CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04274283BRAIN MATRIXUpdated May 5, 2026

Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX - Platform Study

An observational study in Glioma, sponsored by University of Birmingham. Recruiting at 14 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by University of Birmingham · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2020; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aim of the Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX - Platform Study is to more precisely determine the exact type of tumour patients have by developing the essential infrastructure to provide rapid and accurate molecular diagnosis. A large network of clinical hubs across the United Kingdom, with expertise in managing patients with brain tumours, will be developed. Once established this infrastructure will facilitate the rapid introduction of clinical trials testing targeted therapies tailored to the genetic changes of an individual's tumour.

Read the detailed description

Gliomas, a type of brain tumour, are the most common primary tumour of the central nervous system (CNS) and in 2016 there were 5250 deaths from brain tumours in the UK. However, brain tumours are a challenging disease to treat. The tumour's location within the brain and its tendency to grow into nearby brain tissue often make it very difficult to remove the tumour completely with surgery. There is also difficulty in delivering drugs in adequate amounts to the tumour due to the natural defences of the brain.

Brain tumours arise due to changes in the DNA and other molecules in cells of the brain. Different types of gliomas can have different changes and these can be used to determine a precise 'molecular diagnosis'. The ultimate goal for the Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX is to learn how to use these molecular changes to more precisely determine what exact type of tumour patients have, and to identify, decide and test whether specific 'targeted' treatments could improve the survival and/or quality of life of patients with brain tumours.

Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX is a programme of work, the principal purpose of which is to improve the knowledge of, and treatment for, glioma. The programme will include a Platform Study and subsequent interventional clinical trials. The Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX Platform Study forms the backbone of this programme. In the Platform Study, the aim is to develop the infrastructure to provide rapid and accurate molecular diagnosis and the infrastructure to deliver clinical trials of new therapies in the future, thereby improving clinical outcomes in brain tumours.

The researchers aim to recruit 1,000 patients to the study. As gliomas occur at all ages and their specific subtype is hard to predict pre-operatively, the patient population eligible for the study is broad. A large network of clinical hubs across the UK, with expertise in managing patients with brain tumours, will be developed. Once established this infrastructure will facilitate the rapid introduction of clinical trials testing targeted therapies tailored to the genetic changes of an individual's tumour.

Eligible patients will either have had, or be about to have, surgery for their tumour. As part of this study, tumour removed during the operation will be analysed to look for specific molecular changes. As with normal standard care, the tumour will be analysed by a local pathologist. A small part will be sent for review by experts and advanced molecular analysis will be undertaken to get a detailed understanding of the DNA/molecular changes within the patient's tumour. These results will be fed back to the patient's treating doctor. It is intended that this will occur within 28 days; however, it may be longer while the study becomes fully operational.

If samples are available from a patient's previous surgery to their tumour, these may also be analysed. Similarly, if available, other relevant samples such as cerebrospinal fluid, collected as part of their care, may also be analysed. In addition, as technologies and analyses improve the understanding of brain tumours, the researchers may find important results at a later date. These will be fed back to the patient's doctor. Patients will also be asked to give a blood sample, which will also be analysed to look at the molecular features, including of their DNA. This is required to identify what 'new' changes have occurred in the patient's tumour. Following surgery, patients will continue with other treatment(s) as directed by their doctor.

Treatment generally involves radiotherapy and chemotherapy. As is standard practice, patients will be closely monitored for signs of disease progression and the effects of the treatment given. As part of this study, information on patients' treatments and disease will be collected.

Images from brain scans patients undergo, along with relevant clinical information, will also be sent to and stored by the University of Edinburgh, and where appropriate, undergo expert review by a panel of radiologists with expertise in brain tumours. If patients have further surgery, some of the tissue removed may also be analysed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glioma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Glioma

1,397 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioma; 351 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 88 across 238 observational studies indexed under Glioma.

Browse Glioma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 179 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • Patients with a newly diagnosed suspected WHO Grade 2-4 glioma, (as evidenced radiologically) AND suitable for a diagnostic or therapeutic surgical procedure resulting in a frozen tumour sample matched to a blood sample.
  • Patients with progression with known WHO Grade 2-4 glioma (those with available frozen tumour will be prioritised for detailed genomic analysis).

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed suspected WHO Grade 2-4 glioma, (as evidenced radiologically) AND suitable for a diagnostic or therapeutic surgical procedure resulting in a tumour sample matched to a blood sample.
  • Patients with progression with known WHO Grade 2-4 glioma (those with available frozen tumour will be prioritised for detailed genomic analysis).
  • Valid written informed consent for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary spinal cord tumours
  • Active treatment of other malignancy
  • Contraindication to MRI
  • Patients without standard of care imaging available
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • OtherMatched Tumour and Blood Sample - Research Pathway

    For patient's undergoing surgery fresh tissue will be collected from the initial surgery and frozen until shipment to the Oxford BRAIN MATRIX Lab. Matched blood sample for germline DNA will be taken post-Platform Study entry. For patients with progression with available tumour samples from previous tumour surgery, blood will be collected and sent to Oxford along with their tumour samples. Samples will be shipped together to Oxford for molecular analysis (Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and EPIC array). The BRAIN MATRIX neuropathology and genomics team will produce an integrated report (histology, WGS, Heidelberg Classifier) for each case in consultation with the local neuropathology team. Once data is available, a virtual MDT with the BRAIN MATRIX neuropathology, genomics team and local site will be held to ensure all relevant information is incorporated in the final BRAIN MATRIX diagnostic report. The resulting integrated histological-molecular report will be available to local sites

  • OtherMatched Tumour and Blood Sample - NHS GMS pathway

    Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX centres in England can submit matched tissue and blood samples for Whole Genome Sequencing through the standard of care NHS Genomic Medicine Service pathway via their Genomic Laboratory Hub. For those from Devolved Nations, samples must go to the Oxford BRAIN MATRIX Laboratory who can facilitate the processing of samples through an alternative NHS GMS GLH or via the research pathway.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time (from biopsy) to integrated histological-molecular diagnosis using standard-of-care NHS practice

    This is defined as the difference (days) between date of biopsy and date of final local pathology report.

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. Time (from biopsy) to WGS report to the treating clinician using NHS Genomic Medicine Service

    This is defined at the difference (days) between date of biopsy and date that a patient's Genomic Tumour Advisory Board (GTAB) report is produced.

    Time frame: 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to completion of each node of tissue and imaging pathway

    The time to each node of the pathway will be measured from the date of receipt at the current node to date of delivery at the next.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  2. Tumour and biological sample(s) quality control status

    Tumour and biological sample collection will be measured against protocol guidelines. These data will be collected in the surgical and pathological forms.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  3. Imaging quality control status

    Imaging will be measured against established clinical guideline. The imaging form will measure compliance against these guidelines.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  4. Inter-rater agreement of Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) assessments

    Scans will be assessed and scored according to RANO criteria by the hub of Neuro-radiologists.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  5. Extent of surgical resection

    Evaluated from the post-operative MRI scan and categorised as follows: Closed biopsy, open biopsy, debulking \<50%, subtotal resection 50-90%, near total resection 90-\<100%, gross total resection 100%.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  6. Overall survival time

    Defined as the time from date of diagnosis to the date of death. Patients who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last seen in clinic.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  7. Intracranial progression-free survival time

    Defined as the time from date of registration to the earliest of date of intracranial progressive disease or death from disease. The date of an event is defined as the earliest confirmation of progression by radiological assessment, clinical symptoms or MDT. Patients without progression at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last seen in clinic.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  8. Quality of Life (QoL) scores

    Longitudinal measures of QoL will be generated from the QoL questionnaire according to the questionnaire-specific algorithm for scoring.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  9. Type of interventions received

    Details of the type of interventions received will be monitored throughout the follow-up period and recorded on the Case Report Form.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  10. Type of complications from treatments (standard of care) received.

    Details of complications relating to standard of care treatments received will be monitored throughout the follow-up period and recorded on the Case Report Form.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  11. Concordance of diagnoses

    In relation to initial local radiological diagnosis, local pathological diagnosis and integrated histological-molecular diagnosis, any difference between the tiers of diagnoses will be highlighted and categorised as: discordant; agreed; refined.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  12. Samples and images centrally stored

    Defined as confirmed central storage of images and material.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  13. Targetable mutation(s) identified

    Relevant targetable mutations identified by Whole Genome Sequencing and Epigenomic Classification.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  14. Post-mortem sampling consent status and sample collection confirmation

    Based on receipt of post-mortem consent form, and on post-mortem samples with confirmed central storage.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

  15. Number of applications to, and outputs resulting from data repository

    As per title.

    Time frame: To be achieved within a timescale of up to 5 years

07

Study locations

11 of 14 sites recruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
    • Victoria Wykes · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
    Terminated
  • Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre University NHS Trust
    Cardiff, CF14 2TL, United Kingdom
    • Jillian Maclean · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • NHS Lothian
    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth Unviersity Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board
    Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
    Active, not recruiting
  • St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
    Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
    • Ryan Mathew · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • The Walton Centre, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
    Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom
    • Michael Jenkinson · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • King's College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
    • Keyoumars Ashkan · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
    London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom
    • Matthew Williams · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • The Christie Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
    • Catherine McBain · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
    • David Coope · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
    • Joanne Lewis · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
    • Stuart Smith · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
    • Meera Nandhabalan · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Watts C, Savage J, Patel A, Mant R, Wykes V, Pohl U, Bulbeck H, Apps J, Sharpe R, Thompson G, Waldman AD, Ansorge O, Billingham L; TJBM Investigators. Protocol for the Tessa Jowell BRAIN MATRIX Platform Study. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e067123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067123. PubMed 36378622 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Scientifically sound proposals from appropriately qualified researchers will be considered for data sharing. Requests should be made by returning a Data Sharing Request Form to newbusiness@trials.bham.ac.uk; this captures the research requirements, statistical analysis plan, and intended publication schedule. Requests will be reviewed by the Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU) Directors in discussion with the Chief Investigator (CI), Study Management Group (SMG) and independent Scientific Advisory Board (SAB). They will consider the scientific validity of the request, qualifications of the researchers, CI, SMG \& SAB views, consent arrangements, practicality of anonymizing the requested data \& contractual obligations. If supportive of the request, and where not already obtained, Sponsor consent for data transfer will be sought before notifying applicants of the outcome. It is anticipated that applicants will be notified within 3 months of receipt of the original request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04274283
Lead sponsor
University of Birmingham
Collaborators
The Brain Tumour Charity, University of Oxford, University of Edinburgh, Genomics England
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2020
Start date
Nov 24, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

Rhys Mant
Contact
brainmatrix@trials.bham.ac.uk
0121 414 6788
Joshua Savage
Contact
j.savage.1@bham.ac.uk
Colin Watts
principal investigator · Unviersity of Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion