ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04273490Updated Nov 29, 2023

Characterising Pain, QoL, Body Composition, Arterial Stiffness, Muscles and Bones in Adult Persons With XLH and Healthy Controls

An observational study in X-linked Hypophosphatemia and Hereditary Hypophosphatemia, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-29.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
92
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in the phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome (PHEX) results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults.

This study aims to characterize and measure pain, quality of life, muscle function, body composition, arterial stiffness, bone mineral density, geometry and microarchitecture in patients with XLH compared to age and gender-matched controls.

Read the detailed description

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in PHEX results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. FGF23 is a hormone that reduces renal phosphate reabsorption, decreases renal 1α-hydroxylase activity and increases renal 24-hydroxylase activity. As a consequence, individuals with XLH display hypophosphatemia and inadequate levels of 1,25(OH)2D (1). Therefore, conventional medical treatment of XLH aims to replace the loss with oral phosphate and activated vitamin D analogues.

The pain experienced by patients with hypophosphatemic rickets is not well characterized and needs to be addressed in order to establish the most optimal pain management in patients with XLH. The causes of pain experienced by patients with XLH are numerous: osteomalacia, enthesopathy, muscular pain, lower limb deformities, secondary arthrosis, nerve compression, and dental abscesses (3).

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with XLH is only briefly studied (4, 5). A French study found significantly decreased QoL among adult patients with XLH compared to patients with axial spondylarthritis. Especially enthesopathies were associated with a decreased QoL (4).

Increased blood levels of FGF23 are not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in itself (6-8). However, conventional therapy for patients with XLH may increase their cardiovascular risk since complications to the therapy such as nephrocalcinosis and hyperparathyroidism are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness may be a valuable marker of increased cardiovascular risk as it has been able to predict cardiovascular disease and mortality in different populations (10, 11). If conventional therapy increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, arterial stiffness may be increased among patients with XLH which may depend on treatment status (i.e., currently treated, currently non-treated, accumulated (years of) treatment and treatment naïve).

Patients with XLH often complain about muscle fatigue and exhaustion. Muscle function in XLH is thought to be compromised by chronic hypophosphatemia, but the effect of XLH on muscle function has only been briefly evaluated (12, 13).

There are no available reports on body composition in XLH adults, but body mass index (BMI) in XLH is increased compared to controls (14).

In previous studies, examinations by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) have shown significantly larger total bone area in patients with XLH compared to individuals without XLH. However, patients with XLH have a reduced number of trabeculae and cortical thickness (15). These differences are seen regardless of treatment. When receiving conventional treatment, the cortical porosity is significantly elevated compared to patients with XLH who receive no treatment (17).

HYPOTHESES:

Primary null hypotheses:

  • There is no difference in pressure pain threshold between groups.
  • There is no difference in QoL between groups.
  • There is no difference in arterial stiffness assessed by tonometry between groups.
  • There is no difference in 24h blood pressure between groups.
  • There is no difference in muscle strength and function between groups.
  • There is no difference in body composition between groups.
  • There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength between groups.
  • There is no difference in presence of osteoid-volume, -surface or -thickness, osteoclast number, osteoblastic surface, osteoblast morphology or mineralization time between groups.
  • Osteomalacia is not more common in bone biopsies from patients with XLH compared to controls.

Secondary null hypotheses:

  • There is no difference in arterial stiffness within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
  • There is no difference in 24h blood pressure within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
  • There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design:

A cross-sectional study of adult persons with XLH and an age- and gender-matched control group.

Population:

The investigators plan to include 50 persons with XLH and 50 control persons without disturbances in the calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and gender. For women, matching will also be performed on menopausal status.

EXAMINATIONS

Questionnaires:

Pain will be assessed by a bone-specific questionnaire (FACT-BP), a questionnaire for general pain (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)), and one for assessment of neuropathic pain (painDETECT).

The participant's level of catastrophic thinking will be assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Depression and anxiety will be assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7).

Quality of Life will be measured by the SF-36 questionnaire (SF36v2).

Pressure algometry:

Mechanical pressure pain over the bone will be determined as force (N) per skin area (cm2) by a handhold pressure algometer with a 1 cm2 probe (Algometer II, Somedic SenseLab AB) (18). The 1 cm2 probe will be directed perpendicularly to the skin and pressure will be applied at a constant force increase rate until the participant identifies the pressure as pain and presses a button (pressure pain threshold (PPT)). PPT will be measured over the sternum and also corresponding to the tibia 5 cm below the patella. The skin between the thumb and the index finger of the non-dominant hand will be measured as a control site.

Biochemistry:

Blood samples will be collected in a fasting state. The investigators will measure ionized calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinine, parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D metabolites (such as 25OHD; 1,25(OH)2D; 24,25(OH)2D; 1,24,25(OH)3D), vitamin D binding protein, FGF23, sclerostin, Klotho, osteopontin, and bone turnover markers (such as CTX, P1NP, osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase), and relevant genes for hereditary hypophosphatemia (if not previously genetically verified).

24 hour urine will be collected for measurement of calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinin, sodium and potassium.

Blood pressure and arterial stiffness 24-hour blood pressure will be measured using Arteriograph24. Arterial stiffness and pulse wave analysis (PWA) will be assessed by tonometry using the SphygmoCor system (Xcel; AtCor Medical, Sydney, NSW, Australia). Participants treated with betablockers will be excluded from blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurements.

Muscle function The investigators will assess upper and lower extremity strength by handgrip strength, elbow flexion and extension, and knee flexion and extension using the adjustable dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland). To assess physical function, the investigators will use the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, repeated chair rising, repeated weight lifting and 6-minutes' walk test (6 MWT).

Physical examination In order to quantify the degree of malformation of the joints in the lower extremities, the smallest distance between knees and between ankles will be measured in standing, weight bearing position.

Joint mobility The investigators will assess joint function in enthesopathy-suspected joints (neck/back, hip, knee and ankle) as well as shoulder, elbow, wrist and knee in order to discriminate between pain originating from osteomalacia or from enthesopathies.

Body composition and VFA using DXA Body composition and bone mineral density (Forearm, hip, lumbar spine and whole body) will be assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Discovery A scanner; Hologic, USA). Obtaining vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA enables us to exclude reported back pain being due to vertebral compression fractures.

High-resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography:

A HRpQCT bone scan of the dominant distal tibia and radius will be performed using an Xtreme CT-scanner (SCANCO Medical AG, Switzerland).

Bone biopsies:

Optional bone biopsies will be taken after assessment of pain characteristics. Participation in the overall study is allowed without participating in this examination.

One 7 mm biopsy marked with tetracyclin 14, 13, 4, and 3 days prior will be fixed in ethanol and analysed by HRpQCT, Nano-scale and histomorphometry.

02

Conditions studied

  • X-linked Hypophosphatemia
  • Hereditary Hypophosphatemia
03

In context

Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets

49 studies on the registry are indexed under Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 92 is above the median of 50 across 16 observational studies indexed under Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets.

Browse Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,300 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

50 persons with hereditary hypophosphatemia and 50 control persons without disturbances in the calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and gender. For women, matching will also be performed on menopausal status (pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal*).

*Pre-menopausal = regular periods Peri-menopausal = irregular periods +/- hot flashes Post-menopausal = last period ≥1 year ago

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Understand oral and written Danish
  • Able to consent

For XLH only:

  1. genetically verified XLH by detection of a disease-causing mutation in PHEX or a positive family history of X-linked hypophosphatemia.
  2. biochemically verified hereditary hypophosphatemia: serum PO4 below normal range and low TmPO4/, and/or elevated serum FGF23 and a history of childhood rickets or spontaneous endodontic abscesses to exclude acquired hypophosphatemia, e.g., tumor-induced osteomalacia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • P-25OHD \< 25 mmol/L*
  • Severe co-morbidities, which in the opinion of the investigator may have major impact on study outcomes. This may include, but is not limited to o poorly controlled hyperthyroidism o Paget disease

    o type 1 diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus

    o severe and chronic cardiac, liver, or renal disease

    o Cushing syndrome

    o Rheumatoid arthritis

    o Active pancreatitis

    o Malnutrition

    o Recent prolonged immobility*

    o Active (including myeloma)

  • Treatment with

    o Burosumab

    • Beta-blockers
    • Oral
  • For controls only:

    • disturbances in the calcium or phosphate homeostasis

      • participants with low 25OHD levels or recent immobility may be re-screened for participations 6 months after this has been corrected
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Hereditary hypophosphatemia

    Adult persons with genetically or biochemically verified hereditary hypophosphatemia.

  • Control

    Adult control persons without disturbances in calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis matched on age, gender and menopausal status.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PPT

    Pressure pain threshold assessed by pressure algometry

    Time frame: Day 2

  2. Quality of life in patients with bone-specific pain

    Assessed by questionnaire (FACT-BP) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. General pain: Brief Pain Inventory

    Assessed by questionnaire (Brief Pain Inventory) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Neuropathic pain: questionnaire (painDETECT)

    Assessed by questionnaire (painDETECT) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Health-related quality of life: SF36v2

    Assessed by questionnaire (SF36v2) on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    24 hour blood pressure of the upper right arm

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Pulse wave velocity

    Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system

    Time frame: 45 minutes

  8. Arterial stiffness

    Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system

    Time frame: 45 minutes

  9. Arterial stiffness

    Assessed by tonometry using Arteriograph24

    Time frame: 24 hours

  10. Maximum strength

    Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).

    Time frame: Day 2

  11. Maximal force production

    Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).

    Time frame: Day 2

  12. Timed Up and Go

    Measures the time to stand up, walk three metres in a straight line, and immediately return to the chair.

    Time frame: Day 2

  13. Repeated chair rising

    Measures the time for ten consecutive chair rises.

    Time frame: Day 2

  14. Repeated weight lifting

    Measures the time for ten consecutive weight lifts.

    Time frame: Day 2

  15. 6-minutes' walk test

    Measures the distance walked in 6 minutes.

    Time frame: Day 1

  16. Body composition

    Assessed by DXA

    Time frame: Day 2

  17. Vertebral Fracture Assessment

    Assessed by DXA

    Time frame: Day 2

  18. Volumetric bone mineral density

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Time frame: Day 1

  19. Bone geometry

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Time frame: Day 1

  20. Bone microarchitecture

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Time frame: Day 1

  21. Estimated bone strength

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Time frame: Day 1

  22. Mineralization rate

    Histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  23. Mineralization lag time

    Histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  24. Osteoid volume

    Osteoid volume in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  25. Osteoid thickness

    Osteoid thickness in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  26. Osteoid surface covering

    Osteoid surface covering in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  27. Percentage of surface covered by osteoblasts

    Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  28. Percentage of surface covered by osteoclasts

    Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

  29. Lacunar concentration of mineralization inhibitors

    Assessed by nano-scale on bone biopsy

    Time frame: 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Catastrophic thinking

    Assessed by questionnaire (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Depression

    Assessed by questionnaire (Patient Health Questionnaire) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Anxiety

    Assessed by questionnaire (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Smallest distance between knees.

    Measured in standing, weight bearing position.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Smallest distance between ankles.

    Measured in standing, weight bearing position.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Joint mobility

    Passive mobility of the neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist, ankle, back, hip and knee will be measured from anatomic neutral position using a protractor and compared to normal values.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD)

    BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and distal forearm assessed by DXA

    Time frame: Day 2

  5. Plasma concentration of ion-calcium

    Plasma concentration of ion-calcium taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Plasma concentration of phosphate

    Plasma concentration of phosphate taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Plasma concentration of magnesium

    Plasma concentration of magnesium taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Plasma concentration of creatinine

    Plasma concentration of creatinine taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Plasma concentration of PTH

    Plasma concentration of PTH taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Concentration of vitamin D metabolites

    Plasma levels of 25OHD, 1,25(OH)2D, 24,25(OH)2D, 1,24,25(OH)3D and vitamin D-binding protein taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Plasma concentration of FGF23

    Plasma concentration of FGF23 taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Plasma concentration of sclerostin

    Plasma concentration of sclerostin taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  13. Plasma concentration of klotho

    Plasma concentration of klotho taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  14. Plasma concentration of osteopontin

    Plasma concentration of osteopontin taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  15. Plasma concentrations of bone turnover markers

    Plasma levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), C-terminal telopeptide (CTX)

    Time frame: Day 1

  16. Plasma concentration of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase

    Plasma levels of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase taken in a fasting state

    Time frame: Day 1

  17. Urine calcium

    24 hours urine calcium

    Time frame: 24 hours

  18. Urine phosphate

    24 hours urine phosphate

    Time frame: 24 hours

  19. Urine magnesium

    24 hours urine magnesium

    Time frame: 24 hours

  20. Urine creatinine

    24 hours urine creatinine

    Time frame: 24 hours

  21. Urine sodium

    24 hours urine sodium

    Time frame: 24 hours

  22. Urine potassium

    24 hours urine potassium

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dept. of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, The Osteoporosis Clinic
    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2020 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 34 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2019
First posted
Feb 18, 2020
StartActual
Feb 18, 2020
Primary completionActual
Dec 20, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 20, 2022
Last update
Nov 29, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04273490
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2020
Start date
Feb 18, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2022
Completion
Dec 20, 2022
Last update
Nov 29, 2023

Study contacts

Lars Rejnmark
principal investigator · Dept. of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, The Osteoporosis Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion