reported separately in a heartburn score and regurgitation score as well as the total GERD-HRQL score. The follow up scores were combined due to some participants not having specific follow up information.

Time frame:
6 month post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life Using GERD-HRQL Scale
score on a scalePre-hernia Repair ScorePost-hernia Repair Score
Heartburn Score15.67 ± 8.7757.37 ± 9.086
Regurgitation Score15.44 ± 7.7156.38 ± 9.349
Total Score35.44 ± 18.03517.38 ± 22.564
Statistical analysis
  • Pre-hernia Repair Score vs Post-hernia Repair Score · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.07 · Mean difference (final values): 19.875 · 95% CI -2.156 to 41.906

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from 6 months from the hernia repair surgery.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SurgiMend Mesh0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All 9 participants were included in the statistical analysis.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SurgiMend Mesh
Mean64.7 (44 to 73)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SurgiMend Mesh
Female9
Male0
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)SurgiMend Mesh
GERD-HRQL survey
GERD-HRQL survey(0-75 score on survey)SurgiMend Mesh
Mean35.44 ± 18.035
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Kettering Health Network - Grandview Medical Center
    Dayton, Ohio 45405, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Furnee E, Hazebroek E. Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):3998-4008. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3036-y. Epub 2013 Jun 21. PubMed 23793804 ↗
  • Lidor AO, Steele KE, Stem M, Fleming RM, Schweitzer MA, Marohn MR. Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):424-31. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.25. PubMed 25785415 ↗
  • Nason KS, Luketich JD, Qureshi I, Keeley S, Trainor S, Awais O, Shende M, Landreneau RJ, Jobe BA, Pennathur A. Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia results in long-term patient satisfaction and a durable repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Dec;12(12):2066-75; discussion 2075-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0712-7. Epub 2008 Oct 8. PubMed 18841422 ↗
  • Adelman DM, Selber JC, Butler CE. Bovine versus Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Mechanical Properties. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Jun 6;2(5):e155. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000072. eCollection 2014 May. PubMed 25289348 ↗
  • Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00658.x. PubMed 17439596 ↗
  • Radiologic Society of North America (2019). Radiation dose in X-Ray and CT Exam. Available at https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray
  • K. S. Silvipriya, K. Krishna Kumar*, A. R. Bhat, B. Dinesh Kumar, Anish John, Panayappan Lakshmanan. Collagen: Animal Sources and Biomedical Application. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Vol. 5 (03), pp. 123-127, March, 2015. DOI: 10.7324/JAPS.2015.50322
  • Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(4):601-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.12.007. PubMed 18656819 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04282720
Lead sponsor
Kettering Health Network
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2020
Start date
Mar 31, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 16, 2023
Completion
Sep 5, 2023
Results posted
Apr 8, 2026
Last update
Apr 8, 2026

Study contacts

Paul Levy, DO
principal investigator · Kettering Health Network

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion